http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q815052
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:
February 18, 2003 5:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA new mail notification
New mail is only available on IE 5.5 and higher. Verify the IE version
of the client.
Mark
http://www.messageware.net
- Plus Pack for OWA 2000 (Spell, Thes, Addressing, etc)
- SecureLogoff for OWA 2000
-
, February 18, 2003 4:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA new mail notification
I have one remote OWA user who complains after upgrading to Exch2K SP3
that they no longer get new mail notification. I've been thru Technet
and slipstick.com, with nothing standing out on that issue. A
As as 10 seconds from now, I have.
> -Original Message-
> From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 11:50 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Exch2000 OWA new mail notification
>
>
> There's no way to d
, September 12, 2002 11:38 AM
Subject: Exch2000 OWA new mail notification
Exchange 2000 SP3. OWA clients are IE6, SP1.
When emails come in and go right into the Inbox, OWA pops-up that new-mail
notification icon.
However, when emails come in and -- due to various rules -- are delivered to
a sub
Exchange 2000 SP3. OWA clients are IE6, SP1.
When emails come in and go right into the Inbox, OWA pops-up that new-mail
notification icon.
However, when emails come in and -- due to various rules -- are delivered to
a sub-folder of the inbox, there is no New Mail notification.
Without re
Hey Chris,
Remember when I wrote to you about an issue that I had, and you diagnosed it
as a UDP problem over a firewall, and gave me an article about "new mail
notification"?
Well I finally got the Q article. Q264035
Thanks for all your help,
you al are a GREAT resourc
e-
> From: Steve Van Eck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:30 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: New mail notification
>
>
> Recently, the client machines at my WAN sites stopped
> receiving new mail notifications. I have a sniffer on
Recently, the client machines at my WAN sites stopped receiving new mail
notifications. I have a sniffer on my exchange box and conducted two
packet captures. The first is between exchange and a local machine. Outlook
is open when the capture is started, and a new piece of mail is sent to the
c
ration (soon to be HP)
All your base are belong to us.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Meunier
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 9:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Mail Notification
Will that koan tell Ben, Liz and me wha
Could be nic as well.
> -Original Message-
> From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 3:12 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: New Mail Notification
>
>
> Still the router. It has an ACL that only permits
Message-
> From: Jerry Conway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 3:44 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: New Mail Notification
>
>
> Thanks for the help - especially the Latin lesson. But, since
> there had been
> no changes to the
TED]>
>Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: New Mail Notification
>Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 10:23:53 -0800
>
>Well, first I should have spelled it correctly: ad nauseam
&g
Well, first I should have spelled it correctly: ad nauseam
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 9:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Mail Notification
Will that koan tell Ben, Liz and me what the plural of
I think its "Nixon"
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 12:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Mail Notification
Will that koan tell Ben, Liz and me what the plural of "nauseum" is?
-
Will that koan tell Ben, Liz and me what the plural of "nauseum" is?
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Friday, November 16, 2001 11:39 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: New Mail Notification
Subject: RE: New Mail No
The old standby: http://www.mail-resources.com/koans/51899.htm
-Original Message-
From: Bueffel, Scott M - CNF [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 12:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Mail Notification
This has been discussed ad nauseum in the
Subject: New Mail Notification
Hi Everyone,
2 servers (one NT4 sp6a, one W2k sp2)in same site, both Ex5.5 sp4. CLients
are OL2000
I have been moving mailboxes (using the Move Mailbox tool in the Exchange
Admin program) from the older (NT4) server to the newer (W2k) machine
without any problems
Hi Everyone,
2 servers (one NT4 sp6a, one W2k sp2)in same site, both Ex5.5 sp4. CLients
are OL2000
I have been moving mailboxes (using the Move Mailbox tool in the Exchange
Admin program) from the older (NT4) server to the newer (W2k) machine
without any problems, beyond having to once or twice
Discussions
Subject: Re: New mail notification port(s)
Um, no.
There's no new mail notify over our Cisco VPN system, but we have another
legacy system that allows those packets through. I'm trying to do research
so my network guys have something to work with.
Kevin
- Origin
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 August 2001 00:24
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: New mail notification port(s)
Does anyone know the theory behind the randomization of new mail
notification ports? I understand that it can be anywhere between 1024 and
65k. Is that one for each client, picked ran
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Derby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 11:59 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: New mail notification port(s)
>
>
> Um, no.
>
> There's no new mail notify over our Cisco VPN system, but we
Picked randomly by the client.
- Original Message -
From: "Kevin Derby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 6:24 PM
Subject: New mail notification port(s)
> Does anyone know the theory b
> Kevin
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "missy koslosky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 7:31 PM
> Subject: Re: New mail notification port(s)
>
>
> > Lemme
but what's coming back
is just some random port >1024.
- Original Message -
From: "missy koslosky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 9:31 PM
Subject: Re: New mail notification port(s)
&
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 7:31 PM
Subject: Re: New mail notification port(s)
> Lemme guess... You work for an ASP, or a company that wants to at least
> host some Exchange services...
>
> It's
at control this were too hard to rewrite for E2K too...
Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Kevin Derby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 7:24 PM
Subject: New mail notification port(s)
Does anyone
Here's a nice explanation.
http://www.freesoft.org/CIE/Topics/86.htm
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Derby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 6:24 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: New mail notification port(s)
Subject: New mail notific
Does anyone know the theory behind the randomization of new mail
notification ports? I understand that it can be anywhere between 1024 and
65k. Is that one for each client, picked randomly from what's unused, or is
there something else to it?
29 matches
Mail list logo
