I have a rule in outlook that constantly comes up with the following error.
I had a rule called '[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- delete' but it was a bit to
aggressive so I deleted it about a week ago. Now I am coming up with the
following error:
Rule XXX delete can not move mail to the Inbound_Trash
I read through the article but it does not mention the exchsrvr\imcdata
directory. Is it alright to run file based scanning against this directory?
Thanks.
Doug
-Original Message-
From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 8:41 AM
To: Exchange
Thanks,
That really illustrates the differences. I think we will OWA2003
^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^
Keystone Petroleum Equipment, Ltd.
981 Trindle Road West Mechanicsburg, PA 17055
^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^
Doug Kassay - Operations Specialist
Phone 717-697-1651
As per normal in this group when posting I will brace myself for all the
RTFM and/or www.google.com replies, but here goes anyway. We currently run
5.5 and OWA. We are looking at upgrading to Exchange 2000 and OWA in the
very near future ( 3 months). I have never used exchang2K and OWA, but was
2000.
-Original Message-
From: Doug Kassay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 1:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Titanium OWA screenshots
As per normal in this group when posting I will brace myself
for all the RTFM and/or www.google.com
I would recommend capturing your network data at the time the email should
have been sent. This will show you:
1. If your mail server sent (or attempted to send) the mail.
2. The response from the other server.
3. If your mail server never sent the mail when it should have.
I have used a
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 12:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Upgrade Question
Plenty of articles and how to's on MS site with regard from upgrading from
NT4.0/Exchange5.5 to Win2K/E2K
- Original Message -
From: Doug Kassay [EMAIL PROTECTED
is said in Latin seems profound.)
-Original Message-
From: Doug Kassay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 2:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Upgrade Question
Yes, there is. And I have read quite a bit of it. They of course recommend
that we upgrade. I
We are currently running 5.5 enterprise and are in the process of getting a
new main server for an other business application. This is currently the
server that runs Exchange on NT 4 sp6. We will obviously be getting the new
server with 2000 server. The question has come up regarding upgrading
I had a similar problem sending mail to an ISP just recently, similar in the
sense that the email was sent but never received and no error message on my
end. I was able to find the problem by using a packet scanning/capture
utility called Ethereal (http://www.ethereal.com/). This allowed me to
I am getting an odd response from a mail server that I am attempting to send
a message to (fast.net). Here is the message that their server is sending
at the end of my message. 451 See http://pobox.com/~djb/docs/smtplf.html;
A main snippet, referencing the error, from that website says:
It was
This is probably a simple question to most of you, but the answer eludes me.
I am the exchange server administrator (that means that I don't necessarily
know how to fix it, but I get all the inbound failure mail). We have a few
accounts that were deleted due to employees leaving, getting fired,
, Ltd.
981 Trindle Road West Mechanicsburg, PA 17055
^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^
Doug Kassay - Operations Specialist
Phone 717-697-1651
Fax 717-697-8591
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com
Kassay - Operations Specialist
Phone 717-697-1651
Fax 717-697-8591
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Doug Kassay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 8:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Stuck emails
I have a weird one for you. We have one user
Even if you found a vendor/product that could accomplish that task, why
would you want to send out an attachment that 95% of other systems would
just block anyway.
Doug
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:bmellott;SND.com]
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 1:09 PM
To: Exchange
I finally can answer a question on this list :)
AOL sucks!
Seriously, the same thing happened here, and it turned out to be that were
an open relay.
Doug Kassay
-Original Message-
From: Daniel L. Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 1:38 PM
To: Exchange
Just allow for relaying from domB by IP address
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Berepoot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 11:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: using mailserver from another domain
I have 2 w2k domains. 1 (domA) has a Xch
stumped.
Thanks
^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^
Keystone Petroleum Equipment, Ltd.
981 Trindle Road West Mechanicsburg, PA 17055
^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^
Doug Kassay - Operations Specialist
Phone 717-697-1651
Fax 717-697-8591
[EMAIL PROTECTED
18 matches
Mail list logo
