On Thu, 2022-08-18 at 10:33 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-08-18 at 04:10 +0200, Ángel wrote:
> > On 2022-08-16 at 23:24 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > Spam filtering is under the control of the receiver. It's trivial
> > > to
> > > tell Gmail that a message is not spam, and it
On Thu, 2022-08-18 at 04:10 +0200, Ángel wrote:
> On 2022-08-16 at 23:24 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > Spam filtering is under the control of the receiver. It's trivial to
> > tell Gmail that a message is not spam, and it will learn that for
> > future reference. You might also look at
On 2022-08-16 at 23:24 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> Spam filtering is under the control of the receiver. It's trivial to
> tell Gmail that a message is not spam, and it will learn that for
> future reference. You might also look at *why* your mail is being
> classified as spam. Could it be
On 2022-08-16 at 12:30 +0200, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
> Dnia 16.08.2022 o godz. 12:22:55 Andre Klapper pisze:
> > On Tue, 2022-08-16 at 12:19 +0200, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
> > > There is one more valid reason to use POP: if you have a main mail account
> > > (A) and a secondary one (B), and you want to
On Wed, 2022-08-17 at 00:52 +0200, Jaroslaw Rafa via evolution-list
wrote:
> Dnia 16.08.2022 o godz. 23:24:37 Patrick O'Callaghan pisze:
> >
> > Spam filtering is under the control of the receiver. It's trivial
> > to
> > tell Gmail that a message is not spam, and it will learn that for
> >
Dnia 16.08.2022 o godz. 23:24:37 Patrick O'Callaghan pisze:
>
> Spam filtering is under the control of the receiver. It's trivial to
> tell Gmail that a message is not spam, and it will learn that for
> future reference.
It does not. Myself I have two test accounts on Gmail, I send myself mail
On Tue, 2022-08-16 at 23:45 +0200, Jaroslaw Rafa via evolution-list
wrote:
> Dnia 16.08.2022 o godz. 22:37:23 Patrick O'Callaghan pisze:
> > And the free version of Gmail has by far the best spam filtering
> > I've
> > come across. In fact I don't even bother with Bogofilter or
> > Spamassassin
Dnia 16.08.2022 o godz. 22:37:23 Patrick O'Callaghan pisze:
> And the free version of Gmail has by far the best spam filtering I've
> come across. In fact I don't even bother with Bogofilter or
> Spamassassin any more.
Well, it's "too good". All mails from my address usually go to spam at
Gmail,
On Tue, 2022-08-16 at 17:29 +0200, Ralf Mardorf via evolution-list
wrote:
> On Tue, 2022-08-16 at 11:12 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > We've been over this before. There's nothing stopping you from
> > syncing
> > your IMAP account to your local machine. There is *NO* advantage to
> > using
On Mon, 2022-08-15 at 06:08 -0300, Francisco M Neto wrote:
> when I try to add this email address as a POP account, Evolution
> automatically turns it into a "gmail-type" account and reverts to
> IMAP syncing.
Hi,
I tried it with 3.44.4 (which might be pretty much the same as your
3.44.3
On Tue, 2022-08-16 at 11:12 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> We've been over this before. There's nothing stopping you from syncing
> your IMAP account to your local machine. There is *NO* advantage to
> using POP, and a number of disadvantages. The only reason to ever use
> it is if your mail
Hi,
On Tue, 2022-08-16 at 08:30 +0200, Andre Klapper via evolution-list wrote:
> On Mon, 2022-08-15 at 22:57 -0300, Francisco M Neto wrote:
>
> > I just want POP to work properly.
>
> Help Contents Common Mail Questions and Problems Access a
> Gmail POP Account via Evolution.
On Tue, 2022-08-16 at 14:18 +0200, Jaroslaw Rafa via evolution-list
wrote:
> Dnia 16.08.2022 o godz. 13:14:04 Patrick O'Callaghan pisze:
> > > Yes, I would concede that. I occasionally do that as it's a way
> > > of
> > > fetching mail *into* my Gmail account from another account.
> > > However
>
Dnia 16.08.2022 o godz. 13:14:04 Patrick O'Callaghan pisze:
> > Yes, I would concede that. I occasionally do that as it's a way of
> > fetching mail *into* my Gmail account from another account. However
> > that's a special case.
