RE: The spam that gets through

2003-07-09 Thread Neil Hobson
Trend InterScan Messaging Security Suite I believe, although I don't administer our internal systems. The guys that do happended to mention that SurfControl was way better at catching spam. I'll see if I can find some figures. Neil -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: [Exchange2000] Public Folders Restore

2003-07-09 Thread Mike Scott
John, What about deleted item retention? Even if it wasn't switched on when the user deleted the folders, putting it on before the restore might catch the deletion run by the logs. Just a thought - Something to try. Mike -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: The spam that gets through

2003-07-09 Thread Busby, Jacob
Some of our users use the Delete key - yours truly included - but some of them want the spam to analysed further and blocked in the future. I guess my question was phrased badly, so I'll rephrase it: How do you handle users who receive spam that want that source of spam blocked on the filters?

RE: Error on Outlook 2000

2003-07-09 Thread Tony Hlabse
That's what I figured a corrupt message somewhere? I killed all the rules but, didn't try the /clean (freebusy) switches only because we shut that function off for users on Office. But will try it and others anyhow . Thanks Ed. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: Restore Exchange 2000 IS?

2003-07-09 Thread Woodruff, Michael
SP3 -Original Message- From: Jeff Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 4:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions You're using eseutil from what service pack version of exchange? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of

RE: The spam that gets through

2003-07-09 Thread Roger Seielstad
We still do that seat of the pants. We ask the users to forward the message, intact, to our postmaster group, and we manually analyze it in a completely unscientific manner. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems

RE: The spam that gets through

2003-07-09 Thread Neil Hobson
That all sounds very familiar! :-) -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 09 July 2003 12:39 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: The spam that gets through Subject: RE: The spam that gets through We still do that seat of the pants. We

Exchange 2k log reporting

2003-07-09 Thread Mark Condron
All, I would be interested on feedback on what you all use to monitor and report on Exchange 2000 e-mail usage. I was using Melia for 5.5 but when we upgraded the Exchange 2000 version was not ready. I am currently testing Promodag so I would be grateful of any experience of this package but

RE: Exchange 2k log reporting

2003-07-09 Thread Neil Hobson
Promodag is good, as is MessageStats from Quest (www.quest.com) Neil -Original Message- From: Mark Condron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 09 July 2003 13:51 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Exchange 2k log reporting Subject: Exchange 2k log reporting All, I would

OT - MS Outlook mailing list

2003-07-09 Thread The BOYZ from BHUTAN
Does anyone know of good mailing high traffic mailing list on MS Outlook? Thanks. +++ Get a free DrukNet e-mail account and stay in touch http://www.druknet.bt _ List posting FAQ:

RE: OT - MS Outlook mailing list

2003-07-09 Thread Diane Poremsky
Outlook-users @ yahoogroups is the best... Subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or use the newsgroups @ msnews.microsoft.com, archived at google if you just need answers :) -Original Message- Does anyone know of good mailing high traffic mailing list on MS Outlook? Thanks. Reviewing GFI

RE: OT - MS Outlook mailing list

2003-07-09 Thread Neil Hobson
The Yahoo Groups Outlook list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Neil -Original Message- From: The BOYZ from BHUTAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 09 July 2003 09:17 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: OT - MS Outlook mailing list Subject: OT - MS Outlook mailing list Does anyone know

hard drive space

2003-07-09 Thread Matt
exchange 5.5 sp4 nt 4.0 sp6 how much free space should remain on drive where edb's are. I know to do an offline defrag you need space equal to the databases to perform this function. Currently databases are 6 gb and 1 gb with only 1.5 gb free disk space remaining. Store pegs cpu at 100% every 2

RE: hard drive space

2003-07-09 Thread Brady, James
You will need scratch space = current priv size + 10%. -Original Message- From: Matt Sent: Wed Jul 09 06:33:11 2003 To: Exchange Discussions Subject:hard drive space exchange 5.5 sp4 nt 4.0 sp6 how much free space should remain on drive where edb's are. I know to do an

