RE: Public Folder Rights and Replication Questions

2002-10-21 Thread Andrey Fyodorov
A3. Because the user's domain account is gone? -Original Message- From: Swynk Exchange Support List [mailto:SwynkList;cardinal.com] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 11:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public Folder Rights and Replication Questions Q1: On replication schedule. What

RE: How to delete mailbox at the mailbox resources

2002-10-21 Thread Bryon Barkley
Run the cleanup agent on the mailbox store in question. Once done the mailbox should show with a red X. Right click and purge. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-99077;ls.swynk.com]On Behalf Of Carine Lim, Sr.SystEng, SCSM/NSB Sent: Sunday, October 20,

RE: How to delete mailbox at the mailbox resources

2002-10-21 Thread Bryon Barkley
Belay my last, didn't know it was 5.5 and not 2K. Sorry -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-99077;ls.swynk.com]On Behalf Of Carine Lim, Sr.SystEng, SCSM/NSB Sent: Sunday, October 20, 2002 7:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: How to delete mailbox at

RE: OWA 2000 login prompt

2002-10-21 Thread Edwards, Aaron
I just figured it out. I hadn't set up our public folder authentication for OWA yet. Once I set that up to look to our domain for authentication, everything worked. Thanks for your suggestions. Aaron -Original Message- From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:AEdwards;watrust.com] Sent: Monday,

Re: Address Book Listings

2002-10-21 Thread Tony Hlabse
Create a Contact list of their own that list frequently used address list as they see fit. - Original Message - From: Todd Boynton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 2:55 PM Subject: Address Book Listings When a user is creating

RE: Public Folder Rights and Replication Questions

2002-10-21 Thread Blunt, James H (Jim)
Q1: If you bring up the public folder property page and click on the little HELP button in the lower right-hand corner, it will give you a complete explanation. -Original Message- From: Swynk Exchange Support List [mailto:SwynkList;cardinal.com] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 8:48 AM

RE: Address Book Listings

2002-10-21 Thread Todd Boynton
We'd like to be able to do it globally. Todd Boynton   [EMAIL PROTECTED] == Communications Specialist == UNET Technology Services, Network Operations == Maine School and Library

RE: Public Folder Rights and Replication Questions

2002-10-21 Thread Mark Harford
Are you in a mixed exchange 55/2000 environment? Another answer to A3 might be that you have removed the mailbox belonging to an account or possibly there are two 55 mailboxes with the same PWNT, only one of which will replicate properly into AD. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov

RE: Default Mailbox Permissions

2002-10-21 Thread Mark Harford
Is your Recipient Update Service running properly, is there a Recipient Policy that applies to these users have you done anything funny like blocking inheritance of permissions to the OU these new users are in? I'd check the msexchmasteraccountsid and msexchuseraccountcontrol values aer as

Maximum OWA concurrent users

2002-10-21 Thread Microsoft Exchange List Server
MSX55+SP4 1 MSXorganization 1 server Does anobody know the maximum OWA concurrent users allowed in MSX55enterprise version? and MSX5.5 non-enterprise version? Thanks, -er _ List posting FAQ:

RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users

2002-10-21 Thread William Lefkovics
What is the setting in IIS configured for? Otherwise... lots! William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-104116;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Microsoft Exchange List Server Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 2:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Maximum

Re: Need help with 550 5.7.1 Bad recipient format -- possible relay attempt error

2002-10-21 Thread Tony Hlabse
If your running Exchange 2000 and I assuming this, you need the Firewall Software/Hardware to allow ESMTP protocol traffic for Messaging to flow. - Original Message - From: Robert Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 1:32 PM

RE: Fax Sr. on Exchange

2002-10-21 Thread Trent Hancock
OMTOOL Used FaxSr in a VAX/VMS environment (yes, they ported it to NT). -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-103735;ls.swynk.com]On Behalf Of John Matteson Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 3:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax Sr. on Exchange

I just discovered a bug in Exchange 2000

2002-10-21 Thread Andrey Fyodorov
This has been a nagging issue for a long time. I have not been able to send mail to certain groups - messages would just get stuck in the Retry Queue Awaiting Directory Lookup. This was also coincidental with IIS memory leak. I can't believe how simple the cause of the problem is! The groups

Re: Enterprise Edition upgrade - trial ver. - full ver.

2002-10-21 Thread Tony Hlabse
My understanding is you just run it as an upgrade and it will fix the licensing part of it only. - Original Message - From: Jeremy Pinquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 10:02 AM Subject: Enterprise Edition upgrade - trial ver.