>
> Just to add that this isn't an actual advantage of POP in
On Tue, 2022-08-16 at 13:10 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Tue, 2022-08-16 at 12:19 +0200, Jaroslaw Rafa via evolution-list
> wrote:
> > Dnia 16.08.2022 o godz. 11:12:12 Patrick O'Callaghan pisze:
> > > We've been over this before. There's nothing stopping you from
> > > syncing
> > > your
On Tue, 2022-08-16 at 12:19 +0200, Jaroslaw Rafa via evolution-list
wrote:
> Dnia 16.08.2022 o godz. 11:12:12 Patrick O'Callaghan pisze:
> > We've been over this before. There's nothing stopping you from
> > syncing
> > your IMAP account to your local machine. There is *NO* advantage to
> > using
Dnia 16.08.2022 o godz. 12:22:55 Andre Klapper via evolution-list pisze:
> On Tue, 2022-08-16 at 12:19 +0200, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
> > There is one more valid reason to use POP: if you have a main mail account
> > (A) and a secondary one (B), and you want to have all messages from account
> > B
On Tue, 2022-08-16 at 12:19 +0200, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
> There is one more valid reason to use POP: if you have a main mail account
> (A) and a secondary one (B), and you want to have all messages from account
> B forwarded to account A, but account B doesn't allow to configure
> forwarding.
Dnia 16.08.2022 o godz. 11:12:12 Patrick O'Callaghan pisze:
> We've been over this before. There's nothing stopping you from syncing
> your IMAP account to your local machine. There is *NO* advantage to
> using POP, and a number of disadvantages. The only reason to ever use
> it is if your mail
On Tue, 2022-08-16 at 09:51 +0200, Ralf Mardorf via evolution-list
wrote:
> On Mon, 2022-08-15 at 19:59 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> > On Mon, 2022-08-15 at 17:24 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2022-08-15 at 06:08 -0300, Francisco M Neto wrote:
> > > > Nevertheless, I want
On Tue, 2022-08-16 at 09:47 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> > On 16. Aug 2022, at 01:59, Adam Tauno Williams
> > wrote:
> >
> > I strongly encourage NOT using POP. It is an old protocol AND IT ADDS
> > NO VALUE, none what-so-ever. It doesn't, do not believe anyone who
> > tells you otherwise.
On Mon, 2022-08-15 at 19:59 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> On Mon, 2022-08-15 at 17:24 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Mon, 2022-08-15 at 06:08 -0300, Francisco M Neto wrote:
> > > Nevertheless, I want to add email through POP; I *really* don't
> > > want
> > > to keep anything in
> On 16. Aug 2022, at 01:59, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
>
> I strongly encourage NOT using POP. It is an old protocol AND IT ADDS
> NO VALUE, none what-so-ever. It doesn't, do not believe anyone who
> tells you otherwise.
Hi,
I’m in favour of POP for several reasons. One of the reasons is
On Mon, 2022-08-15 at 22:57 -0300, Francisco M Neto wrote:
> I just want POP to work properly.
Help Contents Common Mail Questions and Problems Access a
Gmail POP Account via Evolution.
Cheers,
andre
--
Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net
https://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/
On Mon, 2022-08-15 at 19:57 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> If you are using gmail as a POP server everything is still in Google's
> hands. If this is actually a concern you should consider a different mail
> provider [fastmail.fm?]
That's beside the point; that option is not
On Mon, 2022-08-15 at 17:24 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Mon, 2022-08-15 at 06:08 -0300, Francisco M Neto wrote:
> > Nevertheless, I want to add email through POP; I *really* don't
> > want
> > to keep anything in google's hands.
> Up to you of course, but that logic doesn't make sense
On Mon, 2022-08-15 at 06:08 -0300, Francisco M Neto wrote:
> Greetings,
> I have been trying to add one of my email accounts to Nevertheless, I
> want to add email through POP; I *really* don't want
> to keep anything in google's hands.
If you are using gmail as a POP server everything is still
>
> Also, I appreciate the discussion but it has gone off on a tangent. How
> can I convince Evolution that I want it to use gmail with POP?
If you are setting it up from scratch in Evolution, then I suspect that
it is picking up some old configuration. So I suggest you delete the
gmail
Greetings!
Thanks for the replies.
Also, I appreciate the discussion but it has gone off on a tangent. How
can I convince Evolution that I want it to use gmail with POP?
On Mon, 2022-08-15 at 17:50 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> On Mon, 2022-08-15 at 17:24 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan
On Mon, 2022-08-15 at 17:24 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Mon, 2022-08-15 at 06:08 -0300, Francisco M Neto wrote:
> > Nevertheless, I want to add email through POP; I *really* don't want
> > to keep anything in google's hands.
>
> Up to you of course, but that logic doesn't make sense to
On Mon, 2022-08-15 at 06:08 -0300, Francisco M Neto wrote:
> Nevertheless, I want to add email through POP; I *really* don't want
> to keep anything in google's hands.
Up to you of course, but that logic doesn't make sense to me. If you
don't trust Google, why are you using their mail servers,
Thanks for your response!
On Mon, 2022-08-15 at 10:36 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
>
> Please give your Evolution version as things do change over time.
I'm using Evolution 3.44.3-2, from Debian Bookworm.
> > Why does Evolution do that? Is there any way I can use this email in
> >
Please give your Evolution version as things do change over time.
