Migrate or coexistence of Lotus/Exchange
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/interop/domino.asp
Resource page for lotus/2000 info
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/interop/notes.asp
Outlook 2002 connector to Notes server for email.
You have my sympathies, having just been there done that. You can email me
offline for many notes, links etc. I also probably know the answer to your
m4 sendmail.mc sendmail.cf issue.
MS recieves alot of beatings for security, pricing, licensing (hate it) etc
but the programs are much easier
Absolutely hilarious, even the day after Christmas, even with a teeny little
hangover from jolly making.
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2002 12:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Twas the night before Christmas
1. What in the world does this have to do with Exchange and do you always
hijack threads?
2. Why would you want to open netbios/RPC ports in your firewall...scratch
that open 135-140 any=any it will be fun. (Just on the off chance
liability and all - I AM JOKING)
3. If you can bypass your
OK confusion and headache aside from trying to visualize your environment
from your emails.
1. Do you have a Sonicwall firewall and/or MS PPTP Server?
2. A number of times in this thread (my reply included) a WINS server has
been mentioned, yet you keep referring to LMHOSTS files. Do you know
I think that is office installs a truncated mapi32.dll into winroot/system32
folder and renames the original to mapi32x.dll. The original mapi32.dll I
believe is 621K and the one that is installed is 128K. It would be simple
to verify and do a swap and see if it corrects the issue.
I can't drag
You should be able to prevent the recipient from receiving notification.
What is the Notifications=Inbound set to for the filter that is being used
(Default?). Under advanced options set the notification settings for that
Notification Name.
Let me know if you have further questions, I have
things.
- Original Message -
From: Allan Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 4:28 PM
Subject: exmerge issue
I am trying to exmerge a dozen users on an Ex 5.5 (sp4) NT 4 (sp6a) and
having trouble. The exmerge log
a
corrupted mailbox.
Geoff...
-Original Message-
From: Allan Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 11:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: exmerge issue
FAQ 3.5.A3 references 3.71 being current, I have found a reference for
Exmerge 6
to that might help
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Allan Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 11:44 AM
user A has 180mb reported
Priv Information Store, exmerge estimates 350Mb pst, 45Mb PST is the result.
Thanks for any help.
Allan Johnson
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives
Just to make sure things are interesting, W32/Opaserv-B Magallanez is
supposed to be raised to Level 1 by Fsecure today. Anyone seen this one
yet?
Still feeling pretty cozy behind Martin's list but curious about attachment
extensions for it.
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter
eManager on a gateway server is definitely the way to go, it would only cost
you a 2000 server license and an acceptable PC (processor memory etc). I
have mine running on a dual Pentium 200 with 512MB, leftover server.
The product works well and is relatively customizable, it catches 80-85% of
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full Text Indexing
Err on earlier response. You would need 3rd party app. to
search attachments.
-Original Message-
From: Allan Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 9:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Full
Search with Microsoft Exchange and Ex2000 Full
indexing.
Any advice or opinions are appreciated. Current environment Ex 5.5 SP4 on
NT 4. Perhaps this is the Killer App to get management to let me upgrade
:o).
Thanks,
Allan Johnson
, September 04, 2002 10:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full Text Indexing
What's wrong with using find under tools? This will allow them to search
their own mailboxes.
-Original Message-
From: Allan Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 9:57 AM
. to search
attachments.
-Original Message-
From: Allan Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 9:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Full Text Indexing
My email packrats (err users) have asked for the ability to do full text
searches against mail messages
I didn't think it was the length of the Subject line just the content
probably confused the heck out of the recieving machine so it rejected it.
:o)
-Original Message-
From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 4:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
perhaps you are thinking of 5.5 OWA alias login page? You were still
required to enter Windows Auth unless you had NO Auth Required.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 12:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: OWA setup
I agree, Emanager is pretty good. Not to ham-fisted, I have had to retrieve
5-10 valid emails over 6 months while having a reduction of 80-90% of spam
mails.
FYI for anyone running 3.52 version of Emanager, there is a Bug
(definitely not a enhancement) that can delete your custom rules/content
PHB half day
let us out at three o'clock
thank you pointy one
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 9:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Haiku Good Friday
Half day off today
Oh, such a refreshing change
Drunk before sunset
Subject: Re: 554 Invalid data in message
FYI, I am not nor will I ever be confused with the Official Thread
Monitor. I just happen to remember this thread for the reprimand
delivered, not a soda spurt but a pretty good chuckle.
Doctor, I have a pain.
Where?
Well, I'm not going to tell you
did everyone stop playing golf suddenly?
-Original Message-
From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 10:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: The day after superbowl
yes, that's why it's the most popular sport in the world.
-Original
sorry it is
dealers
prices
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 9:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: mail
I recommend you post the entire NDR.