Re: I just discovered a bug in Exchange 2000

2002-10-21 Thread Tony Hlabse
Curious. Is the AD domain controllers in Native or Mixed mode. I know that certain functions regarding groups to not work correctly when in Mixed -vs- Native. - Original Message - From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 21,

RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users

2002-10-21 Thread Kevin Miller
Why does it stick in my head that you were limited to a Number of mapi connections in the range of a few hundred pre box? Why on earth would I think that.. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP, And Beyond -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: I just discovered a bug in Exchange 2000

2002-10-21 Thread Andrey Fyodorov
All native. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 5:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: I just discovered a bug in Exchange 2000 Curious. Is the AD domain controllers in Native or Mixed mode. I know that certain

RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users

2002-10-21 Thread Martin Blackstone
I dunno, But I was thinking the same thing though I don't have any evidence to support it. -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:Kevinm;wlkmmas.org] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 3:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users Why does it stick in my

RE: I just discovered a bug in Exchange 2000

2002-10-21 Thread Kevin Miller
Good job.. And thanks for sharing.. Simple solutions are often at the bottom of the list of things to try. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP, And Beyond -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-98850;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Monday,

RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users

2002-10-21 Thread Kevin Miller
Well go find the answer then report Back Jr Cadet Blackstone. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP, And Beyond -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-98850;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 3:05 PM To: Exchange

RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users

2002-10-21 Thread Martin Blackstone
Hey! Your in the Jr Cadet league too! -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:Kevinm;wlkmmas.org] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 3:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users Well go find the answer then report Back Jr Cadet Blackstone. --Kevinm M,

RE: I just discovered a bug in Exchange 2000

2002-10-21 Thread Andrey Fyodorov
I just hope that when I call PSS, they would be able to escalate and fix it. We rely on global security groups that need to be mail-enabled, and our hosting architecture uses a windows account that's a member of these groups but is not mail-enabled. I do not want to mail-enable this account

RE: Need help with 550 5.7.1 Bad recipient format -- possible re lay attempt error

2002-10-21 Thread Robert Williams
I am running 5.5 SP4 and I have ESMTP turned on, I was wondering about the other settings noted below -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 11:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Need help with 550 5.7.1 Bad recipient

RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users

2002-10-21 Thread Kevin Miller
I have looked High and low, cannot seem to find the answer to this one.. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP, And Beyond -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-98850;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 3:09 PM To:

Re: Outlook rich text format

2002-10-21 Thread Daniel Chenault
You need to do learn how to do research. Here's a hint: you are having trouble with MIME messages sent in RTF with ATTACHMENTS. Bottom line is no different than what you have already been told: don't send RTF except in special circumstances. - Original Message - From: RBHATIA [EMAIL

Re: Enterprise Edition upgrade - trial ver. - full ver.

2002-10-21 Thread Daniel Chenault
Just do it. - Original Message - From: Jeremy Pinquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 10:02 AM Subject: Enterprise Edition upgrade - trial ver. - full ver. OK, so a few weeks ago we managed to hit the 16GB limit on E2k

RE: Changing Mail Servers

2002-10-21 Thread Vincent Avallone
Do I have to DO anything for that to work? It doesn't seem to work. Do I have to disable the old account? Should I reread Ed's method? My original server is using Associated Accounts to the new domain. -Original Message- From: Chris King [mailto:Cking;whitneyhawks.com] Sent: Thursday,

OOO

2002-10-21 Thread Mark Hanji
Hi. I don't allow OOO (Out Of the Office) in my ex5.5 environment, to be used to the internet. The issue is that the sales people say this is their way to tell our costumers that they are not available. I have tried saying: 1. Security risk 2. Bad Netiquitte 3. Risk of mail loops (Chris - I

Re: Maximum OWA concurrent users

2002-10-21 Thread Tony Hlabse
I think it is more based on resources than a pure number. I do know that if you expect many at one time it is best for a front end / back end setup. - Original Message - From: Kevin Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 5:33 PM

RE: OOO

2002-10-21 Thread Andy David
1. Possibly. 2. Thats debatable. 3. Very low. -Original Message- From: Mark Hanji [mailto:zinnix;bezeqint.net] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 2:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OOO Hi. I don't allow OOO (Out Of the Office) in my ex5.5 environment, to be used to the internet.

RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users

2002-10-21 Thread William Lefkovics
It was also more fickle on IIS4 than IIS5. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-104116;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 3:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Maximum OWA concurrent users I think it is

Re: Need help with 550 5.7.1 Bad recipient format -- possible re lay attempt error

2002-10-21 Thread Tony Hlabse
Well like most Firewalls they lock everything and you have to punch holes in it. Relaying should be allowed to those that successfully Authenticate. Check your setting for same. - Original Message - From: Robert Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:

RE: OOO

2002-10-21 Thread Martin Blackstone
1+2+3= losing battle -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:davida;vss.com] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OOO 1. Possibly. 2. Thats debatable. 3. Very low. -Original Message- From: Mark Hanji [mailto:zinnix;bezeqint.net]

RE: OOO

2002-10-21 Thread Andy David
We allow it here. So far, it has not really been an issue. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:MBlackstone;superioraccess.com] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 3:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OOO 1+2+3= losing battle -Original Message- From: Andy

RE: OOO

2002-10-21 Thread Martin Blackstone
Yea. Us too. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:davida;vss.com] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 12:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OOO We allow it here. So far, it has not really been an issue. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone

Address Book Listings

2002-10-21 Thread Todd Boynton
When a user is creating new mail and clicks on To... to bring up the address book to add names to the message, Is there an easy way to have names sorted by last name, first name instead of the display name? Outlook 2002 and Exchange 2000 Todd Boynton [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users

2002-10-21 Thread Andy David
According to a white paper that came out some 4 years ago, Microsoft estimated OWA 5.5 on IIS 4 was limited to 700-800 concurrent light users. ( read three emails a day average, replying to 5). Estimates for heavy users (8 emails a day,reply to about 20) was around 100 concurrent per box. But of

RE: OWA 2000 login prompt

2002-10-21 Thread Edwards, Aaron
No, None of the public folder are on clustered servers. Just one back-end server. -Original Message- From: McBee, Jim [mailto:JMcBee;cta.net] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 8:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA 2000 login prompt Are any of your public folders on clustered

Re: Maximum OWA concurrent users

2002-10-21 Thread Tony Hlabse
Yep I heard that 100 user theory too but with the new hardware and IIS, I really haven't heard anything from some deployments where OWA was a featured way of getting emails for users. The only thing is when a user connects for the first time then subsequent connections are quicker. Which makes

RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users

2002-10-21 Thread Great Cthulhu Jones
IIS 5.0 and Exchange 5.5 or 2000: as many as your bandwidth will take. Very nice. IIS 4.0 and Exchange 5.5: 200, tops. Once you hit more than 5 active server page requests per second on that box, the server tanks. Whitepapers, shmitepapers. My minions in PSS all know the awful truth: use one IIS

RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users

2002-10-21 Thread Kevin Miller
That oh great tentacled one.. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP, And Beyond -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-98850;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Great Cthulhu Jones Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 6:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Maximum OWA

RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users

2002-10-21 Thread Great Cthulhu Jones
That what? (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-274642;ls.swynk.com]On Behalf Of Kevin Miller Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 8:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users That oh great tentacled one.. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS,

Re: Maximum OWA concurrent users

2002-10-21 Thread Tony Hlabse
Well I heard that the new version of OWA will have built-in VPN type connections with RPC being the way to communicate. Is that true? - Original Message - From: Great Cthulhu Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 9:05 PM Subject:

RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users

2002-10-21 Thread Kevin Miller
What have you heard... --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP, And Beyond -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-98850;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 7:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Maximum OWA concurrent users

RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users

2002-10-21 Thread Petschow, Jeff
Yes it is true you will be able to do RPC over HTTP so a VPN will not be needed. It will require .NET server, Exchange Titanium and Outlook 11. Jeff -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 9:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions

Re: Maximum OWA concurrent users

2002-10-21 Thread Tony Hlabse
Nope I was wrong sorry . The RPC thing had to due with Outlook version 11. Quote Other infrastructure changes in Outlook 11 and Titanium will support RPC over HTTP so that users can connect to Exchange over the Internet From Exchange and Outlook UPDATE Exchange and Outlook UPDATE, Outlook Edition,

RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users

2002-10-21 Thread Kevin Miller
That sounds right from what I have seen.. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP, And Beyond -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-98850;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 7:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Maximum

Re: Maximum OWA concurrent users

2002-10-21 Thread Missy Koslosky
There's no allowed number of connections, per se, but IIS starts crapping out after about 200 concurrent OWA sessions. I don't have a specific reference for this, but I did some extensive testing on this a couple years ago, and this was what we found. Missy - Original Message - From:

RE: Automated PF...

2002-10-21 Thread Ed Crowley
The answer is, of course, to write an event script. Edgar J. Crowley Jr. Technical Consultant Windows Messaging Platforms Practice hp Services *510-612-3365 *[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of

RE: Changing Mail Servers

2002-10-21 Thread Ed Crowley
You need not do anything for that to work, but it works only for Outlook with MAPI, and only when you move mailboxes using the Admin or System Manager tools, not Exmerge. POP3, IMAP4 or OWA won't automatically update profiles. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are

RE: Changing Mail Servers

2002-10-21 Thread Ed Crowley
You need not do anything for that to work, but it works only for Outlook with MAPI, and only when you move mailboxes using the Admin or System Manager tools, not Exmerge. POP3, IMAP4 or OWA won't automatically update profiles. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are