Am Montag, dem 07.11.2022 um 10:40 + schrieb Patrick O'Callaghan:
> Sorry, but it really isn't at all clear unless the reader scrolls
> back
> to look at the earlier mail you are replying to, which for some
> people
> might mean looking at the archive. That's why we encourage people to
>
>
> [Parenthetically, the listserv is set up incorrectly. I ran listservs,
> some twenty something years ago, and the settings on return mail are
> backwards.]
And I ran mailing lists for many years as well and this is exactly how
it should be. Not everyone here are younguns who don't remember
On Mon, 2022-11-07 at 11:56 +0100, Torsten Krah via evolution-list
wrote:
> Am Montag, dem 07.11.2022 um 10:40 + schrieb Patrick O'Callaghan:
> > Sorry, but it really isn't at all clear unless the reader scrolls
> > back
> > to look at the earlier mail you are replying to, which for some
> >
Torsten Krah via evolution-list said on Mon, 07 Nov 2022 11:56:54 +0100
>Am Montag, dem 07.11.2022 um 10:40 + schrieb Patrick O'Callaghan:
>> Sorry, but it really isn't at all clear unless the reader scrolls
>> back
>> to look at the earlier mail you are replying to, which for some
>> people
On Mon, 2022-11-07 at 08:47 +0100, Torsten Krah via evolution-list
wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, dem 02.11.2022 um 20:09 + schrieb Patrick
> O'Callaghan:
> > What option? Please quote some context when replying, otherwise
> > it's
> > not clear what you mean.
>
> In general you are right, but that
I used installed the 3.46.1 (by Flathub.org) version. My OS didn't like
it but it did install and the problem I was having is gone. This
version is working.
The new flathub install software center is not liked by Debian. And the
code Debian is installing is a problem.
On Mon, 2022-11-07 at 09:07 -0500, Steve Litt wrote:
> quoted context
Hi,
right now the same topic is endlessly discussed on questi...@freebsd.org
and on evolution-list@gnome.org . It is discussed every now and then on
every computer related mailing list. On questi...@freebsd.org and on
On Mon, 2022-11-07 at 18:30 +0100, Ralf Mardorf via evolution-list
wrote:
> On Mon, 2022-11-07 at 09:07 -0500, Steve Litt wrote:
> > quoted context
>
> Hi,
>
> right now the same topic is endlessly discussed on
> questi...@freebsd.org
> and on evolution-list@gnome.org . It is discussed every now
On Mon, 2022-11-07 at 20:01 +0800, Mike Lieberman wrote:
> The new flathub install software center is not liked by Debian. And
> the
> code Debian is installing is a problem.
Well you must of missed my email I sent to this list as a reply to you
asking if you would be willing to upgrade to
On Mon, 2022-11-07 at 15:15 -0600, Tim McConnell wrote:
> Your problem with using the flathub version is because the Flatpack
> doesn't honor the dependencies of the distribution.
I'm not sure I understand this comment. The whole point of flatpak
(and snap) is that it's not _supposed_ to need to
On Mon, 2022-11-07 at 16:34 -0500, Paul Smith wrote:
> I'm not sure I understand this comment. The whole point of flatpak
> (and snap) is that it's not _supposed_ to need to worry about the
> dependencies of the distribution. That's why you'd use it.
>
Which is why they are bad ideas to use.
Thanks Patrick,
Yes I could not agree more.
We need to decide on the new list as the priority.
Lets stay on subject.
--
Thanks
Luigi Cantoni
-Original Message-
From: Patrick O'Callaghan
To: evolution-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Evolution] What do I do now? V2
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2022
On Mon, 2022-11-07 at 18:35 -0600, Tim McConnell via evolution-list
wrote:
> On Tue, 2022-11-08 at 08:16 +0800, Mike Lieberman wrote:
> > No, Tim, I didn't miss it. I tested bookworm on a testbench machine
> > and
> > it crashed that machine. OK, it is possible that there was a
> > problem
> >
On Mon, 2022-11-07 at 15:15 -0600, Tim McConnell via evolution-list
wrote:
> On Mon, 2022-11-07 at 20:01 +0800, Mike Lieberman wrote:
> > The new flathub install software center is not liked by Debian. And
> > the
> > code Debian is installing is a problem.
>
> Well you must of missed my email I
On Tue, 2022-11-08 at 08:16 +0800, Mike Lieberman wrote:
> No, Tim, I didn't miss it. I tested bookworm on a testbench machine
> and
> it crashed that machine. OK, it is possible that there was a problem
> with that other machine, but I couldn't risk it.
Interesting, I'm running Bookworm and the
On Tue, 2022-11-08 at 08:08 +0800, Luigi Cantoni via evolution-list
wrote:
> Thanks Patrick,
> Yes I could not agree more.
> We need to decide on the new list as the priority.
>
> Lets stay on subject.
> ___
> evolution-list mailing list
>
Hi Mike,
I have never had that issue.
The location I do it from is:
Edit->Preferences->Composer Preferences->Signatures
You then pick which signature block you wish to do and then select the
option.
There all the Add/Add Script/Edit/Remove are available.
My guess is if you are correctly going to
OK, I was in the wrong place! I was in mail_account/edit
On Tue, 2022-11-08 at 14:31 +0800, Luigi Cantoni via evolution-list
wrote:
> Hi Mike,
> I have never had that issue.
> The location I do it from is:
> Edit->Preferences->Composer Preferences->Signatures
>
> You then pick which signature
I can see how to add new signatures, but not how to edit or delete
them. Is this simply a feature that is yet to be added?
The 'box' below the identified signature stays empty. The edit and
remove buttons stay grayed out.
--
══
Ellis Michael "Mike" Lieberman | Blog
On Mon, 2022-11-07 at 16:17 -0600, Tim McConnell via evolution-list
wrote:
> On Mon, 2022-11-07 at 16:34 -0500, Paul Smith wrote:
> > I'm not sure I understand this comment. The whole point of flatpak
> > (and snap) is that it's not _supposed_ to need to worry about the
> > dependencies of the
On Tue, 2022-11-08 at 13:30 +0800, Mike Lieberman wrote:
> I can see how to add new signatures, but not how to edit or delete
> them. Is this simply a feature that is yet to be added?
>
> The 'box' below the identified signature stays empty. The edit and
> remove buttons stay grayed out.
>
21 matches
Mail list logo
