If they have allowed SSL, then I think they have a reasonable security
posture. As long as you keep the OWA server patched are have run IIS
Lockdown tool, you should be in reasonable shape. Not ideal, nor the
best security posture possible, but in reasonable shape non the less.
Dennis
Robert,
Our Exchange 2000 servers are connected to an EMC CX600 on a SAN. We are using Legato
for our backup. The Legato server is a Sun e450.
Denny
-Original Message-
From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 3/21/2003 10:47 AM
1) Do you really want to interupt you users twice in the same day?
Once when the problem occurs and then again when it is resolved?
2) How many Storage Groups do you have on each node. Is it possible
when both fail you have to many Storage Groups?
3) Not sure.
-Original Message-
If you have a FrontEnd/BackEnd arcitecture, OWA will fail if you disable
HTTP on the BackEnd server.
Denny
-Original Message-
From: Miller, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 3:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: WWW Service on Exchange 2000 server
Tim,
I believe the Standard version of Exchange is limited to 1 Storage group
and 1 database.
Denny
-Original Message-
From: Hooks, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 8:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Number of Storage Groups?
Hello All,
I am
Yanek,
I just completed a similar issue. I also had seen the article you
mention about resetting the system folders. This seemed like a bad idea
to me. I called PSS and they walked me through a process which resolved
the issue. I don't think I could recreate all the steps, and your
situation
Send as permissions are not the same as send on behalf of.
Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 12:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Send on behalf of
You need to give them Send As permissions
. Thanks...
-Original Message-
From: Depp, Dennis M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 12:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Send on behalf of
Send as permissions are not the same as send on behalf of.
Dennis
-Original Message
Andrew,
One way to do this is to create two mailboxes and give the user full
privs on each mailbox. The first mailbox will have a default address of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and the second will have the default address of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Hedges
Charles,
We are currently looking into this. The nice thing about BB is it is an
end to end system. MMIS is more flexible in the devices you can use,
but you have to enter your own agreements for air time. I may be over
simplifying this a bit.
Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Charles
of. Is BB still
(a)/an (preferred) option or has MS closed the gap here? tia
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Depp, Dennis M.
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 8:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Blackberry Server
Charles,
We
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Finnesey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 3:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
How is CommValt now a days ?
Ryan,
-Original Message-
From: Depp, Dennis M. [mailto
Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 9:31 AM
Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
How is CommValt now a days ?
Ryan,
-Original Message-
From: Depp, Dennis M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 6:25
on an EMC SAN
And do I really want to buy all those extra expensive EMC disks? And do
I really want to have to stop the Exchange services (albeit briefly) to
do the split?
-Original Message-
From: Depp, Dennis M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 8:16 AM
ago. Things
may have changed since then.
-Original Message-
From: Depp, Dennis M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 1:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
According to the EMC engineers, they can do a hot
We are planning to use Legato in this situation to backup our Exchange
database.
Dennis Depp
-Original Message-
From: Walbert, Bryan (Bryan) % [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 9:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an
Since Titanium has not yet been released to manufacturing yet and given
your time frame of 3 months, I would migrate to Exchange 2000.
Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 2:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Michael,
Mail enable the public folder. Subscribe the public folder email
address to the list. Have the user change his subscription to no email.
This would allow the mail to be sent to the public folder, but still
allow the person to reply to postings.
Dennis Depp
-Original Message-
The biggest fault I have found with Ntbackup is its lack of support for
tape auto-stackers. If that is not a concer for you, I would go with
Ntbackup.
Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 1:35 PM
To: Exchange
Roger and Jeff,
I am also interested in the problems you encountered. We are in the
process of implementing a Dell/EMC solution. I currently have a test
bed up and running and have seen no problems yet.
Thanks
Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I've used Trend and I am very happy with their support. The only other
company I would consider for my Exchange server is Sybari. They have
some very interesting technology.
Dennis Depp
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002
While I agree the mail belongs to the company and the company has the right to review
anyone's email, has that responsiblitiy been passed down simply because I am an
Exchange Administrator? I don't think so. The company has that privlege, but unless
they transfer that responsibility to you, I
I think the general opinion on this list is don't do clusters. I am
currently working to implement a cluster and it does add an additional
level of difficulty. In my opinion, if you are going to use a cluster,
an N+1 senario does give you the cluster technology with less hardware
expense. It
We are considering MS MIS. Is there anything you don't like about it?
Dennis Depp
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 3:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: PDA recommendations for access to Exchange 2000
I would look at either Trend Scanmail for Exchange or Sybari Antigen.
Dennis Depp
-Original Message-
From: Mustafa E. Senyuz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 11:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Antivirus software for exchange.
Hi people,
Which
Jonathan,
Do you have a copy of the NDR?
Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan [mailto:jwright;spectore.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 10:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Incoming Mail not working
I have setup exchange2k in AD domain environment behind a pix
26 matches
Mail list logo
