RE: Exchange 2000 ForestPrep Fails

2003-08-05 Thread Steve Molkentin
Jamie, As I understand it, Forestprep is only meant to be run on a Windows 2000 domain... I am happy to be wrong, however. themolk. -Original Message- From: Jamie Domingue [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 1 August 2003 2:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Greetings, I

RE: New Entourage

2003-08-05 Thread Ben Schorr
An amazing soy substitute! -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 18:00 To: Exchange

SMTP queues WAY backed up

2003-08-05 Thread Hutchins, Mike
I have googled my butt off, and I have cranked up logging. I cannot get this one. All the smtp queues go into retry almost immediatelly. Help? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface:

Strange relay problem

2003-08-05 Thread jimlam
Please help! We have a strange relay problem, Exchange 2000 SP3 with Post-SP3 rollup, and we are hosting multiple domain in the Exchange server. We have setup relaying as stated everywhere, we allow only computers to send from internal network or have authenticated, and also selected all three

Re: How to undo public folder delete

2003-08-05 Thread Chris Scharff
Search support.microsoft.com for 'DumpsterAlwaysOn' if you have deleted items retention enabled on the PF stores. Search for Disaster Recovery Whitepaper' if you don't. From: Vivek Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 17:04:55 -0700

RE: OWA Question

2003-08-05 Thread Dan Bartley
http://Servername/exchange/mailboxname/calendar Best Regards, Dan Bartley -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 08:29 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Question I thought for some reason that you could view others

RE: Sychronization logs

2003-08-05 Thread Hurst, Paul
Tony, I sad to say that we still use Outlook 2000 as our client and when using it with 5.5 it generates a log if it's successful or not. Don't know when it is connected to Ex 2000. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From:

RE: Requesting Data from Exchange Server too much

2003-08-05 Thread Jose Manzano
Hum.. When I do a route print I see the routing table referencing routes to this network from both cards... So what I'm thinking is ... Clients sends request to Exchange Servers first nic with IP X.X.X.1 Server sees request and sends back info from NIC2,different

RE: Sychronization logs

2003-08-05 Thread Bendall, Paul
I am still using Exch 5.5 with Outlook 2000 in offline mode. It isn't saving a synch file for me either. Paul -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 05 August 2003 14:42 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sychronization logs Well contacted a power user

Re: New Entourage

2003-08-05 Thread Chris Scharff
You are using the Exchange service? From: Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 10:43:54 -0400 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: New Entourage I can't get the darn thing to do active directory

RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003

2003-08-05 Thread Eric Holtzclaw
Does not work with out a upgrade path and is not supported -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 8:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 Are there any restrictions on running Exchange

Re: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003

2003-08-05 Thread Andy David
Other than its not supported, none. - Original Message - From: Pennell, Ronald B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 11:48 AM Subject: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 Are there any restrictions on running Exchange 2000 on a

RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003

2003-08-05 Thread Martin Blackstone
It is not supported. The only version of Exchange supported on W2K3 is E2K3 -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 8:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 Are there any restrictions on

RE: AV/Spam scanning services

2003-08-05 Thread Crumbaker, Ron
I'm considering going with an outside SPAM/AV company. However, my manager feels that we don't need to put AV on our Exchange server if we do...so I am considering going just with AV/SPAM on our Exchange server and keeping everything in house. I was considering using MX Logic Defense Level 3 and

RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003

2003-08-05 Thread Bob Sadler
What? I thought it was the other way around? OK, for those in the know, please clear this up. You upgrade Exchange first, then OS? Or OS first, then Exchange? Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA WAN/Internet Specialist 913-339-6700 x194 Get a Life! Get TWO! Play Second Life!

Re: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003

2003-08-05 Thread Chris Scharff
The AD schema has nothing to do with it. You can install an E2K3 server into a Windows 2000 domain and the E2K3 install will extend the schema appropriately. http://www.mail-resources.com/modules.php?op=modloadname=Newsfile=article; sid=324mode=threadorder=0 From: Eric Holtzclaw [EMAIL

RE: AV/Spam scanning services

2003-08-05 Thread Martin Blackstone
Well, consider this. You have no AV on your Exchange server. Joe User decides to check his hotmail account and accidentally unleashes a nice mail virus. Now this virus is going to head straight for your OL contact or the GAL and promptly infect every mailbox on the network. Nice huh?

RE: MIMAIL virus

2003-08-05 Thread Dickenson, Steven
As has McAfee Groupshield. Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Wilson, Fenton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 12:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MIMAIL virus

RE: Exchange 2000 ForestPrep Fails

2003-08-05 Thread Jeff Beckham
What's the LDAP port set to on the exchange 5.5 server that you are pointing forestprep to? If it is anything other than 389, forestprep can get upset and return this error. Jeff -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jamie Domingue Posted At:

RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003

2003-08-05 Thread Pennell, Ronald B.
OK, next question: If my DC is a w2k3 server, can I add w2k servers (member servers) with exchange 2000. And then upgrade to exchange 2003 later? -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions

GAL Question

2003-08-05 Thread Bridges, Samantha
Hello All. In Exchange 5.5 I created Address Book Views. I had a view for each department. When I did an in-place upgrade on a test environment, the GAL views did not convert. How do I recreate the views in Exchange 2000. In Exchange 5.5, I configured through the Administrator program to

RE: Looking for POP3 Spam solution

2003-08-05 Thread Christopher Hummert
Try Spam Assassin: http://us.spamassassin.org/where.html It's free. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shotton Jolyon Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 10:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Looking for POP3 Spam solution

Rules in error

2003-08-05 Thread Rob Ellis
Might be a simple one - I think I must be missing something obvious here! Outlook XP sp2 Exchange 2000 sp3 User has no rules - has deleted them all. User opens outlook, gets an error: Rules in Error Rule: Server-Requested Client Action Error: MoveCopy Unable to create dest msg I've run

RE: AV/Spam scanning services

2003-08-05 Thread Etts, Russell
Hi there I have used Frontbridge - good but pricey. Singlefin is good and much less expensive - but small. We're testing Postini right now. My opinion - Singlefin, then Postini. HTH Russell -Original Message- From: Michael Brownell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 04,

Re: Problems with forwarding attachments received from the internet

2003-08-05 Thread Andy David
Its from (MCCrappy) NAI... http://www.nai.com/us/products/mcafee/antivirus/email/category.htm - Original Message - From: Pennell, Ronald B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 7:50 AM Subject: RE: Problems with forwarding

RE: MIMAIL virus

2003-08-05 Thread Steck, Herb
we have been okjust noticing that it is increasing in volume past 36 hours. -Original Message- From: Wilson, Fenton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 11:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MIMAIL virus Trend has been blocking it nicely since last

RE: New Entourage

2003-08-05 Thread Couch, Nate
I am going to stick with OL for Mac 2001. It works well enough for me. Certainly better than Entourage in this MS Exchange environment. -- From: Holstrom, Don Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Tuesday, August 5, 2003 1:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions

RE: Sychronization logs

2003-08-05 Thread Tony Hlabse
Well contacted a power user who uses Outlook 100% in offline mode. He had an issue with Synch and since created a new OST he has not seen another log file in his deleted items folder except for the first time. He synchs every 10 minutes and logs on and off everyday. So this backs up what I have

RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003

2003-08-05 Thread Steve
According to the deployment guide: Before you install Exchange Server 2003, ensure that your network and servers meet the following system-wide requirements: • Domain controllers are running Windows 2000 Server Service Pack 3 (SP3) or Windows Server 2003. • Global catalog servers are

RE: New Entourage

2003-08-05 Thread Woodruff, Michael
I can't get the darn thing to do active directory lookups? Where do you specify the cn to the account to use to do searches? -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 12:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Entourage An

OT: problem with GFI FaxMaker

2003-08-05 Thread Fyodorov, Andrey
Hi all. I hope that someone here has had some experience with GFI FaxMaker. We have it here running on our Exchange 2000 environment. It works well for the most part. However sometimes it gets stuck and starts spitting out .IST files instead of TIFFs. The person in charge of FaxMaker project

RE: New Entourage

2003-08-05 Thread Woodruff, Michael
Yes sir. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 10:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: New Entourage You are using the Exchange service? From: Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL