Can you open the users mailbox logged in as you ?
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 29 January 2003 22:01
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: EXMERGE ERROR
Ie Exchange admin privs, not just domain admin.
-Original Message-
From:
If its exchange 2k then it's always IIS as it uses its SMTP service.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 29 November 2002 13:38
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP banner
Charles,
I've tried telnetting to port 25 on an Exchange and a straight IIS
Your send MTA may be routing mail from another IP address which doesn't
match you MX records, so I believe. That is, your mx records for
ownewilliams.co.uk is 193.133.143.82 with the highest preference. If
you send mail via another IP address not in the MX records, then they
will reject your
May have been asked before...
Is there a reg hack that can stop outlook 2k2 from sending RR's and NR's
when in cooperate mode ?
TIA
Ad
www.networkdefence.com
**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential
this for read receipts? Whats a NR?
-Original Message-
From: Adam Romain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 6:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook 10 reg hack to stop RR's and NR's
May have been asked before...
Is there a reg hack that can stop outlook
about anymore. Tools/Options/Email OPtions/Tracking
Options - It works in Corp Mode. You should have SP1 installed as well
so it works right.
-Original Message-
From: Adam Romain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 7:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook
Is there such a tool that will convert Windows Media player files to
good old fashioned WAV files ?
Rgds
Ad
**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or
You have leaky memory.
Performance monitor, Task manager. Use these tools to find the culprit
and then . Chop it out/upgrade etc...
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 24 April 2002 17:24
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: scheduling
the sending SMTP connector give
up and try the next MX record pref, i.e immediately or after a certain
retry parameter ?
TIA
Adam Romain
**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely
, all of them should be
tried before a message is deemed undeliverable.
Try. http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc974.html
Matt
- Original Message -
From: Adam Romain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 5:50 AM
Subject: DNS behaviour
Cheers Bud.
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 April 2002 13:05
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: DNS behaviour with MX preferences...
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, at 10:50am, Adam Romain wrote:
If mailgate1 is always available
Quick one guys, just prove I have it right...or wrong...
I have an NT4.0 domain that I do not want to upgrade. I want to install
a new clean windows 2000 domain, install Exchange 2000 server and have a
trust between the old NT4.0 and the new 2000 domain, so users can log on
and get their email
It must have been the Easter Bunny!
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 02 April 2002 13:21
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: disaster
I have a situation. We have an office in London and it was robbed last
night. They took our exchange server
Whoever said the monarchy is dying ?
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Beeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 22 February 2002 17:05
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Multi-2000 domain
Currently, I have a single 5.5 site in a single domain. We are planning
to keep 5.5
We have a customer based in the UK, who has a branch office in France.
We supply them with content and web access control for the whole
company.
In France though, we have been told that we cannot filter web-access,
i.e. use products like Web-sense etc. because of their human rights.
Same applies
: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 19 February 2002 14:14
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: French restrictions
You should probably be talking to a lawyer.
-Original Message-
From: Adam Romain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 6:07 AM
Silversands
http://www.silversands.co.uk
Microsoft Gold Certified Partner
For Enterprise Systems
For Collaborative Solutions
-Original Message-
From: Adam Romain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 19 February 2002 14:15
Posted To: Exchange Mailing List
Conversation: French restrictions
..and the answer to number 1 was - Yes. They are using 'deliver to
personal folders' on the delivery tab in their mailbox service
properties.
-Original Message-
From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 19 February 2002 15:22
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: mailboxes
://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now!
The quest for certainty blocks the search for meaning. Uncertainty is
the very condition to impel man to unfold his powers. - Erich Fromm
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Adam Romain
Sent: Tuesday, February 19
Are all these users in the same subnet 10.0.0.0 ?
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16 February 2002 20:23
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Relay blues
I know this is fairly easy issue and discussed before but I don't
understand why some users are
Using emerge and some clever switches in the .ini file you could achieve
this quite easily.
Look at the utility from ms support to remove the loveletter virus.
Same sort of Idea..
Adam
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 February 2002 16:42
Is it to do with the wording RE. The PST's ?
I now exactly the problem but couldn't find a solution.
-Original Message-
From: Bob P. Antonietti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 12 February 2002 12:55
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Your Mailbox is over it's Limit Message
Hello.
I
and Mailsweeper for Exchange etc. I
believe Exchange should have perimeter security for performance and
reliability issues.
Any suggestions ?
Ps .I have free choice of firewall. Currently, I don't know of any
firewalls that can proxy x400 and use CVP.
Rgds
Adam Romain
of an
issue and should NEVER take precedence over safety.
-Original Message-
From: Adam Romain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 5:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: X400 virus scanning.
Guys,
I have a large org with a huge x400 connection topology. I'm
I used the same method with a corrupt priv.edb. It was 12Gb in size and
near enough the same on the new server. Make sure you follow the
details for public folder replication too.
When I ran the eseutil (in tests) I lost the attachment table. It
depends where the corruption is, you may be
I do for a law firm.
They have mail printed that is sent to internet rcpts and received from
the internet. I used a mail relay to duplicate the message to an
internal mailbox and have a dedicated PC with a printer print any
message that had certain words in the message header, i.e. ' received:
the pre-requisites section.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 01 February 2002 17:37
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: I'm confused now!
Sure about that?
-Original Message-
From: Adam Romain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday
PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Adam Romain
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 2:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: I'm confused now!
Not at all. Still, I'm learning the hard way (due to go on course in a
few weeks though) What I was trying to get at is that you need to ensure
that at least one
Use the power of TechNet search
-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 01 February 2002 14:17
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Event ID 290
Ok, now Event 290's are common for exchange. When it gives you the
message in the event, where can you find
Exchange 2k can only run one there is at least one win2k server running
in Native mode in your domain.
-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 01 February 2002 17:16
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: I'm confused now!
My existing MSX 5.5 server is in
-Original Message-
From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 31 January 2002 11:27
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Folder problem
It isn't anything stupid like your mailbox has reached its limit is it?
That error pops up when you try to move things around the your
www.cdolive.com
-Original Message-
From: Wynkoop, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 31 January 2002 16:53
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: outlook programming
To do what?
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31,
dsfijj
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 31 January 2002 16:19
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: E-mail and Compaq iPaq's
I'm going to address this question to Ed Missy primarily, since I'm
assuming that working at Compaq, they have a lot
-Original Message-
From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 31 January 2002 16:25
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: E-mail and Compaq iPaq's
You just need to select which additional folders you want to sync in
ActiveSync. No magic involved. Did you look at the
-Original Message-
From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 31 January 2002 12:03
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Could not open one or more attachments!
Typically where I see this is that your AV scanner hasn't had enough
time to scan the attahcment due to it's size.
are running and that your network is
available, and then try connecting again.
I've tried different switches/lan cables etc.
Any ideas ?
Help is greatly appreciated
Adam Romain
Network Defence Ltd.
www.networkdefence.com
Guys,
Does anyone know of such a tool or a command that can find out what
groups exist and what users belong to them ?
TIA
Adam Romain
**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely
to them ... ?
Are we talking NT local/global groups?
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Computer Support Analyst
Network Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Adam Romain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 07 January 2002 10:20
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: Command
The server you moved too, is it a PDC/BDC or a stand alone ?
Does it have a computer account in/from the original domain ? If not,
you won't be able to start it.
-Original Message-
From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 30 November 2001 15:34
To: Exchange Discussions
How big is your Store ?
-Original Message-
From: Gavin Rewell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 November 2001 10:44
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 restarting server - RAID controller at fault?
Hi there Daniel,
There is NOTHING in the event log, the DPT Storage
Everyone is on Thanks Giving Holidays.
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 November 2001 14:53
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: WHERE IS EVERYONE
Anyone out there? Wakie Wakie
_
Me 3.
-Original Message-
From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 November 2001 14:54
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: WHERE IS EVERYONE
Ditto.
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Computer Support Analyst
Network Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original
Solutions Programmes
IBM Global Services
DDI: 01256 752845
Mobile: 07974 111867
Fax: 01256 754899
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Adam Romain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2001 2:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: WHERE
Listers,
I have a situation where I need to import a whole bunch of email data in
to Exchange 5.5. or Exchange 2k, not fussy.
