Yes, but the only users using that are on Exchange 2003.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 5:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: RUS problems.
You would not be using Outlook 2003 in cached
02, 2003 5:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: RUS problems.
You would not be using Outlook 2003 in cached mode would you?
Exchange 2k sp3
=20
=20
I have a weird problem with my exchange 2000 RUS. When I create a new
Distribution Group and let the RUS do its thing
You would not be using Outlook 2003 in cached mode would you?
Exchange 2k sp3
I have a weird problem with my exchange 2000 RUS. When I create a new
Distribution Group and let the RUS do its thing, the group doesn't show
up in the default GAL. Even though the RUS stamped it with all the
Anything in the event log?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Woodruff, Michael
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 7:29 AM
To:
tend to only occur when the SA is started (a reason to not put a
RUS on a mailbox server).
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe Pochedley
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 11:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RUS not working to child
Law - Nothing is impossible for the man who doesn't have to do
it himself.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 3:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: RUS not working to child domain?
Might try rerunning domainprep
]
Posted At: 25 July 2003 15:32
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: RUS not working to child domain?
Subject: RE: RUS not working to child domain?
Chris,
Thanks for the suggestion. Tried it this morning and Domainprep ran
quite quickly (much more quickly than I've ever seen it run when
AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RUS not working to child domain?
4 commons ways RUS can break are below. They may not all be appropriate
to you, but I've cut pasted them from a word doc of mine. :-)
1) RUS configuration references a deleted DC or E2K server, or the
servers defined
Might try rerunning domainprep as well in that domain... Don't think it
would hurt anything anyway.
On 07/24/03 14:41, Joe Pochedley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kind ladies and gentlemen, once again I come forth seeking your
assistance...
A number of months ago we began integrating the systems
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 8:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RUS problems
Sure, but where does it go? The event doesn't have a path or anything to
the file I am missing. Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10
Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 09
June 2003 15:56 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: RUS problems
Subject: RE: RUS problems
Nope Not yet. I am going to reboot tonight.
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL
PROTECTED] Posted At: 09
June 2003 15:56 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: RUS problems
Subject: RE: RUS problems
Nope Not yet. I am going to reboot tonight.
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 10:55 AM
To: Exchange
seeing that myself, but a system
attenant service cycle is a quick and free sanity check before calling
PSS!
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 09
June 2003 15:56 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: RUS problems
Subject: RE: RUS
] Posted At: 09
June 2003 15:56 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: RUS problems
Subject: RE: RUS problems
Nope Not yet. I am going to reboot tonight.
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 10:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Out
List
Conversation: RUS problems
Subject: RE: RUS problems
Nope Not yet. I am going to reboot tonight.
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 10:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Out of interest, have you at any point cycled the System
check before calling
PSS!
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 09
June 2003 15:56 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: RUS problems
Subject: RE: RUS problems
Nope Not yet. I am going to reboot tonight.
-Original Message
: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 09
June 2003 15:56 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: RUS problems
Subject: RE: RUS problems
Nope Not yet. I am going to reboot tonight.
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09
Both your DCs are GCs. Good for exchange but one of the FSMO roles (the
Infrastructure Master) does not want to be on a GC. It doesn't update if
it is run on a GC. Not sure if this applies in a single domain too.
Q1971322:
NOTE: The Infrastructure Master (IM) role should be held by a domain
Exch2k SP3
When I disable an account and hide it from the GAL the RUS stamps the
HideFromAddressList as true, but our Outlook Clients aren't reflecting
the change. If I do a preview from ESM of the Gal, it shows it as
hidden? I have restarted Outlook and pointed to a different Global
Catalog
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, June 09, 2003 8:44 AM
Posted To: List - Exchange Server List
Conversation: RUS problems
Subject: RE: RUS problems
Exch2k SP3
When I disable an account and hide it from the GAL the RUS stamps the
HideFromAddressList as true, but our Outlook Clients
-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At:
Monday, June 09, 2003 8:44 AM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List
Conversation: RUS problems
Subject: RE: RUS problems
Exch2k SP3
When I disable an account and hide it from the GAL the RUS stamps the
HideFromAddressList as true
The exception is if *all* the DCs are GCs, even in the case of a
multi-domain forest, the IM can be on any of them.
- Original Message -
From: Sander Van Butzelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 5:28 AM
Subject: RE: RUS
Both
To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: RUS problems
Subject: RE: RUS problems
Yeah, I have the correct server selected. I have also tried another in
the same site. This is definitely weird. No errors at all. I might
need to consult PSS on this one. Thanks.
-Original Message-
From
Exchange List
Conversation: RUS problems
Subject: RE: RUS problems
Yeah, I have the correct server selected. I have also tried another in
the same site. This is definitely weird. No errors at all. I might
need to consult PSS on this one. Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes
Out of interest, have you at any point cycled the System Attendant
service on your E2k box?
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: 09 June 2003 15:41
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: RUS problems
Subject: RE: RUS problems
I
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 09
June 2003 15:41 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: RUS problems
Subject: RE: RUS problems
I checked all of this. I don't get any errors in the application log
except the one mentioned. Everything is set
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: 09 June 2003 15:56
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: RUS problems
Subject: RE: RUS problems
Nope Not yet. I am going to reboot tonight.
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto
: RUS problems
Subject: RE: RUS problems
Nope Not yet. I am going to reboot tonight.
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 10:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Out of interest, have you at any point cycled the System Attendant
All RUS's should point to the same DC/GC. Let AD replication carry the
changes around the org. Otherwise you risk writing conflicting data to
2 dif't dc's in your environment. Yeah, not good
Stemy
-Original Message-
From: Pham, Tuan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Friday,
Quentin,
CDOEXM allows mailbox movements, here is a (relatively) unchecked code
snippet. Obviously the line breaks have been mseed up.
Sub ADSIMoveMailbox(recipname As String, DestinationServer As String,
MailBoxStore As String, StorageGroup As String)
Dim objUser As IADsUser
Dim objMailbox As
There is a Move function in CDOEXM.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Friday, June 07, 2002 1:11 PM
Posted To: Microsoft Exchange
Conversation: RUS and Move Mailbox
Subject: RE: RUS and Move Mailbox
That may be scriptable through CDOEXM, but I
That may be scriptable through CDOEXM, but I kind of doubt it. I was
never able to find a way to reconnect a mailbox either.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
really test it crossing a domain runs on win32.
You're welcome to take a look at it if you are interested.
jeff e.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 1:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RUS and Move Mailbox
That may
33 matches
Mail list logo