Is this the same problem then?
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 15/10/2003 10:36
There was a SMTP communication problem with the recipient's
email server. Please contact your system administrator.
morpheus.intas.be #5.5.0 smtp;554
adsl-134-28.wanadoo.be[213.177.134.28]: Client host
I would guess so, if all they say is Access Denied it could be any reason,
but the DNS lists are a good place to start.
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From:
Do you know any more searches to see if I'm on any lists?
Kind regards,
Kim Schotanus
===
Kim Schotanus
Information Systems Manager
INTAS
Avenue des Arts 58
B-1000 Brussels
Belgium
T. +32 2 549 01 11
F. +32 2 549 01 56
===
-Original
That's the most comprehensive one I know of, you could also try
www.openrbl.org.
I think it's important to understand how the various lists work - if you're
on one because your IP has sent spam then you can probably do something
about it, however there are lists that have our company listed
Hi,
The problem is that we have SP3 installed on all our servers. If
I understand everything correct the KB-article applies to servers
running SP1. Thanks anyway!
/Ola
_
List posting FAQ:
Archive settings?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Uso
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 1:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
I am delivering to my mailbox and the mail is not delete by any rules.
it keeps happening.
Uso
- Original
Where does it go to? Deleted Items?
Filters? Rules? Any third party spam filters?
Kind regards,
Kim Schotanus
===
Kim Schotanus
Information Systems Manager
INTAS
Avenue des Arts 58
B-1000 Brussels
Belgium
T. +32 2 549 01 11
F. +32 2 549 01 56
Hello Andrey,
Yes I did.
Here is the most confusing part. There is obvious authentication occurring
because both myself and one other client (non-admin) can access mail through
OWA. Neither accounts are on the local OWA server so therefore
authentication must be occurring to the DC (or the
Do you have the preview pane turned on?
Is the preview pane set up to mark messages as Read after a few
seconds?
Is your view set up to display only unread messages?
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From: Uso
Do you have a front-end/back-end set up by the book?
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From: Shawn Connelly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 9:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
Hi all. I was playing with my home computer last night trying to upgrade
it to Windows 2003.
My machine is a Dell desktop. One hard drive with two partitions - C:
and D:.
C: is Windows ME
D: was Windows 2000 Advanced Server.
The Advanced server had been dcpromo-ed looong time ago.
So when I
Do you have Junk E-mail processing turned on and set to Move items to
another folder? If so, anything in the body or subject that might get
snagged according to the filters.txt file
(http://office.microsoft.com/assistance/preview.aspx?AssetID=HA010450051033;
CTT=98)
-Original Message-
Do you have your hard drive(s) connected to a pci device? I've seen this
problem with Promise RAID controllers.
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 7:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: botched W2KAdvServer - W2003
I have some users that when they send an attachment, the attachment is
stripped before the recipient can view it.Have anyone has this problem
before.
Thanks
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web
This is probably a shot in the dark but I had a user report a similar
problem. He had Outlook set to mark a message read after 2 seconds
(Tools, Options, Other, Preview Pane Options) AND had a filter on to
only show unread messages.
This cause a message to appear in his Inbox briefly then to
Is it stripped or is Outlook blocking access to it? Internal or
external recipients?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Smith Thomas
Contr 911 SPTG/SC
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 10:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Attachments
This is by design with newer versions of outlook.
Or it could be a properly configured AV product on the server.
ZIP The files then send. That will almost always ensure that they get
there as long the attachment is small enough.
-- Rev. Kevinm WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP
-Original Message-
Is the OWA server configured as a front-end server? Do the accessible
mailboxes reside on a different server from the inaccessible ones?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
SP1 or later.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Olle Gustafson
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 5:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
I believe my drive is connected to an onboard IDE controller. It is a
plain vanilla Dell desktop.
But I will double-check. Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Arlo Clizer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 10:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: botched
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;290497
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Smith Thomas Contr
911 SPTG/SC
There is a Yahoo! Windows 2003 list.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 7:03 AM
I thought if I used the magic OT prefix, it would be OK. Anyway the
Yahoo groups don't work for me now - company Internet usage policy
doesn't allow them.
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP]
Kim,
I use the Blackhole lookup option from www.samspade.org. It will search
by domain name or IP and will query 15 different RBL's for the information
you supply.
Currently, it would appear that intas.be is on the FiveTen RBL.
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL
I'm not telling you that you committed a sin. But you'll get a better
answer from the Yahoo! groups. The Yahoo! groups are e-mail discussion
lists like this one; I can't see why there would be any difference in your
policy.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting
can they see their mail after you append \exchange\username for their
failed login?
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Shawn Connelly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 9:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: exchange digest: October 14, 2003
Hello Andrey,
I have done it, but with SSL (I made a self-signed cert with my own CA,
actually on the same server) and basic auth. I haven't tried it with
NTLM auth, so I can't say whether that should work or not. I would go
with SSL and basic for your testing, since that mirrors real-world
anyway.
David
Did you select Basic Authentication on the client?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Troels Majlandt
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 5:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RPC over HTTP - username/password are refused
Hi there !
I have
You open ports 135, 137, 138, and all = 1024 and it will work. Unless it's
a Win2k AD infrastructure, then you've only got a dozen or so that have to
be opened.
Windows Authentication through a firewall is a lose/lose situation - don't
do it. A far better scheme is to use ISA server (or some
Do any of you smart exchange gurus know how much bandwidth does a MS
PPTP connection and a MAPI connection to a exchange server be per user?
