RE: GWART

2002-01-14 Thread Neil Hobson
List Conversation: GWART Subject: RE: GWART One of the address spaces on one bridgehead is listed as *(A)* and the other is listed as *:. One of our admins from our NJ site stated that we need to add the *(A)* to the other bridgehead. I tend to disagree though. I tend to think

Re: GWART

2002-01-14 Thread missy koslosky
Nope. LaCretia is correct - * should be the only address space. Missy - Original Message - From: Neil Hobson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 7:49 AM Subject: RE: GWART Something in the back of my mind says

RE: GWART

2002-01-14 Thread Neil Hobson
In that case my mind ain't working like it used to... :-) -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 14 January 2002 13:03 Posted To: Exchange Mailing List Conversation: GWART Subject: Re: GWART Nope. LaCretia is correct - * should be the only

RE: GWART

2002-01-14 Thread Neil Hobson
Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 14 January 2002 13:03 Posted To: Exchange Mailing List Conversation: GWART Subject: Re: GWART Nope. LaCretia is correct - * should be the only address space. Missy - Original Message - From: Neil Hobson [EMAIL

RE: GWART

2002-01-14 Thread Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US
AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: GWART Actually, what I meant to say is that, although I'd agree that * is the usual way to go, doesn't the presence of a *@* in the GWART appear as a better route than * ? That being said, I'd just change both to * and raise the cost

RE: GWART

2002-01-14 Thread Roger Seielstad
://www.peregrine.com -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 8:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: GWART Nope. LaCretia is correct - * should be the only address space. Missy - Original Message - From

RE: GWART

2002-01-14 Thread Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US
: Monday, January 14, 2002 7:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: GWART Neil has it right, however - '*@*' more closely matches the target address, so the connector with which that is associated will be chosen every time. -- Roger

RE: GWART

2002-01-14 Thread Neil Hobson
Conversation: GWART Subject: RE: GWART So If I change it on both bridgeheads to be *: then traffic for each site should flow through the bridgehead for that site right? Also, I had a question about the administrative management domain name. What is this used for? I read that if you set this up

RE: GWART

2002-01-14 Thread Neil Hobson
I see. You don't mean the admd field...Q234639 will help you. Neil -Original Message- From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 January 2002 14:24 To: Neil Hobson Subject: RE: GWART Thanks for the information, its very helpful. I got confused here

RE: GWART

2002-01-11 Thread Chris Scharff
I've read them, but could I explain how to in general. Um, not without a six pack... however, it is Friday afternoon. What is the address space on your IMS boxxen? What is the desired flow for IMS traffic? -Original Message- From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: GWART

2002-01-11 Thread Gary Aiston
Are both your IMC's inbound and outbound or is 1 in and 1 out? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: 11 January 2002 21:29 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: GWART I've read them, but could I explain how to in general