Hi,
Environment:
NT4 SP6
EXCHANGE SERVER 5.5 SERVICE PACK 4
I have an exchange server which is not replicating public folders to other
servers which are in different sites. I am getting the message:
The Client Operation Failed.
Microsoft Exchange Server Information Store
ID no:
Test
uop Guildford IT
Tel:+44 1483 466107
E-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This e-mail message (including any attachments) is intended for the
addressee(s) only, and may contain confidential information. The
unauthorised use, disclosure or copying of this
Try removing the limit administrative access to home folder on the
properties window
Regards
Santhosh.H
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Sebastian, Didy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003
What is the make/model of your disk controller/raid card?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 February 2003 03:41
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Ex 2000 Migration test -1018 after move mailbox.
-1018 error point towards hardware errors on
If you are using MOM for strictly E-mail monitoring, then you got a
elephant gun for shooting small game. The last time I looked monitoring
200 servers was considered a small installation.
Pretty much you are covered on everything using the default settings;
however, you'll want to tweak your
Well it is used already on the customer's site to monitor the other
servers. After pouring over the documentation and the default settings,
I agree with you just tweak the alerts. Thanks
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Matteson
Sent:
My Exchange servers developed an interesting problem over the weekend.
When I got to work this morning the Exchange Administrator account was
locked out. The following events are logged around the time when the
account gets locked out and I am unable to find any information in the
Knowledge Base
User Group
We have an exchange server where the store.exe seems to be slowly using up all the
physical memory. Has any one seen any Q article for this problem?
We also have another server that runs in tandem with the problem server and this does
not seem to leak memory (two connector servers)
-Original Message-
From: Marc Mearns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 February 2003 15:25
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Memory leak store .exe
User Group
We have an exchange server where the store.exe seems to be
slowly using up all the physical memory. Has any one
Robert
1 We are getting alerts from our TNG alerting system to say that the server is low on
physical memory.
2.After a reboot the server slowly eats up the physical memory and does not seem to
drop back.
Regards
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Marc,
Exchange's Store.exe will use up all the physical RAM it can get.
However, it is generally well behaved when giving it back to other
processes that need it. Are you seeing errors on the server?
Your conector server probably isn't exhibiting this behaviour since
Store.exe isn't doing much.
-Original Message-
From: Marc Mearns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 February 2003 15:59
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Memory leak store .exe
Robert
1 We are getting alerts from our TNG alerting system to say
that the server is low on physical memory.
Hi All,
Would someone just confirm for me the suggested method to replicate all
public folders to a new server, and once replication is complete the rehome
the folders (server migration).
I'm a little unsure whether it's better, but more tedious to do it using the
Public Folders section of
Mike
What concerns me is the fact that the memory usage for the store.exe just creeps up
all the time. On the other server it is pretty static.
Regards
-Original Message-
From: Mike Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 February 2003 16:16
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
But you said the other 2 are just connectors. I'm assuming the one that is
using so much memory is the one that actually houses the mailboxes. Correct?
-Original Message-
From: Marc Mearns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 8:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Marc,
As mailboxes get accessed, messages moved in and out and so on, RAM
usage will increase. This is normal. A quick search on the MS KB for
'store memory' will give some articles describing instances where things
are going wrong, but from the information we have here I don't think
that's the
Martin
Sorry both server that I am looking at are connector servers. The only difference that
I am aware of is that the one that has a memory problem is has one email account on it
for postmaster.
I did a quick comparison of memory. See below
DateMem Usage Peak Mem Usage
Mike
Cheers.
This is a connector server with one account on it (Postmaster for NDR's etc).
Regards
-Original Message-
From: Mike Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 February 2003 16:37
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Memory leak store .exe
Marc,
As mailboxes get
Start from the Home site and make the changes there. Do the replicas
first, allow 24 - 48 hours for directory information and the replicas to
do their things and then make the changes to the home server.
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original
I'm having difficulty finding information on this either in MS's
Knowledgebase or in the various books I have:
We have routing turned on on our Exchange 5.5 box (latest SP's, etc.) but
have it set so that relaying is not allowed via the recommended method (set
for Hosts and clients with these IP
Well done Seb! You obviously don't read much on this list.
-Original Message-
From: Sebastian, Didy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 February 2003 02:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Is this working
Test
uop Guildford IT
Tel:+44 1483 466107
E-mail: mailto:[EMAIL
1. Your TNG alerts are set to alarm conditions that are not necessarily
alarms.
