-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16 July 2002 18:13
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: CLEVER SPAM EMAIL
Reading those docs makes troubleshooting e-mail issues so
much easier. Printing out RFC821 and trying to send e-mail
from
And yet, Baldric^WRobert, there are administrators out there who would not
recognize a clever spam email if it danced up and down in front of them
singing Clever Spam Emails are Here Again.
Which is (partially) why SMTP has continued to work, since it was designed
to run without too much
Ah, yes but there's a bit more to that one, IIRC:
And yet, Baldric^WRobert, there are administrators out there who would not
recognize a clever spam email if it
painted itself purple and danced naked on top of a harpsichord,
singing Clever Spam Emails are Here Again.
(I knew I'd memorized
Reading those docs makes troubleshooting e-mail issues so
much easier. Printing out RFC821 and trying to send e-mail
from a telnet session (to duplicate what's being done in the
RFCs) takes only a day, but the benefits will last much longer.
I don't see how anyone could call themselves
I did not have email with that woman.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 10:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: CLEVER SPAM EMAIL
Reading those docs makes troubleshooting e-mail issues so
much easier. Printing
Does this mean I have no recourse?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange
AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: CLEVER SPAM EMAIL
Does this mean I have no recourse?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: CLEVER SPAM EMAIL
Does this mean I have no recourse?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 12:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: CLEVER SPAM EMAIL
Really, and this doesn't apply solely to you, Mr. Taguchi, everyone
should read and understand RFCs 821 and 822, and their successors 2821
and 2822. All this Spam, spoofing
Greetings,
We have been receiving mail from someone out there where they have been
placing the return address as the receivers address. When the user
receives a message it looks as though its coming from themselves. Is
there anywhere in the Exchange 5.5 admin where I can place a restriction
on
]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 12:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: CLEVER SPAM EMAIL
Greetings,
We have been receiving mail from someone out there where they have been
placing the return address as the receivers address. When the user
receives a message it looks as though its coming
Here is a copy of the header I got from the user. It appears that the
senders address has been forged with the receivers address.
Received: from mail.syncor.com (YWING [10.10.51.35]) by
us-whl-e2.syncor.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service
Version 5.5.2653.13)
id
[EMAIL PROTECTED]??
-Original Message-
From: Casey Taguchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: CLEVER SPAM EMAIL
Here is a copy of the header I got from the user. It appears that the
senders address has been forged
13 matches
Mail list logo