Thanks, ED,
Unfortunately, the Exchange Management Service is running.
Paul Christopher
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: 05 July 2003 00:30
Posted To: ADSExchangeNews
Conversation: MSexchangeTRansport ID: 350
Subject: RE: MSexchangeTRansport ID:
This is a repost after trying answer to post. Exchange 5.5 nt sp6 exchange spk 4.0
Store still runs at 100%. Takes 2-3 days to max out. If I reboot server
everything ok for a couple of days. Shut down av sw. Databases are 1 gb and 6 gb.
Cannot not do an offline defrag because there is only 1.5 gb
Agreed. I would install the new disk, use Ghost to image the disk across (while making
the second partition fill the remainder of the new disk, and then
shut down and remove the old drive for safe keeping. Once the new drive came up ok, I
would shut it down again then install another identical
I have been using Sybari Antigen realtime and don't see any burden, even with 3,000
very active users per server.
-Original Message-
From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2003 10:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: best linux av?
Yes, I see
Hello!
I wondering what solution you're providing for user who need wireless
email. I am looking for solution for Palm and it will be added bonus if
it can support Pocket PC and RIM for future... I am currently using
ThinAirServer to provide wireless email, but Palm is no longer going to
Hi
Had one of my 7 exchange servers (nt4, ex5.5, all in the same site) crash
recently and it took the logs with it. So staged a new server and dumped the
online backup to it and it came up fine. However...now i am getting some
reports of some odd behavior. One of those being that users in another
Take a look at a company called Motivus. www.motivus.com
They also give you access to your desktop. Lots of nice features.
-Original Message-
From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 10:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Wireless Email for Palm and
Exchange 2000 SP3 OS SP3.
Our Exchange 2000 server has an intermittent problem with slow outbound
mail. Currently the SMTP queue growth is 300 minutes, but sometimes it is
as high as 900 minutes and never drops below 100 minutes.
I've searched the swink archives, the web and Microsoft, but have
Hi All,
We are running Exchange 5.5 SP4 with post sp4 Hotfixes, clients are a mix
of Outlook 2000 and 98, and I wondered if anyone has seen or can explain
the following.
One of our users received 8 messages into his Inbox all as draft messages
from 8 different people. The originators have been
you are a victim of spam
or a virus
-Original Message-
From: Nathan Boyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 12:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Critical queue growth
Exchange 2000 SP3 OS SP3.
Our Exchange 2000 server has an intermittent problem with slow
I am looking for a recommendation of where to advertise my job for any
interested Exchange 2000/Active Directory people.
The company is based in the bay area, and so far I have used Craiglist.
Also if anyone knows of the same kind of job in LA, I would be interested,
as that is where I am
you are a victim of spam
or a virus
I think it is spam rather than a virus. I've restricted many of our mail
lists to just staff, but we use so many of them on the internet.
_
List posting
Could it be as simple as having set a rule incorrectly in Outlook on the client side?
Wild Guess,
Bill Kuhl
-Original Message-
From: Phil Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 11:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Drafts Arriving in Inbox
Hi All,
We are
I have recently upgraded to SBS 2000 which is a total package with exchange
2000 and sql 2000 on one box. Personally i see a flaw in doing so but when
it comes to money that is all the company wanted to spend.
My problem comes in where we have remote users that are connecting to the
internet with
I have recently upgraded to SBS 2000 which is a total package with
exchange
2000 and sql 2000 on one box. Personally i see a flaw in doing so but when
it comes to money that is all the company wanted to spend.
My problem comes in where we have remote users that are connecting to the
internet with
VPN
Get a VPN and have all your users use it to connect to Exchange via OL.
-Original Message-
From: PJ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 9:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Question on calander sharing with remote users.
I have recently upgraded to SBS
Or maybe OWA...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent: 07 July 2003 19:11
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Question on calander sharing with remote users.
VPN
Get a VPN and have all your users use it to connect
could be someone outside of your organization that is infected and keeps
sending bogus mail to you that keeps on getting rejected
-Original Message-
From: Nathan Boyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 12:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Critical queue growth
OWA works fine if you just want to do calendaring and look up free/busy
info. If you want to be able to open someone elses calendar, it is a
pain in the butt. Who wants to have to type
https://server.company.com/exchange/user/calendar every time they want
to open someone else's calendar?
Does Ex2k3 do this any better?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Winzenz
Sent: 07 July 2003 19:58
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Question on calander sharing with remote users.
OWA works fine if you just want to do calendaring
Not as far as I know. You can't really expect a Web Client to have the
same functionality of the full Outlook client, now can you?
Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418
-Original Message-
From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday,
Thanks,
I do believe this will be the best and quickest way to get people to share
calanders from external offices. Thanks for your help in this area.
Only one thing now. people have shared their calander on the network and it
seems that when ever someone sends a meeting request to someone in
Do you share the whole kitchen or just the colander?
-Original Message-
From: PJ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 12:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Question on calander sharing with remote users.
I have recently upgraded to SBS 2000 which is a total package
Delegates is just what it sounds like. You delegate the ability to
accept meetings and maintain your calendar to others. If you only want
others to be able to READ (view) your calendar, Delegates is NOT what
you want to set up. For that, you just go into the Calendar Properties,
and under
Just share the calander.. that is all.. nothing else unless that changes
from administration. but i doubt it.
- Original Message -
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 2:22 PM
Subject: RE: Question on calander
Thanks for the advice, will check on that see if they are sharing things
right.
- Original Message -
From: Ben Winzenz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 2:41 PM
Subject: RE: Question on calander sharing with remote users.
Delegates
Well, with E2K3, you would use Outlook via RPC over HTTP which in your case
would be a wonderful thing.
-Original Message-
From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 12:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Question on calander sharing with remote
I have been experiencing a weird problem over the last couple of weeks.
The Information Store Service grows at a pretty decent pace and
eventually gets over a Gig in size. I have never seen this happen on my
server before.
The problem is that once it gets so big the whole server shuts down and
I'm running Exchange 2000 and can issue S/MIME keys for individual
users. However, I'd really like to issue one for a public folder. Is
there a simple way to do this that I am missing, or is the feature not
present?
I've set up a test folder and unchecked the box Hide from Exchange
address lists
The RAM behavior is normal and intended. Exchange will use all available RAM
and will relinquish it to another process if needed. I suspect the two
things you report (RAM usage and spontaneous reboots) are unrelated.
Are there anything in the Event Logs from before/after the reboot? Can you
10-4 on what you and Henry said (Yes...you are right...system files, other
software...everything.). I am using a SCSI drive.
Arch
-Original Message-
From: ml.exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 9:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Move Exchange server
I'm running into a situation at a client where email addresses never get
generated on any new mail-enabled user or group. We've waited as long as
overnight and still no email addresses. But if we restart the System
Attendant, the addresses appear in a matter of minutes.
The environment is as
32 matches
Mail list logo
