What monitoring tools are people using that operate like the old 5.5 Link Monitors
that disappeared in E2K? Does MOM do Link Monitor tests?
Thanks,
John Clark
Bank One Card Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
302.282.1464
**
This
We have Exchange 5.0. When a user logs in, it appears (on the connection
info) that the users has logged in three times. We noticed this when we
kept getting errors saying we had exceeded our user limit. Does anyone
have any idea why the exchange server would log everyone in 3 times?
Thanks
That'll work if the message doesn't leave Exchange, but all tracking
will tell you is that it went through the Internet Mail Service (or E2K
virtual server).
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Technical Consultant
hp Services
There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems.
Thank you for all the replies. They have all been very helpful.
The way I have set this up is almost exactly as per Greg's situation below.
I don't actually need to receive email for the users in the new company name
at the moment.
Mail being sent to the new company is going elsewhere and then
Tony,
What make is it BO, Pink or something even more up or down market? and I
agree with you about belts (my last one I forgot to unclip it so it sketched
:-(
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everyone wants one but not yours
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse
Direct drive is the best for LP's. I used to have a pair of Technic
1200's in a past life.
Thank you,
Alex Gonzalez
Senior Systems Administrator
Handleman Company
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914
-Original Message-
From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday,
I swear I get the weirdest errors..
Anyone have an issue with indexing all of a sudden stop working? All of a sudden the
last 4 days are not being indexed. I checked to see if it was paused but it wasn't.
It's scheduled to run all the time and it used to display new messages within a few
Outlook 2002 provides a warning when a PST or OST file approaches 2GB. I
would like to modify this warning to occur at 1GB, anyone know if this can
be done and were?
_
List posting FAQ:
It does?
-Original Message-
From: wade robinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 5:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook 2002 2GB Warning
Outlook 2002 provides a warning when a PST or OST file approaches 2GB. I
would like to modify this warning to
Yup. I think you need at least SP1 installed. When it reaches 1.8 GB or so,
it says something like Cant copy items
or Stop using psts Moron . Something like that.
- Original Message -
From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday,
Huh. I guess I have never run into that.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 6:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Outlook 2002 2GB Warning
Yup. I think you need at least SP1 installed. When it reaches 1.8 GB or so,
it
Exchange 2000, SP3, W2K SP3.
I'm afraid I can't provide a great deal of informatiuon here since there
just isn't any! Basically, one day I have a perfectly working mail
system then suddenly it stops receiving incoming mail. Outgoing is
absolutely fine. There is nothing in the event viewer to
Requests to mail.bondyweb.com on port 25 just time out.
telnet mail.bondyweb.com 25
Connecting To mail.bondyweb.com...Could not open connection to the host
on port 25: Connect failed
Check your firewall, and any other things which could cause the
appropriate port to be blocked... Check also
One for the directory
One for the private store
One for the public store
One login to rule them all (directory)
one ring to bind them (private store)
One ring to bring them all (public store)
and in the darkness bind them (still on 5.0)
;)
-Original Message-
From: Mark Freeman
Leema,
Use MS article Q223391, even though it refers to the reverse situation, it
will work in correcting this problem.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everyone wants one but not yours
-Original Message-
From: MSExchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 22 November 2002
a. Disable the license logging service (it's broken) and use
VisualInterNotepad to track your license compliance.
b. multiple logons are covered multiple times in the archives.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Freeman
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 11/21/2002 4:12 PM
Subject: Exchange 5.0
Don't believe it is a configurable value, but an MCS engagement could
probably get you a 1GB warning.
-Original Message-
From: wade robinson
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 11/26/2002 7:52 AM
Subject: Outlook 2002 2GB Warning
Outlook 2002 provides a warning when a PST or OST file
The server isn't answering on port 25.
C:\telnet mail.simonbond.com 25
Connecting To mail.simonbond.com...
Could not open a connection to host on port 25 : Connect failed
C:\telnet 217.39.149.150 25
Connecting To 217.39.149.150...
Could not open a connection to host on port 25 : Connect failed
I know OT but you all know a lot and I am at my wits end trying to find a
RDP client that works on a Mac OS before OS X.
Anyone heard of one?
Much Thanks!
Chris
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Hey folks...
New virus with a new extension that you may want to think about blocking
(.ceo):
http://www.sarc.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.hllw.winevar.html (link may wrap)
_
List posting FAQ:
Hi,
I'm having a problem with 1 user account. I deleted it, then re-created it (in
the AD User and Computer manager).
Now, in the Mailbox Manager, I see the user's mailbox listed, but with a red X
on it. If I choose to reconnect it, I receive the exact error shown in
Never trust a CEO.
- Original Message -
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 10:38 AM
Subject: New virus...
Hey folks...
New virus with a new extension that you may want to think about blocking
Yes, but Dan said it last, quoting Ed...
Drew Nicholson
Technical Writer
Network Engineer
LAN Manager
RapidApp
312-372-7188 (work)
312-543-0008 (cell)
Born To Edit
-Original Message-
From: Veld, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 6:02 PM
To: Exchange
No errors in the event log at _all_???
Drew Nicholson
Technical Writer
Network Engineer
LAN Manager
RapidApp
312-372-7188 (work)
312-543-0008 (cell)
Born To Edit
-Original Message-
From: Simon Bond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 8:26 AM
To: Exchange
You might be able to write a batch file that checks the size of the PSTs
and does something about it. All the PSTs would have to be accessible,
of course...
Drew Nicholson
Technical Writer
Network Engineer
LAN Manager
RapidApp
312-372-7188 (work)
312-543-0008 (cell)
Born To Edit
-Original
Don't believe there is/was one. There was however a citrix ICA solution for
Mac OS9 users.
-Original Message-
From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 9:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
I know OT but you all know a lot and I am at my wits end
Hi,
Where can I find a list of the most attachments to block?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxj.htm
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 8:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: attachments
Hi,
Where can I find a list of the most attachments to block?
The Martin Blackstone list of attachments to block...
Basics
vbs;shs;js;com;bat;cmd;pif;scr;chm;VB
Full List
EML;VB;ASX;ADE;ADP;BAS;BAT;BIN;CHM;CMD;COM;CPL;CRT;DLL;EXE;HIV;HLP;HTA;INF;I
NS;ISP;JS;JSE;JTD;MSC;MSI;MSP;MST;OCX;OFT;OVL;PCD;PIF;PL;PLX;SCR;SCT;SH;SHB;
Don't forget to add .ceo also.
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 8:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: attachments
Hi,
Where can I find a list of the most attachments to block?
Yup. Checkout Microsoft's Remote Desktop Connection software. It works
great with Windows 2000 Server or Windows XP. It will not connect to
Windows NT 4 boxes though. For that I go with VNC.
Nate Couch
EDS Messaging
--
From: Chris H
Reply To: Exchange Discussions
http://www.swinc.com/resource/e2kfaq_appxj.htm
Thanks to Martin.
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 10:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: attachments
Hi,
Where can I find a list of the most attachments to block?
PS you could get crazy and load up IIS and do the web interface and run it
thru a browser..
bill
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 11:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: TOTALLY OT: Mac RDP Client??
Don't believe
So you do not block mpeg and exe?
K/
Original Message-
From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 17:10
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: attachments
Don't forget to add .ceo also.
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL
Our company was looking into this product but ended up going the Citrix route.
http://www.hobsoft.com/www_us/produkte/connect/jwt-mac.htm
Melissa
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 11:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
It is an Empire Model# 598 II
It was the best I could find in my price range in 1976.
- Original Message -
From: Gonzalez, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 8:02 AM
Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for
Sorry,
overlooked
-Original Message-
From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 17:10
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: attachments
Don't forget to add .ceo also.
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
What version of exchange/ outlook are you using? If youre using exh2k
and outlook 2002 then most attachments are blocked by default - I'm not
sure about earlier versions of outlook.
The blocked attachments are referred as level one. Have a look at
Q290497
-Original Message-
From: Kim
I block both.
The MPG, AVI, MP3 stuff mostly to save space. My users seem to think email
is their personal trading platform.
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 8:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: attachments
So
BUT, the problem with letting OL block the files is two fold.
A) They are still in the IS.
