Help!!!
I deleted a user's mailbox and recreated it (they had deleted all mail I have .pst file for recovery from backup) The object appears on the server on which it was created on but if I click on it it says the object cannot be found, this may be because replication has not completed It has been like this now for 18 hours!! What to do, Ex5.5 sp4 etc. thanks Vanessa Watkins Network Manager Royal Holloway, University of London Tel: 01784 443728 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RTF converted to HTML overnight!
I'm running Exchange 2000 service pack 3. We send all internal messages in Rich Text format but since upgrading from service pack 2 to service pack 3 the Rich Text Format e-mails are being converted to HTML format overnight! Has anyone seen this before of know why it may be happening? Regards Dave Hornby _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help!!!
Vanessa, You are using the same server in the site to view the object (if you go to a n other server it m8ight not have the update yet and you are trying to view the old object). Cheers Paul (just down the road from you, Brooklands) Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Watkins V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 January 2003 09:45 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Help!!! I deleted a user's mailbox and recreated it (they had deleted all mail I have .pst file for recovery from backup) The object appears on the server on which it was created on but if I click on it it says the object cannot be found, this may be because replication has not completed It has been like this now for 18 hours!! What to do, Ex5.5 sp4 etc. thanks Vanessa Watkins Network Manager Royal Holloway, University of London Tel: 01784 443728 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (6) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IIS
Hidden share of the M: drive[1], of course. [1] There is no M: drive[2] [2] Hi William! Les Bessant [EMAIL PROTECTED] IT Manager, Sanderson Townend Gilbert Direct Dial: 0191 269 0110 Mobile: 07976 234 165 http://www.sandersons.com -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 January 2003 21:23 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IIS What the hell is an M$? On 1/9/03 15:18, Johnny Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That apache.org post was a subtle anti M$ jab I think hhehe I saw a report the other day that apache has like 66% of the market and IIS 33%. J -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 1:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IIS 4 out of 5 admins prefer jackass . - Original Message - From: Alexander Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 4:08 PM Subject: Re: IIS I think jackass might be a little strong - it seemd a pretty good suggestion of a possible alternative to IIS. Alex Chris Scharff wrote: I'm confused as to how this answer was helpful to Tony. I looked at the URL you listed, but was unable to determine a download URL on that website for IIS. Perhaps you meant to point him to www.google.com, but just made an unfortunate typo. Certainly you wouldn't be engaging in puerile behavior would you? Jackass. On 1/9/03 12:44, Christopher Hummert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: www.apache.org -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 10:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IIS Can someone tell me where I can download IIS4 or IIS5. Thank Tony Nguyen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) System Administrator/DBA Senior Aerospace Jet Products (858) 278-8400 EXT. 250 www.jetproducts.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The information in this communication and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient any use, review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error please notify us immediately on 0191 261 2681 and delete the original message and any copies of it. Any opinions, conclusions or other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Sanderson Townend Gilbert are neither given nor endorsed by the firm. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IIS
I think you all missed the point of Mr. Scharff's post, but whatever, the mere fact that Hummert's parents allow him to leave his room everyday and post to mailing lists makes no sense either. - Original Message - From: Johansson Patrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 4:28 PM Subject: RE: IIS Hmmm, maybe you are right that we should keep this on topic and without any excess noise. Either way, don't you think that reacting to a humourous answer to a question any admin should know or know how to find out in that way is a bit overboard? Take it a bit easy, we all have stressful jobs and we are just having a bit of fun while trying to help others out. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 9. tammikuuta 2003 23:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IIS I'm confused as to how this answer was helpful to Tony. I looked at the URL you listed, but was unable to determine a download URL on that website for IIS. Perhaps you meant to point him to www.google.com, but just made an unfortunate typo. Certainly you wouldn't be engaging in puerile behavior would you? Jackass. On 1/9/03 12:44, Christopher Hummert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: www.apache.org -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 10:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IIS Can someone tell me where I can download IIS4 or IIS5. Thank Tony Nguyen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) System Administrator/DBA Senior Aerospace Jet Products (858) 278-8400 EXT. 250 www.jetproducts.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IIS
lol -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 2:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IIS I think you all missed the point of Mr. Scharff's post, but whatever, the mere fact that Hummert's parents allow him to leave his room everyday and post to mailing lists makes no sense either. - Original Message - From: Johansson Patrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 4:28 PM Subject: RE: IIS Hmmm, maybe you are right that we should keep this on topic and without any excess noise. Either way, don't you think that reacting to a humourous answer to a question any admin should know or know how to find out in that way is a bit overboard? Take it a bit easy, we all have stressful jobs and we are just having a bit of fun while trying to help others out. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 9. tammikuuta 2003 23:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IIS I'm confused as to how this answer was helpful to Tony. I looked at the URL you listed, but was unable to determine a download URL on that website for IIS. Perhaps you meant to point him to www.google.com, but just made an unfortunate typo. Certainly you wouldn't be engaging in puerile behavior would you? Jackass. On 1/9/03 12:44, Christopher Hummert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: www.apache.org -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 10:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IIS Can someone tell me where I can download IIS4 or IIS5. Thank Tony Nguyen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) System Administrator/DBA Senior Aerospace Jet Products (858) 278-8400 EXT. 250 www.jetproducts.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook Problem under Exch 5.5
1.4 Gig! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Candee Vaglica Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 4:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem under Exch 5.5 How large is the pst? -Original Message- From: Wilson, Fenton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 4:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook Problem under Exch 5.5 User has 2000 SR-1 9.0.0.4527, with a large PST, has 3 emails in outbox which do not clear though they get sent out whenever he hits Send/Receive. He is unable to delete items from his Personal Folder Inbox- gets message the messenger interface has returned an unknown error and he is unable to clear reminders. Exchange 5.5 on NT4 SP6a Any suggestions? TIA, Fenton Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Outlook Problem under Exch 5.5
Sounds like a corrupt PST file. - Original Message - From: Wilson, Fenton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 4:23 PM Subject: Outlook Problem under Exch 5.5 User has 2000 SR-1 9.0.0.4527, with a large PST, has 3 emails in outbox which do not clear though they get sent out whenever he hits Send/Receive. He is unable to delete items from his Personal Folder Inbox- gets message the messenger interface has returned an unknown error and he is unable to clear reminders. Exchange 5.5 on NT4 SP6a Any suggestions? TIA, Fenton Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IIS
I haven't seen my parents in weeks, but I did see your mom a few minutes ago. She said to say Hi for her -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 1:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IIS I think you all missed the point of Mr. Scharff's post, but whatever, the mere fact that Hummert's parents allow him to leave his room everyday and post to mailing lists makes no sense either. - Original Message - From: Johansson Patrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 4:28 PM Subject: RE: IIS Hmmm, maybe you are right that we should keep this on topic and without any excess noise. Either way, don't you think that reacting to a humourous answer to a question any admin should know or know how to find out in that way is a bit overboard? Take it a bit easy, we all have stressful jobs and we are just having a bit of fun while trying to help others out. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 9. tammikuuta 2003 23:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IIS I'm confused as to how this answer was helpful to Tony. I looked at the URL you listed, but was unable to determine a download URL on that website for IIS. Perhaps you meant to point him to www.google.com, but just made an unfortunate typo. Certainly you wouldn't be engaging in puerile behavior would you? Jackass. On 1/9/03 12:44, Christopher Hummert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: www.apache.org -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 10:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IIS Can someone tell me where I can download IIS4 or IIS5. Thank Tony Nguyen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) System Administrator/DBA Senior Aerospace Jet Products (858) 278-8400 EXT. 250 www.jetproducts.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble with creating a rule in Outlook to forward email
Using Outlook 2k connecting to Exchange 5.5 I am trying to set a rule to forward all email to a different external email. The error message says: Changes to the rule could not be saved. There is not enough memory or the rules are too complex. Try deleting some rules This is the only rule I have and my email box is empty. Any ideas? Found nothing on Technet or Google search. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IIS
Isn't that a show on MTV? John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, January 09, 2003 4:13 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: IIS Subject: Re: IIS 4 out of 5 admins prefer jackass . - Original Message - From: Alexander Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 4:08 PM Subject: Re: IIS I think jackass might be a little strong - it seemd a pretty good suggestion of a possible alternative to IIS. Alex Chris Scharff wrote: I'm confused as to how this answer was helpful to Tony. I looked at the URL you listed, but was unable to determine a download URL on that website for IIS. Perhaps you meant to point him to www.google.com, but just made an unfortunate typo. Certainly you wouldn't be engaging in puerile behavior would you? Jackass. On 1/9/03 12:44, Christopher Hummert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: www.apache.org -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 10:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IIS Can someone tell me where I can download IIS4 or IIS5. Thank Tony Nguyen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) System Administrator/DBA Senior Aerospace Jet Products (858) 278-8400 EXT. 250 www.jetproducts.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IIS
Someone take away his shovel please. On 1/9/03 15:30, Johnny Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Micro$oft -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 1:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IIS What the hell is an M$? On 1/9/03 15:18, Johnny Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That apache.org post was a subtle anti M$ jab I think hhehe I saw a report the other day that apache has like 66% of the market and IIS 33%. J -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 1:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IIS 4 out of 5 admins prefer jackass . - Original Message - From: Alexander Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 4:08 PM Subject: Re: IIS I think jackass might be a little strong - it seemd a pretty good suggestion of a possible alternative to IIS. Alex Chris Scharff wrote: I'm confused as to how this answer was helpful to Tony. I looked at the URL you listed, but was unable to determine a download URL on that website for IIS. Perhaps you meant to point him to www.google.com, but just made an unfortunate typo. Certainly you wouldn't be engaging in puerile behavior would you? Jackass. On 1/9/03 12:44, Christopher Hummert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: www.apache.org -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 10:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IIS Can someone tell me where I can download IIS4 or IIS5. Thank Tony Nguyen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) System Administrator/DBA Senior Aerospace Jet Products (858) 278-8400 EXT. 250 www.jetproducts.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 Recovery
Is SIS that important? I've always treated it as something that helps make for more efficient delivery rather than something to save space since over time the SIS ratio will tend towards 1:1 anyway. See KB article 198673 for a justification of this. Mark -Original Message- From: John W. Luther [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 January 2003 16:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 Recovery No, it doesn't. I've asked our Exchange Admin about the SIS, but he is out sick today. Our current setup is quite stable now. I failed to mention we are running Exchange 2000. We also have an independent box on which we run the Perl scripts that do the automated jiggery pokery. At 02:45 PM 1/8/2003 -0600, you wrote: Doesn't play hell with your SIS? On 1/8/03 13:20, John W. Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey. We have multiple small exchange servers that do their backups to recovery servers that have several mirrored drives so no single production server has any of its backups on the same drive mirror. With our database size limit we have one recovery server for every three mail servers. In addition we have at least one hot spare mail server. When there is an outage we note which folks are affected and then recreate their (now empty) mailboxes on the recovery server to get them back into email. We then Exmerge the backed-up mail out of the backups into the new mailboxes. Some tlog juggling has to be done in order to recover all mail, but it is fairly strait forward. Each of our servers costs ~6K using off the shelf components. We learned the value of lots of small servers when our Dell PowerEdge equipment crapped out on us repeatedly early last year. You could probably do this with three servers, then. One for production, one for recovery/backups and one hot spare. Under your limit, though? Well, I guess that would depend on your shopping ability and the components you choose. John John W. Luther Systems Administrator Computing and Information Services University of Missouri - Rolla At 11:02 AM 1/8/2003 -0800, Newsgroups wrote: I am not aware of a budget but when I mentioned the solution from Marathon Technologies they almost fell off their chairs. I think they want to spend somewhere from $3k to $7K (Not sure, as they have not told me anything). I told them that for that price the best thing they could do is have another server and do a daily restore of the database on that box and if the main server dies put up the new one instead. What do you think? Any other ideas? Thanks -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 10:48 AM Posted To: Exchange Newsgroups Conversation: Exchange 2000 Recovery Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 Recovery Seamless, transparent, automatic and cheap? Don't believe such a high availability solution exists. Even overspeccing a single box to ensure it's fully redundant gets rather expensive on a per user basis for only 180 users. What are the actual requirements surrounding the solution and what budget has been proposed to implement it? On 1/8/03 12:27, Newsgroups [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We are looking into different methods of recovery from Exchange 2000. I know there are several ways of doing this. We want to be able to recover w/ out any user interaction (by that we mean it would be transparent to them and they don't want to be down for 4 to 6 hours). We have about 180 users. I know we can cluster them but they don't want to go that route because of the cost. Will software or hardware replication work and be transparent or are there any other technologies that you may be aware of? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IIS
The question wasn't about exchange it was about IIS. He never said anything about exchange in his original message -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IIS A viable alternative as it relates to Exchange? Really. On 1/9/03 15:28, Christopher Hummert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Actually it was a very helpful answer to Tony. While it may not be the product he's looking for, it's a viable alternative and at least it's not venerable to a half billion cmd.exe exploits -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 1:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IIS I'm confused as to how this answer was helpful to Tony. I looked at the URL you listed, but was unable to determine a download URL on that website for IIS. Perhaps you meant to point him to www.google.com, but just made an unfortunate typo. Certainly you wouldn't be engaging in puerile behavior would you? Jackass. On 1/9/03 12:44, Christopher Hummert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: www.apache.org -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 10:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IIS Can someone tell me where I can download IIS4 or IIS5. Thank Tony Nguyen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) System Administrator/DBA Senior Aerospace Jet Products (858) 278-8400 EXT. 250 www.jetproducts.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IIS
It was posted in an Exchange forum. The assumption would be that he wants to use OWA. In which case IIS is the only solution -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 2:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IIS The question wasn't about exchange it was about IIS. He never said anything about exchange in his original message -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IIS A viable alternative as it relates to Exchange? Really. On 1/9/03 15:28, Christopher Hummert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Actually it was a very helpful answer to Tony. While it may not be the product he's looking for, it's a viable alternative and at least it's not venerable to a half billion cmd.exe exploits -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 1:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IIS I'm confused as to how this answer was helpful to Tony. I looked at the URL you listed, but was unable to determine a download URL on that website for IIS. Perhaps you meant to point him to www.google.com, but just made an unfortunate typo. Certainly you wouldn't be engaging in puerile behavior would you? Jackass. On 1/9/03 12:44, Christopher Hummert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: www.apache.org -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 10:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IIS Can someone tell me where I can download IIS4 or IIS5. Thank Tony Nguyen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) System Administrator/DBA Senior Aerospace Jet Products (858) 278-8400 EXT. 250 www.jetproducts.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help!!!
