-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 12:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST
Well I thought this had died with everyone having made their
points, but
apparently not. I
har.
a message recall sent to a List..
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 3:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Recall: Meeting Requests
Tim Ault would like to recall the message, Meeting Requests.
::snicker::
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 12:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Recall: Meeting Requests
Tim Ault would like to recall the message, Meeting Requests.
Funny that OL even allows it.
I had to try. I just had to.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 3:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Recall: Meeting Requests
::snicker::
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault
ahhh.. NO.
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
If I could wish for my life to be perfect, it would be tempting but I would
have to decline, for life would no longer teach me anything. --Allyson Jones
-Original
(yessir, I am pushing the mouse nicely today..)
As you may have already read..
I want OL2k clients to resolve a mailbox against some specific value entered
into a recipient field of a new message. Q151198 describes the
straightforward process of setting this up: set the Search-Flags schema
imagine my horror
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 4:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Recall: Meeting Requests
ahhh.. NO.
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
shad'dup..
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 4:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Recall: Meeting Requests
imagine my horror
_
List posting FAQ:
OK. Please send me a self-addressed stamped envelope and a $20 (US
Dollars) recalled email processing fee and I will send it back to you.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tim Ault
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 2:55 PM
To:
no. you shad'up.
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 4:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Recall: Meeting Requests
shad'dup..
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 4:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
Hey All,
Am searching the Archives now, but figured I would
throw this out to you in hopes that someone will be
able to answer it faster than it is taking me to look
through the Archives.
I have been attempting to restore my Exchange Server
for emergencies and in the past I have had little
What do you mean? Did you run into problems?
Thanks
Saul Gonzalez
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, March 21, 2002 12:58 PM
Posted To: Exchange Newsgroups
Conversation: Exchange 2000, DNS, and DC on Same Server
Subject: RE:
shad'up, the both of you.
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 4:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Recall: Meeting Requests
no. you shad'up.
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 4:14 PM
To: Exchange
Get the trank gun.
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
If I could wish for my life to be perfect, it would be tempting but I would
have to decline, for life would no longer teach me anything. --Allyson Jones
-Original
Are you gonna share that stuff you're smokin'?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tim Ault
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 3:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Recall: Meeting Requests
no. you shad'up.
-Original Message-
Ok, just for snicks, let's say we have agree on most things up to this
point, let's drill on one of them a tad more. As a starting point, let me
pick one thing you said Bill, and start with that.
. . . although I will admit that so far Microsoft has written the best
client for Exchange.
I
Nothing serious. It would be more important if this was also the GC. I
found anytime you change DC/GC configuration on the network, there are
Exchange implications. I had to have dsadiag.exe handy to force recognition
of DC/GC changes. Is this DC also the GC? Is this the only DNS server?
My
This is the only Server in Active Directory so it is the DC/GC and the
only DNS Server. How did you use dsadiag.exe to force recognition?
Thanks
Saul Gonzalez
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, March 21, 2002 1:41 PM
Posted To:
It is a very simple tool.
It has two options:
1 - list GC's and DC's.
2 - force E2K rediscovery of DC's and GC's.
I believe it is found on the Exchange2000 sp2 CD.
William
-Original Message-
From: Exchange Newsgroups [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 1:53 PM
As soon as you install the second DC, make sure that you take the GC role
off the original DC and make the new DC a GC.
In a multi-DC environment a GC and Infrastructure Master role hate to be on
the same machine, and really weird things happen.
For some time the Infrastructure Master role will
Since I'm not in our DPI shop anymore, I don't know all the details. But we
had[1] a national contract with SunGard which included them rolling up, to
any of our sites, with an 18 wheeler, with all the hardware already
installed and ready for a restore.
Was a cool concept. Our Florida and
As in aroused? Me too.
-Original Message-
From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 6:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST
Jumping Jiminey. I guess I am.
It's just that Dupler fellow. I get all excited.
--
I'm pretty sure Exchange on handles the online buddy information, etc.
All the network traffic is client client.
-Original Message-
From: Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, 22 March 2002 6:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Instant Messaging Server?
Does anyone have
Speak to your firewall administrator?
-Original Message-
From: Van Huissteden, Adriaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 5:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Off Topic-- Open Network Ports (161 162)
Hi,
I need to open and allow ports 161
If there's a single domain, there's absolutely no need to move the IM
role to a separate machine.
M
- Original Message -
From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 5:15 PM
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000, DNS, and DC on
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q268/7/44.ASP
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Data Support Analyst
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Dean Michael Dorman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 March 2002 15:38
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook 2000 SR-1, all
By default the store wont check itself for 2 hours. So leave it another hour
before adding the mailbox to the clients profile. If the additional mailbox
has already been added. Remove it from the client and re-add it in an hour.
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Data Support Analyst
BT Ignite eSolutions
I know for sure that they're only *supposed* to reply once per address,
but that this can break. Took MS 9 months to fix this one for me -- so
caution is best heeded.
Missy
- Original Message -
From: Andersson Mikael (SIX) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All,
In my experience, there are two ways to set up an OOO reply.
(a) Use the 'Out of Office Assistant' - Tools Out of Office Assistant.
This will only send one reply per instance of the OOO Assistant per person
e-mailing. If you turn it off, then on again, you'll get another message
from the
101 - 129 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
