To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Serbian premier assassinated
Get it right man, it's GEOLOGY! Sheesh sum peeple air so stoopid...
-Original Message-
From: Dillon, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 12:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Serbian premier
Didn't anyone here take Geometry ???
-Original Message-
From: Bernadette Gerber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 2:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Serbian premier assassinated
or George Bush with the rest of what lies south of Canada, either
Saw a Cingular guy on a pole...he says they can't fix w/o duct tape, and
alas, none is to be found
sorry
-Original Message-
From: Bingel, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 4:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blackberry/Cingular down
apparently so--you and others
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:davida;vss.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 7:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
*yawn*
-Original Message-
From: Dillon, Jeff [mailto:JDillon;s-3.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 07
The Republican Imperialist Evangelical Army has just seized the US Congress,
and we're STILL sweating RBLs?
Trust me--there are bigger problems at hand than the failed Admin
RBL-Awareness Week
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff;messageone.com]
Sent: Thursday,
busy network
busy server at one end or the other of the RPC pipe
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bnewman;kempersports.com]
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 2:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: rpc operations/sec
I've been troubleshooting the poor performance of
The picture you linked is a pretty good characterization of an RBL...has
your final question on this list been adequately answered?
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc;noghri.net]
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 12:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
You left space for Serious Sam, I hope
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 5:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Diskkeeper and Exchange- My experience
And 4 years ago Microsoft told you running Exchange
Hooda thunk the 40 wudd be leadin' the dang deal?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 11:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: very OT
Winston Cup?
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL
that'll be $1.05 each and counting
-Original Message-
From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 4:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: What a lag . . .
That's nothing. I have library books that have been overdue for three weeks
now.
Beyond carnivore Tyson's origin has yet to be established -- Lewis *might*
end up looking like Gumby!
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 11:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: It's OT time
Now all we need is for Lewis to
Nothing a little carpet couldn't fix...simply cover the list-server's
blowhole. Shag works fastest
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 8:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Echo...
Echo
In order to make space on your hard drive for the Sealand character set, we
regret that bound-checking of any/all input was forgone
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 3:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
title or mating call?
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 2:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: restore exchange to different hardware
quack
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Nor one that could reliably crash several times a day.
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 5:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server
And no car manufacturer has made a car yet
Just make sure the forgetful Exec's give you permission in writing. As you
point out, they won't remember they did. Then ponder what they'll think if
a sensitive message from their sent ends up in the wrong hands...THEY know
they couldn't have misclicked the recipient.
And so forth...
Can you think of another way to make the sent folder message count be
greater than the number of actually-sent messages. So can I.
-Original Message-
From: Mood, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Sent Item not
You need two levels of admin password...a master that you hold, and personal
admin equivs for the jerks. LET HIM GET SUSPICIOUS because he might stop at
that point.
-Original Message-
From: David Fortuna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 10:02 AM
To: Exchange
For years, under either Outlook 97 or 2000, I've noticed that a folder's
unread message count (which appears to the right of an Outlook folder
shortcut entry) does not consistently reset to zero (about 10% of the time)
after reading all of the messages in the folder and then deleting them. The
It seems that Exchange Admin Advisory #7 applies:
As there are no worthy recipients hosted on AOL/Hotmail, only cursory
efforts shall be employed to determine causes of non-delivery.
see also: SPAM nozzle / Matrix / portal-junkies / attachment Cuisinart
-Original Message-
From:
What's clearly criminal is the length of Damien's disclaimer. The email
thingie is always covered in the company policy manual, the receipt of which
you attest under threat of non-employment.
So when DO we start shooting the lawyers?
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dillon, Jeff
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 11:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Tracking an Email Message
What's clearly criminal is the length of Damien's disclaimer. The email
thingie is always covered in the company
While we're at it, who has the elusive list of expected errors?
-Original Message-
From: Patrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 1:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: ASP error
I get an error message indicvating a problem with ASP it just says
Unexpected
Software mirrored drive failures usually result in a blue screen. The fix
is to repair the faulty drive. Not a DC or ADS issue, but clearly something
that should have been fixed long ago. At $245/pop, its probably a great
revenue-generator.
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Pinquist
1--what do the READMEs say about installation?
2--yes, the service packs work
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 11:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Trial Version
Hi..
Can anyone help me here...
I downloaded a
Did you peak at the Commit Charge memory usage figures prior to your service
restarts? This may help confirm that out-of-memory is really what's
happening.
