I've been told that they do worm scanning before pattern matching in 6.5. If that's
true that was a good, smart move. We're still running 6.2 so I can't confirm.
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 12:49 PM
To: Exchange
This one slipped by our *.com file matching as well... actually it's been a
little hit and miss... some were caught but others were not stopped until we
installed the defnition file--We're running Antigen with the Norman def.
I'm still seeing weird stuff some seem to be getting through he IMC
Hey all:
I've been peppering the list with some Exchange 2000 in place upgrade
questions and have just a couple more. I've been testing an upgrade of a 4
Ex 5.5 server environment using an in place upgrade. It was finally decided
this was the way to go because it actually appears to lessen
I was thinking that might be the problem... BUT
Would that take care of *.*.*.*.com files? If that's really the issue, this
is something that Sybari needs to address from a coding standpoint in my
opinion. *.com should kill anything that ends in *.com. Or is it up to me
to guess how many
Is 7024 event an expected event on the IS/DS consistency check for unknown
usernames on:
system configuration
Schedule + Free Busy
Offline Address book
OAB 2
It reads:
Public Folder System Configuration does not have any Owners in its access
control list.
It's just an informational event, and
to a production machine.
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer
There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Harmon, Josh
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 11:50 AM
To: Exchange
I've got a test environment where I've done multiple restores over the past
four years. Currently it's setup in a pretty precise mirror image of what i
have in production. 4 Exchange servers, same site, same org. I had to do a
restore on one of the servers yesterday and bring it back to
There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Harmon, Josh
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 8:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: ADC on Exchange2k SP2 disk
I'm about to install the ADC
:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ADC on Exchange2k SP2 disk
The SP2 Deployment Guide recommends that you use the ADC from the SP2
CD.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Harmon, Josh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 04 January 2002 14:42
Posted To: Exchange Mailing List
I'm about to install the ADC to connect our single Exchange 5.5 site to our
single Forest/Domain. I noticed that on the exchange SP1 and SP2 disks
there is an ADC.
Does anyone know if I can/should install this version or is it only
necessary/recommended to install the SPx versions if you have
Yeah... it's that kind of thing. By scheduling software I meant it needed
access to everyone's calendar to put some items in a master calendar in a
public folder. It reminded me a of a presentation I saw at the '99 MEC in
Atlanta--they did something similar, but as I recall much cleaner.
Why
Unfortunately the answer to this question is restore the server to it's
pre-sp4 state (whatever that was).
That includes your information store as it must be the same version of your
Service Pack (meaning you can't restore the bins to sp3 and expect your sp4
store to work--or any post sp4
I've just received a proposal to install some calendaring software on one of
our exchange servers that requires a lot of things I'm pretty uncomfortable
with without divulging too much about the software (I'm not under
non-disclosure--but I'm not under disclosure either!). This software
Yes... the come in by the hundreds some day Off site of course... I
think this one will be around for ever... or at least until MS doesn't allow
it's home computers to speak on any port by default (personal firewall,
wrappers, whatever).
Incidentally I really haven't seen that many nimda or
14 matches
Mail list logo
