I don't know if I had any replies on this subject (I had a little
trouble with my mail), so if you could answer it again... BTW I was
unable to search the archives. Are you sure the link is right?
--
Anyone knows the correct syntax for the PFADMIN tool
I would say it depends on the company, as my last place we had 15 Exch
Admins just for the UK, god know how many more in the US Europe, Asia. Each
of different levels and responsibilities for different areas of Exchange
(backup, external, interconnection with notes, basic admin,
Hi,
I have a 5.5 server in a seperate site in an org maintained by our mother
company so all sister companies can share the contacts and they all are
replicating to/from the moth. company.
For some reason some sister companies see double entries in one of the sites
(this site recently merged with
DNS hasen't broken yet here. Therefore I don't know anything about it (g).
Jim Helfer
Ed Crowley wrote:
Hell, many Exchange administrators aren't involved with e-mail judging
from the SMTP and DNS questions I see!
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting
Start using Sendmail and you'll find out more then you ever wanted to know
about DNS.
You'll have to learn it sooner or later so it'll better be sooner..
B.
Take my word for it, the silliest woman can manage a clever man, but it
needs a very clever woman to manage a fool.
--
As far as I know, pfadmin and pfinfo don't work with Exchange 2000.
Sorry.
-Original Message-
From: Rui Silva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 3:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE-Post: PFADMIN
I don't know if I had any replies on this subject (I had a
this is a direct dial in to the network.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
How big are those attachments?
Hell, even on the LAN at the office, if someone sends me something with
12MB attachment, it still takes a good 30 seconds to open it.
Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
WAN/Internet Specialist
913-339-6700 x194
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Windows 2000 SP3
Exchange 2000 SP3
Exchage 5.5 SP4
100% Active Directory
I have an Exchange 5.5 Site with three servers.
Server AExchange 2000 SP3 (With SRS)
Server BExchange 2000 SP3
Server CExchange 5.5 SP4 (Bridgehead)
I want to remove Server A completely from the
My company is currently running Exchange 5.5. Problem is, most of my clients are
running Outlook 97. I read somewhere that I can upgrade them all to Outlook 2000 as
long as we have Exchange Client Licenses for them.
But where do I get Outlook 2000? I mean, I could install it from the Office
On the Office 2000 CD there is a separate installer for only Outlook on
the root of the CD.
-Matt
Matthew Bailey
LAN Engineer
CSK Auto, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Office: (602) 631-7486
Fax: (602) 294-7486
Chaos reigns within.
Reflect, repent, and reboot.
Insufficient data and enough potential widespread business impact to likely
justify a call to PSS.
On 3/18/03 4:44, Uso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have a 5.5 server in a seperate site in an org maintained by our mother
company so all sister companies can share the contacts and they all
Why is it a problem that your users are running Outlook 97? As long as it is
8.2.3.5228[1] or later it's Y2K compliant...
[1] IIRC
On 3/18/03 9:15, Mike Strock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My company is currently running Exchange 5.5. Problem is, most of my clients
are running Outlook 97. I
Actually what we did during a recent migration was to simply delete the SRS
and then re-created it on another server. Then we monitored SRS replication
to make sure all was going well.
Nate Couch
EDS Messaging
--
From: Clemens, Rick
Reply To: Exchange Discussions
Sent:
I was afraid I had complicated it by not deleting it.hmmmwell I
guess I will delete it off of Server A tonight and see what happens.
-Original Message-
From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 9:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Actually what we
The only problem is a reboot would give me 'stiff' opposition. Sorry... :)
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 4:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: WebDAV Exploit
Your experience speaks volumes.
- Original
There is?
-Original Message-
From: Bailey, Matthew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 7:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
On the Office 2000 CD there is a separate installer for only Outlook on
the root of the CD.
-Matt
Matthew Bailey
LAN Engineer
CSK Auto, Inc.
Yea, the Custom button when you run setup. g
- Original Message -
From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 11:08 AM
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000 and Exchange 5.5
There is?
-Original Message-
From:
SETUPOUT.EXE will setup only Outlook
There also installers for Access, Excel, FrontPage, Powerpoint, and
Word.
-Matt
Matthew Bailey
LAN Engineer
CSK Auto, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Office: (602) 631-7486
Fax: (602) 294-7486
Chaos reigns within.
Reflect,
For that matter make an Administrative Install then use the ORK to fully
customize your deployment.
From: Bailey, Matthew [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000 and Exchange 5.5
Date: Tue, 18 Mar
In the 11/99 Technet package there was a Service Packs CD which was an
Outlook 2000 install CD for Exchange 5.5 if that helps any.
Ronni
-Original Message-
From: Mike Strock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 7:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook
I have also seen the product ZYINDEX do that.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 12:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: PST database?
Depending on the the underlying need and processes involved, the following
solutions
We just started using public folders to house a list of concerts we
sponsor. Everyone is allowed to place a note with their name, department
and extension into the concert sub-folder they are interested in.
The problem is that the person who manages the tickets needs to print out
all the notes in
Select them all, right click and select Print.
You even have the option to start each note on a separate page (not recommended in
this case, but enabled by default.)
Does that not work?
Paul
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 18,
Or you may even export all the notes to an Excel file and then selectively
print the columns you require through Excel.
-Original Message-
From: Arnold, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 1:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: How do I print the contents
Hey that works like a charm! Thanks!
But now I have a new problem...
Users of Outlook 2002 under Windows XP have the 'start each item on a new
page' greyed out and selected by default under the print options. Only by
moving to Outlook 2000 under XP or 2000 are they allowed to select/deselect
Permissions
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: How do I print the contents of a folder?
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 15:41:16 -0400
Hey that works like a charm! Thanks!
But now I have a new problem...
All,
Quick question:
Our Security Team is recommending we disable the WWW service on the Exchange
2000 servers. Other than OWA functionality (the OWA servers will be
patched), will any other component of Exchange 2000 care?
TIA
_
If you have a FrontEnd/BackEnd arcitecture, OWA will fail if you disable
HTTP on the BackEnd server.
Denny
-Original Message-
From: Miller, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 3:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: WWW Service on Exchange 2000 server
If your Security Team is recommending this, wouldn't they know the
implications of their recommendations? Your patched OWA servers, are these
FE servers? Cause FE servers, simply proxy back the same requests to the BE
servers in E2K using the same protocol... So OWA will be broken completely
for
Oops, didn't see your reply Dennis. You are of course, spot on.
On 3/18/03 14:33, Depp, Dennis M. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you have a FrontEnd/BackEnd arcitecture, OWA will fail if you disable
HTTP on the BackEnd server.
Denny
-Original Message-
From: Miller, Robert
Scanmail 3.8 on Exchange 5.5SP4.
The Trend KB article 9030 deals with updating Scanmail when you change the
service account password, it talks of updating the password on the service,
then running a couple of Trend utils and entering the new password...
It's probably paranoia on my part but
That is a GREAT statement. I'm going to remember this one. It is a great
question to ask the security guys.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 1:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
If your Security Team is recommending this,
I have setup a 2+1 cluster node in our lab (two active one passive)as
back-end server plus a front-end server. It looks like that the cluster
works as far as when one shuts down a node the passive node takes over the
services of that node, or even when the network cable is unplugged.
However,
Actualy I just removed the replication connector, waited a little until
everything was gone, put it back and now the directory is clean. I just have
to monitor now and see if it's going to get messed up again or not. I
strongly believe (hope) it will be fine and that the issue was related to
the
35 matches
Mail list logo