Have you tried a DS/IS adjust on the server? (N.B. do NOT check the PF options) -Original Message- From: Watkins V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 January 2003 09:45 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Help!!! I deleted a user's mailbox and recreated it (they had deleted all mail I have .pst file for recovery from backup) The object appears on the server on which it was created on but if I click on it it says the object cannot be found, this may be because replication has not completed It has been like this now for 18 hours!! What to do, Ex5.5 sp4 etc. thanks Vanessa Watkins Network Manager Royal Holloway, University of London Tel: 01784 443728 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] BBCi at http://www.bbc.co.uk/ This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IIS
Johansson Patrick wrote: ok, have to admit that you may have a point after having looked through the archives at Mr. Hummerts answers to various posts, not to mention the last one. Sorry. I'd just like to warn anyone new to the list that following any links posted by Mr. Hummert is not advisable. Really. Don't do it. You'll be sorry. Jim H _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IIS
Yea cause all the post on this list are on topic -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 2:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IIS It was posted in an Exchange forum. The assumption would be that he wants to use OWA. In which case IIS is the only solution -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 2:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IIS The question wasn't about exchange it was about IIS. He never said anything about exchange in his original message -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IIS A viable alternative as it relates to Exchange? Really. On 1/9/03 15:28, Christopher Hummert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Actually it was a very helpful answer to Tony. While it may not be the product he's looking for, it's a viable alternative and at least it's not venerable to a half billion cmd.exe exploits -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 1:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IIS I'm confused as to how this answer was helpful to Tony. I looked at the URL you listed, but was unable to determine a download URL on that website for IIS. Perhaps you meant to point him to www.google.com, but just made an unfortunate typo. Certainly you wouldn't be engaging in puerile behavior would you? Jackass. On 1/9/03 12:44, Christopher Hummert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: www.apache.org -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 10:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IIS Can someone tell me where I can download IIS4 or IIS5. Thank Tony Nguyen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) System Administrator/DBA Senior Aerospace Jet Products (858) 278-8400 EXT. 250 www.jetproducts.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IIS
Please explain to us how Apache is a viable alternative to IIS for running Outlook Web Access. I'd really like to hear this one. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 4:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IIS Actually it was a very helpful answer to Tony. While it may not be the product he's looking for, it's a viable alternative and at least it's not venerable to a half billion cmd.exe exploits -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 1:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IIS I'm confused as to how this answer was helpful to Tony. I looked at the URL you listed, but was unable to determine a download URL on that website for IIS. Perhaps you meant to point him to www.google.com, but just made an unfortunate typo. Certainly you wouldn't be engaging in puerile behavior would you? Jackass. On 1/9/03 12:44, Christopher Hummert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: www.apache.org -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 10:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IIS Can someone tell me where I can download IIS4 or IIS5. Thank Tony Nguyen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) System Administrator/DBA Senior Aerospace Jet Products (858) 278-8400 EXT. 250 www.jetproducts.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Syncing items in Public Folders Favorites
Daniel knows things. Lots of things. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Veld, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 4:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Syncing items in Public Folders Favorites Just a quick question. How did you determine they are trying to delete an item?? -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, 10 January 2003 4:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Syncing items in Public Folders Favorites The person attempted to delete an item and does not have the rights to do so. The delete operation is failing during sync and thus the message. Clear it by removing the folder from being synched, synch once, then add it back. - Original Message - From: Gonzalez, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 9:02 AM Subject: Syncing items in Public Folders Favorites We have some users that consistently get errors when syncing some items inside Public Folder Favorites. See the log: 7:47:47 Error synchronizing message 'FW: ShopKo 1/14/03 Top Hit Endcap' 7:47:47 [80070005-508-80070005-322] 7:47:47 You do not have sufficient permission to perform this operation on this object. See the folder contact or your system administrator. We have recreated the Outlook profile and the ost file and they still get the error. Other users with the same rights do not. We are using EX2000 SP3. The clients are using Outlook 2002 on Windows XP no SP's. They are connecting via a RAS dial in with RADIUS. Any idea's? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IIS
Different Paul. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Veld, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 6:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IIS Hey, what do you mean by that!! Regards, Paul. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, 10 January 2003 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IIS Not a problem. He's quite a Paul. On 1/9/03 16:17, Johansson Patrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ok, have to admit that you may have a point after having looked through the archives at Mr. Hummerts answers to various posts, not to mention the last one. Sorry. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10. tammikuuta 2003 0:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IIS I have no problem with people enjoying their time on this list, I do however have a problem with the odd jackass or seven. Mr. Hummert has demonstrated time and again that he's natural born loser, I was simply helping him out with an object lesson. On 1/9/03 15:28, Johansson Patrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmmm, maybe you are right that we should keep this on topic and without any excess noise. Either way, don't you think that reacting to a humourous answer to a question any admin should know or know how to find out in that way is a bit overboard? Take it a bit easy, we all have stressful jobs and we are just having a bit of fun while trying to help others out. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 9. tammikuuta 2003 23:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IIS I'm confused as to how this answer was helpful to Tony. I looked at the URL you listed, but was unable to determine a download URL on that website for IIS. Perhaps you meant to point him to www.google.com, but just made an unfortunate typo. Certainly you wouldn't be engaging in puerile behavior would you? Jackass. On 1/9/03 12:44, Christopher Hummert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: www.apache.org -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 10:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IIS Can someone tell me where I can download IIS4 or IIS5. Thank Tony Nguyen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) System Administrator/DBA Senior Aerospace Jet Products (858) 278-8400 EXT. 250 www.jetproducts.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Transaction log reports
Possibly, but I don't hardly understand why you'd want to. Transaction logs are going to show the changes that are actually made to the information store database tables. I'm not sure what kind of reporting you'd expect to get from them, frankly. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 7:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Transaction log reports No, I am talking about the transaction logs. Can they be archived and used as a source of information for reporting purposes? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Glenn Corbett Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 4:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Transaction log reports Well, there are transaction logs, maybe you should have a look at all those .log files in your mdbdata directory. On second thoughtsyou'd better not :) However, charles may be referring to tracking logs, not transaction logs. G. - Original Message - From: Mark Jeremy [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 9:38 AM Subject: RE: Transaction log reports Hmmm, Transaction log is only related to MS-SQL and there no such thing as transaction logs for Exchange. Could you re-word your question please? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 3:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Transaction log reports eh? - Original Message - From: Charles Marriott [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 3:22 PM Subject: Transaction log reports What is the best practice on extracting report info from E2k transaction logs or can it be done? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Transaction log reports
I dunno, I've got 6 Exchange servers with transaction logs on every one. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Mark Jeremy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 5:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Transaction log reports Hmmm, Transaction log is only related to MS-SQL and there no such thing as transaction logs for Exchange. Could you re-word your question please? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 3:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Transaction log reports eh? - Original Message - From: Charles Marriott [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 3:22 PM Subject: Transaction log reports What is the best practice on extracting report info from E2k transaction logs or can it be done? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help!!!
Thank you all, I found that there had been a replication problem so I deleted it and recreeated it and all is well except: there are loads of duplicate messages, is there an easy way to get rid of them. I have seen this before when doing exporting of .pst and importing again. Vanessa -Original Message- From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 January 2003 12:00 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help!!! Have you tried a DS/IS adjust on the server? (N.B. do NOT check the PF options) -Original Message- From: Watkins V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 January 2003 09:45 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Help!!! I deleted a user's mailbox and recreated it (they had deleted all mail I have .pst file for recovery from backup) The object appears on the server on which it was created on but if I click on it it says the object cannot be found, this may be because replication has not completed It has been like this now for 18 hours!! What to do, Ex5.5 sp4 etc. thanks Vanessa Watkins Network Manager Royal Holloway, University of London Tel: 01784 443728 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] BBCi at http://www.bbc.co.uk/ This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IIS
So you made an *assumption* about what he was asking? Didn't you have some words of wisdom on that topic once as well? On 1/9/03 16:19, Christopher Hummert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yea cause all the post on this list are on topic _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IIS
www.google.com ? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 2:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IIS Ok... So then describe for the class the 'logic' that led you to post a URL for Apache when someone asked for a download IRL for IIS. I'm anxiously awaiting a glimpse into your dementia. On 1/9/03 16:28, Christopher Hummert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No I didn't. If I was to make an assumption I would have assumed that he posted a message asking about IIS on and exchange list because he was going to install OWA -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 2:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IIS So you made an *assumption* about what he was asking? Didn't you have some words of wisdom on that topic once as well? On 1/9/03 16:19, Christopher Hummert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yea cause all the post on this list are on topic _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Transaction log reports
Hmmm, Transaction log is only related to MS-SQL and there no such thing as transaction logs for Exchange. Could you re-word your question please? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 3:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Transaction log reports eh? - Original Message - From: Charles Marriott [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 3:22 PM Subject: Transaction log reports What is the best practice on extracting report info from E2k transaction logs or can it be done? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IIS
guy's fight like you are married. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 5:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IIS Ok... So then describe for the class the 'logic' that led you to post a URL for Apache when someone asked for a download IRL for IIS. I'm anxiously awaiting a glimpse into your dementia. On 1/9/03 16:28, Christopher Hummert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No I didn't. If I was to make an assumption I would have assumed that he posted a message asking about IIS on and exchange list because he was going to install OWA -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 2:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IIS So you made an *assumption* about what he was asking? Didn't you have some words of wisdom on that topic once as well? On 1/9/03 16:19, Christopher Hummert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yea cause all the post on this list are on topic _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Trouble with creating a rule in Outlook to forward email
There is a size limit. If you have other rules that may be the case. The size is limited to 64k I think. Also I remember it is that way because that is a RPC packet size or something like that. I may get blasted for not looking it up the way the list has gone today. - Original Message - From: MS Exchange Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 4:47 PM Subject: Trouble with creating a rule in Outlook to forward email Using Outlook 2k connecting to Exchange 5.5 I am trying to set a rule to forward all email to a different external email. The error message says: Changes to the rule could not be saved. There is not enough memory or the rules are too complex. Try deleting some rules This is the only rule I have and my email box is empty. Any ideas? Found nothing on Technet or Google search. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Trouble with creating a rule in Outlook to forward email
I don't remember the limits, but there are finite amounts for the total number of rules and the space that they can consume. Also, you may want to take at look at the relative advantages and disadvantages of disabling Outlook rules in favor of Exchange rules. -Original Message- From: MS Exchange Mailing List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 1:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Trouble with creating a rule in Outlook to forward email Using Outlook 2k connecting to Exchange 5.5 I am trying to set a rule to forward all email to a different external email. The error message says: Changes to the rule could not be saved. There is not enough memory or the rules are too complex. Try deleting some rules This is the only rule I have and my email box is empty. Any ideas? Found nothing on Technet or Google search. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IIS
We are..in fact I can't wait till we get to the makeup $ex -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mellott, Bill Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 2:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IIS guy's fight like you are married. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 5:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IIS Ok... So then describe for the class the 'logic' that led you to post a URL for Apache when someone asked for a download IRL for IIS. I'm anxiously awaiting a glimpse into your dementia. On 1/9/03 16:28, Christopher Hummert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No I didn't. If I was to make an assumption I would have assumed that he posted a message asking about IIS on and exchange list because he was going to install OWA -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 2:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IIS So you made an *assumption* about what he was asking? Didn't you have some words of wisdom on that topic once as well? On 1/9/03 16:19, Christopher Hummert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yea cause all the post on this list are on topic _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Opinions on the best message format.