>
> Nevertheless, I want to add email through POP; I *really* don't want to
> keep anything in google's hands. However, when I try to add this email address
> as a POP account, Evolution automatically turns it into a
On Wed, 2018-11-28 at 14:01 -0700, William Dossett via evolution-list
wrote:
> the reported error was failed to authenicate the name 1.9 was not
> provided by and service files
Hi,
it usually means that some background service exited unexpectedly,
maybe it crashed for some reason. Which
On Wed, 2018-11-28 at 14:01 -0700, William Dossett wrote:
> I've tried everything I can think of and have found googling
"Help > Contents > Access a Gmail IMAP Account via Evolution".
What to do to make people read user documentation...?
andre
--
Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net
LOL that worked immediately. Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Leopoldo Macias
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2018 2:46 PM
To: William Dossett ; evolution-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Evolution] evolution and gmail
Bill,
I use gmail on my Evolution. Have you tried using Online
Yeah, should have been using Online accounts, thanks!
-Original Message-
From: evolution-list On Behalf Of Patrick
O'Callaghan
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2018 4:01 PM
To: evolution-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Evolution] evolution and gmail
On Wed, 2018-11-28 at 14:01 -0700, William
On Wed, 2018-11-28 at 14:01 -0700, William Dossett via evolution-list
wrote:
> I've tried everything I can think of and have found googling and I can't make
> evolution work with gmail.
I've been doing that for years. In fact I'm answering this via a Google
account (G Suite in this case, but I
Bill,
I use gmail on my Evolution. Have you tried using Online Accounts to
set it up? I use Settings-->Online Accounts and selecting Google.
Worked for me without having to enter the port numbers or security
settings.
Evolution 3.26.6
On Wed, 2018-11-28 at 14:01 -0700, William Dossett via
On Mon, 2015-08-24 at 19:56 +1000, Alex McConnell wrote:
I have updated Evolution to 3.16.0 from the ppa to see if that helps
but the behaviour seems to be unchanged.
It seems to me that some process is going into a loop or perhaps
there is some library that reaches its maximum number of
Am Montag, den 24.08.2015, 12:28 +0200 schrieb Ralf Mardorf:
I can't help much with the issue, but AFAIK the archive provides much
information about it.
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 19:56:41 +1000, Alex McConnell wrote:
After it stalls, I have to use xkill to kill Evolution.
Did you try
On Tue, 2015-08-25 at 22:33 +0200, Tom wrote:
Am Montag, den 24.08.2015, 12:28 +0200 schrieb Ralf Mardorf:
I can't help much with the issue, but AFAIK the archive provides
much
information about it.
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 19:56:41 +1000, Alex McConnell wrote:
After it stalls, I have to
On Mon, 2015-08-24 at 21:53 +1000, Alex McConnell wrote:
I had come across the suggestion about concurrent connections before
but it does not appear
in the pop configuration - I think it must only be for an IMAP
connection.
I should have added I have looked around extensively for a
On Mon, 2015-08-24 at 16:39 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Mon, 2015-08-24 at 21:53 +1000, Alex McConnell wrote:
I had come across the suggestion about concurrent connections
before
but it does not appear
in the pop configuration - I think it must only be for an IMAP
I can't help much with the issue, but AFAIK the archive provides much
information about it.
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 19:56:41 +1000, Alex McConnell wrote:
After it stalls, I have to use xkill to kill Evolution.
Did you try Evolution's force shutdown option first?
--force-shutdown
On Mon, 2015-08-24 at 19:56 +1000, Alex McConnell wrote:
Ever since installing Ubuntu 15.04 I have had a combination of
problems with Evolution
Means nothing - please use Evolution version numbers, not distro
version numbers.
Evolution seems to stall part through a pop download from Gmail.
On Mon, 2015-08-24 at 11:37 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
Gmail aggressively throttles connections that it thinks are hitting
it too hard - it interprets more than one concurrent connection as
being too much.
I wouldn't say it's that exact. They don't explicitly give a limit so
this is anecdotal.