The problem with the data is the way it is formatted, although I can
have it hosed in to a SQL server/access database etc. then reformatted.
The format of the data
it in the server.
Depending on the size with that data you could Send it all to the server
with a script and something like BLAT.
Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Adam Romain
Sent: Wednesday, November 21
MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
-Original Message-
From: Adam Romain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 10:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Migration of mail data
Listers,
I have
Happy Thanks Giving Mr Bush America!
http://www.guardian.co.uk/bush/graphic/0,7367,602463,00.html
-Original Message-
From: Joel Musheno [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 November 2001 16:53
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: turkey
not us, we will be here friday as well. So
What version of Exchange ?
Stop IIS/Do not publish the website/Deny each user access through
protocol rights/Don't install it !!
-Original Message-
From: may [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 November 2001 12:09
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA stop
i want to stop the OWA
Tell us then!!
-Original Message-
From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 November 2001 17:30
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cache file in Outlook?
Nevermind I found it.
Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL
Ah! You mean Q287623
Thanks
: )
-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 November 2001 19:00
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cache file in Outlook?
Search for reset nickname in the knowledge base.
-Original Message-
From: Adam
that's in 2.0. Don, can you confirm or deny that?
I seem to recall that in 1.2 the machines have to be powered on already,
and then you use the PCM service. But we don't do that.
-Original Message-
From: Adam Romain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 11:25 AM
All,
Would anyone have any suggestions to alternates to SMS and LANDesk.
Picture is this:
650 users, 1 site, all win95/98 win NT4.0 servers. Need to rollout
software upgrades, patches, etc. Keep asset management. Run remote
desktop control for support etc.
Any suggestions would greatly be
: Alternates to SMS and Intel LANDesk
With those site requirements you sound like a textbook case for SMS 1.2.
I
know about 2.0 and its good points, but for stability and reliability, I
gotta say 1.2 Rules.
-Original Message-
From: Adam Romain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October
only talk to *ME*!
-Original Message-
From: Adam Romain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 12:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OFF TOPIC : Alternates to SMS and Intel LANDesk
can you remote manage client with SMS ?
i.e. see and control their desktop
know about 2.0 and its good points, but for stability and reliability, I
gotta say 1.2 Rules.
-Original Message-
From: Adam Romain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 3:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OFF TOPIC : Alternates to SMS and Intel LANDesk
All,
Would
off?
Ed Crowley
Compaq Computer
--- Adam Romain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it's not as simple as that.
Anyway, I've found a possible solution.
There is a reg hack where you can run an .exe at log
off.
Simply make the .exe cmd /c c:\logoffscript.bat
Bingo!
Yet to be tested though
-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 September 2001 16:43
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic - Running .bat's or .exe's at log off ?
Your users actually log off?
Ed Crowley
Compaq Computer
--- Adam Romain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it's not as simple
...
That's strange... What pray tell would one want to run after a user
logs off?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Adam Romain
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 7:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic - Running .bat's
.bat's or .exe's at log off ?
I would love to see that
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Adam Romain
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 10:38
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic - Running .bat's or .exe's at log off ?
one
on the desktop and they vaporize as soon as they logoff.
-Original Message-
From: Adam Romain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 10:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic - Running .bat's or .exe's at log off ?
one would like to clean up scripts that got
backup and restore to an alternate location preserving file permissions
if you can.
Adam Romain
Technical Consultant
Network Defence
http://www.networkdefence.com
-Original Message-
From: David Ng [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 September 2001 03:23
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject
It would do the job, but even the native winnt backup program can do it.
I'm not an Arcserve fan, so I would recomend using the native backup.
Regards
Adam Romain
Technical Consultant
Network Defence
http://www.networkdefence.com
-Original Message-
From: David Ng [mailto:[EMAIL
Restores will not recreate the shares.
Adam Romain
Technical Consultant
Network Defence
http:://www.networkdefence.com
-Original Message-
From: Ian Midgley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 September 2001 09:34
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NT 4 related question.
Restore
63 matches
Mail list logo