Plain text is the most basic and standard format that *ANY* email client can read. Any other platform (Linux, sun, Atari (j/k), etc.) would not be able to read RTF format and some wont be able to read HTML format. Have you or your lawyers saw some email messages that had some junk HTML code within a message so bad that you can't read the message itself. And there's waayyy to many people have different preference on how to decorate their email message with HTML to a point it can be quite annoying for those who receive it. So the main point is - plain text is the best email format out there - barnone. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of East, Bill Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 3:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Opinions on the best message format. In addition to the other objections raised, there are plenty of tricks that could be done with stylesheets, embedded content, c. that would substantially mask or change the content of a message after it had been received by your lawyers. Plain text makes it much harder to insert small print. -- be - MOS -Original Message- From: Darrin J. Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 12:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Opinions on the best message format. Can anyone think of arguments against using html or RTF? Personally I think that plain text is the way to go because of minimum hassle. But I'm dealing with 200 attorneys that like to ask why? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 9:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Opinions on the best message format. Plain text. On 1/9/03 10:02, Darrin J. Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I wanted to get the groups opinion on the best message format to use in Outlook 98. Text/HTML or RTF. Any pros or cons regarding the types would be most helpful. The backend is Exchange 2000 with SP3. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Transaction log reports
huh, must have missed something, what are all those files in my \Exchsrvr\Mdbdata directory? :) -Original Message- From: Mark Jeremy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10. tammikuuta 2003 0:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Transaction log reports Hmmm, Transaction log is only related to MS-SQL and there no such thing as transaction logs for Exchange. Could you re-word your question please? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 3:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Transaction log reports eh? - Original Message - From: Charles Marriott [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 3:22 PM Subject: Transaction log reports What is the best practice on extracting report info from E2k transaction logs or can it be done? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IIS
LMAO! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mellott, Bill Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 5:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IIS guy's fight like you are married. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 5:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IIS Ok... So then describe for the class the 'logic' that led you to post a URL for Apache when someone asked for a download IRL for IIS. I'm anxiously awaiting a glimpse into your dementia. On 1/9/03 16:28, Christopher Hummert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No I didn't. If I was to make an assumption I would have assumed that he posted a message asking about IIS on and exchange list because he was going to install OWA -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 2:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IIS So you made an *assumption* about what he was asking? Didn't you have some words of wisdom on that topic once as well? On 1/9/03 16:19, Christopher Hummert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yea cause all the post on this list are on topic _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changing the SMTP Message-ID field
Hi everyone! I have been asking around about this and no one seems to know. I had someone recently ask me how they can change the SMTP Message-ID field in the SMTP header. Their E2K servers are sending out a message ID that they don't want sent. It looks something like this: Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] One of the objections to this is that it exposes the internal machine name. The other is that the company has changed their SMTP domain name and it no longer matches the name in the Message-ID. I figure you can probably change it through SendMail or some other solution that re-writes the header of the message, but I'm wondering if there is a simpler solution. Any thoughts or ideas? Thanks, Jim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Transaction log reports
You are misinformed. All transacted databases have transaction logs. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark Jeremy Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 3:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Transaction log reports Hmmm, Transaction log is only related to MS-SQL and there no such thing as transaction logs for Exchange. Could you re-word your question please? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 3:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Transaction log reports eh? - Original Message - From: Charles Marriott [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 3:22 PM Subject: Transaction log reports What is the best practice on extracting report info from E2k transaction logs or can it be done? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IIS
i like fish -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 2:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IIS I think you've confused this list with alt.webserv.advocacy, dumbass. On 1/9/03 16:14, Christopher Hummert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The question wasn't about exchange it was about IIS. He never said anything about exchange in his original message -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IIS A viable alternative as it relates to Exchange? Really. On 1/9/03 15:28, Christopher Hummert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Actually it was a very helpful answer to Tony. While it may not be the product he's looking for, it's a viable alternative and at least it's not venerable to a half billion cmd.exe exploits -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 1:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IIS I'm confused as to how this answer was helpful to Tony. I looked at the URL you listed, but was unable to determine a download URL on that website for IIS. Perhaps you meant to point him to www.google.com, but just made an unfortunate typo. Certainly you wouldn't be engaging in puerile behavior would you? Jackass. On 1/9/03 12:44, Christopher Hummert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: www.apache.org -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 10:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IIS Can someone tell me where I can download IIS4 or IIS5. Thank Tony Nguyen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) System Administrator/DBA Senior Aerospace Jet Products (858) 278-8400 EXT. 250 www.jetproducts.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 Recovery
I don't know about that. I've had multi-year old servers that hover around 1.5, some that have stayed consistently over 4. What I find even more interesting is that I've started with many servers with an SIS of 1.0 - following an ExMerge based migration, and I've seen a steady increase in SIS over time, but I'll admit that they rarely get over 2-3 in those cases. Even at 1.5, a 30GB store is much smaller than the 45 that it would be otherwise. I'd call the benefit a mixture of both delivery speed improvements and disk storage space savings. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 6:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Recovery Is SIS that important? I've always treated it as something that helps make for more efficient delivery rather than something to save space since over time the SIS ratio will tend towards 1:1 anyway. See KB article 198673 for a justification of this. Mark -Original Message- From: John W. Luther [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 January 2003 16:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 Recovery No, it doesn't. I've asked our Exchange Admin about the SIS, but he is out sick today. Our current setup is quite stable now. I failed to mention we are running Exchange 2000. We also have an independent box on which we run the Perl scripts that do the automated jiggery pokery. At 02:45 PM 1/8/2003 -0600, you wrote: Doesn't play hell with your SIS? On 1/8/03 13:20, John W. Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey. We have multiple small exchange servers that do their backups to recovery servers that have several mirrored drives so no single production server has any of its backups on the same drive mirror. With our database size limit we have one recovery server for every three mail servers. In addition we have at least one hot spare mail server. When there is an outage we note which folks are affected and then recreate their (now empty) mailboxes on the recovery server to get them back into email. We then Exmerge the backed-up mail out of the backups into the new mailboxes. Some tlog juggling has to be done in order to recover all mail, but it is fairly strait forward. Each of our servers costs ~6K using off the shelf components. We learned the value of lots of small servers when our Dell PowerEdge equipment crapped out on us repeatedly early last year. You could probably do this with three servers, then. One for production, one for recovery/backups and one hot spare. Under your limit, though? Well, I guess that would depend on your shopping ability and the components you choose. John John W. Luther Systems Administrator Computing and Information Services University of Missouri - Rolla At 11:02 AM 1/8/2003 -0800, Newsgroups wrote: I am not aware of a budget but when I mentioned the solution from Marathon Technologies they almost fell off their chairs. I think they want to spend somewhere from $3k to $7K (Not sure, as they have not told me anything). I told them that for that price the best thing they could do is have another server and do a daily restore of the database on that box and if the main server dies put up the new one instead. What do you think? Any other ideas? Thanks -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 10:48 AM Posted To: Exchange Newsgroups Conversation: Exchange 2000 Recovery Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 Recovery Seamless, transparent, automatic and cheap? Don't believe such a high availability solution exists. Even overspeccing a single box to ensure it's fully redundant gets rather expensive on a per user basis for only 180 users. What are the actual requirements surrounding the solution and what budget has been proposed to implement it? On 1/8/03 12:27, Newsgroups [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We are looking into different methods of recovery from Exchange 2000. I know there are several ways of doing this. We want to be able to recover w/ out any user interaction (by that we mean it would be transparent to them and they don't want to be down for 4 to 6 hours). We have about 180 users. I know we can cluster them but they don't want to go that route because of the cost. Will software or hardware replication work and be transparent or are there any other technologies that you may be aware of? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
RE: Outlook Client and Language
Hi Allison, Thanks for the information. It looks very useful Didy -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 2:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Outlook Client and Language Hi, The folder names are in the same language as your version of Outlook used that opened the mailbox for the very first time. See if this will help you to rename the German top-level folders to the English equivalents: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;263668 Cheers, Allison W. inubit AG On Thursday 09 January 2003 02:46 pm, you wrote: Hi, We have a user in Germany who had a german installation of Office, which included Outlook 97. So, when he went into the application it would show his standard folders within the mailbox in the German language. So, whenever he goes to a different machine, even if that machine has an English version of Office, those standard folders are still in german. He now has a new machine with an English installation of Office and would like everything to be in English. Does anybody know how to reset the folders to show everything in English? The microsoft website says you can fix this problem with Outlook 2002, but we currently are running Outlook 2000. Hope you'll can help. Thanks, Didy uop Guildford IT Tel: +44 1483 466107 E-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This e-mail message (including any attachments) is intended for the addressee(s) only, and may contain confidential information. The unauthorised use, disclosure or copying of this e-mail or any information contained within it is strictly prohibited and may be illegal. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the author and delete this e-mail immediately in its entirety. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Titanium OWA screenshots
If anyone cares to see, I've posted some screenshots of the Titanium OWA here: http://www.clishe.com/titanium/titaniumowa.htm J a s o n C l i s h e Senior Network Engineer Analysts International, Sequoia Services Group Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Direct: (248) 371-3542 Mobile: (248) 891-8780 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Titanium OWA screenshots
Thank you Jason. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Clishe, Jason Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 10:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Titanium OWA screenshots If anyone cares to see, I've posted some screenshots of the Titanium OWA here: http://www.clishe.com/titanium/titaniumowa.htm J a s o n C l i s h e Senior Network Engineer Analysts International, Sequoia Services Group Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Direct: (248) 371-3542 Mobile: (248) 891-8780 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
CE / Pocket Outlook and Exch2K
We have 1 user in our organization who uses Windows CE 3.0 with Pocket Outlook 3.0 to access e-mail on our Exchange2K box when he travels. Normally I wouldn't allow it because we have no techs trained in CE but this guy is the President of the college so he uses what he wants. Anyway heres the issue. When he opens a message from someone outside of our e-mail domain, no problems. When he opens a message from inside ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), he can read the header info - sender, subject, etc, but the body of the message is gone and it says Unsupported text or character set removed. It doesn't seem to matter if the sender uses plain text, Rich text or HTML as the format and changing the font doesn't matter either. I believe the standard font is Times New Roman and that is installed on his little box and works in Pocket Word and Pocket Excel. Does anyone know of any issues between the CE/Pocket Outlook client and Exchange 2000? The MS Knowledge base doesn't have anything. Jeff Hague MCSE, MCT Network Manager Randolph-Macon College _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange 2000 Recovery
That article is fairly poorly written IMO. Not that anything it says is factually incorrect, but it is misleading.[1] Is SIS that important? There is no easy answer to that. Should it be a consideration in planning, deployment and recovery? Absolutely. [1] Entropy in the universe is increasing. On 1/10/03 5:57, Mark Harford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is SIS that important? I've always treated it as something that helps make for more efficient delivery rather than something to save space since over time the SIS ratio will tend towards 1:1 anyway. See KB article 198673 for a justification of this. Mark -Original Message- From: John W. Luther [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 January 2003 16:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 Recovery No, it doesn't. I've asked our Exchange Admin about the SIS, but he is out sick today. Our current setup is quite stable now. I failed to mention we are running Exchange 2000. We also have an independent box on which we run the Perl scripts that do the automated jiggery pokery. At 02:45 PM 1/8/2003 -0600, you wrote: Doesn't play hell with your SIS? On 1/8/03 13:20, John W. Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey. We have multiple small exchange servers that do their backups to recovery servers that have several mirrored drives so no single production server has any of its backups on the same drive mirror. With our database size limit we have one recovery server for every three mail servers. In addition we have at least one hot spare mail server. When there is an outage we note which folks are affected and then recreate their (now empty) mailboxes on the recovery server to get them back into email. We then Exmerge the backed-up mail out of the backups into the new mailboxes. Some tlog juggling has to be done in order to recover all mail, but it is fairly strait forward. Each of our servers costs ~6K using off the shelf components. We learned the value of lots of small servers when our Dell PowerEdge equipment crapped out on us repeatedly early last year. You could probably do this with three servers, then. One for production, one for recovery/backups and one hot spare. Under your limit, though? Well, I guess that would depend on your shopping ability and the components you choose. John John W. Luther Systems Administrator Computing and Information Services University of Missouri - Rolla At 11:02 AM 1/8/2003 -0800, Newsgroups wrote: I am not aware of a budget but when I mentioned the solution from Marathon Technologies they almost fell off their chairs. I think they want to spend somewhere from $3k to $7K (Not sure, as they have not told me anything). I told them that for that price the best thing they could do is have another server and do a daily restore of the database on that box and if the main server dies put up the new one instead. What do you think? Any other ideas? Thanks -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 10:48 AM Posted To: Exchange Newsgroups Conversation: Exchange 2000 Recovery Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 Recovery Seamless, transparent, automatic and cheap? Don't believe such a high availability solution exists. Even overspeccing a single box to ensure it's fully redundant gets rather expensive on a per user basis for only 180 users. What are the actual requirements surrounding the solution and what budget has been proposed to implement it? On 1/8/03 12:27, Newsgroups [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We are looking into different methods of recovery from Exchange 2000. I know there are several ways of doing this. We want to be able to recover w/ out any user interaction (by that we mean it would be transparent to them and they don't want to be down for 4 to 6 hours). We have about 180 users. I know we can cluster them but they don't want to go that route because of the cost. Will software or hardware replication work and be transparent or are there any other technologies that you may be aware of? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL
RE: Trouble with creating a rule in Outlook to forward email
I have the exact same rule for another mailbox that works properly. I have also tried to create this rule from different clients, so I assume the problem is server side. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, January 09, 2003 4:28 PM Posted To: MS Exchange Mailing List Conversation: Trouble with creating a rule in Outlook to forward email Subject: RE: Trouble with creating a rule in Outlook to forward email Then pursue the second option...or the rules are too complex and try simplifying your rule. -Original Message- From: MS Exchange Mailing List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 1:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Trouble with creating a rule in Outlook to forward email Using Outlook 2k connecting to Exchange 5.5 I am trying to set a rule to forward all email to a different external email. The error message says: Changes to the rule could not be saved. There is not enough memory or the rules are too complex. Try deleting some rules This is the only rule I have and my email box is empty. Any ideas? Found nothing on Technet or Google search. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Trouble with creating a rule in Outlook to forward email
I would clearing down the rules for that mailbox (via 'OOFRULES') incase there is a corruption within the rules area for that mailbox and then try again. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: MS Exchange Mailing List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 January 2003 16:15 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Trouble with creating a rule in Outlook to forward email I have the exact same rule for another mailbox that works properly. I have also tried to create this rule from different clients, so I assume the problem is server side. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, January 09, 2003 4:28 PM Posted To: MS Exchange Mailing List Conversation: Trouble with creating a rule in Outlook to forward email Subject: RE: Trouble with creating a rule in Outlook to forward email Then pursue the second option...or the rules are too complex and try simplifying your rule. -Original Message- From: MS Exchange Mailing List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 1:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Trouble with creating a rule in Outlook to forward email Using Outlook 2k connecting to Exchange 5.5 I am trying to set a rule to forward all email to a different external email. The error message says: Changes to the rule could not be saved. There is not enough memory or the rules are too complex. Try deleting some rules This is the only rule I have and my email box is empty. Any ideas? Found nothing on Technet or Google search. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (04) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CE / Pocket Outlook and Exch2K
I think it's a bug of some kind. I'm having the same issue with one of my users. I've been searching for a solution for a couple of months but haven't found anything that seems to relate to it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hague, Jeff Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 6:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: CE / Pocket Outlook and Exch2K We have 1 user in our organization who uses Windows CE 3.0 with Pocket Outlook 3.0 to access e-mail on our Exchange2K box when he travels. Normally I wouldn't allow it because we have no techs trained in CE but this guy is the President of the college so he uses what he wants. Anyway heres the issue. When he opens a message from someone outside of our e-mail domain, no problems. When he opens a message from inside ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), he can read the header info - sender, subject, etc, but the body of the message is gone and it says Unsupported text or character set removed. It doesn't seem to matter if the sender uses plain text, Rich text or HTML as the format and changing the font doesn't matter either. I believe the standard font is Times New Roman and that is installed on his little box and works in Pocket Word and Pocket Excel. Does anyone know of any issues between the CE/Pocket Outlook client and Exchange 2000? The MS Knowledge base doesn't have anything. Jeff Hague MCSE, MCT Network Manager Randolph-Macon College _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook Response Times
We're back to this again...My testing followed this path: Since I don't have the problem on my PC with OLXP but my boss has the problem on his PC, also using OLXP I: Logged on my PC as him and setup his outlook profile Tested a message sent from himself, to himself The new message appeared instantly. I logged into his PC with my account and setup my outlook profile Tested a message sent from myself, to myself Message appeared to sit in the outbox until I clicked another folder. Both PC's are plugged into ports right beside eachother on the same patch pannel and into the same switch. I swapped ports and tested again: My testing produced the same results. So, my question now becomes, does this sound like a software configuration issue? Since my testing concluded that regardless of which port my machine was plugged into, notifications worked flawlessly, I now don't buy that this is a UDP starvation issue despite understanding that polling works through UDP, unless it's happening at the nic on the PC. Again, both PC's are indentical in hardware and the OS and OLXP were applied from the same image. Both have the XP firewall piece disabled as well. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 12:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Outlook Response Times Your right. As soon as I sent it I realized it was wrong. Thank you. should have retracted it. - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 11:27 PM Subject: RE: Outlook Response Times I have the firewall turned on and I have problems with neither response time nor new mail notifications. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Newsgroups Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 9:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Response Times Casey I had this same problem on and it was because of XP. As them if by any chance they have the built in Windows XP Internet Connection Firewall checked. If this is checked it blocks certain ports (Not sure which one) and you don't get the email until another folder is clicked on. If that is not the case, is there a router between the client and server? Saul -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, November 14, 2002 8:31 AM Posted To: Exchange Newsgroups Conversation: Outlook Response Times Subject: Outlook Response Times Greetings, I'm running Exchange 2000 SP2 in an native win2k network. I have a few clients (mixed, some OLXP and some OL2000) that are seeing delays with mail delivery. For example, If I send a message to my boss the message doesn't appear in his inbox until after he clicks on a different folder and then clicks on his inbox again. Even if he clicks the send/receive button the message still doesn't show. The only commonalities between each client is that their OS's are all WinXP and they are all using Outlook in corporate mode. Any ideas would be appreciated. -Casey _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Holiday Files
Are there any other places that Holidays are kept other than the Outlook.TXT file for OL98? I wanted to modify that file to contain our company holidays. When I did that though, I came up with some duplicates. Looking at the Outlook.TXT file, the holidays listed only go up to 2001. However, I have holidays on my calendar up until 2005, so there must be somewhere else it is pulling these holidays from. Anybody know where? Thanks. Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Public Folder Items disappearing during replication
We have 2 EX2000 SP3 Servers. We are migrating from one to another. I setup replication for some Public Folders to replicate every 4 hours on a Normal sense of urgency. I am hearing complaints that items are missing. Am I missing something here? Please help. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Outlook Response Times
I think then that you've isolated the issue. Carry on with your testing and let us know. On 1/10/03 10:35, Friese, Casey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We're back to this again...My testing followed this path: Since I don't have the problem on my PC with OLXP but my boss has the problem on his PC, also using OLXP I: Logged on my PC as him and setup his outlook profile Tested a message sent from himself, to himself The new message appeared instantly. I logged into his PC with my account and setup my outlook profile Tested a message sent from myself, to myself Message appeared to sit in the outbox until I clicked another folder. Both PC's are plugged into ports right beside eachother on the same patch pannel and into the same switch. I swapped ports and tested again: My testing produced the same results. So, my question now becomes, does this sound like a software configuration issue? Since my testing concluded that regardless of which port my machine was plugged into, notifications worked flawlessly, I now don't buy that this is a UDP starvation issue despite understanding that polling works through UDP, unless it's happening at the nic on the PC. Again, both PC's are indentical in hardware and the OS and OLXP were applied from the same image. Both have the XP firewall piece disabled as well. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 12:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Outlook Response Times Your right. As soon as I sent it I realized it was wrong. Thank you. should have retracted it. - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 11:27 PM Subject: RE: Outlook Response Times I have the firewall turned on and I have problems with neither response time nor new mail notifications. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Newsgroups Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 9:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Response Times Casey I had this same problem on and it was because of XP. As them if by any chance they have the built in Windows XP Internet Connection Firewall checked. If this is checked it blocks certain ports (Not sure which one) and you don't get the email until another folder is clicked on. If that is not the case, is there a router between the client and server? Saul -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, November 14, 2002 8:31 AM Posted To: Exchange Newsgroups Conversation: Outlook Response Times Subject: Outlook Response Times Greetings, I'm running Exchange 2000 SP2 in an native win2k network. I have a few clients (mixed, some OLXP and some OL2000) that are seeing delays with mail delivery. For example, If I send a message to my boss the message doesn't appear in his inbox until after he clicks on a different folder and then clicks on his inbox again. Even if he clicks the send/receive button the message still doesn't show. The only commonalities between each client is that their OS's are all WinXP and they are all using Outlook in corporate mode. Any ideas would be appreciated. -Casey _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List
Re: Holiday Files
Outlook? www.slipstick.com On 1/10/03 10:39, McCready, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are there any other places that Holidays are kept other than the Outlook.TXT file for OL98? I wanted to modify that file to contain our company holidays. When I did that though, I came up with some duplicates. Looking at the Outlook.TXT file, the holidays listed only go up to 2001. However, I have holidays on my calendar up until 2005, so there must be somewhere else it is pulling these holidays from. Anybody know where? Thanks. Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OofO Assistant - Forward Rule - Changes to the rule could no t be saved
Make sure you have added the address you want to use to your Personal Address Book. Then point the rule at this entry, rather than entering the name directly. Be aware that this will be a client based rule, so you will need to have Outlook logged in for it to fire. You might get it to be a server rule i you create a Custom Recipient first. Be even more aware that you will create an e-mail loop that will not please you, your boss, your admin guys or their boss. Cheers, Chris -Original Message- From: MS Exchange Mailing List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 January 2003 18:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OofO Assistant - Forward Rule - Changes to the rule could not be saved Using Outlook 2k connecting to Exchange 5.5 I am trying to set a rule to forward all email to a different external email. The error message says: Changes to the rule could not be saved. There is not enough memory or the rules are tooo complex. Try deleting some rules This is the only rule I have and my email box is empty. Any ideas? Found nothing on Technet or Google search. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 Recovery
The reported ratio can be highly skewed by having many small files sent to many users on one server so a 1:5 ratio may not mean that exmerge would create 45GB from a 30GB store. It might be worth comparing the summed results of an mbinfo or mailbox resources export with the reported store size (less white space) to see if this really is the case on your servers especially the ones reporting 4. Let us know if you do! Mark -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 10 January 2003 13:07 Posted To: Exchange 55 list server Conversation: Exchange 2000 Recovery Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Recovery I don't know about that. I've had multi-year old servers that hover around 1.5, some that have stayed consistently over 4. What I find even more interesting is that I've started with many servers with an SIS of 1.0 - following an ExMerge based migration, and I've seen a steady increase in SIS over time, but I'll admit that they rarely get over 2-3 in those cases. Even at 1.5, a 30GB store is much smaller than the 45 that it would be otherwise. I'd call the benefit a mixture of both delivery speed improvements and disk storage space savings. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 6:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Recovery Is SIS that important? I've always treated it as something that helps make for more efficient delivery rather than something to save space since over time the SIS ratio will tend towards 1:1 anyway. See KB article 198673 for a justification of this. Mark -Original Message- From: John W. Luther [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 January 2003 16:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 Recovery No, it doesn't. I've asked our Exchange Admin about the SIS, but he is out sick today. Our current setup is quite stable now. I failed to mention we are running Exchange 2000. We also have an independent box on which we run the Perl scripts that do the automated jiggery pokery. At 02:45 PM 1/8/2003 -0600, you wrote: Doesn't play hell with your SIS? On 1/8/03 13:20, John W. Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey. We have multiple small exchange servers that do their backups to recovery servers that have several mirrored drives so no single production server has any of its backups on the same drive mirror. With our database size limit we have one recovery server for every three mail servers. In addition we have at least one hot spare mail server. When there is an outage we note which folks are affected and then recreate their (now empty) mailboxes on the recovery server to get them back into email. We then Exmerge the backed-up mail out of the backups into the new mailboxes. Some tlog juggling has to be done in order to recover all mail, but it is fairly strait forward. Each of our servers costs ~6K using off the shelf components. We learned the value of lots of small servers when our Dell PowerEdge equipment crapped out on us repeatedly early last year. You could probably do this with three servers, then. One for production, one for recovery/backups and one hot spare. Under your limit, though? Well, I guess that would depend on your shopping ability and the components you choose. John John W. Luther Systems Administrator Computing and Information Services University of Missouri - Rolla At 11:02 AM 1/8/2003 -0800, Newsgroups wrote: I am not aware of a budget but when I mentioned the solution from Marathon Technologies they almost fell off their chairs. I think they want to spend somewhere from $3k to $7K (Not sure, as they have not told me anything). I told them that for that price the best thing they could do is have another server and do a daily restore of the database on that box and if the main server dies put up the new one instead. What do you think? Any other ideas? Thanks -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 10:48 AM Posted To: Exchange Newsgroups Conversation: Exchange 2000 Recovery Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 Recovery Seamless, transparent, automatic and cheap? Don't believe such a high availability solution exists. Even overspeccing a single box to ensure it's fully redundant gets rather expensive on a per user basis for only 180 users. What are the actual requirements surrounding the solution and what budget has been proposed to implement it? On 1/8/03 12:27, Newsgroups [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We are looking into different methods of recovery from Exchange 2000. I know there are several ways of doing this. We want to be
Re: Exchange 2000 Recovery
Agreed, if my current IS is 30GB in size the size of my IS after an exmerge import/export could be as small as something just over 32K or as large as 100GB (or more). It's kind of hard to draw any conclusions from the SIS ratio alone. Kind of like the mailbox I exported to PST which was 60x larger in PST format than it was in the exchange DB. On 1/10/03 10:56, Mark Harford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The reported ratio can be highly skewed by having many small files sent to many users on one server so a 1:5 ratio may not mean that exmerge would create 45GB from a 30GB store. It might be worth comparing the summed results of an mbinfo or mailbox resources export with the reported store size (less white space) to see if this really is the case on your servers especially the ones reporting 4. Let us know if you do! Mark -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 10 January 2003 13:07 Posted To: Exchange 55 list server Conversation: Exchange 2000 Recovery Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Recovery I don't know about that. I've had multi-year old servers that hover around 1.5, some that have stayed consistently over 4. What I find even more interesting is that I've started with many servers with an SIS of 1.0 - following an ExMerge based migration, and I've seen a steady increase in SIS over time, but I'll admit that they rarely get over 2-3 in those cases. Even at 1.5, a 30GB store is much smaller than the 45 that it would be otherwise. I'd call the benefit a mixture of both delivery speed improvements and disk storage space savings. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 6:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Recovery Is SIS that important? I've always treated it as something that helps make for more efficient delivery rather than something to save space since over time the SIS ratio will tend towards 1:1 anyway. See KB article 198673 for a justification of this. Mark -Original Message- From: John W. Luther [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 January 2003 16:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 Recovery No, it doesn't. I've asked our Exchange Admin about the SIS, but he is out sick today. Our current setup is quite stable now. I failed to mention we are running Exchange 2000. We also have an independent box on which we run the Perl scripts that do the automated jiggery pokery. At 02:45 PM 1/8/2003 -0600, you wrote: Doesn't play hell with your SIS? On 1/8/03 13:20, John W. Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey. We have multiple small exchange servers that do their backups to recovery servers that have several mirrored drives so no single production server has any of its backups on the same drive mirror. With our database size limit we have one recovery server for every three mail servers. In addition we have at least one hot spare mail server. When there is an outage we note which folks are affected and then recreate their (now empty) mailboxes on the recovery server to get them back into email. We then Exmerge the backed-up mail out of the backups into the new mailboxes. Some tlog juggling has to be done in order to recover all mail, but it is fairly strait forward. Each of our servers costs ~6K using off the shelf components. We learned the value of lots of small servers when our Dell PowerEdge equipment crapped out on us repeatedly early last year. You could probably do this with three servers, then. One for production, one for recovery/backups and one hot spare. Under your limit, though? Well, I guess that would depend on your shopping ability and the components you choose. John John W. Luther Systems Administrator Computing and Information Services University of Missouri - Rolla At 11:02 AM 1/8/2003 -0800, Newsgroups wrote: I am not aware of a budget but when I mentioned the solution from Marathon Technologies they almost fell off their chairs. I think they want to spend somewhere from $3k to $7K (Not sure, as they have not told me anything). I told them that for that price the best thing they could do is have another server and do a daily restore of the database on that box and if the main server dies put up the new one instead. What do you think? Any other ideas? Thanks -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 10:48 AM Posted To: Exchange Newsgroups Conversation: Exchange 2000 Recovery Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 Recovery Seamless, transparent, automatic and cheap? Don't
RE: Exchange 2000 Recovery
Here we go: Store Size (from bkups):29.4GB Total reported MB size: 19.1GB Whitespace: 1.0GB Deleted Item retention: 6.3GB Current SIS ratio is 1.8:1 Judging by what this shows - it would make be believe that either the total store size is being reported incorrectly by my backups, or the SIS ratio is incorrect. I'd be willing to assume the former rather than the latter, however. Weird. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 11:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Recovery The reported ratio can be highly skewed by having many small files sent to many users on one server so a 1:5 ratio may not mean that exmerge would create 45GB from a 30GB store. It might be worth comparing the summed results of an mbinfo or mailbox resources export with the reported store size (less white space) to see if this really is the case on your servers especially the ones reporting 4. Let us know if you do! Mark -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 10 January 2003 13:07 Posted To: Exchange 55 list server Conversation: Exchange 2000 Recovery Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Recovery I don't know about that. I've had multi-year old servers that hover around 1.5, some that have stayed consistently over 4. What I find even more interesting is that I've started with many servers with an SIS of 1.0 - following an ExMerge based migration, and I've seen a steady increase in SIS over time, but I'll admit that they rarely get over 2-3 in those cases. Even at 1.5, a 30GB store is much smaller than the 45 that it would be otherwise. I'd call the benefit a mixture of both delivery speed improvements and disk storage space savings. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 6:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Recovery Is SIS that important? I've always treated it as something that helps make for more efficient delivery rather than something to save space since over time the SIS ratio will tend towards 1:1 anyway. See KB article 198673 for a justification of this. Mark -Original Message- From: John W. Luther [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 January 2003 16:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 Recovery No, it doesn't. I've asked our Exchange Admin about the SIS, but he is out sick today. Our current setup is quite stable now. I failed to mention we are running Exchange 2000. We also have an independent box on which we run the Perl scripts that do the automated jiggery pokery. At 02:45 PM 1/8/2003 -0600, you wrote: Doesn't play hell with your SIS? On 1/8/03 13:20, John W. Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey. We have multiple small exchange servers that do their backups to recovery servers that have several mirrored drives so no single production server has any of its backups on the same drive mirror. With our database size limit we have one recovery server for every three mail servers. In addition we have at least one hot spare mail server. When there is an outage we note which folks are affected and then recreate their (now empty) mailboxes on the recovery server to get them back into email. We then Exmerge the backed-up mail out of the backups into the new mailboxes. Some tlog juggling has to be done in order to recover all mail, but it is fairly strait forward. Each of our servers costs ~6K using off the shelf components. We learned the value of lots of small servers when our Dell PowerEdge equipment crapped out on us repeatedly early last year. You could probably do this with three servers, then. One for production, one for recovery/backups and one hot spare. Under your limit, though? Well, I guess that would depend on your shopping ability and the components you choose. John John W. Luther Systems Administrator Computing and Information Services University of Missouri - Rolla At 11:02 AM 1/8/2003 -0800, Newsgroups wrote: I am not aware of a budget but when I mentioned the solution from Marathon Technologies they almost fell off their chairs. I think they want to spend somewhere from $3k to $7K (Not sure, as they have not told me anything). I told them that for that price the best thing they could do is have another server and do a
Leaking Routing Group
Hi all. Just saw some weird stuff. I have multiple administrative groups. Let's call them administrative group A and administrative group B. Each administrative group has its own routing group - RG A and RG B respectively. The SMTP connectors in RG B are set to service only RG B (connector scope) A user whose home server is in administrative group A (routing group A) sent a message to an internet address. For some weird reason, the message chose to go via a front-end server that belongs to administrative group B (routing group B) How could this happen? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Leaking Routing Group
Please disregard. I found the reason. I had set up some additional address spaces on routing group B connectors when I was troubleshooting some other issues way in the past, and subsequently forgot about it. Getting old sucks :( -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 1:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Leaking Routing Group Hi all. Just saw some weird stuff. I have multiple administrative groups. Let's call them administrative group A and administrative group B. Each administrative group has its own routing group - RG A and RG B respectively. The SMTP connectors in RG B are set to service only RG B (connector scope) A user whose home server is in administrative group A (routing group A) sent a message to an internet address. For some weird reason, the message chose to go via a front-end server that belongs to administrative group B (routing group B) How could this happen? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your preference (given the capabilities of each w/cost not a fact or)?
Robomon? Bindview? NetIQ? Quest? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ntbackup vs. Veritas for Exch 5.5 D/R ??
Our old exchange box is running NT4 and exchange 5.5 with veritas backup exec 7.3 (and the exchange addon). I have just set up a new server with win2k server and exchange 5.5 and I am considering just using ntbackup for D/R (disaster recovery). I understand the adavantages of the Veritas backup database for file backup and recovery, but in the case of recovering an exchange server I'm not sure what extra I am getting from veritas. One thing that ntbackup will do that I have not been able to do with Veritas is backup to a file. With Ntbackup, I can do a full backup to another hard drive and then another second complete backup to a tape every night. I can still have the tapes offsite etc, but now also have a much faster restore off of another hard drive. Tom Alverson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ntbackup vs. Veritas for Exch 5.5 D/R ??
The biggest fault I have found with Ntbackup is its lack of support for tape auto-stackers. If that is not a concer for you, I would go with Ntbackup. Dennis -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 1:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Ntbackup vs. Veritas for Exch 5.5 D/R ?? Our old exchange box is running NT4 and exchange 5.5 with veritas backup exec 7.3 (and the exchange addon). I have just set up a new server with win2k server and exchange 5.5 and I am considering just using ntbackup for D/R (disaster recovery). I understand the adavantages of the Veritas backup database for file backup and recovery, but in the case of recovering an exchange server I'm not sure what extra I am getting from veritas. One thing that ntbackup will do that I have not been able to do with Veritas is backup to a file. With Ntbackup, I can do a full backup to another hard drive and then another second complete backup to a tape every night. I can still have the tapes offsite etc, but now also have a much faster restore off of another hard drive. Tom Alverson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ntbackup vs. Veritas for Exch 5.5 D/R ??