You didn't buy all that memory for it to sit unused, did you?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
In Exchange 5.5 you need at least one store on the server, even a
connector server, so that NDR's and the like have a place to go.
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At:
Thanks John. Presumably I do the following (better sure than sorry):
Go to the new servers Public IS, instances tab, add everything except
eventconfig_otherservers
Go to the old servers Private IS, set Public Folder server to the new server
Wait a day or two for replication (these servers are
Contact the listmaster for issues, don't post test
messages.
--- Sebastian, Didy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Test
uop Guildford IT
Tel: +44 1483 466107
E-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This e-mail message (including any attachments) is
intended for the
I guess what I was thinking really didn't get down on the paper clearly.
You should follow this procedure:
In the Exchange admin program, go to PUBLIC FOLDERS, ignore the
system folders for now.
Find the PF branch that you want to move to the other server
in your site. Find the
Add an entry to the list of 'hosts and clients with these IP addresses' for
the IP address of the host to relay.
On 2/17/03 12:18, Matt Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having difficulty finding information on this either in MS's
Knowledgebase or in the various books I have:
We have
No, what you said made sense - I guess I'm not that clear on what doing that
way does different to doing it on the Public IS instances settings,
assuming that all the existing public folders are only located on one
server.
If that's the way to do it then fair enough, it just seemed it will take
Normally, that would be sage advice, but nobody knows who the listmaster
for this list is any more. Better to post something useful, like
helping someone with a problem.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original
Good afternoon,
Outlook 98 NT 4.0 SP4
How do you get a hardcopy list of the names in a distribution list?
I have tried everything I could, and could not get it.
Thanks.
Mike Mitchell
Systems email Administrator
Alverno Information Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(317) 532-7800 ext. 6211
Are you running Exchange 5.5? If so, you can export the distribution
lists to a CSV file. The membership list is included in th
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Monday, February 17, 2003 9:48 AM
Posted To: Exchange Technical Mailing List
Export the list using directory export specifying the Members field.
Note, however, the names will show in their X500 notation. Such a
utility could be scripted. Perhaps something already exists on
http://www.cdolive.com or http://www.slipstick.com.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail
I did give that a try already and I got no good results. I've even tried
telnetting into the Exchange server once having made that change and was
still given the 550 message. And, yes, I did restart the IMS. I'll give it
a try with a full reboot of the server. Perhaps there's something glitchy
(Oooppsss, darn notebook touchpad... - Completing and resending)
Are you running Exchange 5.5? If so, you can export the distribution
lists to a CSV file. The membership list is included in CSV file. It
ain't pretty, but it will get you're a copy out to a file.From their
you can massage it
Another quick and dirty way is to open the DL properties in Exchange Admin
and select modify. You can then the select the entire list of members and
copy it into a text file.
Ben Parrnelli
Network Administrator
Comm Data Directorate
MAGTF Training Command
29 Palms, CA 92278
-Original
John:
Many thanks to you and Ed for the advice and tips. Unfortunately I once
again have to bare my ass to the group and admit that while I was sure some
Microsoft conspiracy was in the works... I didn't have the replication
schedule set properly on both servers.
Once set, about half the
I have seen what I will call strange behavior when configuring the hosts
and clients with these IP addresses in 5.5 E2K seems much more predictable
with this configuration option. I've seen some where adding a particular IP
does not work but defining a subnet of hosts DOES work. I did not come to
Scenario 1: If you use Titanium front-end OWA server and access mailboxes on Ex2000,
you get the Ex2000 OWA interface (not the E3k rich or basic).
Scenario 2: If you use Titanium front-end OWA server and Titanium back-end server you
get the new OWA interface.
Is this right or should I be
That sounds correct and would be consistent with past behavior.
On 2/17/03 16:22, Schneider, Bryan D [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scenario 1: If you use Titanium front-end OWA server and access mailboxes on
Ex2000, you get the Ex2000 OWA interface (not the E3k rich or basic).
Scenario 2: If
Ami Perc 3QC
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, 17 February 2003 11:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Ex 2000 Migration test -1018 after move mailbox.
What is the make/model of your disk controller/raid card?
I believe I've found a use for getting information from transaction files.
At least that's my thinking unless someone has a better way. One of my VPs
had her e-mail being re-directed to another e-mail account offsite (so she
can receive it on her Blackberry). We also had the e-mail being
I believe I've found a use for getting information from transaction files.
At least that's my thinking unless someone has a better way. One of my VPs
had her e-mail being re-directed to another e-mail account offsite (so she
can receive it on her Blackberry). We also had the e-mail being
42 matches
Mail list logo
