RE: DL with no Members (WAS) RE: High Physical Memory Utilizati on

2002-01-15 Thread Hunter, Lori
But you don't get a COPY of the mail sent to the postmaster mailbox, do you? Don't you still want the sender to know that the address is invalid, but you personally don't want to see the mail bouncing by? I just sent something. Let me know if you got a copy in postmaster. -Original

RE: DL with no Members (WAS) RE: High Physical Memory Utilizati on

2002-01-15 Thread Durkee, Peter
Q150095 perhaps? -Peter -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: DL with no Members (WAS) RE: High Physical Memory Utilization Mr. Lefkovics / Dr. Dogg, When I send an e-mail to

RE: DL with no Members (WAS) RE: High Physical Memory Utilizati on

2002-01-15 Thread Lefkovics, William
Why would you ask privately offline if you were going to take the responses back to a public forum? William -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 12:21 PM To: 'Exchange Discussions' Subject: DL with no Members (WAS) RE:

RE: DL with no Members (WAS) RE: High Physical Memory Utilizati on

2002-01-15 Thread Martin Blackstone
: High Physical Memory Utilizati on Why would you ask privately offline if you were going to take the responses back to a public forum? William -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 12:21 PM To: 'Exchange Discussions

RE: DL with no Members (WAS) RE: High Physical Memory Utilizati on

2002-01-15 Thread Blunt, James H (Jim)
(WAS) RE: High Physical Memory Utilizati on Why would you ask privately offline if you were going to take the responses back to a public forum? William -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 12:21 PM To: 'Exchange Discussions

RE: DL with no Members (WAS) RE: High Physical Memory Utilizati on

2002-01-15 Thread Blunt, James H (Jim)
: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 12:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DL with no Members (WAS) RE: High Physical Memory Utilizati on But you don't get a COPY of the mail sent to the postmaster mailbox, do you? Don't you still want the sender to know that the address is invalid, but you personally

RE: DL with no Members (WAS) RE: High Physical Memory Utilizati on

2002-01-15 Thread Hunter, Lori
where you work. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 3:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DL with no Members (WAS) RE: High Physical Memory Utilizati on Ok...I deleted the DL and recreated it, with only the x400

RE: DL with no Members (WAS) RE: High Physical Memory Utilizati on

2002-01-15 Thread Blunt, James H (Jim)
Lori, I give the accounts a 30-day grace period before I add them to the list. Jim -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 1:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DL with no Members (WAS) RE: High Physical Memory Utilizati

RE: DL with no Members (WAS) RE: High Physical Memory Utilizati on

2002-01-15 Thread Durkee, Peter
) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 13:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DL with no Members (WAS) RE: High Physical Memory Utilizati on Ok...I deleted the DL and recreated it, with only the x400 addy and 2 smtp addy's...one is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Now that it has an x400

RE: DL with no Members (WAS) RE: High Physical Memory Utilizati on

2002-01-15 Thread Blunt, James H (Jim)
]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DL with no Members (WAS) RE: High Physical Memory Utilizati on Maybe there's a replication issue. Is the DL on the same server as your IMC? Also, if you think the problem is caused by the lack of list members, you

RE: DL with no Members (WAS) RE: High Physical Memory Utilizati on

2002-01-15 Thread Durkee, Peter
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DL with no Members (WAS) RE: High Physical Memory Utilizati on Maybe there's a replication issue. Is the DL on the same server as your IMC? Also, if you think the problem is caused by the lack