Not an issue. The tape drive is an HP Ultrium 100/200G drive that can easily hold our 30G store. -Original Message- From: Depp, Dennis M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 1:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ntbackup vs. Veritas for Exch 5.5 D/R ?? The biggest fault I have found with Ntbackup is its lack of support for tape auto-stackers. If that is not a concer for you, I would go with Ntbackup. Dennis -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 1:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Ntbackup vs. Veritas for Exch 5.5 D/R ?? Our old exchange box is running NT4 and exchange 5.5 with veritas backup exec 7.3 (and the exchange addon). I have just set up a new server with win2k server and exchange 5.5 and I am considering just using ntbackup for D/R (disaster recovery). I understand the adavantages of the Veritas backup database for file backup and recovery, but in the case of recovering an exchange server I'm not sure what extra I am getting from veritas. One thing that ntbackup will do that I have not been able to do with Veritas is backup to a file. With Ntbackup, I can do a full backup to another hard drive and then another second complete backup to a tape every night. I can still have the tapes offsite etc, but now also have a much faster restore off of another hard drive. Tom Alverson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Customizing the uncustomizable
Is RLQuickED a MCS-provided only tool, or something publically available. A quick Google on RLQuickED didn't turn up anything. -Walden Walden H Leverich III President Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x11 (208) 692-3308 eFax [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.) -Original Message- From: Kelley, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 7:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Customizing the uncustomizable We worked with MCS and they provided me with the RLQuickED utility. It was not intuitive to use and took me about 2 hours of playing with the utility to understand how it worked. Afterwards I was able to modify the dll change text and add additional paragraphs that made better sense and was customized for our environment. We have not had any problems, and this dll is used on all 4 of our exchange 2000 servers in production. Jason Qualcomm, Inc. -Original Message- From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 6:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Customizing the uncustomizable The nasty bit is where it then goes on and suggests moving items to your PST file which is something most of us are trying to avoid at all costs! I've tried out the RLQuikED tool to edit the dll which contains this message in the past following an old posting on this list (in a test lab), but it's not something I would ever consider using in production. MCS or someone like Chris Scharff are one solution to edit the actual message. However a simpler possibly cheaper solution might be to simply script some automatic message when your monitoring/reporting software detects a mailbox over a certain size. Mark -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 January 2003 14:34 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Customizing the uncustomizable What's so hard to understand about, you're over your limit, please reduce the size of your mailbox. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, January 06, 2003 4:17 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Customizing the uncustomizable Subject: Customizing the uncustomizable Does the hard-coded 'mailbox limits warning' message (my description) unique to a specific file? If so, perhaps I could hex-edit the darn thing to say something more meaningful.. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] BBCi at http://www.bbc.co.uk/ This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IIS4 OWA
Where can I find information's on how to config IIS4 for OWA. Thank Tony _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ntbackup vs. Veritas for Exch 5.5 D/R ??
I can do a full backup to another hard drive and then another second complete backup to a tape every night. Or, you could do as we do, a complete backup to a drive each night, and then backup _that_ drive to tape. We've centralized a number of our server backups to a machine we affectionately call backup and then we backup the backup files to tape. Granted it's a two step process to restore, first restore the .bak from the tape to the machine and then the files from the .bak, but on the other hand I can restore a machine w/o having to retrieve the backup tapes. -Walden Walden H Leverich III President Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x11 (208) 692-3308 eFax [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.) -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 1:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Ntbackup vs. Veritas for Exch 5.5 D/R ?? Our old exchange box is running NT4 and exchange 5.5 with veritas backup exec 7.3 (and the exchange addon). I have just set up a new server with win2k server and exchange 5.5 and I am considering just using ntbackup for D/R (disaster recovery). I understand the adavantages of the Veritas backup database for file backup and recovery, but in the case of recovering an exchange server I'm not sure what extra I am getting from veritas. One thing that ntbackup will do that I have not been able to do with Veritas is backup to a file. With Ntbackup, I can do a full backup to another hard drive and then another second complete backup to a tape every night. I can still have the tapes offsite etc, but now also have a much faster restore off of another hard drive. Tom Alverson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IIS4 OWA
There is nothing to really configure. You install IIS4, SP the box, patch, install OWA, add Exch SP. -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 10:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IIS4 OWA Where can I find information's on how to config IIS4 for OWA. Thank Tony _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IIS4 OWA
Which part of the FAQ isn't clear, or doesn't go in-depth enough for you? Which part of the help files aren't clear, or don't go in-depth enough for you? http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/planning/55/OutlookWebaccess.asp Honestly, looking over your posting history, I don't believe you even care to try since you have 4,000 list members here at your beck and call. -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, January 10, 2003 12:57 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: IIS4 OWA Subject: IIS4 OWA Where can I find information's on how to config IIS4 for OWA. Thank Tony _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Your preference (given the capabilities of each w/cost not af act or)?
To do what? -- Chris Scharff, MVP-Exchange MessageOne Exchange Monitoring Reporting:http://www.messageone.com/MV.asp Free Custom OWA Screens: http://www.messageone.com/m1owa/index.asp On 1/10/03 12:28, Tim Ault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Robomon? Bindview? NetIQ? Quest? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Your preference (given the capabilities of each w/cost not a fact or)?
NetIQ, absolutely, no question about it. -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10. tammikuuta 2003 20:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Your preference (given the capabilities of each w/cost not a fact or)? Robomon? Bindview? NetIQ? Quest? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: owa outlook 2002 outlook 2000 sr1
ok Here is what I got. Probaly a simple answer for this but my brain is now mush. The workstation running outlook 2002 has 2 problems. 1. When you launch OWA it goes straight to a mail box (the wrong one) with out asking for username and password. I cleaned IE of cookies and files not corrected. If I go thru AOL on this computer I get the login screen and all is find. With outlook 2002 I cannot get connected to proper mail box. Once again outlook 2002 does not prompt me for user name and password so I end up looking at a different hosted global address list. Default address is deleted. How do I release this wierd behavoir?? -Original Message- From: Matt Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 12:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: owa outlook 2002 outlook 2000 sr1 Help me please. Have ex2k sp3 server only server with exchange. Have one account that can access mailbox thru OWA no problems. Remotely from his home office can access thru outlook 2000 sr1. From in house workstation running XP and outllook 2002 cannot match name to address list. I can see other names on exch server thru outlook 2002 but not the one I need. I set up another xp system with outlook 2000 sr1 not attached to any domain just in it's own workgroup and it connects and opens this users mailbox. What am I missing?? I need his workstation to work with 2002 outlook! Thanks .+--xm ,)ç¥r(纷 \bí½½!䶶 0 á§zÇå±±r㬬:.Ë mé[hyç£\z[,æ¼ )räZZvh⧧+-iÙ¢2áG( .+-¦-xm¶ÿà ,Â)Ür¿ë(º· ýì\ öªÙÈb½ë!¶Úÿ 0³ §ÊþÈzÇȱæ«r¬¥:.˱Êâmé[hæ¯yì\ ©àz[,Ã)ärÅÈZËZvh§+-iÙ¢Ì2G(
RE: Your preference (given the capabilities of each w/cost not af act or)?
..to do what you use it to do. Tim. x3683 -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 2:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Your preference (given the capabilities of each w/cost not af act or)? To do what? -- Chris Scharff, MVP-Exchange MessageOne Exchange Monitoring Reporting:http://www.messageone.com/MV.asp Free Custom OWA Screens: http://www.messageone.com/m1owa/index.asp On 1/10/03 12:28, Tim Ault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Robomon? Bindview? NetIQ? Quest? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Customizing the uncustomizable
MCS only. -Original Message- From: Walden H. Leverich III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 12:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Customizing the uncustomizable Is RLQuickED a MCS-provided only tool, or something publically available. A quick Google on RLQuickED didn't turn up anything. -Walden Walden H Leverich III President Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x11 (208) 692-3308 eFax [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.) -Original Message- From: Kelley, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 7:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Customizing the uncustomizable We worked with MCS and they provided me with the RLQuickED utility. It was not intuitive to use and took me about 2 hours of playing with the utility to understand how it worked. Afterwards I was able to modify the dll change text and add additional paragraphs that made better sense and was customized for our environment. We have not had any problems, and this dll is used on all 4 of our exchange 2000 servers in production. Jason Qualcomm, Inc. -Original Message- From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 6:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Customizing the uncustomizable The nasty bit is where it then goes on and suggests moving items to your PST file which is something most of us are trying to avoid at all costs! I've tried out the RLQuikED tool to edit the dll which contains this message in the past following an old posting on this list (in a test lab), but it's not something I would ever consider using in production. MCS or someone like Chris Scharff are one solution to edit the actual message. However a simpler possibly cheaper solution might be to simply script some automatic message when your monitoring/reporting software detects a mailbox over a certain size. Mark -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 January 2003 14:34 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Customizing the uncustomizable What's so hard to understand about, you're over your limit, please reduce the size of your mailbox. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, January 06, 2003 4:17 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Customizing the uncustomizable Subject: Customizing the uncustomizable Does the hard-coded 'mailbox limits warning' message (my description) unique to a specific file? If so, perhaps I could hex-edit the darn thing to say something more meaningful.. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] BBCi at http://www.bbc.co.uk/ This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List
Re: Your preference (given the capabilities of each w/cost not af act or)?