-Original Message-
From: Kalligonis, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 2:23 PM
To: Exchange
That'd be in 2nd gear, BTW...
-Original Message-
From: Rocky Stefano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 4:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange and NAS
Yeah sure but you can only do 55 on the highway anyways :)
-Original Message-
From:
It means there is one more issue, or one less, depending upon your point of
view.
-Original Message-
From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 5:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Microsoft Security Bulletin MS02-003
What does this mean?
-
Well, they're now in bug-fix mode as you've read, so there's a general
moratorium on desired feature updates as well as the more numerous you want
this--trust us stuff. Probably worth the wait
-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February
Our 98%-effective content filter is simple enough!!!
1) First line of msg ends in !, !!, or especially !!!
2) Just $
3) You've been selected
4) XXX gets the rest
This lets through the subscribed JOD about the two soaking-wet coeds who
rescued a 9-inch rooster from a pond--thereby keeping
. We
look forward to working with you.
(Still can't figure out how to work XXX in there)
-Original Message-
From: Dillon, Jeff [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking spam
Our 98%-effective content filter
A 2-Carat D flawless would be sufficient down-payment for 1 year of my
automated alt.clueless.boss forum.
-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 2:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird Error
I understand that, but
If you have a zero budget or zero boss, don't let the 'ole flyback
capacitor scare you away. There are lotsa useful pots in there that can
fix the focus, the brightness, etc, and you can futz with the magnets if the
screen is lumpy. Likewise, many a monitor has been resurrected by replacing
a
minutes does nothing to discharge the
Capacitor.
-Original Message-
From: Dillon, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 11:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: fix monitor
If you have a zero budget or zero boss, don't let the 'ole flyback
capacitor scare you
#11 -- plan ahead
-Original Message-
From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 4:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Top Ten Statements or Phrases - Year 2001
Dear DL Members,
What were the top ten posts, statements, or phrases of
Thought it was I'm running IE 2.0 and Outlook 97 on Windows 3.1 and I
can't...
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 5:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Top Ten Statements or Phrases - Year 2001
Do you use Outlook?
Easily counteracted by HHCLB [1]
[1] Here He Comes--Look Busy
-Original Message-
From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 1:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Is that a tumbleweed rolling by?
I've mastered sleeping with my eyes open.
.#snd
which list was that on?
-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 2:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Attachment Nazi
Ok, that's scary. Yes, I hate allowing docs, etc. You want to send a pic
of your kid? Zip
Well, you're down to 7 confirmed virus carriers. It's a start
-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 3:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Attachment Nazi
I will only be allowing these attachment types through our
Waiting for the msg recall
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 11:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: System Idle Process
This has *GOT* to be a joke question, right?
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac
MS says (Q263949) and Russ repeats that MAPI-scanning has a potential hole,
but the AVAPI x.0 and shim methods don't (depending of course upon the 3rd
party shim or AVAPI process behavior).
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001
Technologists aren't necessarily good behaviorists.
Change the password on the admin account he may be abusing (don't notify
him), and then give his personal account the permissions needed for his job
description (this you do tell him). If he has half a clue, the mischief
will end. The logs
turn on some perf-mon counters and see whatcha see. be gentle with the
graphing update interval. if you can squeeze in a server restart, you could
possibly be an instant hero.
-Original Message-
From: Leblanc, Shawn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 6:04 PM
Once it's up, Martin will have:
1--even more time to waste here, having attained Email Valhalla
b--reason to believe that extension blocking is the least of the issues
4--both 1 and 3
Place your bets now
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
The girls all acknowledge you're pretty fast.
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS?
Do too... My morning
-I just had a conference call thingie.
Goodbye
-Original Message-
From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 1:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: User Friendly Exchange List
Hello.
- Original Message -
From: Martin Tuip [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL
You have a motherboard that is not W2K-compatible, because that's all that
is left. The good news is that a replacement will only cost about 5% of
amount paid to you (and list members) during this troubleshooting exercise.
-Original Message-
From: Ewart, Vicki L. [mailto:[EMAIL
, August 21, 2001 6:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Apologies
Analogy:
If your dog poops on the floor do you keep putting newspaper under his butt?
Or do you correct him?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dillon, Jeff
Sent: Tuesday
The amount of time that is magically available to scold OOO miscreants in
triplicate makes the claims of time-wasting nuisance ring a bit hollow,
no?
Fess up -- if it isn't spelling, lack of FAQ reading, it would just be
something...else. OOO to the list is a dead horse, and it should be
49 matches
Mail list logo
