RE: Notes client to Outlook client
Migrate or coexistence of Lotus/Exchange http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/interop/domino.asp Resource page for lotus/2000 info http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/interop/notes.asp Outlook 2002 connector to Notes server for email. http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=60c4d659-3249-46cc- 9cb9-db128b38e399DisplayLang=en Ask me next week and I will let you know how a migration goes. Allan -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 4:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Notes client to Outlook client Have a client doing a Notes to Exchange 2000 migration. What he wants migrated is Calendar and Contact from the client side not the server side. Does anyone know of tools for that? _ The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: redhat 8 and sendmail forums
You have my sympathies, having just been there done that. You can email me offline for many notes, links etc. I also probably know the answer to your m4 sendmail.mc sendmail.cf issue. MS recieves alot of beatings for security, pricing, licensing (hate it) etc but the programs are much easier to figure out and get running. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 11:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: redhat 8 and sendmail forums Use VI to make changes to the sendmail.cf file. This page will help you get started on using it: http://www.cs.colostate.edu/helpdocs/vi.html -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 7:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: redhat 8 and sendmail forums I have the Bat Book. I just miss the basics of LINUX really. For example, I have installed REDHAT8.0 and I cannot compile macro files to make changes to the sendmail.cf file. It says silly little things like 'command not found' etc... I only installed LINUX a few days ago, so we are just getting to know each other. At the moment its like a bad date, its doing all the talking and tell me whats wrong with life and I can't get a word in edge ways ! k The batbook by O'Reilly is excellent..if your going to play with sendmail..buy it.. bill -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 9:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: redhat 8 and sendmail forums Being fed by the nipple of all things GUI, i need some help... I need to configure SENDMAIL on a REDHAT 8.0 Linux box. Would any of you guys know of any good lists/websites like this one where I could get NEWBIE advice. TIA ...knighTslayer... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Twas the night before Christmas
Absolutely hilarious, even the day after Christmas, even with a teeny little hangover from jolly making. -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2002 12:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Twas the night before Christmas Unless you want to get away from the family. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Etie Sent: Wednesday, December 25, 2002 22:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Twas the night before Christmas Oh sure it's funny until you have to go in on Christmas. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Wednesday, December 25, 2002 12:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Twas the night before Christmas Twas the night before Christmas, and all 'cross the WAN Email traffic was humming as only it can. Best wishes and greetings and tacky ecards And SPAM of the kind that ought to be barred. Helpdesks and Admins at home with their kin Grumbling o'er what a tough year it has been. Yet grateful for clients and bosses and such Pondering if they should tell them as much. With IIS fully patched and BSD in the front, So my Exchange server need not take the brunt, I can celebrate with my family full of Christmas cheer Knowing my servers are good til New Years. The wail of the pager then gave me the creeps! Even with batteries removed to prevent any beeps. Don my robe and to the home PC I head VPN to the office, but the connection seems dead. Driving to work, the big question I muster: Why did I go with Active/Active cluster?? Nothing coulda prepared me, no matter the time, On the serverroom floor, all the Elves of MIME! Now HELO, now MAIL FROM Now RCPT TO, now DATA On IP, On Hostname On Header and ta-da! To the virtual server Out the NIC to the 'net Bring on the next one! We'll get through this yet! The information store it seems had a bit of a fall And emails have spilled on the floor and the walls. Notes, tasks, contacts. Calendars, too. All over the place. What else could we do? You? You encode them?, I asked, simply aghast. Then I remembered, but just one year past. Santa had worked on my server that night. Since then it had seemed to be running alright. Now his helpers are here, data on the floor still Like the wrong switch run on e-s-e util. I watched in awe as the elves did assemble little packets back into the mail they resembled. Their eyes were so bright, their arms how they spun. They worked very hard, yet had so much fun! With green and red hats, they stood a foot tall. Dozens of them working and having a ball! Their cheeks were all rosy, their faces asmile. Their jackets and pants: the epitomy of style. Adorned with white sneakers with the words Got Stick? And teamwork to make any manager sick. Some segments they tossed; I asked what was that? Oh do not worry, just winmail dot DATs. They cleaned up a mess I couldn't explain, Almost done, my server was running again. Who would believe me? How could I tell? They'd institutionalize me; say I'm not well. The elves were all done; their work for today. And berated me for my open relay. Look at it this way, they spoke with a sigh, At least you're not running Oracle 9i. Then together they yelled then disappeared from sight, Happy Messaging to all, and to all a good night! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: VPN breaks Outlook
