RE: Exchange.NET anyone ?

2002-07-30 Thread David N. Precht
OWA has one. http://www.spellchecker.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hansen, Eric Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 19:08 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange.NET anyone ? I'm hoping for a owa spellchecker. Freaking hotmail

RE: Exchange.NET anyone ?

2002-07-30 Thread Mark Rotman
To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange.NET anyone ? There is a really nice upgrade for OWA from a company called Messageware. Good view of the GAL (plus contacts), great spell check, even a thesaurus (so Ed can find words for Haiku Friday g). Nice product, available now. We've been using

RE: Exchange.NET anyone ?

2002-07-30 Thread Tom Meunier
: Exchange.NET anyone ? OWA has one. http://www.spellchecker.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hansen, Eric Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 19:08 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange.NET anyone ? I'm hoping for a owa

RE: Exchange.NET anyone ?

2002-07-30 Thread Bauer, Mr. Rick
PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 12:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange.NET anyone ? Holy cow. More expensive than Messageware, with less features. Such a deal. -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, July 30, 2002

RE: Exchange.NET anyone ?

2002-07-29 Thread Cook, Jason
I heard from an MS Exchange Tech that the next rev will include things like mobile user management. I think their idea is to get rid of Mobile Information Server and integrate that into the next Exchange rev. Other than that I don't know, hopefully there's some more OWA tweaks. Jason Cook

RE: Exchange.NET anyone ?

2002-07-29 Thread Kevin Miller
Yes it will be. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of RBHATIA Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 1:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions

RE: Exchange.NET anyone ?

2002-07-29 Thread Hansen, Eric
I'm hoping for a owa spellchecker. Freaking hotmail has it, hotmail owa. :\ -Original Message- From: Cook, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange.NET anyone ? I heard from an MS Exchange Tech that the next

RE: Exchange.NET anyone ?

2002-07-29 Thread Bauer, Mr. Rick
School -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 7:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange.NET anyone ? I'm hoping for a owa spellchecker. Freaking hotmail has it, hotmail owa. :\ -Original Message- From: Cook, Jason

RE: Exchange.NET anyone ?

2002-07-29 Thread Siegfried Weber
Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange.NET anyone ? There is a really nice upgrade for OWA from a company called Messageware. Good view of the GAL (plus contacts), great spell check, even a thesaurus (so Ed can find words for Haiku Friday g). Nice product, available now. We've been using

RE: Exchange.NET anyone ?

2002-07-29 Thread Bauer, Mr. Rick
Subject: RE: Exchange.NET anyone ? Uhm, well. Don't get me wrong on this, ok? But did you install Exchange 2000 SP3 on a server running PlusPack from Messageware? It's a great product but what I wanted to point out is: the more third party SW you have installed the more are you bound to wait until

RE: Exchange.NET anyone ?

2002-07-29 Thread Bauer, Mr. Rick
, July 29, 2002 7:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange.NET anyone ? Uhm, well. Don't get me wrong on this, ok? But did you install Exchange 2000 SP3 on a server running PlusPack from Messageware? It's a great product but what I wanted to point out is: the more third party SW you

RE: Exchange.NET anyone ?

2002-07-29 Thread Siegfried Weber
=server / -Original Message- From: Bauer, Mr. Rick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 2:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange.NET anyone ? Siegfried: Your point is well taken; we ran the product on our test lab for a while before we deployed