RE: Groupshield 5.0 vs. Sybari

2002-07-12 Thread Christopher Hummert
Only if you have an import. American are fee free -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 10:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Groupshield 5.0 vs. Sybari Don't you have to pay additional fees

RE: Groupshield 5.0 vs. Sybari

2002-07-12 Thread Randal, Phil
: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 July 2002 23:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Groupshield 5.0 vs. Sybari groupshield sucks. sybari doesn't. simple. - Original Message - From: Kevin Dietz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent

RE: Groupshield 5.0 vs. Sybari

2002-07-12 Thread Couch, Nate
I haven't tried Groupshield 5 yet, but 4.51 has been as stable as a rock for me. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: missy koslosky Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 17:25 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Groupshield 5.0 vs

RE: Groupshield 5.0 vs. Sybari

2002-07-12 Thread Kevin Dietz
Oh Heaven and Hell? Sounds like a good song or something which one? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe:

RE: Groupshield 5.0 vs. Sybari

2002-07-12 Thread Kevin Dietz
Same here. My current license expires in 3 months and am just looking into whether or not sybari is a better product. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:

RE: Groupshield 5.0 vs. Sybari

2002-07-12 Thread Durkee, Peter
wouldn't believe the difference in tech support! -Peter -Original Message- From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 1:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Groupshield 5.0 vs. Sybari From my experience, Groupshield 5 is a much better product than its

RE: Groupshield 5.0 vs. Sybari

2002-07-12 Thread Christopher Hummert
Ok what about Symantec's product? Does it even stack up? -Chris -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Durkee, Peter Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 8:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Groupshield 5.0 vs. Sybari So is Groupshield 5

RE: Groupshield 5.0 vs. Sybari

2002-07-11 Thread Martin Blackstone
One is heaven, one is hell -Original Message- From: Kevin Dietz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 3:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Groupshield 5.0 vs. Sybari I see one big differnce in the apps on paper. Sybari utilizies 4 engines vs. the 1 engine

Re: Groupshield 5.0 vs. Sybari

2002-07-11 Thread missy koslosky
groupshield sucks. sybari doesn't. simple. - Original Message - From: Kevin Dietz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 6:06 PM Subject: Groupshield 5.0 vs. Sybari I see one big differnce in the apps on paper. Sybari utilizies 4

RE: Groupshield 5.0 vs. Sybari

2002-07-11 Thread Ed Crowley
Don't you have to pay additional fees for additional engines? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kevin Dietz Sent: