Administrator
Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Whitlock, Teresa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Server Slower Than Workstations
However if you are not using Win 2K, I'd also check WINS resolution
However if you are not using Win 2K, I'd also check WINS resolution.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 12:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Server Slower Than Workstations
I concur on this one... check DNS
Exchange performance depends more heavily on memory and disk subsystem than
processor speed. There may be something else that is common with the new
line of PCs you've got like different O/S, weird network cards etc.
S.
-Original Message-
From: Bill Kuhl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Outlook startup-up performance issues are almost always name resolution.
- Original Message -
From: Bill Kuhl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 9:23 AM
Subject: Server Slower Than Workstations
If servers are slower than
I see this about one out of every 50 times I start Outlook98. My desktop is
a 366MHz - the servers are quad 500Mhz machines, so it may not be related to
desktop/server speed ratio.
-Original Message-
From: Bill Kuhl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 10:24 AM
]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 12:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Server Slower Than Workstations
I see this about one out of every 50 times I start Outlook98. My desktop
is a 366MHz - the servers are quad 500Mhz machines, so it may not be
related to desktop/server speed ratio
Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Server Slower Than Workstations
Outlook startup-up performance issues are almost always name resolution.
- Original Message -
From: Bill Kuhl [EMAIL PROTECTED
7 matches
Mail list logo