B) They can be accessed with OWA.
Relying on OL to do your content blocking is a poor method. It should be
the last step, certainly NEVER the first. And since virtually any Exchange
based AV will do this
I got this announcement from Symantec this morning concerning .ceo and
.pif's.
http://www.sarc.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.hllw.winevar.html
Peter Seitz
Cubic Corporation
Systems Analyst
San Diego, Ca. 92123
(858) 505-2724
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL
Blocking CEO files is a good step, but this virus takes advantage of a
two-year old hole to register CEO files as executables. If you are running
a recent version if IE (and more specifically, a recent version of the JVM)
you are protected.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H
according to the Symantec write up the .CEO gets registered as a executable
file format.
now by my limited understanding to do this you would first have to have
something that could do this...i.e. I would figure the .PIF in the e-mail.
SO I guess that the .PIF reg's the .CEO and the .HTM is maybe
BTW, Trend has had this covered since DAT 390
-Original Message-
From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 8:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: attachments+virus
I got this announcement from Symantec this morning concerning .ceo and
.pif's.
Easy tiger, never said anything about relying on it and apologies if
that's what came across - just where there is a list of blocked
attachments. From that one could deduce which ones to block...
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 November
That's a file that doesn't have a clue about how the system operates but
wants to open everything and just gets larger and larger over time
without any discernible output while taking up a huge amount of
resources.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Can you telnet and send a message that way?
- Original Message -
From: Simon Bond [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 9:26 AM
Subject: Strange Incoming Mail Problem
Exchange 2000, SP3, W2K SP3.
I'm afraid I can't provide a
Time for a restore.
- Original Message -
From: Allison M. Wittstock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 10:41 AM
Subject: Error when attempted to reconnect a Mailbox.
Hi,
I'm having a problem with 1 user account. I deleted
I checked for it at http://filext.com/c.htm , but it isn't listed.
On Tuesday 26 November 2002 17:17, you wrote:
What the heck is a .CEO file anyhow?
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 8:18 AM
To: Exchange
Use the Monitoring and Status node of ESM in E2K
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 4:04 PM
Subject: E2K Link Monitor Replacement
What monitoring tools are people using that operate like the old 5.5
BTW - there is also a full fledged Citrix ICA client for Mac OS X as well.
Smooth install and no problems so far.
Nate Couch
EDS Messaging
--
From: Mellott, Bill
Reply To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 10:11
To: Exchange Discussions
Well, heh, I have no backups running at the moment since my tape drive is
kaputt. I am using Ed Crowley's Never Restore Method. Is there still some
hope?
Also, why would this happen to the user? He was able to login, then one day
he received from OL2k the error message Unable to find name
Hi,
I need to disable the Recipient Update Service for most users, i.e. get
the tick box 'Automatically update e-mail addresses based on recipient
policy' unchecked in AD User Properties/Email addresses.
Does anyone know which AD property controls this feature or has doe this
via code/scripting?
Second in the state
Store with fresh donut lamp lit
Years of happiness
--Brett
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To
Can someone direct me to a good website or give me a detailed explanation
(if possible and have some extra time to kill) as to how I can upgrade my
Exchange 5.5 server to Exchange 2000? Ours is a single domain and nothing
extra-ordinary. I do like to install Exchange 2000 on a new box and use
HI all,
This is my first time on this list!
I have a few questions concerning webservices and Exchange.
This is my problem!
I have to write a webservice for Exchange 2000...
1-Can i develop a webservice from my PC or do i have to bring
my development environment to the Exchange server?
What monitoring tools are people using that operate like the old 5.5 Link Monitors
that disappeared in E2K? Does MOM do Link Monitor tests?
Thanks,
John Clark
Bank One Card Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
302.282.1464
Can someone direct me to a good website or give me a detailed explanation
(if possible and have some extra time to kill) as to how I can upgrade my
Exchange 5.5 server to Exchange 2000? Ours is a single domain and nothing
extra-ordinary. I do like to install Exchange 2000 on a new box and use
Folks,
We are facing a very starnge problem in the Exchange 2k server with POP3.
People are connecting the server using Internet email settings thru outlook
ooutlook express.