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL
No laughing list persons, to much multi-tasking.
Sorry for the interruption return to your Exchange discussion.
-Original Message-
From: Allan Johnson
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 9:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: mail
sorry it is
dealers
prices
-Original Message
understanding why
bumblebees, pigs, flat birds fly
ask Yoda you must
My whack at an answer on Haiku Fri.
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 9:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Was: Question from a troll to a Yoda -
looking for that engagement ring she can't say NO to?
-Original Message-
From: Dillon, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 2:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird Error
A 2-Carat D flawless would be sufficient down-payment for 1 year of my
Your environment and mine are comparable. I just lost my battle with
managment and had to move forward with an eManager solution on 3.52 Trend
Suite. I setup W2K server front end with Interscan and eManager. I have to
admit I spent about 1 week slowly implementing additional rules above what
Considering the many posts on mail filtering and the fact that eManager
wanted the same type of thing, I ended up accepting mail on 25 for
Interscan/eManager (W2K server) forwarding directly 127.0.0.1:6025 to IIS5
SMTP accepting on port 6025 and then forwarded all mail directly to my
Exchange
Not sure about Scanmail having the file locked but have you tried del or
attrib from a DOS prompt?
Allan
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Off topic: EXPLORER.EXE
.
-Original Message-
From: Allan Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off topic: EXPLORER.EXE 100% CPU
Not sure about Scanmail having the file locked but have you tried del or
attrib from a DOS prompt?
Allan
.
Security Auditing (logon success/failure etc) is enabled/configured through
MMC.
-Original Message-
From: Wynkoop, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 5:41 PM
To: Allan Johnson
Subject: RE: OWA 5.5sp4 on IIS5/Win2k SP2
Yes, I'm unable to get my mail
is with the authentication of OWA
against the exchange server (but i'm not sure). I can get to the website
just fine, but not to my mailbox. I'm confused and need some suggestions.
Thanks,
John
-Original Message-
From: Allan Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 9:27 AM
have you set
under Local Policies=Log on Locally, hopefully something along the lines of
domain/global user group.
-Original Message-
From: Allan Johnson
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 11:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA 5.5sp4 on IIS5/Win2k SP2
Have you installed the Ex
, I tried the domain/username idea with no change in
the symptoms. Local Policies=Log on Locally is granted to all domain
users.
thanks for you suggestions.
-Original Message-
From: Allan Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 11:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Have you tried logging in with administrator level users?
Do the w3svc logs and/or security logs show anything usefull?
-Original Message-
From: Wynkoop, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 3:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA 5.5sp4 on
hours but I hate that answer.
The only other thing I can think of right now would be to re-apply SP4 but
that is not a willy-nilly answer for a production server.
Any help is appreciated.
Allan Johnson
_
List posting FAQ: http
Virus software configured correctly (Trend or Sybari) on your Exchange
server will run great and protect your mailboxes like a champ. Trend
Scanmail - saving my butt for 3+ yrs.
We are evaluating gateway scanning for content filtering as well as another
layer of virus protection, call it a warm
well evidently tis' the season to be content scanning. I am evaluating
eManager due to the fact I use Trend for Exchange and Servers, another
product on clients. Is anyone currently using eManager in production for
the purpose of content filtering and do you give a thumb up or down?
rant
it is
Just FYI, normally wouldn'nt post it but thought others might be interested.
An answer to stupid HTML mail.
http://ntbugtraq.ntadvice.com/default.asp?sid=1pid=55did=38
Allan
_
List posting FAQ:
IIRC, Nimda infected rich20.dll. Once the virus is removed you still need
to replace rich20.dll with a known clean copy for OL to start working again.
Outside of the Nimda scenerio I have seen client virus software with the OL
addin cause similar things to happen. If you have such a program
Had the same config. But FAQ configuration works better. Otherwise there is
an MS whitepaper about setting up Exchange with MS Proxy and running proxy
client on Ex. Like I said the FAQ configuration works better and is easier.
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxh.htm
-Original
All Disney theme parks (4) have been shut down and are being evacuated at
this time.
Even the mouse is scared.
From Central Florida
Allan J.
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 11:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Is the business fax field populated?
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 3:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: contacts
OAB, like PSTs ... hmmm.. BAD
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't know if I would consider this the first time since 1812the term
act of war is correct in my opinion but let us not forget those that were
lost before. Let us hope that something like this never happens again!
World Trade Center Bombing
Friday, February 26, 1993
At 12:18 on a snowy
http://www.worldvillage.com/family/parental.html
Above site has 20 or so programs and even some hardware solutions for
internet/PC control.
Some parents are hesitant to use the sTicK(tm) (or Foot for that matter) and
I have gone as far as installing W2K Pro with profiles for children so that
46 matches
Mail list logo
