RE: hops?

02, 2002 7:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: hops? I do believe that's TCP returning the error; Exchange is only reporting it. In proper OSI modeling an application knows nothing about what is happening on the lower levels and hops is a TCP concept. - Original Message - From

RE: hops?

5:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: hops? I, for one, am deeply disappointed that this thread is not about beer. I was about to jump on this like a donkey on a waffle(1) (1) Hi, CJ! Dale L. Orr Network Administrator DoD Polygraph Institute -Original Message- From

RE: hops?

Got to love that osi thingamajigy. -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 5:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:Re: hops? I do believe that's TCP returning the error; Exchange is only reporting it. In proper

RE: hops?

::spudder:: -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 6:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: hops? :( sorry buddy, I don't drink beer, and its not that I'm from Utah. Its just cause I don't like the taste. Now if we were

RE: hops?

I thought this thread was about dancing bears. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Analyst BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Orr, Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 5:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: hops? I

Re: hops?

Reminds me of what I used to say about MSMail: What's amazing is not how well the bear dances, but that the bear dances at all. - Original Message - From: Louis Joyce [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 8:23 AM Subject: RE: hops

RE: hops?

, 2002 4:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: hops? I do believe that's TCP returning the error; Exchange is only reporting it. In proper OSI modeling an application knows nothing about what is happening on the lower levels and hops is a TCP concept. - Original Message - From: Hansen

RE: hops?

The lies we told about how secure it was . . . -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 7:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: hops? Reminds me of what I used to say about MSMail: What's amazing is not how well the bear

hops?

Hi I'm running down a event id 142, and I do think its ISP related with a border gateway protocol issue. The problem is generating a undeliverable that indicates the emails cant go over 17 hops to their target. Now I'm no networking wiz but it looks like a loop issue outside our system, so I

Re: hops?

I do believe that's TCP returning the error; Exchange is only reporting it. In proper OSI modeling an application knows nothing about what is happening on the lower levels and hops is a TCP concept. - Original Message - From: Hansen, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL

too many hops

what does the following mean? _ The original message was received at Thu, 14 Feb 2002 14:34:55 +0300 (MSK) from relay3.mailru.com [80.68.244.39] - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors - [EMAIL PROTECTED] (reason: 554 5.4.6 Too many hops) (expanded from

RE: too many hops

Got Loop? -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 8:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: too many hops what does the following mean? _ The original message was received at Thu, 14 Feb 2002 14:34:55 +0300 (MSK) from

RE: too many hops

and what can I do? Kim -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 February, 2002 2:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: too many hops Got Loop? -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14

Re: too many hops

14, 2002 7:25 AM Subject: too many hops what does the following mean? _ The original message was received at Thu, 14 Feb 2002 14:34:55 +0300 (MSK) from relay3.mailru.com [80.68.244.39] - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors - [EMAIL PROTECTED] (reason: 554 5.4.6

RE: 554 too many hops error

Sounds like a loop. Post the SMTP headers so we can try to see what's going on. -Original Message- From: jojo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 5:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 554 too many hops error This is not the first time that my user

RE: 554 too many hops error

addresses had permanent fatal errors - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Transcript of session follows - 554 Too many hops 18 (17 max): from [EMAIL PROTECTED] via localhost, to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 550 postmaster... User unknown - Original message follows - Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: 554 too many hops error

Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: 554 too many hops error Subject: RE: 554 too many hops error this are the headers... if i found there's a loop problem.. what should i do.. sorry for my sutpid question co'z i'm a newbie in exchange thank you! Joseph The original

RE: 554 too many hops error

, September 07, 2001 10:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 554 too many hops error vscan.pacific.net.ph and pob1.pacific.net.ph are playing hot-potato with the email. I'd say you have a misconfigured virus scanner, guessing from the dns name of the machine. -Original Message

RE: 554 too many hops error

Well, now I'm really angry. Andy David J Muller International -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 10:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 554 too many hops error On top of that, gasso.com.ph is violating

RE: 554 too many hops error

many hops error Well, now I'm really angry. Andy David J Muller International -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 10:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 554 too many hops error On top of that, gasso.com.ph