When try to download the mails from the server, it is saying timed out or
it just hangs for long time. All these
How are they connecting? Does this happen only from the outside?
- Original Message -
From: Karvannan S [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 12:11 AM
Subject: POP3
Folks,
We are facing a very starnge problem in the Exchange 2k
For very small, single server environments, you can simply upgrade your
E55 server to E2K and this works fairly well, although I have seen some
minor issues in some of these migrations. Basic process is, install W2K
and AD, install ADC and then upgrade E2K server. There are good process
documents
Hello John,
The company I work for has a product called ExRay for Exchange which
offers link monitor functionality.
You can get more information at www.intellireach.com
--- Greg
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002
Define webservice.
Drew Nicholson
Technical Writer
Network Engineer
LAN Manager
RapidApp
312-372-7188 (work)
312-543-0008 (cell)
Born To Edit
-Original Message-
From: Jan Van Steenbergen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2002 3:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Check to make sure that somebody didn't reconfigure the firewall to block
port 25 inbound to your Exchange server. This would explain why it was
working one day and not the next without you making any changes.
Exchange 2000, SP3, W2K SP3.
I'm afraid I can't provide a great deal of
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/interop/55.asp
I'm going to go ahead and be nasty here. If you are not able to navigate to
the Microsoft Exchange website (real hard to figure out:
www.microsoft.com/exchange) and from there find the link that talks about
coexistence and deployment
There are a lot of intervening devices between you and your users. If they
havne't change anything, and you havent' changed anything and we work on the
assumption that the software didn't reconfigure or rewrite itself overnite
than the only logical explanation is that something in-between changed.
If that is the case, then I would create Custom Recipients for the other
company instead of using another mailbox. This will help keep things clean
and your security folks will be happy that there is not this superfluous
mailbox out there.
Thank you for all the replies. They have all been very
If you have a PIX (Cisco) firewall this would be in the Mail Conduit make
sure they have it configured properly.
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 8:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Strange Incoming Mail Problem
Hi All,
I'm being unsubscribed from a mailing list because of reported Probe
Failure errors, and I'm having difficulty getting off square one with this
issue.
The mailing list is an L-Soft software, Le mot du Jour. The
administrative messages come through fine, but regular mailings do
Well...
The only thing worthwhile that I have to add is Learn to Spell.
Yah...you're a die-hard fan, aren't ya? Having been a die-hard fan of the
team myself, since 1976 and the Jack Lambert days, I can tell you that their
name is spelled STEELERS, not STILLERS.
Hey...it's Thanksgiving
Yeah? So how does it get associated/executed?
-Original Message-
From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 10:21 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: attachments+virus
Subject: RE: attachments+virus
I got this announcement from
Your IMS doesn't appear to be what is exposed to the internet, are you
looking at the mail logs of mail.wtwarch.com? Those would likely provide
better information than the Exchange IMS logs would.
-Original Message-
From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November
Maybe he's a big fan of Ben's movies.
Drew Nicholson
Technical Writer
Network Engineer
LAN Manager
RapidApp
312-372-7188 (work)
312-543-0008 (cell)
Born To Edit
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 11:11 AM
To:
Guess your Pittsburg slang is a bit rusty Jim? You're getting divorced, you
ought to be out celebrating. *sheesh* ;)
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 11:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Well...
The only
Email me offline, I can send you a step by step..cookbook style..if you
like,else, if you do a google search, you will find a boatload of info.
Raj
-Original Message-
From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 9:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Jim: Check your attitude at the door or get it adjusted! LOL
Gèoff...
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 12:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Problems with incoming Mailing list mail
Well...