Oh, in that case... All of the above. On 1/10/03 13:28, Tim Ault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ..to do what you use it to do. Tim. x3683 -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 2:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Your preference (given the capabilities of each w/cost not af act or)? To do what? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Customizing the uncustomizable
Actually, I think you can get it through your TAM now as well if you have a premier support contract. On 1/10/03 13:29, Daniel Chenault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: MCS only. -Original Message- From: Walden H. Leverich III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 12:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Customizing the uncustomizable Is RLQuickED a MCS-provided only tool, or something publically available. A quick Google on RLQuickED didn't turn up anything. -Walden Walden H Leverich III President Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x11 (208) 692-3308 eFax [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.) -Original Message- From: Kelley, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 7:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Customizing the uncustomizable We worked with MCS and they provided me with the RLQuickED utility. It was not intuitive to use and took me about 2 hours of playing with the utility to understand how it worked. Afterwards I was able to modify the dll change text and add additional paragraphs that made better sense and was customized for our environment. We have not had any problems, and this dll is used on all 4 of our exchange 2000 servers in production. Jason Qualcomm, Inc. -Original Message- From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 6:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Customizing the uncustomizable The nasty bit is where it then goes on and suggests moving items to your PST file which is something most of us are trying to avoid at all costs! I've tried out the RLQuikED tool to edit the dll which contains this message in the past following an old posting on this list (in a test lab), but it's not something I would ever consider using in production. MCS or someone like Chris Scharff are one solution to edit the actual message. However a simpler possibly cheaper solution might be to simply script some automatic message when your monitoring/reporting software detects a mailbox over a certain size. Mark -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 January 2003 14:34 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Customizing the uncustomizable What's so hard to understand about, you're over your limit, please reduce the size of your mailbox. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, January 06, 2003 4:17 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Customizing the uncustomizable Subject: Customizing the uncustomizable Does the hard-coded 'mailbox limits warning' message (my description) unique to a specific file? If so, perhaps I could hex-edit the darn thing to say something more meaningful.. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] BBCi at http://www.bbc.co.uk/ This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Customizing the uncustomizable
Resource Hacker could probably do it. http://www.users.on.net/johnson/resourcehacker/ -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 1:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Customizing the uncustomizable MCS only. -Original Message- From: Walden H. Leverich III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 12:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Customizing the uncustomizable Is RLQuickED a MCS-provided only tool, or something publically available. A quick Google on RLQuickED didn't turn up anything. -Walden Walden H Leverich III President Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x11 (208) 692-3308 eFax [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.) -Original Message- From: Kelley, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 7:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Customizing the uncustomizable We worked with MCS and they provided me with the RLQuickED utility. It was not intuitive to use and took me about 2 hours of playing with the utility to understand how it worked. Afterwards I was able to modify the dll change text and add additional paragraphs that made better sense and was customized for our environment. We have not had any problems, and this dll is used on all 4 of our exchange 2000 servers in production. Jason Qualcomm, Inc. -Original Message- From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 6:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Customizing the uncustomizable The nasty bit is where it then goes on and suggests moving items to your PST file which is something most of us are trying to avoid at all costs! I've tried out the RLQuikED tool to edit the dll which contains this message in the past following an old posting on this list (in a test lab), but it's not something I would ever consider using in production. MCS or someone like Chris Scharff are one solution to edit the actual message. However a simpler possibly cheaper solution might be to simply script some automatic message when your monitoring/reporting software detects a mailbox over a certain size. Mark -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 January 2003 14:34 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Customizing the uncustomizable What's so hard to understand about, you're over your limit, please reduce the size of your mailbox. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, January 06, 2003 4:17 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Customizing the uncustomizable Subject: Customizing the uncustomizable Does the hard-coded 'mailbox limits warning' message (my description) unique to a specific file? If so, perhaps I could hex-edit the darn thing to say something more meaningful.. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] BBCi at http://www.bbc.co.uk/ This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL
Reroute Incoming Mail
All, As in Exchange 5.5. On the IMS connector properties you had a Routing tab. Under this tab you could reroute incoming email. Can someone point me to where I can find the equivalent to this on E2K? I'm driving myself nuts trying to find out where I can configure this. Thanks for you help! __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Holiday Files
Found it. There was a Transmit Holiday Forms Tool at Slipstick. Thanks sir. Robert -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Holiday Files Outlook? www.slipstick.com On 1/10/03 10:39, McCready, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are there any other places that Holidays are kept other than the Outlook.TXT file for OL98? I wanted to modify that file to contain our company holidays. When I did that though, I came up with some duplicates. Looking at the Outlook.TXT file, the holidays listed only go up to 2001. However, I have holidays on my calendar up until 2005, so there must be somewhere else it is pulling these holidays from. Anybody know where? Thanks. Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Reroute Incoming Mail
Under servers, servername, smtp, default smtp virtual server, properties -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 12:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Reroute Incoming Mail All, As in Exchange 5.5. On the IMS connector properties you had a Routing tab. Under this tab you could reroute incoming email. Can someone point me to where I can find the equivalent to this on E2K? I'm driving myself nuts trying to find out where I can configure this. Thanks for you help! __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Reroute Incoming Mail
I've looked in there a million times. I must just be going nuts. The tab must be setup somewhat differently. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics W. 240.453.3575 C. 240.372.3644 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Gordon Olson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 3:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Reroute Incoming Mail Under servers, servername, smtp, default smtp virtual server, properties -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 12:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Reroute Incoming Mail All, As in Exchange 5.5. On the IMS connector properties you had a Routing tab. Under this tab you could reroute incoming email. Can someone point me to where I can find the equivalent to this on E2K? I'm driving myself nuts trying to find out where I can configure this. Thanks for you help! __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Reroute Incoming Mail
There are several possible answers to that question and I'm feeling lazy today. What are you trying to do (and I'll answer that question specifically if I can)? On 1/10/03 14:22, Bowles, John L. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All, As in Exchange 5.5. On the IMS connector properties you had a Routing tab. Under this tab you could reroute incoming email. Can someone point me to where I can find the equivalent to this on E2K? I'm driving myself nuts trying to find out where I can configure this. Thanks for you help! __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Reroute Incoming Mail
Basically we have a SendMail server that catches all email sent to one of our sites. It reads a list of authenticated email addresses and then it passes it on to our Exchange server. So it sends it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Then once it gets to the Exchange serverit then process the mail from that address as Inbound mail.You see where I'm going with this? And please. Do not ask me why we are doing this. I'm inheriting this crap. Thanks for you help! __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 3:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Reroute Incoming Mail There are several possible answers to that question and I'm feeling lazy today. What are you trying to do (and I'll answer that question specifically if I can)? On 1/10/03 14:22, Bowles, John L. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All, As in Exchange 5.5. On the IMS connector properties you had a Routing tab. Under this tab you could reroute incoming email. Can someone point me to where I can find the equivalent to this on E2K? I'm driving myself nuts trying to find out where I can configure this. Thanks for you help! __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Reroute Incoming Mail
By [EMAIL PROTECTED] do you mean [EMAIL PROTECTED]? On 1/10/03 15:08, Bowles, John L. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Basically we have a SendMail server that catches all email sent to one of our sites. It reads a list of authenticated email addresses and then it passes it on to our Exchange server. So it sends it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Then once it gets to the Exchange serverit then process the mail from that address as Inbound mail.You see where I'm going with this? And please. Do not ask me why we are doing this. I'm inheriting this crap. Thanks for you help! __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 3:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Reroute Incoming Mail There are several possible answers to that question and I'm feeling lazy today. What are you trying to do (and I'll answer that question specifically if I can)? On 1/10/03 14:22, Bowles, John L. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All, As in Exchange 5.5. On the IMS connector properties you had a Routing tab. Under this tab you could reroute incoming email. Can someone point me to where I can find the equivalent to this on E2K? I'm driving myself nuts trying to find out where I can configure this. Thanks for you help! __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Reroute Incoming Mail
Basically we have a SendMail server that catches all email sent to one of our sites. It reads a list of authenticated email addresses and then it passes it on to our Exchange server. So it sends it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Then once it gets to the Exchange serverit then process the mail from that address as Inbound mail.You see where I'm going with this? And please. Do not ask me why we are doing this. I'm inheriting this crap. Thanks for you help! What's in /etc/sendmail.cf and in /etc/mail/ ? Why not asking why you do it like that ? Everything has a reason, knowing why may be enlightenling. On the sendmail box you can do whatever you want with the mails. Agreed, it's not click-click-click. kr= _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Reroute Incoming Mail
Ok sorry but I'm going to ask it. Why are you doing this? Are you running virus or content scanning on the sendmail server? Do you know much about sendmail? If not, and you're not doing any scanning on the sendmail server it might be better to have the mail directed to the exchange server and take out the redundant system. If you do have a need for this system could you please tell us what's in the /etc/sendmail.cf file and in the /etc/mail/ directory? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bowles, John L. Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 1:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Reroute Incoming Mail Basically we have a SendMail server that catches all email sent to one of our sites. It reads a list of authenticated email addresses and then it passes it on to our Exchange server. So it sends it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Then once it gets to the Exchange serverit then process the mail from that address as Inbound mail.You see where I'm going with this? And please. Do not ask me why we are doing this. I'm inheriting this crap. Thanks for you help! __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 3:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Reroute Incoming Mail There are several possible answers to that question and I'm feeling lazy today. What are you trying to do (and I'll answer that question specifically if I can)? On 1/10/03 14:22, Bowles, John L. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All, As in Exchange 5.5. On the IMS connector properties you had a Routing tab. Under this tab you could reroute incoming email. Can someone point me to where I can find the equivalent to this on E2K? I'm driving myself nuts trying to find out where I can configure this. Thanks for you help! __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Reroute Incoming Mail
I can think of a number of legitimate reasons to have a Sendmail gateway which have nothing to do with virus or content scanning, though those might be legitimate reasons as well. This is especially true in enterprise environments, or in secure environments. Exchange has rather limited routing and rewrite capabilities in comparison. On 1/10/03 16:00, Christopher Hummert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok sorry but I'm going to ask it. Why are you doing this? Are you running virus or content scanning on the sendmail server? Do you know much about sendmail? If not, and you're not doing any scanning on the sendmail server it might be better to have the mail directed to the exchange server and take out the redundant system. If you do have a need for this system could you please tell us what's in the /etc/sendmail.cf file and in the /etc/mail/ directory? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bowles, John L. Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 1:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Reroute Incoming Mail Basically we have a SendMail server that catches all email sent to one of our sites. It reads a list of authenticated email addresses and then it passes it on to our Exchange server. So it sends it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Then once it gets to the Exchange serverit then process the mail from that address as Inbound mail.You see where I'm going with this? And please. Do not ask me why we are doing this. I'm inheriting this crap. Thanks for you help! __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 3:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Reroute Incoming Mail There are several possible answers to that question and I'm feeling lazy today. What are you trying to do (and I'll answer that question specifically if I can)? On 1/10/03 14:22, Bowles, John L. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All, As in Exchange 5.5. On the IMS connector properties you had a Routing tab. Under this tab you could reroute incoming email. Can someone point me to where I can find the equivalent to this on E2K? I'm driving myself nuts trying to find out where I can configure this. Thanks for you help! __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Reroute Incoming Mail
True. But I was also curious as to his level of knowledge with sendmail. With all the vulnerabilities and patches that come out on a regular basis, if he doesn't know that much about it then it might be better to see he can get rid of the machine instead of leaving a vulnerable machine out in the open. So I guess that leads to another question. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 2:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Reroute Incoming Mail I can think of a number of legitimate reasons to have a Sendmail gateway which have nothing to do with virus or content scanning, though those might be legitimate reasons as well. This is especially true in enterprise environments, or in secure environments. Exchange has rather limited routing and rewrite capabilities in comparison. On 1/10/03 16:00, Christopher Hummert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok sorry but I'm going to ask it. Why are you doing this? Are you running virus or content scanning on the sendmail server? Do you know much about sendmail? If not, and you're not doing any scanning on the sendmail server it might be better to have the mail directed to the exchange server and take out the redundant system. If you do have a need for this system could you please tell us what's in the /etc/sendmail.cf file and in the /etc/mail/ directory? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bowles, John L. Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 1:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Reroute Incoming Mail Basically we have a SendMail server that catches all email sent to one of our sites. It reads a list of authenticated email addresses and then it passes it on to our Exchange server. So it sends it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Then once it gets to the Exchange serverit then process the mail from that address as Inbound mail.You see where I'm going with this? And please. Do not ask me why we are doing this. I'm inheriting this crap. Thanks for you help! __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 3:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Reroute Incoming Mail There are several possible answers to that question and I'm feeling lazy today. What are you trying to do (and I'll answer that question specifically if I can)? On 1/10/03 14:22, Bowles, John L. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All, As in Exchange 5.5. On the IMS connector properties you had a Routing tab. Under this tab you could reroute incoming email. Can someone point me to where I can find the equivalent to this on E2K? I'm driving myself nuts trying to find out where I can configure this. Thanks for you help! __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IIS4 OWA
