Site connector question

2003-11-15 Thread Kevin Dietz
Currently I have a single Exchange Server 2K in my main office - I have an office opening remotely in 2 weeks - Do I add an exchange server into my organization at this remote site? Is it to speed access to the GAL or does it have a copy of the priv and pub databases. The connection to the main

Re: Site connector question

2003-11-15 Thread Tony Hlabse
How many users at the remote site? From: Kevin Dietz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Site connector question Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 11:42:32 -0800 Currently I have a single Exchange Server 2K in my main

RE: Site connector question

2003-11-15 Thread Ed Crowley [MVP]
Answers inline. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Dietz Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 11:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions

RE: Mailbox Store Inaccessible

2003-11-15 Thread Ed Crowley [MVP]
If I were you I would call Microsoft PSS. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gregg Porter Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 7:44 AM

RE: Soliciting opinions on redundant 5.5 bridgehead servers

2003-11-15 Thread Ed Crowley [MVP]
Why bother? Myself, I'd prefer both to be online and running. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Ault Sent: Wednesday,

RE: exchange2003 and msx55 diff exchnage orgs same windowsdomain

2003-11-15 Thread Ed Crowley [MVP]
It's possible. I don't know that it's best. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Microsoft Exchange List Server Sent: Wednesday,

RE: Your PC seized, modem used for LD calls

2003-11-15 Thread Ed Crowley [MVP]
I'd like to see that happen to me. My PC doesn't have a modem and I can't get long distance on my phone without a dialing a tedious phone card string. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From:

RE: Your PC seized, modem used for LD calls

2003-11-15 Thread Martin Blackstone
I haven't had a modem in at least 3 years. I don't even want a landline anymore, but until someone can come up with a way to have multiple cell phones with the same number, I'm stuck. Also, one can request an international dialing block on their lines. You then enter a code to make an

RE: 5.5 and OSX - Mac Outlook connectivity

2003-11-15 Thread Ed Crowley [MVP]
Exchange 2003 OWA might be your best option. Check it out! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Holstrom, Don J. Sent: Wednesday,

Problem with OWA

2003-11-15 Thread Sanjeev Sharma
I am currently having an issue with OWA on Exchange 5.5 SP4 running on NT 4.0 Server with SP6a. Lately it just stopped working all of a sudden after years of running. One of things I have been doing to resolve this issue is deleting all the files in exchsrvr\webtemp directory but it only works for

RE: Problem with OWA

2003-11-15 Thread Martin Blackstone
Do you have ANY Outlook 2003 users? Even one. -Original Message- From: Sanjeev Sharma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 5:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Problem with OWA I am currently having an issue with OWA on Exchange 5.5 SP4 running on NT 4.0

RE: Problem with OWA

2003-11-15 Thread Sanjeev Sharma
Yes, there are about three who are using Outlook2k3. Thx. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 5:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem with OWA Do you have ANY Outlook 2003 users? Even one. -Original

RE: Problem with OWA

2003-11-15 Thread Martin Blackstone
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?kbid=818709 -Original Message- From: Sanjeev Sharma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 5:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem with OWA Yes, there are about three who are using Outlook2k3. Thx.

RE: Problem with OWA

2003-11-15 Thread Sanjeev Sharma
Thanks a lot, Martin. Also, what can I do resolve latency issue for Outlook2k clients. Is there any utility I can run to make my exchange perform better faster? Thanks again. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 5:24

RE: Problem with OWA

2003-11-15 Thread Martin Blackstone
Gonna need some more info. Whats your environment? Server specs? Users? Store sizes, etc... -Original Message- From: Sanjeev Sharma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 5:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem with OWA Thanks a lot, Martin. Also,

outsource!?

2003-11-15 Thread Jon Hill
My CIO has asked me to attend a meeting in which IBM is going to propose outsourcing our e-mail services, taking over for our 350 Exchange 2000 mailboxes. I'm looking for arguments to marshal against outsourcing. So far, what I've got is: * security: We use Clearswift MIMEsweeper to

RE: Automatic archive in Exchange2000

2003-11-15 Thread Jon Hill
KVS recently partnered with MDY FileSurf, a DoD 5015.2-compliant records manager. It doubles or triples the cost of the entire solution but (a) you can use FileSurf for other records management needs and (b) MDY adds tough (DoD-compliant!) auditing and other security measures, along with RM

RE: outsource!?

2003-11-15 Thread Ed Crowley [MVP]
Service. These kind of bids generally come with a specific list of included services with very specific SLAs. If you find you need something even minutely different than the contracted offering, they'll gouge you. They make their money on the change orders. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP