Re: [Evolution] Fedora 23, Evolution 3.18.5.2, Authentication EWS

2016-04-18 Thread Milan Crha
On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 12:11 +0200, ErikULRICH wrote: > >[1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765106 > > > Will there be a regular update for Fedora 23 (obtainable via dnf) > which will contain a patched version of "ntlm_auth"? Hi, it's not the samba (which provides the

Re: [Evolution] evolution-list Digest, Vol 129, Issue 10

2016-04-18 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 12:38 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Mon, 18 Apr 2016 12:27:03 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > I guess the request for feature enhancement should be filed against > > the composer and not against the mailing list actions plugin, right? > > The composer perhaps wasn't the

Re: [Evolution] evolution-list Digest, Vol 129, Issue 10

2016-04-18 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Mon, 18 Apr 2016 12:27:03 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: >I guess the request for feature enhancement should be filed against the >composer and not against the mailing list actions plugin, right? The composer perhaps wasn't the right choice, since the box doesn't appear in the editor, but when

Re: [Evolution] evolution-list Digest, Vol 129, Issue 10

2016-04-18 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 12:27 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 10:10 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > > Can you file a BZ report please? Remember to quote the number here > > in > > case anyone wants to follow up. > Somebody needs to follow up, since I won't do it, because

Re: [Evolution] evolution-list Digest, Vol 129, Issue 10

2016-04-18 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 10:10 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > Can you file a BZ report please? Remember to quote the number here in > case anyone wants to follow up. Somebody needs to follow up, since I won't do it, because I'm not a digest user. I guess the request for feature enhancement

Re: [Evolution] mailbox

2016-04-18 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 09:46 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > Evolution and Claws are too different, to share settings. PS: Keep in mind that Evo is a heavy weight MUA providing many features by default, while Claws is lightweight by default, but allows to add plugins, e.g. for HTML. Evo also ships

[Evolution] Real server-side IMAP folders (Was: Re: Some questions..)

2016-04-18 Thread Milan Crha
On Sun, 2016-04-17 at 14:47 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > There's also an issue about Trash folders. In Evo the default Trash > is a virtual folder which just lists the messages marked for > deletion, but recent versions allow you to specify a real Trash if > that's what you want or your

Re: [Evolution] Fedora 23, Evolution 3.18.5.2, Authentication EWS

2016-04-18 Thread ErikULRICH
>On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 09:46 +0200, ErikULRICH wrote: >> On 2016-04-15 I received a bunch of updates. Since then, evolution is >> unable to connect to my exchnge account (profile is using EWS). I am >> asked for a password repeatedly which is given correctly and >> successfully stored in

Re: [Evolution] local mail box garbage collection

2016-04-18 Thread Milan Crha
On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 01:47 +0200, Ernest Sales wrote: > Sorry for not making it clear: I'm using the Evolution builtin > backup. Hi, could you compare the content of the two files and see whether the new files were not deleted from the disk on Expunge or some other file(s) changed their

Re: [Evolution] IMAP+ does not register that mail has been marked read?

2016-04-18 Thread Milan Crha
On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 10:09 +0200, Bjørn T Johansen wrote: > I have a folder now that Evolution tells me has 19 unread mails. But > this folder was marked read severeal hours ago and both Claws Mail > and my webmail > sees the mails as read but Evolution still tells me I have 19 unread > mails in

Re: [Evolution] Some questions..

2016-04-18 Thread Milan Crha
On Sun, 2016-04-17 at 13:41 +0200, Bjørn T Johansen wrote: > - Does Evolution support IMAP Idle? Hi, yes, as long as the server supports it. Though it also depends on the version of the evolution-data-server you are using. > - Can one email address have two different signtatures,

Re: [Evolution] Fedora 23, Evolution 3.18.5.2, Authentication EWS

2016-04-18 Thread Milan Crha
On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 09:46 +0200, ErikULRICH wrote: > On 2016-04-15 I received a bunch of updates. Since then, evolution is > unable to connect to  my exchnge account (profile is using EWS). I am > asked for a password repeatedly which is given correctly and > successfully stored in

Re: [Evolution] evolution-list Digest, Vol 129, Issue 10

2016-04-18 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 10:16 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Mon, 18 Apr 2016 00:37:05 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > > The other thing I notice is that the menu offers Reply to Sender > > and > > Reply to All, but not Reply to List, which is the preferred way to > > reply to list

Re: [Evolution] local mail box garbage collection

2016-04-18 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 01:47 +0200, Ernest Sales wrote: > > I'm just speculating, but all this means a lot of file activity. If > > your backup procedure is incremental this could mean that the first > > backup after the cleanup operation creates a lot of new data. > > > Sorry for not making it

Re: [Evolution] ActiveSync Active

2016-04-18 Thread Milan Crha
On Sat, 2016-04-16 at 11:09 +0200, FoxNET Support wrote: > I do not hide it, but I use Outlook for my email synchronized platform in > ActiveSync. > I fell over on Evolution in ActiveSync. > > https://github.com/GNOME/evolution-activesync Hi, the github.com is only a mirror, the main

Re: [Evolution] evolution-list Digest, Vol 129, Issue 10

2016-04-18 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Mon, 18 Apr 2016 00:37:05 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: >The other thing I notice is that the menu offers Reply to Sender and >Reply to All, but not Reply to List, which is the preferred way to >reply to list messages. Not sure if that's a bug or a necessary feature >due to some limitation

[Evolution] IMAP+ does not register that mail has been marked read?

2016-04-18 Thread Bjørn T Johansen
I have a folder now that Evolution tells me has 19 unread mails. But this folder was marked read severeal hours ago and both Claws Mail and my webmail sees the mails as read but Evolution still tells me I have 19 unread mails in that folder, why? I have tried restarting Evolution also but no

[Evolution] Fedora 23, Evolution 3.18.5.2, Authentication EWS

2016-04-18 Thread ErikULRICH
Hi Evolution Experts, On 2016-04-15 I received a bunch of updates. Since then, evolution is unable to connect to my exchnge account (profile is using EWS). I am asked for a password repeatedly which is given correctly and successfully stored in gnome-keyring. I checked that with seahorse.

Re: [Evolution] mailbox

2016-04-18 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Sun, 17 Apr 2016 15:36:39 -0400, Stari Karp wrote: >I use on the other computer which is in network Claws mail and I like >the same settings which I have on Evolution and Users and their email >have on the other computer where I running Fluxbox. Is it possible to >import to Claws mail, plese.