I have setup a stand alone server that is a the same as the production server but having problem getting the OWA to work. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 11:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IIS4 OWA Which part of the FAQ isn't clear, or doesn't go in-depth enough for you? Which part of the help files aren't clear, or don't go in-depth enough for you? http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/planning/55/OutlookWebaccess.asp Honestly, looking over your posting history, I don't believe you even care to try since you have 4,000 list members here at your beck and call. -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, January 10, 2003 12:57 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: IIS4 OWA Subject: IIS4 OWA Where can I find information's on how to config IIS4 for OWA. Thank Tony _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IIS4 OWA
Tony, we are more than happy to help, but please try to be more descriptive about your problems. What is happening? Are you getting any errors? What do they say? -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 3:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IIS4 OWA I have setup a stand alone server that is a the same as the production server but having problem getting the OWA to work. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 11:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IIS4 OWA Which part of the FAQ isn't clear, or doesn't go in-depth enough for you? Which part of the help files aren't clear, or don't go in-depth enough for you? http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/planning/55/OutlookWebaccess.asp Honestly, looking over your posting history, I don't believe you even care to try since you have 4,000 list members here at your beck and call. -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, January 10, 2003 12:57 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: IIS4 OWA Subject: IIS4 OWA Where can I find information's on how to config IIS4 for OWA. Thank Tony _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IIS4 OWA
Exchange won't install OWA on a standalone server, it needs to be a member server. On 1/10/03 17:22, Tony Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have setup a stand alone server that is a the same as the production server but having problem getting the OWA to work. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 11:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IIS4 OWA Which part of the FAQ isn't clear, or doesn't go in-depth enough for you? Which part of the help files aren't clear, or don't go in-depth enough for you? http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/planning/55/OutlookWebaccess.asp Honestly, looking over your posting history, I don't believe you even care to try since you have 4,000 list members here at your beck and call. -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, January 10, 2003 12:57 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: IIS4 OWA Subject: IIS4 OWA Where can I find information's on how to config IIS4 for OWA. Thank Tony _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 Recovery
So instead of a costly solution for us we may just restore to another server on a daily basis to minimize downtime. Now as for all the users, since they are pointing to that box, do you know if a simple DNS change to the new server would still work with outlook? Thanks Saul -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, January 10, 2003 9:47 AM Posted To: Exchange Newsgroups Conversation: Exchange 2000 Recovery Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 Recovery Agreed, if my current IS is 30GB in size the size of my IS after an exmerge import/export could be as small as something just over 32K or as large as 100GB (or more). It's kind of hard to draw any conclusions from the SIS ratio alone. Kind of like the mailbox I exported to PST which was 60x larger in PST format than it was in the exchange DB. On 1/10/03 10:56, Mark Harford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The reported ratio can be highly skewed by having many small files sent to many users on one server so a 1:5 ratio may not mean that exmerge would create 45GB from a 30GB store. It might be worth comparing the summed results of an mbinfo or mailbox resources export with the reported store size (less white space) to see if this really is the case on your servers especially the ones reporting 4. Let us know if you do! Mark -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 10 January 2003 13:07 Posted To: Exchange 55 list server Conversation: Exchange 2000 Recovery Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Recovery I don't know about that. I've had multi-year old servers that hover around 1.5, some that have stayed consistently over 4. What I find even more interesting is that I've started with many servers with an SIS of 1.0 - following an ExMerge based migration, and I've seen a steady increase in SIS over time, but I'll admit that they rarely get over 2-3 in those cases. Even at 1.5, a 30GB store is much smaller than the 45 that it would be otherwise. I'd call the benefit a mixture of both delivery speed improvements and disk storage space savings. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 6:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Recovery Is SIS that important? I've always treated it as something that helps make for more efficient delivery rather than something to save space since over time the SIS ratio will tend towards 1:1 anyway. See KB article 198673 for a justification of this. Mark -Original Message- From: John W. Luther [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 January 2003 16:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 Recovery No, it doesn't. I've asked our Exchange Admin about the SIS, but he is out sick today. Our current setup is quite stable now. I failed to mention we are running Exchange 2000. We also have an independent box on which we run the Perl scripts that do the automated jiggery pokery. At 02:45 PM 1/8/2003 -0600, you wrote: Doesn't play hell with your SIS? On 1/8/03 13:20, John W. Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey. We have multiple small exchange servers that do their backups to recovery servers that have several mirrored drives so no single production server has any of its backups on the same drive mirror. With our database size limit we have one recovery server for every three mail servers. In addition we have at least one hot spare mail server. When there is an outage we note which folks are affected and then recreate their (now empty) mailboxes on the recovery server to get them back into email. We then Exmerge the backed-up mail out of the backups into the new mailboxes. Some tlog juggling has to be done in order to recover all mail, but it is fairly strait forward. Each of our servers costs ~6K using off the shelf components. We learned the value of lots of small servers when our Dell PowerEdge equipment crapped out on us repeatedly early last year. You could probably do this with three servers, then. One for production, one for recovery/backups and one hot spare. Under your limit, though? Well, I guess that would depend on your shopping ability and the components you choose. John John W. Luther Systems Administrator Computing and Information Services University of Missouri - Rolla At 11:02 AM 1/8/2003 -0800, Newsgroups wrote: I am not aware of a budget but when I mentioned the solution from Marathon Technologies they almost fell off their chairs. I think they want to spend somewhere from $3k to $7K (Not sure, as they have not told me anything). I told them that for that price the best
Pure Message from Active State formally perlmx
In doing my research for our anti-spam software, we've decided that this software might fit our needs, but I've not seen it mentioned in any of the messages of this forum or in the faq's, anyone use this? We currently are using Trend Micro emanager and we do not like it. \\ - - // (--@-@--) +-oOOo-(_)-oOOo--+ |\\_|_// | |John M. Strongosky, |San Diego Community College |District Email Administrator |Phone: 619.388.6725 |8bits down a wire, spoken words fly away, |while written word's stay on +--Oooo--+ oooO ( ) ( ) ) / \ ( (_/ \_) Remember 9/11, In an Atom Bomb, Chemical, and Biological Detonation we are all Downwinder's... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Access to Exchange Server
http://www.funkyfreshdesigns.com/images/hold/zerowing.gif -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 7:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Access to Exchange Server Somebody set us up the bomb. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Access to Exchange Server All your ports belong to us. - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 12:23 PM Subject: Re: Access to Exchange Server Why wouldn't they be able to access the server given the open ports?[1] Here's a list of your currently open ports... Open Port: 25 Open Port: 27 Open Port: 110 Open Port: 119 Open Port: 135 Open Port: 139 Open Port: 143 Open Port: 389 Open Port: 445 Open Port: 563 Open Port: 593 Open Port: 636 Open Port: 993 Open Port: 995 Open Port: 1030 Open Port: 1032 Open Port: 1035 Open Port: 1037 Open Port: 1041 Open Port: 1043 Open Port: 1047 Open Port: 1049 Open Port: 1051 Open Port: 1053 Open Port: 1069 [1] Should be using VPN to access. On 1/9/03 8:03, Cooke, Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: See that's what I thought as well. I even opened up a ticket with Cisco and went through our entire settings and they couldn't find any holes that would be allowing this type of access. Brian Cooke Systems Administrator U.S. Inspect -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 11:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Access to Exchange Server You mean they can get in from the Internet? Your firewall is misconfigured. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Cooke, Brian Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 1:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Access to Exchange Server I have a problem with access to our Exchange server. We are using Exchange 5.5 and have just migrated from NT 4.0 to Win2K Advanced server. The old server was also the PDC and it still is. Recently I realized that anyone with Outlook and internet access can access the server as long as they know the name or IP adress of the server, can authenticate to our PDC, and there is a mailbox for that user. This did not happen with our old server. We use a PIX 520 firewall so I contacted Cisco and they seem to think our firewall config is correct. Both the PDC and the Exchange server have external IP addresses and there is an mx record for the Exchange server. Anyone got any ideas? Thanks in advance, Brian _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL
Re: Exchange 2000 Recovery
I guess it all depends on how one defines cost. Restoring to another server on a daily basis would be extremely expensive in terms of manpower at my organization. A DNS change might work for users (depends somewhat on network configuration) but it's not seamless since at a minimum the user would have to restart Outlook, and there's no way to automate server failover either. So if seamless and automatic are no longer requirements, the number of possible solutions and costs for implementation change dramatically. -- Chris Scharff, MVP-Exchange MessageOne Exchange Monitoring Reporting:http://www.messageone.com/MV.asp Free Custom OWA Screens: http://www.messageone.com/m1owa/index.asp On 1/10/03 17:44, Newsgroups [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So instead of a costly solution for us we may just restore to another server on a daily basis to minimize downtime. Now as for all the users, since they are pointing to that box, do you know if a simple DNS change to the new server would still work with outlook? Thanks Saul -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, January 10, 2003 9:47 AM Posted To: Exchange Newsgroups Conversation: Exchange 2000 Recovery Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 Recovery Agreed, if my current IS is 30GB in size the size of my IS after an exmerge import/export could be as small as something just over 32K or as large as 100GB (or more). It's kind of hard to draw any conclusions from the SIS ratio alone. Kind of like the mailbox I exported to PST which was 60x larger in PST format than it was in the exchange DB. On 1/10/03 10:56, Mark Harford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The reported ratio can be highly skewed by having many small files sent to many users on one server so a 1:5 ratio may not mean that exmerge would create 45GB from a 30GB store. It might be worth comparing the summed results of an mbinfo or mailbox resources export with the reported store size (less white space) to see if this really is the case on your servers especially the ones reporting 4. Let us know if you do! Mark -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 10 January 2003 13:07 Posted To: Exchange 55 list server Conversation: Exchange 2000 Recovery Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Recovery I don't know about that. I've had multi-year old servers that hover around 1.5, some that have stayed consistently over 4. What I find even more interesting is that I've started with many servers with an SIS of 1.0 - following an ExMerge based migration, and I've seen a steady increase in SIS over time, but I'll admit that they rarely get over 2-3 in those cases. Even at 1.5, a 30GB store is much smaller than the 45 that it would be otherwise. I'd call the benefit a mixture of both delivery speed improvements and disk storage space savings. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 6:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Recovery Is SIS that important? I've always treated it as something that helps make for more efficient delivery rather than something to save space since over time the SIS ratio will tend towards 1:1 anyway. See KB article 198673 for a justification of this. Mark -Original Message- From: John W. Luther [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 January 2003 16:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 Recovery No, it doesn't. I've asked our Exchange Admin about the SIS, but he is out sick today. Our current setup is quite stable now. I failed to mention we are running Exchange 2000. We also have an independent box on which we run the Perl scripts that do the automated jiggery pokery. At 02:45 PM 1/8/2003 -0600, you wrote: Doesn't play hell with your SIS? On 1/8/03 13:20, John W. Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey. We have multiple small exchange servers that do their backups to recovery servers that have several mirrored drives so no single production server has any of its backups on the same drive mirror. With our database size limit we have one recovery server for every three mail servers. In addition we have at least one hot spare mail server. When there is an outage we note which folks are affected and then recreate their (now empty) mailboxes on the recovery server to get them back into email. We then Exmerge the backed-up mail out of the backups into the new mailboxes. Some tlog juggling has to be done in order to recover all mail, but it is fairly strait forward. Each of our servers costs ~6K using off the shelf components. We learned the value of lots of small servers
RE: Transaction log reports
Where else would the mail be stored? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Mark Jeremy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 5:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Transaction log reports Eh, there's a database within E2K? *puzzled look* -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Charles Marriott Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 5:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Transaction log reports You are misinformed. All transacted databases have transaction logs. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark Jeremy Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 3:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Transaction log reports Hmmm, Transaction log is only related to MS-SQL and there no such thing as transaction logs for Exchange. Could you re-word your question please? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 3:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Transaction log reports eh? - Original Message - From: Charles Marriott [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 3:22 PM Subject: Transaction log reports What is the best practice on extracting report info from E2k transaction logs or can it be done? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Transaction log reports
The Oracle transaction logs aren't any different than the Exchange ones - they're going to log a bunch of database specific crap. Most likely, you're really wanting to look at the tracking logs. I'd wager that the Oracle Application Server email application doesn't have real message tracking logs, so they have to resort to the described process. I'm sure that you could, however, find something useful in the transaction logs - if you're really interested in inserts, deletes and updates of the actual tables. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 7:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Transaction log reports I haven't either Jim but I was included in a discussion with some Oracle folks and Oracle logs are a useful source of report info. Oracle has an email app and we were discussing it. You ever had any experience with it? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of McBee, Jim Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 5:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Transaction log reports Charles: I have never seen a tool for mining information from the transaction logs. The information in those logs would be information that only a mother could love. Specifically, mother-ESE. The transaction logs contain pages of data that will be written to the EDB or EDB/STM files; these pages correspond to the message information, but they may not be in any useful order, at least to mere humans. If you want to see a little more on the log files, you can use the ESEUTIL /M option to dump some info about the logs. AFAIK, Microsoft does not publicly publish any useful information on the contents of the log files or the ESE database. You are certainly not a newbie to Exchange or this list, so I know this is not one of those stupid questions. Did you have a specific goal in mind with this information. Any help? Jim -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, January 09, 2003 2:06 PM Posted To: Exchange Technical Mailing List Conversation: Transaction log reports Subject: RE: Transaction log reports No, I am talking about the transaction logs. Can they be archived and used as a source of information for reporting purposes? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Glenn Corbett Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 4:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Transaction log reports Well, there are transaction logs, maybe you should have a look at all those .log files in your mdbdata directory. On second thoughtsyou'd better not :) However, charles may be referring to tracking logs, not transaction logs. G. - Original Message - From: Mark Jeremy [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 9:38 AM Subject: RE: Transaction log reports Hmmm, Transaction log is only related to MS-SQL and there no such thing as transaction logs for Exchange. Could you re-word your question please? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 3:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Transaction log reports eh? - Original Message - From: Charles Marriott [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 3:22 PM Subject: Transaction log reports What is the best practice on extracting report info from E2k transaction logs or can it be done? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