The
We usually throw the freeware locate.com into their logon script, and have it delete,
move, alert, whatever we want from there. It's a great program for finding junk on a
workstation. We use it during migrations to go find all PSTs and PABs and move them
up to the network before we blow the
Hi there,
According to technet it should be opossible to autmatically save the
contact details of a recipient you reply to in the address book, I have
XP, SP2 and can't find a bloody way to do this
_
List posting FAQ:
RTFA!! ;)
The .HTM exploits the Microsoft VM ActiveX Component vulnerability
[MS00-075] to register the .ceo extension as an executable file. The email
message is formed to take advantage of the Incorrect MIME Header Can Cause
IE to Execute E-mail Attachment vulnerability [MS01-020], but due to
I am moving exchange 2k to a new server and am using the procedures
found at http://www.swinc.com/resource/e2kfaq_appxa.htm. Anyway, I'm on
step 6 which says Install Exchange 2000 and bring it up to the same
service pack and hotfix level as the existing server. At this point
I've installed
::-Original Message-
::From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
::Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 12:11 PM
::To: Exchange Discussions
::Subject: RE: Problems with incoming Mailing list mail
::
::
::Well...
::
::The only thing worthwhile that I have to add is Learn to
Bite me. If the vulnerability starts with MS00 or MS01, anyone who catches it at this
point deserves it.
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 11:50 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: attachments+virus
::
::Your IMS doesn't appear to be what is exposed to the
::internet, are you looking at the mail logs of
::mail.wtwarch.com? Those would likely provide better
::information than the Exchange IMS logs would.
::
Actually, it points to an SMTP Proxy set up on my firewall (Watchguard
Yep yep.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 12:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: attachments+virus
Bite me. If the vulnerability starts with MS00 or MS01,
anyone who catches it at this point deserves
ESM doesn't do link monitoring.
Thanks,
John Clark
Technology Operations Manager
Bank One Card Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
302.282.1464
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 11:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: E2K
Already looking at the product Found it after I originally sent this message. So
far it's missing functionality to point to a smarthost rather than use an MX lookup to
send SMTP alerts.
Thanks,
John Clark
Technology Operations Manager
Bank One Card Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
302.282.1464
http://www.microsoft.com/usa/presentations/Exchange5.5_to_Exchange2000_Migra
tion.ppt
http://www.exchangeadmin.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=22252
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/interop/migrate_mb.asp
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/itsolutio
Oh, and make absolutely sure that your internal DNS is working properly
before you even try to install Ex2K.
Aloha,
-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com
-Original Message-
From:
I am about to do an in-place upgrade of 2 Exchange 5.5 servers to Exchange
2000. I know this is not the preferred method but that decision was out of
my control. I have read most of the documentation available from Microsoft
but I was wondering if anybody had some real world experience to offer.
Anything in the Event logs?
Aloha,
-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com
-Original Message-
From: Mike Winfrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 7:53 AM
Reference?
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 11:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Hi there,
According to technet it should be opossible to autmatically
save the contact details of a recipient you reply to in the
Perhaps Kim has noticed the Outlook Express setting Tools Options Send -
Automatically put people I reply to in my Address Book [1]. I don't
believe there is a corresponding Outlook setting.
Jim Helfer
[1] I'm no grammarist,[2] but I think there's something incorrect about that
sentence
[2]
Perhaps they are thinking of recipient's digital ID to their contact list.
Gèoff...
-Original Message-
From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 2:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Problems with incoming Mailing list mail
Perhaps
Do you have multiple servers? Did replication complete after the deletion?
Maybe one of the other servers still has the original account and thinks the
SMTP address is still valid and won't let you reconnect the mailbox.
-Original Message-
From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL
Is there anyway to change all contacts' internet format from rtf to
plain text without having to change the properties of each individual
one.
I have a user who has 100's of contacts and wants to change them all to
plain text.
_
Sure. File/Import/Export/Export to DOS, etc., etc.,
Gèoff...
-Original Message-
From: Boynton, Todd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 3:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Changing all contacts to plain text recipients
Is there anyway to change all
Doesn't seem to export RTF / Plain Text settings for contacts.
Todd
-Original Message-
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 3:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Changing all contacts to plain text recipients
Sure.
Do you mean that your user wants to change the format of the e-mail that he
sends to each contact?
-Original Message-
From: Boynton, Todd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 12:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Changing all contacts to plain text recipients
Yes.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 4:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Changing all contacts to plain text recipients
Do you mean that your user wants to change the format of the e-mail that
he
sends
He's running into this problem.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;278061
Article 278061 in MS Knowledge Base
The solution works but you have to make change for all contacts.
Todd
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
