I have never seen a problem rejecting this(remember reject, not drop).
Others may have different experiences.
-Original Message-
From: David Florea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 12:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: smtp - UDP, TCP, or IP?
I see that
ns
Subject: RE: smtp - UDP, TCP, or IP?
Dont need to. However , you should reject 113 - dont merely drop it.
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 9:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: smtp - UDP, TCP, or IP?
Wow I hav
As Benjamin stated, reject sends back a TCP RST, drop simply drops and does
nothing afterwards - not good in this case.
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 9:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: smtp - UDP, TCP, or IP?
Ok
Ok sounds good. Can you explain why? I'm going to reject it but I'm also
curious.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 7:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: smtp - UDP, TCP, or IP?
Dont need to. However , you sho
Dont need to. However , you should reject 113 - dont merely drop it.
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 9:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: smtp - UDP, TCP, or IP?
Wow I have a lot to learn then, I don't even
ould I have port 113 open? It sounds like I should.
Much thanks.
e-
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 4:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: smtp - UDP, TCP, or IP?
On Thu, 9 May 2002, at 6:35pm, Hansen, Eric wrote
On Thu, 9 May 2002, at 6:35pm, Hansen, Eric wrote:
> As part of our access statement we used "tcp permit" for 110 and 25. Well
> it turned out that by doing this mail came in but didn't go out.
SMTP is TCP port 25. SMTP does not use UDP, not is it an IP-layer
protocol.
Make sure you have a
7 matches
Mail list logo
