If those really are rfc822 mail files, you could probably just
concatenate them together (which would produce an mbox file) and copy
the mbox file to ~/.evolution/mail/local/.
Something like:
cd ~/.evolution/mail/exchange/acct/personal/sub/folders/Saved\ Items/
cat * cache-mbox
mv cache-mbox
the question is now: How
does one (easily!) convert an RFC 822 file to the appropriate
evolution local directory format?
Thanks for your input Andrew.
Cheers
James
On 09/02/07, Andrew Montalenti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If those really are rfc822 mail files, you could probably just
Hi,
I've been an Evolution user for a long time. The main reason I use
Evolution is for its search/indexing features, since I have huge mail
boxes and like to be able to search through them quickly.
In recent versions of Evolution (I guess beyond 2.7, I'm using 2.8.1)
the Search Box at the top
:54 -0500, Andrew Montalenti wrote:
Hi,
I've been an Evolution user for a long time. The main reason I use
Evolution is for its search/indexing features, since I have huge mail
boxes and like to be able to search through them quickly.
In recent versions of Evolution (I guess beyond
On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 15:01 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
IMHO, the very idea of having a clickable icon *inside* a text entry box
makes me squirm. It's just wrong wrong wrong. An icon in a text box
looks like a label or type indicator, not something operational.
Lucky for us, we have not
, 2007-02-19 at 23:13 +0100, M Wedin wrote:
I second this!
And I wouldn't be at all sorry if I could use Evolution without having
to install Gnome. A great app shouldn't be tied to a specific
windowmanager.
Just my opinion ...
Wed
On Mon, 2007-02-19 at 17:03 -0500, Andrew Montalenti
Hi,
On Fri, 2007-06-01 at 14:58 +0200, Thomas Novin wrote:
Is it possible to reply Outlook Style? When you have a mail
conversation with people using Outlook, it would be nice to be able to
reply the same way as they do, not breaking the style of the mail.
This is a funny request.
My first
Hi all,
I often want to forward someone a piece of an e-mail I've written. I do
the natural thing -- go into my Sent box, find the relevant e-mail,
copy it, and paste quotation in the Evo composer.
But this is what happens:
[example]
Poor substitute to you actually being there, however :-)
Hi Daniel,
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 13:02 -0400, Daniel Gryniewicz wrote:
...
Bogofilter, in my experience. It's not even close. After training, my
spamassassin never got better than 90% catch rate, which is still some
hundred spams a day for me. Bogofilter is 99.9% at least, probably
better.
Hi evo-list,
I just upgraded from Hardy - Intrepid on Ubuntu, which bumped my
Evolution version up to 2.24.3. Most of my VFolders are no useless,
since I had a whole bunch of VFolders that referenced other VFolders.
These worked perfectly well in 2.22 but they don't work at all in 2.24.
This
Hi,
On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 10:23 -0500, Art Alexion wrote:
I disagree. I disagree that the inconsistency is occasional. Rather
it is nearly constant. /Occasionally/ the count is correct.
2.24.3 here as well (Ubuntu Intrepid). I agree with Alex. Mis-count is
constant. I have a search
I recently upgraded from Ubuntu Hardy to Ubuntu Intrepid. Most of my
GNOME software worked well upon upgrade, there were even some
improvements. However, a major piece of GNOME software that I use every
single day and that is important to both my personal life and business
stopped functioning
Art,
[reply below]
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 12:35 -0400, Art Alexion wrote:
While I am as frustrated as you with some of the bugs and regressions
that you mention, I don't think it is constructive, or even in your
self interest, to take such a scolding and tattling tone with people,
many of
software experience and
would have some time to volunteer to this? I'm thinking it could be on
an upcoming weekend, to accomodate people's work schedules.
Also, what time zone are the core Evolution developers in?
Andrew
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 12:55 -0400, Andrew Montalenti wrote:
Art,
[reply
Art,
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 13:11 -0400, Art Alexion wrote:
And while I agree that the developers should take stock of whether they
envision themselves as working on a widely deployed production
application, and release accordingly, I think much of the blame may like
with the Ubuntu packagers,
Art, one clarification:
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 17:15 -0400, Art Alexion wrote:
And that is precisely the problem. N+1 is appropriate for Debian
Experimental, but not for Debian Stable. Ubuntu doesn't have those
designations, and when a new version of the distro is released, it is
released
I've been wrestling with this problem that has a lot of reports online
related to the mysterious message, Error loading address book followed
by:
We were unable to open this address book.
Please check that the path /home/foo/.evolution/addressbook/local/system
exists and that you have permission
17 matches
Mail list logo