I have a T1, and the remote office has SDSL 1.1 with a IP Sec tunnel to
the T1.
Just need a estimation of user to bandwidth ratio.
Thanks, Eric
No, should we?
-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: woensdag 15 oktober 2003 20:22
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Hot off the Fixes
Anyone applied these yet?
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/secur
Well, we have to get through the Pile of Bureaucracy here to apply them.
I was wondering if anyone had so I could do the all the other exchange
admins jumped off the bridge... schtick.
#46 SMTP(e2k)/IMC(5.5) vulnerability
#47 Cross site scripting through OWA
Any takers?
;)
-Original
A little off the topic of norm but was curious if a few who have resource
booking for LCD Projectors, laptops etc... have some kind of liability
template they send along with the confirmation of the booking. You know the
usual Risk Management mumbo jumbo, leave it in your car with the doors
Not that I have ever seen.
Nate Couch
EDS Messaging
--
From: Finch Brett
Reply To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 1:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Resource bookings and liabilities
A little off the topic of norm but was
Is that KB or kbps?
-Original Message-
From: Kevinm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 10:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Bandwidth question with MAPI and PPTP
I always try to allocate 20k per active session. If you are running
outlook 2003 against
Ok we all know about Outlook2003 and Exchange 5.5 OWA, so now you can just
grab the patch, silly question but does it just need to go onto the OWA
server or the Exchange server as well, the DOC's doesn't really tell you
which server to apply it to.
MS03-046 is listed as critical and involves somebody sending bogus data to
your smtp port. In our case, the smtp port of our exchange server is not
directly connected to the internet - our external SMTP interface is a
sendmail firewall that forwards the email to an antivirus gateway and then
to
I'll be applying them tonight. Fun times.
-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 11:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Hot off the Fixes
Well, we have to get through the Pile of Bureaucracy here to apply them.
I
Tested and rolled out.
-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 11:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Hot off the Fixes
Anyone applied these yet?
It looks like cdo.dll exists on both Exchange and OWA. I'd suggest patching
both.
Regards,
Arlo
-Original Message-
From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 12:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook 2K3 Exchange 5.5 CDO Patch 2657.55
Ok
How did you hear about this (MS046)? I'm subscribed to MS's security bulletin service
but I haven't received anything from MS regarding this patch.
Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr
-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October
I have an RSS newsfeed that tells me anytime MS makes a new download
available
-Original Message-
From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 1:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Hot off the Fixes
How did you hear about this (MS046)?
I read Martins Email.
-- Rev. Kevinm WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 1:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Hot off the Fixes
I have an RSS newsfeed
Who doesn't?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevinm
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 4:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Hot off the Fixes
I read Martins Email.
-- Rev. Kevinm WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP
-Original
I don't think Buck does yet??
-- Rev. Kevinm WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy David
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 1:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Hot off the Fixes
Who doesn't?
All the mail that's not fit to read.
Now featuring Wireless Open Relay Technology (WORT).
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 1:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Hot off the Fixes
Who doesn't?
-Original
Thank god
-Original Message-
From: Kevinm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 1:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Hot off the Fixes
I don't think Buck does yet??
-- Rev. Kevinm WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Dad doesn't either.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevinm
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 4:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Hot off the Fixes
I don't think Buck does yet??
-- Rev. Kevinm WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP
MS PSS only had me patch the OWA server and I have not had a problem
since.
Ken
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Finch Brett
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 2:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook 2K3 Exchange 5.5 CDO Patch
Right. Just the OWA box
-Original Message-
From: Jasa, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 1:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2K3 Exchange 5.5 CDO Patch 2657.55
MS PSS only had me patch the OWA server and I have not had a problem
since.
Thanx... Seems like I'll be patching the PROD box now anyways, just not the
CDO :) Nice slammer of a day, 7 hotfixs at once...
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 14:30
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2K3
Hi Martin
Can you tell me how you did this? I just downloaded a RSS newsreader
and I don't know how to get it to work with MS..
Thanks
Russell
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 4:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
The newsfeed is http://www.thundermain.com/rss/
I use NewsGator which integrates with Outlook
-Original Message-
From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 1:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Hot off the Fixes
Hi Martin
Can you tell
I'm glad I waited, security ms03-047 takes care of this as well.
-Original Message-
From: Finch Brett
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 14:34
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2K3 Exchange 5.5 CDO Patch 2657.55
Thanx... Seems like I'll be patching the PROD box now anyways,
For MS03-047, it says: System administrators should install this security
patch on their servers running Outlook Web Access 5.5. So OK, my OWA server
is a separate box from my Exchange server so I should only have to install
this on the OWA box. However, in the patch details section is says:
No
-Original Message-
From: Chuck Parkey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 2:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Hot off the Fixes
For MS03-047, it says: System administrators should install this security
patch on their servers running Outlook Web
You could add it to the display name of the resource!
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Finch Brett
Sent: Wednesday, October 15,
The load of a PPTP connection depends on what you're sending through it.
Rule of thumb for MAPI Outlook sessions is to plan for 3 to 4 KBps per light
user, 5 to 7 KBps per moderate user, and 10 or more KBps per heavy user.
Remember that this is from available bandwidth, something that is
That's very conservative.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevinm
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 10:06 AM
To: Exchange
10Kbps per user? The way my users use Outlook, I would estimate closer to
40K So it really depends on how everyone uses Outlook and what their
expectations are.
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 5:48 PM
To:
I don't plan on very useful users at remote offices..
-- Rev. Kevinm WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley
[MVP]
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 2:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Bandwidth
61 matches
Mail list logo
