Re: [Evolution] Non-subscribers - Was: Performance Issues

2016-05-26 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Thu, 26 May 2016 15:06:11 +0200, Marc Santhoff wrote: >"reply-to" MUAs handle this header in different ways, in combination with mailing list replies. JFTR "Claws" does it better than "Evolution", but in the end it doesn't matter in what way the header, in combination with mailing list replies

[Evolution] Non-subscribers [Was: Performance Issues]

2016-05-26 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
> Each approach has pros and cons. Sure. > IMO for Evolution as a much used MUA, that belongs to the GNOME DE, > the approach of a half-opened mailing list is the best choice. Yeah, I do not have strong feelings about it, just a preference. It certainly is not an issue worthy of angst or

Re: [Evolution] Non-subscribers - Was: Performance Issues

2016-05-26 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Thu, 26 May 2016 13:50:26 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: >A question for the moderators: do you get many creationist nuts who >mistake the purpose of this list? (That alone is sufficient reason to >keep to subscribers only!) Assumed an experienced Linux user doing some research randomly notice an

[Evolution] Non-subscribers - Was: Performance Issues

2016-05-26 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Wed, 2016-05-25 at 21:00 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > The only way to do that is to restrict posting to list subscribers. No, other lists provide the feature I mentioned, for example [1] and see also the screenshot. "If you would like to cancel this posting, please visit the following

Re: [Evolution] Non-subscribers - Was: Performance Issues

2016-05-25 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Wed, 2016-05-25 at 22:36 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Wed, 2016-05-25 at 21:00 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > The only way to do that is to restrict posting to list subscribers. > > No, other lists provide the feature I mentioned, for example [1]. > "If you would like to cancel this

[Evolution] Non-subscribers - Was: Performance Issues

2016-05-25 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Wed, 2016-05-25 at 21:00 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > The only way to do that is to restrict posting to list subscribers. No, other lists provide the feature I mentioned, for example [1]. "If you would like to cancel this posting, please visit the following URL", otherwise it's held for