On Tue, 2015-05-05 at 07:55 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
Am Samstag, den 02.05.2015, 11:58 + schrieb Joakim Tjernlund:
You need to set LDFLAGS too
Unfortunately it still fails to build when passing
`LDFLAGS='-fsanitize=address'`.
what is your complete build command and the error output
Am Dienstag, den 05.05.2015, 07:51 +0200 schrieb Paul Menzel:
Dear Evolution folks,
is running Evolution 3.16 with GNOME 3.14 supported, that means tested
by someone? Will all futures work?
I am thinking about if it’s feasible to put Evolution 3.16 in Debian
Backports [1] for Debian 8
On Tue, 2015-05-05 at 09:49 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
On Tue, 2015-05-05 at 08:16 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
the only left option I can think of is that the missing messages are
marked either as Junk or as Deleted. These messages are not shown in
regular folders.
You can View-Show Deleted
Am Dienstag, den 05.05.2015, 08:16 +0200 schrieb Milan Crha:
On Mon, 2015-05-04 at 14:08 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
Any ideas?
Hi,
the only left option I can think of is that the missing messages are
marked either as Junk or as Deleted. These messages are not shown in
regular
On Tue, 2015-05-05 at 08:16 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
the only left option I can think of is that the missing messages are
marked either as Junk or as Deleted. These messages are not shown in
regular folders.
You can View-Show Deleted Messages, but the Junk messages are shown
in the Junk
On Tue, 2015-05-05 at 07:50 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
As the local backend can cope with missing UIDs, I guess the
read-only On The Web backend can safely add missing UIDs as well.
Hi,
I did so, for 3.17.2+ [1] and 3.16.2+ [2]. It requires to cleanup
On Mon, 2015-05-04 at 14:08 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
Any ideas?
Hi,
the only left option I can think of is that the missing messages are
marked either as Junk or as Deleted. These messages are not shown in
regular folders.
You can View-Show Deleted Messages, but the Junk messages are
On Tue, 2015-05-05 at 07:51 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
is running Evolution 3.16 with GNOME 3.14 supported, that means
tested by someone?
Hi,
yes, it is. I currently run the development version of evolution with
it too.
Will all futures work?
Evolution didn't change its hard
On 2015-05-05 at 08:12, Milan Crha wrote:
On Tue, 2015-05-05 at 07:50 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
As the local backend can cope with missing UIDs, I guess the
read-only On The Web backend can safely add missing UIDs as well.
Hi,
I did so, for 3.17.2+ [1] and 3.16.2+ [2]. It requires to
