Same thing happened to me 2 weeks ago. Are you upgrading to 2000 or to
5.5 Enterprise? If just the Enterprise edition, it's very quick and
painless. Just make sure you have a solid backup and your TechNet handy
in case you run into a little snag like we did with Q233219.
> We hit the 16GB limit
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Russell =
> Hopkinson
> Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 1:09 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Conflict Message appears in a different language
>
>
> Lately, and for some unknown reason, conflict messages delivered to a =
> pu
r ISP won't allow them to whitelist our IP
address. Mail going to [EMAIL PROTECTED] is routed through a
different ISP who doesn't use this list to block spam.
> Why not just tell them to send it to the correct SMTP address?
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Russ
Lately, and for some unknown reason, conflict messages delivered to a
public folder have the subject in a different language: "Zpráva o
konfliktu" (which is Czech, I think). However, when I open the message,
it's in English. I also get conflict notification messages in my Inbox,
and their subject
To the whole domain, which is why we'd like to stay away from having to
manage custom recipients.
> for just one user or just to the one external domain?
>
>
> From: "Russell Hopkinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" &
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hope this clears up our issue. Thanks.
> Sure. Add the email addy to each Exchange mailbox and then set it as the
> default reply-to.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Russell Hopkinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, June 19,
We have a need to change the domain name on certain outbound messages
(e.g., mail going out to [EMAIL PROTECTED] should be readdressed to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]). I know this can be done for inbound messages,
but is there any way of accomplishing this for outbound messages on 5.5?
We are getting ready to hit our head on the 16Gb limit of our Exchange
Server (5.5, SP4). How difficult is it to upgrade to the Enterprise
version? Also, how strongly should we consider taking this opportunity to
upgrade to 2000 Enterprise directly from 5.5 Standard? (We're not currently
running
So I have a question, then (but first, a little background): We're getting
the "disk is at or near capacity" messages since we have only 887Mb "free"
on our 17Gb partition (which has the priv and pub edb's). I immediately
archived and deleted about 3Gb from public folders.
Now I really don't wa
I apologize if this message appears more than once. I tried posting last
night, before realizing that I was not set up as a subscriber yet...
So I have a question, then (but first, a little background): We're getting
the "disk is at or near capacity" events since we have only 887Mb "free" on
ou
I apologize if this winds up being the third copy of this message; for
some reason, I'm not seeing any of my posts sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
so I'm trying this through the web site. Anyway...
So I have a question, then (but first, a little background): We're
getting
the "disk is at or near cap
11 matches
Mail list logo