RE: hard drive space

2003-07-09 Thread Pennell, Ronald B.
Matt, you actually need more than the database size. Say, 1.2 times. You can use network connected disk space to do the offline defrag. Might take awhile depending on network speed. Or even attach a larger drive to your system for temp storage. Ron -Original Message- From: Matt

RE: A bit off topic - Multiple apps on 1 server

2003-07-09 Thread Mellott, Bill
I agree totally with Ed...and avoid too many app's on one box (I've got boxes with just 1 app that's a pain) I recently did have to do such a thing..(and break my own person rule of never!) W2K Svr, (DHCP, F/P, IIS) sp2+sp2postfixes faxination Device (fax ports back to my Faxsvr)

RE: hard drive space

2003-07-09 Thread Jeff Beckham
1. You might make sure you have the latest version of store.exe. 2. Exmerge out the data. Mount a blank store. Merge it back in. 3. Otherwise, contact MS and have them take a user dump when the store is pegged. They'll be able to review it and see what is causing the store spike. Then

RE: Way out in left field (Sorry)

2003-07-09 Thread Todd Graham
Are you using an Avaya phone system? It's really close right now, I need to make my decision soon, and they are about equal at this point. Thanks all for the input! Todd -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 4:03 PM To:

RE: hard drive space

2003-07-09 Thread Martin Blackstone
What Exchange AV package are you using? NAI, CA? -Original Message- From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 6:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: hard drive space exchange 5.5 sp4 nt 4.0 sp6 how much free space should remain on drive where edb's are. I

RE: hard drive space

2003-07-09 Thread Roger Seielstad
That's not entirely true. What you need is non-whitespace + 10%(+/- a bit), not current database + 10%. The defrag process creates a new database and copies the data from the old file into the new one, then replaces the old one with the new one.

RE: hard drive space

2003-07-09 Thread Martin Blackstone
Then smokes a cigarette -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 7:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: hard drive space That's not entirely true. What you need is non-whitespace + 10%(+/- a bit), not current database +

RE: Way out in left field (Sorry)

2003-07-09 Thread Roger Seielstad
We're using a tradtional Avaya PBX, although we're doing some VOIP stuff with it. We're slowly looking at transitioning to significant amounts of VOIP over the next 2-3 years though. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems

RE: hard drive space

2003-07-09 Thread Dickenson, Steven
I was wondering what that smell was last time I ran a defrag... Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 10:38 AM To:

RE: hard drive space

2003-07-09 Thread Roger Seielstad
Is that before or after it falls asleep at 9pm? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 09,

eseutil defrag inconsistency

2003-07-09 Thread Shotton Jolyon
We have recently deleted a large (700+) number of accounts and mailboxes. It has been decided that defragmenting the store would be useful. We have tested the procedure on a disaster recovery server. Twice. The two restored stores were about a week apart in date and no drastic changes were

RE: hard drive space

2003-07-09 Thread Gonzalez, Alex
Do you need the extra HD space to run an eseutil defrag on EX2000? -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 10:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Is that before or after it falls asleep at 9pm?

RE: hard drive space

2003-07-09 Thread Henderson Richard
Yes -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 09 July 2003 15:59 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: hard drive space Do you need the extra HD space to run an eseutil defrag on EX2000? -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: hard drive space

2003-07-09 Thread Martin Blackstone
Before of course. Who the hell smokes in bed? -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 7:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: hard drive space Is that before or after it falls asleep at 9pm?

