Re: Recommendations for an Exchange 2k server (3000 Mailboxes)

2002-02-01 Thread Benjamin Scott
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Wynkoop, John wrote: Performace is the main issue here with cost running a very close second. Good, fast, cheap: Pick two. -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not | | necessarily represent the views or

RE: Recommendations for an Exchange 2k server (3000 Mailboxes)

2002-02-01 Thread Wynkoop, John
2k server (3000 Mailboxes) On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Wynkoop, John wrote: Performace is the main issue here with cost running a very close second. Good, fast, cheap: Pick two. -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not | | necessarily

RE: Recommendations for an Exchange 2k server (3000 Mailboxes)

2002-02-01 Thread Mellott, Bill
A friend has on his wall 1.) Good 2.) Fast 3.) Cheap pick two -Original Message- From: Wynkoop, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 11:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recommendations for an Exchange 2k server (3000 Mailboxes) Good and Fast

RE: Recommendations for an Exchange 2k server (3000 Mailboxes)

2002-02-01 Thread Benjamin Scott
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Wynkoop, John wrote: We were looking at about $50k for a dell with LTO backup, sound right? I like Dell. LTO backup is well-regarded. Without more information (mailbox sizing, expected activity rates, etc.), it is impossible to provide an answer, but conventional wisdom