You are right Lori. I did not say new to the list, nor did I say brand new.
But I am new
compared to you older folks that have been doing this for years and years
and ions.
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 22 May, 2002 1:26 PM
To:
Are you 'positive' about that?
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 May 2002 16:57
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer
b eing used
Im not an ion, but I am a charged particle.
Negative
-Original Message-
From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 11:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer
b eing used
Are you 'positive' about that?
-Original Message-
Must be, cuz he said not an-ion.
-Original Message-
From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 12:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer
b eing used
Are you 'positive' about that?
One atom looks at another and says, I think I just lost an electron!
The other says,
Are you positive?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 12:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for
Except you're not new Mike. You've been asking questions of this caliber
for over a year. I'm beginning to believe that you cannot read.
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 4:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party
That got him where it hurts Lori.
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 22 May 2002 19:26
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing
used
Except you're not new Mike. You've been asking
Hope so. This man refuses to learn to fish, so he can just starve.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Arnold () [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 2:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer
b eing used
Why should he fish when others can answer his question afresh and then create a nice
thread taking the rise out of him. Perhaps he's into SM or something, not that I know
what SM means, any more than I know what FSCK means (if you're following the other
threads)
-Original Message-
SM's...is that a new candy?
-Original Message-
From: Mark Arnold () [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 4:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer
b eing used
Why should he fish when others can
Kind of, but instead of them being candy they're all chocolatey (that's never spelt
right surely) but still round, with a strange whiff of salt. A pint of beer for the
1st to get the reference
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 22 May 2002
Chef?
-Original Message-
From: Mark Arnold () [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 3:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer
b eing used
Kind of, but instead of them being candy they're all
Dunno, but fsck is a *nix command, isn't it? ;-}
-Original Message-
From: Mark Arnold () [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 1:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer
b eing used
Kind of, but
You will find £2.20 in your left pocket. Pub/bar somewhere near you.
When you get back you can ask how the hell sterling got in your pocket and why the
barman accepted it.
-Original Message-
From: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 22 May 2002 21:32
To: Exchange Discussions
Not so as you'd notice grin
-Original Message-
From: David Florea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 22 May 2002 21:37
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing
used
Dunno, but fsck is a *nix command, isn't it? ;-}
Check with NetIQ. I think their AppAnalyzer tool might be able to do that. Of
course, it's pricey.
-Original Message-
From: James Casstevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 10:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that
btw...I think if you upgrade ScanMail to the ESE version, it then does allow
you to determine the stale mailboxes.
dave
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 1:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check
What is Scanmail and what is it used for?
Thanks..
-Original Message-
From: James Casstevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, 20 May, 2002 12:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer
being used
Does anyone know of
Really?
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 4:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer
b eing used
What is Scanmail and what is it used for?
Thanks..
Yeah really... I am a new administrator and I haven't a clue. Sorry.
-Original Message-
From: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 21 May, 2002 4:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer
b eing used
A popular (read effective) antivirus for mail servers.
Google is your friend here. :^)
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 4:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer
You all are my friends here. Thanks...
-Original Message-
From: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 21 May, 2002 4:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer
b eing used
A popular (read effective)
Real friends pay my tab...
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 4:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer
b eing used
You all are my friends here. Thanks...
When and where John?
-Original Message-
From: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 21 May, 2002 4:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer
b eing used
Real friends pay my tab...
-Original
KC. Bryant's on Brooklyn around lunchtime. :)
Seriously, I somewhat stumbled into MS Exchange administration
and this list a few years ago. Any question I've ever thought
I had has been answered by 1)research and 2)someone on this list.
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike
Upgrade your ScanMail version and it really isn't much of an issue.
-Original Message-
From: James Casstevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 12:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no
longer being used
26 matches
Mail list logo