RE: hard drive space

2003-07-09 Thread Martin Blackstone
Yes, regardless of your Exch version. -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 7:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: hard drive space Do you need the extra HD space to run an eseutil defrag on EX2000? -Original

RE: hard drive space

2003-07-09 Thread Gonzalez, Alex
Great so what do you do if you have a 50GB data store on 60GB drives? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 11:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Yes, regardless of your Exch version. -Original Message- From: Gonzalez,

RE: hard drive space

2003-07-09 Thread Henderson Richard
Redirect the temp file -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 09 July 2003 16:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: hard drive space Great so what do you do if you have a 50GB data store on 60GB drives? -Original Message- From: Martin

RE: hard drive space

2003-07-09 Thread Martin Blackstone
There are command switches that enable you to redirect it to another drive. You can also redirect it to a mapped drive on another box. This will of course affect the performance of the defrag though. -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July

Re: hard drive space

2003-07-09 Thread Andy David
You can also run eseutil locally on a non-exchange server that has space on any databases copied over from the prod server. - Original Message - From: Henderson Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 11:09 AM Subject: RE: hard

RE: hard drive space

2003-07-09 Thread Henderson Richard
Not sure, Martins answer covered what I have done in the past. It is a jet direct utility so as long as you have the .edb .stm files you may be able to. Anyone know? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 09 July 2003 16:15 To: Exchange Discussions

RE: hard drive space - OT Story

2003-07-09 Thread Bob Sadler
Just wanted to pass on this little tale of mine: A while back, my boss in his infinite wisdom, decided to install some software for his APC Backup Units on the Exchange/Web server. While I frown on him installing anything more on this machine, like I said, he's the boss. Today though, when I

Re: hard drive space

2003-07-09 Thread Andy David
Not sure about what? If you can do it? Technet article: 244525 - Original Message - From: Henderson Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 11:18 AM Subject: RE: hard drive space Not sure, Martins answer covered what I have

RE: hard drive space - OT Story

2003-07-09 Thread Christopher Hummert
My boss doesn't know the admin password. Things are safer that way, though if I was to die or something like that he has a way to get the password -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Sadler Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 8:21 AM To:

RE: hard drive space

2003-07-09 Thread Henderson Richard
Well that answers that, the answer is yes. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 09 July 2003 16:24 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: hard drive space Not sure about what? If you can do it? Technet article: 244525 - Original Message -

RE: hard drive space

2003-07-09 Thread Matt
Ok got the go ahead to add 2 drives. I'll add the drives mirror and then run 5.5 optimization to move to new drives. I had just installed exchange svp 4, I would have thought I had already rec'd latest ver of store!! Will check. The system was running CA av but I stopped all the services for

RE: [Exchange2000] Public Folders Restore

2003-07-09 Thread John Matteson
The public folder was deleted through the ESM utility, not via Outlook. It looks like I'll be building a recovery server, air-gapped from the production network and getting some practical experience doing the restore to an offline server. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981

RE: [Exchange2000] Public Folders Restore

2003-07-09 Thread Mike Scott
Ah, I guess it's a restore then. Sounds like an ideal job for the person that used ESM to delete the folders! Mike -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 09 July 2003 17:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Public Folders Restore The

W2KSP4 v. Exchange

2003-07-09 Thread Dflorea
I put SP4 on my W2K/E2K Exchange box last night, and it seems to have broken some functionality, remote users who connect via VPN are unable to connect, and some users cannot view HTML messages. Anyone come across similar behavior? David

RE: [Exchange2000] Public Folders Restore

2003-07-09 Thread John Matteson
sheepishly raises hand John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Mike Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 12:13 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: [Exchange2000] Public Folders

RE: W2KSP4 v. Exchange

2003-07-09 Thread Ward, Stuart
reapply exchange sp? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 12:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: W2KSP4 v. Exchange I put SP4 on my W2K/E2K Exchange box last night, and it seems to have broken some functionality, remote

Outlook freezes on Public Folders

2003-07-09 Thread bmcguire
I have one user whos Outlook 2000 will freeze as soon as she clicks on the public folders. Exchange 2000. She has been able to use public folders until yesterday. This happens on whatever pc she uses (no roaming profiles). I created a new test user using the copy option in ActiveDirectory

Whitepaper on Microsoft's Exchange 2003 installation

2003-07-09 Thread John Matteson
Does anyone have a link to a whitepaper or other document that explains Microsoft's reputed 8 Node cluster installation of Exchange 2003? We are looking at methods of increasing availability to users and this is something my boss is interested in. Thanks. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404)

Re: Whitepaper on Microsoft's Exchange 2003 installation

2003-07-09 Thread Andy David
Not sure if its 8 nodes, but you can start here and look around: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=/support/exch2000/exchangelib.asp Dont be fooled by the exch2000 reference in the link. - Original Message - From: John Matteson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions

bridgehead/smtp best practices?

2003-07-09 Thread Steve B
I seem to be involved in a bit of philosophical debate and want to get opinions from the field on this. Basically, I have some service mailboxes that I would prefer not to run on regular mailbox servers. These particular mailboxes do not hold any email, they are simply needed for the cirictal

Public folders in Exchange Server 2003

2003-07-09 Thread Sharma, Shshank
Am wondering if any of you have encountered an issue like this. I am trying to programmatically insert documents into the Exchange Public Folder tree (on Exchange 2003 Server), using VBA (on the Microsoft Outlook 2003 Beta client version 11.4920.2920). The objective is to build a Document

Exchange 5.5 to 2000 Migration

2003-07-09 Thread Sandhya Pai
Hello everyone, Currently we are on a single domain Nt4 and Exchange 5.5 system. We will be merging with the University Exchange 2000 system. The account names of the users will be automatically created and will be different from what we have. My question is, are there any migration tools that

Re: bridgehead/smtp best practices?

2003-07-09 Thread Andy David
I rarely reboot mail servers. That said, if your Exch Server is having problems, those Exch dependent service mailboxes arent going to be doing too much anyway are they? - Original Message - From: Steve B [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July

AutoAccept Script

2003-07-09 Thread Bailey, Matthew
Does anybody have any experience with the AutoAccept Script? I am having a weird problem. I have about 12 conference rooms setup as resources. 5 of the 12 conference rooms return confirmations when the conference room is booked as a resources. The other 7 do not but will work if you add them

RE: AutoAccept Script

2003-07-09 Thread Bailey, Matthew
Sorry, it is an Exchange 2000 server will all the latest updates and the latest version of the AutoAccept script. - Matt Matthew Bailey LAN Engineer CSK Auto, Inc. Voice: 602.631.7486 Fax: 602.294.7486 -Original Message- From: Bailey, Matthew Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 11:28 AM

RE: AutoAccept Script

2003-07-09 Thread Chris Scharff
Is this Robert Strong's script? It's never really been a supported script and is even less so under E2K.[1] There are a couple of alternatives for E2K... I'm going to install ERM for my users (http://www.swinc.com/erm/) during our next outage window. [1] Are all of the conference rooms on the

user limits for Outlook 2000

2003-07-09 Thread Tony Hlabse
I have been looking and have not found the answer. Does anybody remember the amount of users allowed for Outlook 2000 Personal Distribution lists running in an Exchnage 2000 environment. You can change it in Exchnage but that doesn't affect the personal DL or does it.

RE: Whitepaper on Microsoft's Exchange 2003 installation

2003-07-09 Thread John Matteson
Thanks. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 12:58 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Whitepaper on Microsoft's Exchange 2003

Re: user limits for Outlook 2000

2003-07-09 Thread Tony Hlabse
Found what I was looking for. See link http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb%3ben-us%3b238569 From: Tony Hlabse [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: user limits for Outlook 2000 Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2003

RE: user limits for Outlook 2000

2003-07-09 Thread Martin Blackstone
Approx 150 -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 12:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: user limits for Outlook 2000 I have been looking and have not found the answer. Does anybody remember the amount of users allowed for

RE: AutoAccept Script

2003-07-09 Thread Bailey, Matthew
It is the script located referenced here: http://autoaccept-sink.sourceforge.net/ All the conference rooms are on one server. Thanks to Martin Tuip, I was able to find my problem on the known issues list. If an Outlook client has a resource mailbox open and attempts to automatically process an

RE: AutoAccept Script

2003-07-09 Thread Chris Scharff
I don't believe it needs a reboot, but I think some services do need to be stopped/started (been a while since I tested it in my lab, but I'll be doing more shortly before we actually install). I tend to do all software updates during an outage window if at all possible just because one never

RE: AutoAccept Script

2003-07-09 Thread Bailey, Matthew
one never knows when something simple will go pear shaped. Ain't that the truth and it's sig quote material. Thanks again for the help, - Matt Matthew Bailey LAN Engineer CSK Auto, Inc. Voice: 602.631.7486 Fax: 602.294.7486 -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL

POP3 Broken?

2003-07-09 Thread Woods, Tony
Hello, Exchange 5.5 SP3 on NT 4 SP6a I've just found out that POP3 doesn't work on my dfg.com domain. From the command line, internally, I type telnet mail.dfg.com 110 it just sits there and hangs. Alternatively, if I do the same for mail.moneymart.ca, it connects immediately. Again, this is

RE: POP3 Broken?

2003-07-09 Thread Chris Scharff
If you telnet to port 110 on the localhost where your mailbox resides can you connect? To the netbios name? To the IP? Is mail.dfg.com a FE server for your 5.5 environment or the mailbox server itself (i.e. Should you expect it to be listening)? -Original Message- From: Woods, Tony

RE: POP3 Broken?

2003-07-09 Thread Woods, Tony
Hi Chris, Just got this resoloved... After having another cisco admin take a look, there was no mapping for port 110 on the outside to the inside for the server the houses some of the mailboxes that needed it. All fixed up now Love that second opinion [;-) Cheers, Tony -Original

upgrading 5.5 standard to enterprise

2003-07-09 Thread Greg Sachs
We are trying to upgrade a server from Exchange 5.5 standard to Exchange 5.5 enterprise. The server was just build w/ standard - a database restored from another server to be retired w/ the same name. Restore worked fine, had the server running standard edition no problem We then tried to

RE: upgrading 5.5 standard to enterprise

2003-07-09 Thread Greg Sachs
Strangest thing. In taskmgr in addition to setup, there was an instance of xcopy started by the setup. We killed that b4 setup this time, and the setup proceeded, finished successfully... Odd - either way everything is up and running, reporting unlimited storage, and we just reinstalled

RE: Error on Outlook 2000

2003-07-09 Thread Ed Crowley
Not just freebusy. I was thinking of /cleanreminders specifically, but run 'em all. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP One man's Spam is another man's UCE. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 4:08 AM To:

RE: eseutil defrag inconsistency

2003-07-09 Thread Ed Crowley
It is reasonable to expect an inconsistency when the databases aren't consistent? What if you run the defrag twice ON THE SAME DATABASE, i.e., copies from the same unmodifed database? Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Helping others with Exchange for over a twentieth of a century. -Original

RE: hard drive space

2003-07-09 Thread Ed Crowley
You have the latest Exchange 5.5 service pack installed? Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 8:51 AM To:

RE: Outlook freezes on Public Folders

2003-07-09 Thread Ed Crowley
Exactly on what does she click to cause the freeze? Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Protecting the world from PSTs and bricked backups. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 9:50 AM To: Exchange

RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 Migration

2003-07-09 Thread Ed Crowley
NetIQ, Quest and Aelita all have good migration tools. I'm not sure if any of them are particularly well suited to your interesting problem where the user and mailbox names will be changed. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP One man's Spam is another man's UCE. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

RE: bridgehead/smtp best practices?

2003-07-09 Thread Ed Crowley
I also question your assertion that mailbox servers need more frequent reboots. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Helping others with Exchange for over a twentieth of a century. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve B Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003

RE: upgrading 5.5 standard to enterprise

2003-07-09 Thread Ed Crowley
I think you're overcomplicating this. All you should have to do is install Exchange 5.5 Enterprise on top of Standard and reapply the latest service pack, after taking a couple of backups of course. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Helping others with Exchange for over a twentieth of a century.