SV: RPC over HTTP - username/password are refused

Hi there ! Yes I have used Basic Authentication under Exchange - Proxy setting up the client. Under security pane, (hope this is correct translated - Iám using a Danish client) I have NOT selected - Crypter data beetween client and exchange I have NOT selected - Ask alwyas after

language issue

My NDR's are suddenly in another language. How can I revert them back to English and how is this possible? Kim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface:

RE: Hot off the Fixes....

Thank you very much for all your information! Russell -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 4:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hot off the Fixes The newsfeed is http://www.thundermain.com/rss/ I use

Warnings after installing patch for MS03-046

Hi list We just installed this patch on our E2k SP3 running on win2k SP4 and immediately after that we started to get these warnings - several every minute : EVENTLOG : Application EVENT TYPE : WARNING (2) SOURCE : MSExchangeTransport CATEGORY : Exchange Store Driver EVENT ID : 350 TIME :

Warnings after installing patch for MS03-046

Hi list We just installed this patch on our E2k SP3 running on win2k SP4 and immediately after that we started to get these warnings - several every minute : EVENTLOG : Application EVENT TYPE : WARNING (2) SOURCE : MSExchangeTransport CATEGORY : Exchange Store Driver EVENT ID : 350 TIME :

RE: A new post in every Public Folder, or how to force a backfill ...

Catching up and wanted to put some extra documentation on this issue and we found zero-help on this through Google Groups and this list when we experienced it. Jane Dumke Messaging Manager University of Wisconsin - Stevens Point mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] phone:(715)346-2463 fax:(715)346-4577

Public Folder Traffic from SMTP sever routing to New Server In Site

We recently added 3 new servers to our Ex2K, SP3 site (W2K, SP4). We noticed that all traffic coming through our front-end servers addressed to public folders is being routed through one of the new servers. The new server has a public folder store, but none of the PFs that the messages are

RE: FIXED RE: [Exchange2000] Problems with E2K SP3 bridgehead

Sounds like that feature was an afterthought... I think it actually was. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions

Outlook 2003.

We are currently running Exchange 5.5 and are looking at moving to Exchange 2003 and skipping Exchange 2000. We are currently running Outlook 2002 on our client systems. My question is... Are there any reasons not to begin moving our client desktops to Outlook 2003? Does anyone know of any

RE: Outlook 2003.

There has been an issue raised with the store.exe service crashing with outlook 2003 clients being used in some cases. MS has released a store.exe patch that fixes it. One exch 5.5 server out 36 we have had this issue, and the patch fixed it. Anthony L. Sollars Technology Consultant Information

RE: Outlook 2003.

OL 2003 works great with Exchange 5.5 If you use OWA, there is hotfix you will want to install to ensure compatability with OL2003 and E55 OWA users. There is also one for OL2003 rules that can cause issues with Exchange 5.5. If I could remember the KB numbers I would post them. -Original

RE: Outlook 2003.

Sure, do it. Outlook 2003 is really nice. We are upgrading from 2000 straight to 2003. What a difference! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 7:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook 2003. We are currently

RE: Outlook 2003.

Martin, Here is the one for OL2003 causing issues with the Ex5.5 store. http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=829418 829418 - XADM: Information Store Intermittently Stops Responding and an Access Violation Occurs in EcDSDNFromSz -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL

NDR Question

Hi everyone, I was wondering , if there is a way I can stop NDR to senders and still have copies of NDRs sent to a mailbox within same exchange organization ? I looked all KB but couldn't find a way to do this. I'm running Exchange 2k-SP3. Any help or direction in this regards will be greatly

RE: NDR Question

Why would you do that? NDR's are a very necessary tool. How is someone that is trying to email the CEO know that his important message did not get delivered? -Original Message- From: Gagrani, Kishore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 9:39 AM To: Exchange

RE: [SPAM-FILT] - RE: NDR Question - Number of numbers in MIME From exceeds maximum threshold

I'm sorry , I meant blocking SMTP sender's NDR . Essentially trying to block SPAMMERS a response for those mails which bounce back to them because of a wrong e-mail address spelling or mail bound for someone who no more exists with my company. As I wrote we'll manually monitor those mails (as

RE: [SPAM-FILT] - RE: NDR Question - Number of numbers in MIME From exceeds maximum threshold

Make a distribution list that goes nowhere and put those email addresses that you are getting spammed with there. Acts as a blackhole, eating up junk and never gives an NDR :) Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA WAN/Internet Specialist 913-339-6700 x194 Get a Life! Get TWO! Play Second

Exchange 2000 Web Public Folder Setup Issue

Hi All, I am experiencing a wierd issue when making a new Web Store in Public folders to develop in. I start by doing the following: 1. Create a new Public Folder Tree 2. Create a New Public store and bind it to new tree 3. Create an HTTP entry in the HTTP protocals for the new tree and add

Active Directory/Exchange 2000 Failover Question

HI Everyone, We are running Ad in our environment with Exchange 2000. We have 2 AD servers in the same site and only 1 server has all FSMO roles (we havent gotten a chance to move them yet). For some reason when one of our DC's failed (the one with all the FSMO roles), our other DC did not

RE: Outlook 2003.

Does Outlook 2003 have the same licensing setup as the other versions? That is, I have an Exchange 2000 server, and licenses for Office 2000. Can I install Outlook 2003 on workstations using the Exchange CALs? Thanks, Erick -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: Outlook 2003.

Check with your MS licensing rep for exact details. I was told that each Exchange 2003 CAL includes a license to use Outlook 2003, but not all of Office. I don't believe that you can use Exchange 2000 CAL's do to this, though. Again, to be sure, check with MS. They are the only ones authorized

RE: Outlook 2003.

I agree with checking with MS licensing rep however, I've never assumed that a license to use Outlook was a license to use Office but quite the opposite. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday,

Exchange 2000 and DS tolpology query

Hi All, How can I speed up the DS topology Query for Exchange 2000? Right now its about every 15 minutes. When my AD fails, it takes 15 minutes for it to fail over. Thans about 14 minutes too long for our executive staff. Any suggestions? Timothy

RE: Outlook 2003.

http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/howtobuy/LicensingFAQ.asp This may answer some of your questions. I know it's confusing. Check with your licensing rep to be sure (and for your own legal protection). You must have the latest version of an Exchange CAL in order to use the latest version of

RE: Outlook 2003.

So true Even then I have gotten conflicting answers. I have been told that we have purchased everything. I am just dragging my feet until there is service pack released for Exchange 2003. That is how I got buy-off for skipping 2000 and going straight to 2003. At TechEd they made it seem that

RE: NDR Question

Thanks Bob. Kishore -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 12:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: [SPAM-FILT] - RE: [SPAM-FILT] - RE: NDR Question - Number of numbers in MIME From exceeds maximum threshold - Number of numbers

Can't recover some deleted public folders

Hi all. We are having a hard time trying to recover some public folders that have been deleted (using Tools-Recover Deleted Items) With Outlook 2000, we get an immediate error message saying that we don't have permissions to do this. (We do have all the permissions needed) With Outlook 2003,

RE: Active Directory/Exchange 2000 Failover Question

Is your other server (the one that didn't fail) also a GC? You'll have all sorts of problems if you don't have a live GC anywhere on your network. JC -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Timothy Schilbach Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 1:00

RE: Active Directory/Exchange 2000 Failover Question

Hi There, Thank for the reply. Yes it is, but I think I found the answer and the solution. Its documented here: http://www.winnetmag.com/MicrosoftExchangeOutlook/Article/ArticleID/25332/MicrosoftExchangeOutlook_25332.html This did the trick nicely by allowing me to increase the DS auery

Re: Can't recover some deleted public folders

Hi There, This is happerning because the folder is 'tombstoned' in your direcyry. This means if its recovered, the GUIDbound to it is picked up by the system attendant again and is deleted. The way to get arround thsi to so: 1. Restore the folder in a non production environement 2. sweep

RE: Outlook 2003.

I don't think I was totally clear. I was wondering if the Exchange CAL allowed me to use Outlook 2003 only (not all of Office). I wouldn't assume that it would allow me to use all of office. We're on Office 2k, and will stick with that for a little bit longer, but I would like to move to

RE: Outlook 2003.

And I am saying you have to check with MS Licensing to get a straight answer. I was told that each Exchange 2003 CAL included a license for Outlook 2003. Personally, I would not think that an Exchange 2000 CAL covers Outlook 2003, but hey, I'm don't work for Microsoft. They have an 800 number

RE: Hot off the Fixes....

It appears that MS03-046 (829436) is a duplicate of September Post SP3 Rollup. I have checked several files to have the same date, size and version. SPMSG.DLL and SPUNINST.EXE is missing from the \Bin directory however. Should I reinstall it nonetheless? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

RE: Can't recover some deleted public folders

Doesn't sound like fun. Our PF store is 100GB. It takes a day and then some to restore it from tape. -Original Message- From: Timothy Schilbach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 3:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Can't recover some deleted public

PF wierdness

Hey guys, I am using MicroEye's script director to document forms in our Ex5.5 environment. The tool is hanging on a folder and I am currently having them custom code something for me. I am trying to go ahead and fix the problem for myself to save time and money but I can't avoid the hang.

RE: Can't recover some deleted public folders

Weird thing, we just explained to the user who actually deleted the PF how to use DumpsterAlwaysOn, and she was able to recover the PF. -Original Message- From: Timothy Schilbach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 3:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re:

RE: Can't recover some deleted public folders

Hello, I've had this happen in our environment, and so far the only thing I can trace it to is PFs created pre-Exchang2K and the upgrade. There are various Q articles that'll recommend ISINTEG, and some other things. You should obviously give those a shot, but they never solved the problem for

SMTP relay to a nonstandard port

Is there any way to use the Windows 2000 SMTP relay to route email for a particular domain to a non-standard port on another server? When I set the host for the relay, along with the port, I get an error that the domain name is not valid. If I don't specify the port, I don't get the error.

Exchange 2003 Install Problems

I am installing the first 2003 server in a 5.5 site. I have done all the forest and domain prep work as well as the rest using the excellent guide they now have when installing Exchange 2003. BUT . . . when installing the server itself I get this error when trying to select the Messaging and

RE: Exchange 2003 Install Problems

Who are you installing Exchange as? Try installing it as the user you specified as the Exchange Admin during the Forestprep/domainprep steps. You will probably need to delegate control to your user account as that superuser to be able to install Exchange 2003. This is what I had to do to

Missing Meetings in Outlook 2000

I have a user that is unable to view meetings in her Outlook Calendar. The date that the meeting occurs is in bold, but when you look at the date there are no meetings that appear for that day. To make things more interesting, I had her log into our Outlook Web Access, and all of her meetings

OWA and URLScan-Blocked Special Characters

OK, we all know that when you run Urlscan on an Exchange server that you will not be able to view certain notes in OWA, specifically those notes with special characters in the subject line. The special characters are below, along with the reason, according to MS documentation, that these should

Please check my setup

I'm doing a fairly massive reconfiguration of my email infrastructure, and I would really appreciate it if you could check my setup for problems. The system will behave in the following way. I have two servers, an external web server, and an internal Exchange 2000 server. I set up an SMTP Relay

Help! Mail Queue is all blocked up...

Hello everyone, I am running Exchange 2000 on an internal server. I am publishing the SMTP Service on my ISA Box, and I am routing all my mail to Xwall (a popular Spam package) which in turn routes mail to the Exchange Box. Xwall runs on Port 25, and Exchange SMTP (incoming) runs on Port 24 (so

FW: RE: Just Released - Digital Cable Descrambler 3899

UNLOCK Digital Cable - FREE! ***NEWEST VERSION - Released September 4, 2003*** * Sporting PPVs like Wrestling Boxing * Adult Channels * Special Musical Concerts * Blockbuster New Release PPV Movies Cheapest Price on the NET !! Only $39 !

RE: RE: Just Released - Digital Cable Descrambler 3899

Larry = pst = bad. themolk. P.S. I wish he was the M:\ drive... -Original Message- From: Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 17 October 2003 7:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: FW: RE: Just Released - Digital Cable Descrambler 3899 UNLOCK Digital Cable - FREE!