I deleted a user's mailbox and recreated it (they had deleted all mail I
have .pst file for recovery from backup) The object appears on the server on
which it was created on but if I click on it it says the object cannot be
found, this may be because replication has not completed It has been
I'm running Exchange 2000 service pack 3. We send all internal messages in Rich Text
format but since upgrading from service pack 2 to service pack 3 the Rich Text Format
e-mails are being converted to HTML format overnight! Has anyone seen this before of
know why it may be happening?
Vanessa,
You are using the same server in the site to view the object (if you go to a
n other server it m8ight not have the update yet and you are trying to view
the old object).
Cheers
Paul (just down the road from you, Brooklands)
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everyone wants one but not
Hidden share of the M: drive[1], of course.
[1] There is no M: drive[2]
[2] Hi William!
Les Bessant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IT Manager, Sanderson Townend Gilbert
Direct Dial: 0191 269 0110
Mobile: 07976 234 165
http://www.sandersons.com
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL
I think you all missed the point of Mr. Scharff's post, but whatever, the
mere fact that Hummert's parents allow him to leave his room everyday and
post to mailing lists makes no sense either.
- Original Message -
From: Johansson Patrick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL
lol
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 2:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: IIS
I think you all missed the point of Mr. Scharff's post, but whatever,
the mere fact that Hummert's parents allow him to leave his room
1.4 Gig!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Candee Vaglica
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 4:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Problem under Exch 5.5
How large is the pst?
-Original Message-
From: Wilson,
Sounds like a corrupt PST file.
- Original Message -
From: Wilson, Fenton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 4:23 PM
Subject: Outlook Problem under Exch 5.5
User has 2000 SR-1 9.0.0.4527, with a large PST, has 3 emails in
I haven't seen my parents in weeks, but I did see your mom a few minutes
ago. She said to say Hi for her
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 1:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: IIS
I
Using Outlook 2k connecting to Exchange 5.5 I am trying to set a rule to
forward all email to a different external email. The error message
says: Changes to the rule could not be saved. There is not enough
memory or the rules are too complex. Try deleting some rules
This is the only rule I
Isn't that a show on MTV?
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, January 09, 2003 4:13 PM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: IIS
Subject: Re: IIS
4
Someone take away his shovel please.
On 1/9/03 15:30, Johnny Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Micro$oft
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 1:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: IIS
What the hell is an M$?
Is SIS that important? I've always treated it as something that helps make
for more efficient delivery rather than something to save space since over
time the SIS ratio will tend towards 1:1 anyway.
See KB article 198673 for a justification of this.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: John
The question wasn't about exchange it was about IIS. He never said
anything about exchange in his original message
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 2:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
It was posted in an Exchange forum. The assumption would be that he wants to
use OWA. In which case IIS is the only solution
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 2:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IIS
The
Have you tried a DS/IS adjust on the server? (N.B. do NOT check the PF
options)
-Original Message-
From: Watkins V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 January 2003 09:45
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Help!!!
I deleted a user's mailbox and recreated it (they had deleted all mail I
Johansson Patrick wrote:
ok, have to admit that you may have a point after having looked
through the archives at Mr. Hummerts answers to various posts, not to
mention the last one. Sorry.
I'd just like to warn anyone new to the list that following any links
posted by Mr. Hummert is not
Yea cause all the post on this list are on topic
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 2:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IIS
It was posted in an Exchange forum. The assumption
Please explain to us how Apache is a viable alternative to IIS for running
Outlook Web Access. I'd really like to hear this one.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
Daniel knows things. Lots of things.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Veld, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday,
Different Paul.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Veld, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 6:50 PM
Possibly, but I don't hardly understand why you'd want to.
Transaction logs are going to show the changes that are actually made to the
information store database tables. I'm not sure what kind of reporting you'd
expect to get from them, frankly.
I dunno, I've got 6 Exchange servers with transaction logs on every one.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Mark Jeremy [mailto:[EMAIL
Thank you all, I found that there had been a replication problem so I
deleted it and recreeated it and all is well except: there are loads of
duplicate messages, is there an easy way to get rid of them. I have seen
this before when doing exporting of .pst and importing again.
Vanessa
So you made an *assumption* about what he was asking? Didn't you have some
words of wisdom on that topic once as well?
On 1/9/03 16:19, Christopher Hummert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yea cause all the post on this list are on topic
www.google.com ?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 2:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: IIS
Ok... So then describe for the class the 'logic' that led you to post a
URL for Apache
Hmmm, Transaction log is only related to MS-SQL and there no such thing
as transaction logs for Exchange. Could you re-word your question
please?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 3:31 PM
To:
guy's fight like you are married.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 5:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: IIS
Ok... So then describe for the class the 'logic' that led you to post a URL
for Apache when
There is a size limit. If you have other rules that may be the case. The
size is limited to 64k I think. Also I remember it is that way because that
is a RPC packet size or something like that. I may get blasted for not
looking it up the way the list has gone today.
- Original Message -
I don't remember the limits, but there are finite amounts for the total
number of rules and the space that they can consume. Also, you may want to
take at look at the relative advantages and disadvantages of disabling
Outlook rules in favor of Exchange rules.
-Original Message-
From:
We are..in fact I can't wait till we get to the makeup $ex
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mellott, Bill
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 2:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IIS
guy's fight like you are married.
Plain text is the most basic and standard format that *ANY* email client
can read. Any other platform (Linux, sun, Atari (j/k), etc.) would not
be able to read RTF format and some wont be able to read HTML format.
Have you or your lawyers saw some email messages that had some junk HTML
code within
huh, must have missed something, what are all those files in my
\Exchsrvr\Mdbdata directory? :)
-Original Message-
From: Mark Jeremy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10. tammikuuta 2003 0:39
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Transaction log reports
Hmmm, Transaction log is only
LMAO!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mellott, Bill
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 5:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IIS
guy's fight like you are married.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff
Hi everyone!
I have been asking around about this and no one seems to know. I had
someone recently ask me how they can change the SMTP Message-ID field in
the SMTP header. Their E2K servers are sending out a message ID that
they don't want sent. It looks something like this:
Message-ID:
You are misinformed. All transacted databases have transaction logs.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark Jeremy
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 3:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Transaction log reports
Hmmm, Transaction log
i like fish
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 2:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: IIS
I think you've confused this list with alt.webserv.advocacy, dumbass.
On 1/9/03 16:14, Christopher Hummert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't know about that. I've had multi-year old servers that hover around
1.5, some that have stayed consistently over 4. What I find even more
interesting is that I've started with many servers with an SIS of 1.0 -
following an ExMerge based migration, and I've seen a steady increase in SIS
over
Hi Allison,
Thanks for the information. It looks very useful
Didy
-Original Message-
From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 2:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Outlook Client and Language
Hi,
The folder names are in the same
If anyone cares to see, I've posted some screenshots of the Titanium OWA
here:
http://www.clishe.com/titanium/titaniumowa.htm
J a s o n C l i s h e
Senior Network Engineer
Analysts International, Sequoia Services Group
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Direct: (248) 371-3542
Mobile: (248) 891-8780
Thank you Jason.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Clishe, Jason
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 10:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Titanium OWA screenshots
If anyone cares to see, I've posted some screenshots of the Titanium OWA
We have 1 user in our organization who uses Windows CE 3.0 with Pocket
Outlook 3.0 to access e-mail on our Exchange2K box when he travels.
Normally I wouldn't allow it because we have no techs trained in CE but
this guy is the President of the college so he uses what he wants.
Anyway heres the
That article is fairly poorly written IMO. Not that anything it says is
factually incorrect, but it is misleading.[1]
Is SIS that important? There is no easy answer to that. Should it be a
consideration in planning, deployment and recovery? Absolutely.
[1] Entropy in the universe is
I have the exact same rule for another mailbox that works properly. I
have also tried to create this rule from different clients, so I assume
the problem is server side.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, January 09, 2003 4:28
I would clearing down the rules for that mailbox (via 'OOFRULES') incase
there is a corruption within the rules area for that mailbox and then try
again.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everyone wants one but not yours
-Original Message-
From: MS Exchange Mailing List
I think it's a bug of some kind. I'm having the same issue with one of
my users. I've been searching for a solution for a couple of months but
haven't found anything that seems to relate to it.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hague, Jeff
We're back to this again...My testing followed this path:
Since I don't have the problem on my PC with OLXP but my boss has the
problem on his PC, also using OLXP I:
Logged on my PC as him and setup his outlook profile
Tested a message sent from himself, to himself
The new message appeared
Are there any other places that Holidays are kept other than the Outlook.TXT
file
for OL98? I wanted to modify that file to contain our company holidays.
When I did
that though, I came up with some duplicates. Looking at the Outlook.TXT
file, the
holidays listed only go up to 2001. However, I
We have 2 EX2000 SP3 Servers. We are migrating from one to another. I
setup replication for some Public Folders to replicate every 4 hours on
a Normal sense of urgency. I am hearing complaints that items are
missing. Am I missing something here? Please help.
I think then that you've isolated the issue. Carry on with your testing and
let us know.
On 1/10/03 10:35, Friese, Casey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We're back to this again...My testing followed this path:
Since I don't have the problem on my PC with OLXP but my boss has the
problem on his
Outlook? www.slipstick.com
On 1/10/03 10:39, McCready, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are there any other places that Holidays are kept other than the Outlook.TXT
file
for OL98? I wanted to modify that file to contain our company holidays.
When I did
that though, I came up with some
Make sure you have added the address you want to use to your Personal
Address Book.
Then point the rule at this entry, rather than entering the name directly.
Be aware that this will be a client based rule, so you will need to have
Outlook logged in for it to fire. You might get it to be a server
The reported ratio can be highly skewed by having many small files sent to
many users on one server so a 1:5 ratio may not mean that exmerge would
create 45GB from a 30GB store. It might be worth comparing the summed
results of an mbinfo or mailbox resources export with the reported store
size
Agreed, if my current IS is 30GB in size the size of my IS after an exmerge
import/export could be as small as something just over 32K or as large as
100GB (or more). It's kind of hard to draw any conclusions from the SIS
ratio alone.
Kind of like the mailbox I exported to PST which was 60x
Here we go:
Store Size (from bkups):29.4GB
Total reported MB size: 19.1GB
Whitespace: 1.0GB
Deleted Item retention: 6.3GB
Current SIS ratio is 1.8:1
Judging by what this shows - it would make be believe that either the total
store size is
Hi all. Just saw some weird stuff.
I have multiple administrative groups. Let's call them administrative group A and
administrative group B.
Each administrative group has its own routing group - RG A and RG B respectively.
The SMTP connectors in RG B are set to service only RG B (connector
Please disregard. I found the reason. I had set up some additional address spaces on
routing group B connectors when I was troubleshooting some other issues way in the
past, and subsequently forgot about it. Getting old sucks :(
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov
Sent: Friday,
Robomon?
Bindview?
NetIQ?
Quest?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List
Our old exchange box is running NT4 and exchange 5.5 with veritas backup
exec 7.3 (and the exchange addon). I have just set up a new server with
win2k server and exchange 5.5 and I am considering just using ntbackup for
D/R (disaster recovery).
I understand the adavantages of the Veritas
The biggest fault I have found with Ntbackup is its lack of support for
tape auto-stackers. If that is not a concer for you, I would go with
Ntbackup.
Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 1:35 PM
To: Exchange
Not an issue. The tape drive is an HP Ultrium 100/200G drive that can
easily hold our 30G store.
-Original Message-
From: Depp, Dennis M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 1:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Ntbackup vs. Veritas for Exch 5.5 D/R ??
Is RLQuickED a MCS-provided only tool, or something publically available. A
quick Google on RLQuickED didn't turn up anything.
-Walden
Walden H Leverich III
President
Tech Software
(516) 627-3800 x11
(208) 692-3308 eFax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.TechSoftInc.com
Quiquid latine
Where can I find information's on how to config IIS4 for OWA. Thank
Tony
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:
I can do a full backup to another hard drive and then another second
complete backup to a tape every night.
Or, you could do as we do, a complete backup to a drive each night, and then
backup _that_ drive to tape. We've centralized a number of our server
backups to a machine we affectionately
There is nothing to really configure. You install IIS4, SP the box, patch,
install OWA, add Exch SP.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 10:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: IIS4 OWA
Where can I find information's on how
Which part of the FAQ isn't clear, or doesn't go in-depth enough for you? Which part
of the help files aren't clear, or don't go in-depth enough for you?
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/planning/55/OutlookWebaccess.asp
Honestly, looking over your posting history, I don't believe you
To do what?
--
Chris Scharff, MVP-Exchange
MessageOne
Exchange Monitoring Reporting:http://www.messageone.com/MV.asp
Free Custom OWA Screens:
http://www.messageone.com/m1owa/index.asp
On 1/10/03 12:28, Tim Ault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robomon?
Bindview?
NetIQ?
Quest?
NetIQ, absolutely, no question about it.
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10. tammikuuta 2003 20:28
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Your preference (given the capabilities of each w/cost not a
fact or)?
Robomon?
Bindview?
NetIQ?
Quest?
ok Here is what I got. Probaly a simple answer for this but my brain is now mush. The
workstation running outlook 2002 has 2 problems. 1. When you launch OWA it goes
straight to a mail box (the wrong one) with out asking for username and password. I
cleaned IE of cookies and files not
..to do what you use it to do.
Tim.
x3683
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 2:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Your preference (given the capabilities of each w/cost not af
act or)?
To do what?
--
Chris
MCS only.
-Original Message-
From: Walden H. Leverich III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 12:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Customizing the uncustomizable
Is RLQuickED a MCS-provided only tool, or something publically available. A
quick Google on
Oh, in that case... All of the above.
On 1/10/03 13:28, Tim Ault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
..to do what you use it to do.
Tim.
x3683
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 2:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re:
Actually, I think you can get it through your TAM now as well if you have a
premier support contract.
On 1/10/03 13:29, Daniel Chenault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MCS only.
-Original Message-
From: Walden H. Leverich III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003
Resource Hacker could probably do it.
http://www.users.on.net/johnson/resourcehacker/
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 1:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Customizing the uncustomizable
MCS only.
All,
As in Exchange 5.5. On the IMS connector properties you had a Routing
tab. Under this tab you could reroute incoming email. Can someone point
me to where I can find the equivalent to this on E2K? I'm driving
myself nuts trying to find out where I can configure this. Thanks for
you help!
Found it. There was a Transmit Holiday Forms Tool at Slipstick.
Thanks sir.
Robert
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 11:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Holiday Files
Outlook? www.slipstick.com
On 1/10/03
Under servers, servername, smtp, default smtp virtual server, properties
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 12:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Reroute Incoming Mail
All,
As in Exchange 5.5. On the IMS connector
I've looked in there a million times. I must just be going nuts. The
tab must be setup somewhat differently.
__
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support Engineering
Celera Genomics
W. 240.453.3575
C. 240.372.3644
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original
There are several possible answers to that question and I'm feeling lazy
today. What are you trying to do (and I'll answer that question specifically
if I can)?
On 1/10/03 14:22, Bowles, John L. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
As in Exchange 5.5. On the IMS connector properties you had a
Basically we have a SendMail server that catches all email sent to one
of our sites. It reads a list of authenticated email addresses and then
it passes it on to our Exchange server. So it sends it to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Then once it gets to the Exchange serverit
then process the mail from
By [EMAIL PROTECTED] do you mean [EMAIL PROTECTED]?
On 1/10/03 15:08, Bowles, John L. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Basically we have a SendMail server that catches all email sent to one
of our sites. It reads a list of authenticated email addresses and then
it passes it on to our Exchange
Basically we have a SendMail server that catches all email sent to one
of our sites. It reads a list of authenticated email addresses and then
it passes it on to our Exchange server. So it sends it to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Then once it gets to the Exchange serverit
then process the mail
Ok sorry but I'm going to ask it. Why are you doing this? Are you
running virus or content scanning on the sendmail server? Do you know
much about sendmail? If not, and you're not doing any scanning on the
sendmail server it might be better to have the mail directed to the
exchange server and take
I can think of a number of legitimate reasons to have a Sendmail gateway
which have nothing to do with virus or content scanning, though those might
be legitimate reasons as well. This is especially true in enterprise
environments, or in secure environments. Exchange has rather limited routing
and
True. But I was also curious as to his level of knowledge with sendmail.
With all the vulnerabilities and patches that come out on a regular
basis, if he doesn't know that much about it then it might be better to
see he can get rid of the machine instead of leaving a vulnerable
machine out in the
I have setup a stand alone server that is a the same as the production
server but having problem getting the OWA to work.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 11:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IIS4 OWA
Which part of
Tony, we are more than happy to help, but please try to be more descriptive
about your problems.
What is happening? Are you getting any errors? What do they say?
-Original Message-
From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 3:23 PM
To: Exchange
Exchange won't install OWA on a standalone server, it needs to be a member
server.
On 1/10/03 17:22, Tony Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have setup a stand alone server that is a the same as the production
server but having problem getting the OWA to work.
-Original Message-
So instead of a costly solution for us we may just restore to another
server on a daily basis to minimize downtime. Now as for all the users,
since they are pointing to that box, do you know if a simple DNS change
to the new server would still work with outlook?
Thanks
Saul
-Original
In doing my research for our anti-spam software, we've decided that this
software might fit our needs, but I've not seen it mentioned in any of the
messages of this forum or in the faq's, anyone use this? We currently are
using Trend Micro emanager and we do not like it.
http://www.funkyfreshdesigns.com/images/hold/zerowing.gif
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 7:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Access to Exchange Server
Somebody set us up the bomb.
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Technical
I guess it all depends on how one defines cost. Restoring to another server
on a daily basis would be extremely expensive in terms of manpower at my
organization. A DNS change might work for users (depends somewhat on network
configuration) but it's not seamless since at a minimum the user would
Where else would the mail be stored?
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Mark Jeremy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday,
The Oracle transaction logs aren't any different than the Exchange ones -
they're going to log a bunch of database specific crap. Most likely, you're
really wanting to look at the tracking logs.
I'd wager that the Oracle Application Server email application doesn't have
real message tracking
94 matches
Mail list logo