: Pete Biggs p...@biggs.org.uk
To: evolution-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Evolution] Evolution and Gmail not playing
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 11:37:18 +0100
On Mon, 2015-08-24 at 19:56 +1000, Alex McConnell wrote:
Ever since installing Ubuntu 15.04 I have had a combination of
problems with Evolution
To add even more confusion to this, GMail has two modes. You may not
have known about this, but:
http://gmailblog.blogspot.com/2008/10/new-in-labs-advanced-imap-controls.html
Quoting the important part:
If you'd prefer that deleted messages not remaining in any other
visible IMAP folders
On Sat, 2010-10-30 at 08:31 -0500, Christian wrote:
I'm using Gmail with Evolution through IMAP. The problem is that there's
no way to set Evolution to use the Gmail trash folder for deleted
e-mail. I'm able to set Drafts and Sent, but not Trash. Right now I have
to move mails manually when I
On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 17:43 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
See http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=78755 and
http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=78892
So does this answer the OP question? When you delete a message using
IMAP it will be moved to
On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 17:54 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
When I delete messages in Gmail it's moved to the [Gmail]/Trash folder
from which it's permanently deleted after 30 days. So all it would take
to get it working was having an option to set the Trash folder just like
you can sett Sent
On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 14:42 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 17:54 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
Also you should consider the process that is necessary to delete a
message under the two schemes - for the Evo/IMAP model all you need to
do is a single mark as deleted
On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 08:42 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
On Sat, 2010-10-30 at 08:31 -0500, Christian wrote:
I'm using Gmail with Evolution through IMAP. The problem is that there's
no way to set Evolution to use the Gmail trash folder for deleted
e-mail. I'm able to set Drafts and Sent, but
Let me first note that its confusing having multiple replies on the same
topic to various people all in a row =). Continuing below...
On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 08:53 -0500, Christian wrote:
On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 17:43 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
Other e-mail clients has while
Thunderbird has a
Thanks! I think we can all agree that Evo's support for Gmail isn't
complete. The discussion is whether it should be since Google is
breaking the rules of IMAP. One can dislike how Gmail works, but it's
still a very popular e-mail service which it makes sense to support also
for Evo. Several
On Sat, 2010-10-30 at 08:31 -0500, Christian wrote:
Hi,
I'm using Gmail with Evolution through IMAP. The problem is that there's
no way to set Evolution to use the Gmail trash folder for deleted
e-mail.
I'm not a great user of gmail - I have an account though - and my
impression was that
On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 10:47 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
On Sat, 2010-10-30 at 08:31 -0500, Christian wrote:
Hi,
I'm using Gmail with Evolution through IMAP. The problem is that
there's
no way to set Evolution to use the Gmail trash folder for deleted
e-mail.
I'm not a great user of
I'm not a great user of gmail - I have an account though - and my
impression was that there was no Trash folder - when you delete a mail
in Gmail it disappears. I certainly can't see a Trash folder. I seem
to remember there was a big song and dance when Gmail was created that
you
On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 15:43 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
I'm not a great user of gmail - I have an account though - and my
impression was that there was no Trash folder - when you delete a mail
in Gmail it disappears. I certainly can't see a Trash folder. I seem
to remember there was
On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 11:38 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 15:43 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
I'm not a great user of gmail - I have an account though - and my
impression was that there was no Trash folder - when you delete a mail
in Gmail it disappears. I
On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 15:43 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
I'm not a great user of gmail - I have an account though - and my
impression was that there was no Trash folder - when you delete a mail
in Gmail it disappears. I certainly can't see a Trash folder. I seem
to remember there was
On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 10:47 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
On Sat, 2010-10-30 at 08:31 -0500, Christian wrote:
Hi,
I'm using Gmail with Evolution through IMAP. The problem is that there's
no way to set Evolution to use the Gmail trash folder for deleted
e-mail.
I'm not a great user of
See http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=78755 and
http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=78892
So does this answer the OP question? When you delete a message using
IMAP it will be moved to the [Gmail]/Trash folder because that's where
its label
When I delete messages in Gmail it's moved to the [Gmail]/Trash folder
from which it's permanently deleted after 30 days. So all it would take
to get it working was having an option to set the Trash folder just like
you can sett Sent and Drafts.
You should be aware that the Trash folder in
On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 17:54 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
Also you should consider the process that is necessary to delete a
message under the two schemes - for the Evo/IMAP model all you need to
do is a single mark as deleted operation over IMAP followed at some
later time by an expunge; for the
On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 14:42 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 17:54 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
Also you should consider the process that is necessary to delete a
message under the two schemes - for the Evo/IMAP model all you need to
do is a single mark as deleted
On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 07:02 +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 14:42 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 17:54 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
Also you should consider the process that is necessary to delete a
message under the two schemes - for the Evo/IMAP model
On 3/6/08, Brian Cardarella [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a GMail account that I cam accessing via IMAP through Evolution.
When I delete an email shouldn't that email be moved to the GMail IMAP
Trash folder? Or at least be moved to Evolution's local Trash folder?
Neither is happening.
So maybe I'm missing something. I see how the IMAP removes the label
when you delete an email... thus the deleted email ends up in
[GMail]\All Mail What I don't understand is how to configure Evolution
to move deleted items to the Trash folder... much how Google recommends
for the other major
On Thu, 2008-03-06 at 17:29 -0500, Brian Cardarella wrote:
I'm sorry if I'm bringing up something that has been brought up before
but I cannot find any answer and I'm not getting any replies in IRC.
I have a GMail account that I cam accessing via IMAP through Evolution.
When I delete an
71 matches
Mail list logo