1. What in the world does this have to do with Exchange and do you always hijack threads? 2. Why would you want to open netbios/RPC ports in your firewall...scratch that open 135-140 any=any it will be fun. (Just on the off chance liability and all - I AM JOKING) 3. If you can bypass your firewall and browse your internal LAN why have the firewall? 4. Log onto the client with appropriate User name and password (also appropriate domain config). VPN to sonicwall with a WINS server in the local LAN and defined on the client. Test name resolution/browsing. http://www.faughnan.com/netbios.html offers a good explanation of Netbios over TCP with NAT also many links to trouble shooting he same. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:RTener;midship.com] Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 10:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook Does anyone know what port I would have to open on my sonic wall to let people browse the network over the vpn. If i bypass my firewall at home i can search for computers on my the network but if i dont i cannot find any computers rich\\\thanks -Original Me ssage- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:afyodorov;innerhost.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 10:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook Would you like me to give you an example? we are a hosting company. Customers connect to our Exchange servers from all over the world, from a variety of client OSes. Their machines are not members of our domain. They can't possibly use our WINS. What would you do to allow their PCs to resolve the short name of our Exchange server? -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad;inovis.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 4:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook No there aren't. There are times in which its easier than doing it a different way, but that doesn't mean there are times in which they must be used. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:afyodorov;innerhost.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 2:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook there are some situations when one must use HOSTS file. -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:dely;TripathImaging.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 12:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook Neither, use WINS and DNS, works every time... -Original Message- From: RBHATIA [mailto:RBHATIA;AIIM.ORG] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 9:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook Is it the LMHOSTS file or the HOSTS file ? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:RTener;midship.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook yes you should use the lmhost file on the client pc to map to your exchange server thats what we use here at my office and it works good. If you need more help dont hesitate to email me. rich -Original Message- From: JPC [mailto:jpciocon;hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 8:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: VPN breaks Outlook Hi, folks: Mixed mode, currently migrating users from 5.5 to E2k. Remote users have Outlook 2002 on W2k Professional laptops and Alcatel PERMIT/Client. These users connect via dial-up, they can access their mailboxes and send/receive no problem. When they use LinkSys router and DSL, they can access our network, the internet and other network resources EXCEPT for their mailboxes on the E2k server. Synchronization failure messages are related to network problems preventing access to the Exchange server or the RPC message box retrieving data from Exchange server. These eventually fail and nothing is exchanged between the client and their server mailbox. Has anyone seen this? If so, what tips would you suggest? Thanks very much. -Juancho _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _
RE: VPN breaks Outlook
OK confusion and headache aside from trying to visualize your environment from your emails. 1. Do you have a Sonicwall firewall and/or MS PPTP Server? 2. A number of times in this thread (my reply included) a WINS server has been mentioned, yet you keep referring to LMHOSTS files. Do you know if you have a WINS server? As a number of people have said, your answer is to connect to a firewall via VPN and have a WINS server available to perform name resolution for you, thus removing the need for your LMHOSTS file and resolving other PCs in the domain. There are more elegant and functional solutions but that is probably the simplest and easiest for you to implement. As an aside http://www.mcseco-op.com/_vti_bin/shtml.exe/rules.htm is a link that includes instructions on how to submit to an MCSE study list (Saluki). Many generic questions such as yours are fielded by MCSEs and students and there is no off topic subjects as long as it involves an MS product in some way. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:RTener;midship.com] Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook Yes I can connect to the vpn and read email from the exchange server. I can find the exchange server if I look for it through search for computers on network. We use lmhost file to connect to the exchange server. My VPN server is the primary domain contoller and when i search for it on the network i cant find it. But if i go to my firewall over the internet and enter a username and password to bypass it I can find any computer on the network. I want to be able to search for all computers on my network without bypassing the firewall. If anyone knows what port to open or what to do i would appreciate it. thanks rich ps sorry for hijacking this thread. -Original Message- From: Byron Kennedy [mailto:byron;markettools.com] Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 12:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook Does the vpn work in general from behind the firewall? Do other protocols like icmp work? Is the vpn site-to-site or client-gateway? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:RTener;midship.com] Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 7:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook Does anyone know what port I would have to open on my sonic wall to let people browse the network over the vpn. If i bypass my firewall at home i can search for computers on my the network but if i dont i cannot find any computers rich\\\thanks -Original Me ssage- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:afyodorov;innerhost.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 10:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook Would you like me to give you an example? we are a hosting company. Customers connect to our Exchange servers from all over the world, from a variety of client OSes. Their machines are not members of our domain. They can't possibly use our WINS. What would you do to allow their PCs to resolve the short name of our Exchange server? -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad;inovis.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 4:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook No there aren't. There are times in which its easier than doing it a different way, but that doesn't mean there are times in which they must be used. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:afyodorov;innerhost.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 2:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook there are some situations when one must use HOSTS file. -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:dely;TripathImaging.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 12:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook Neither, use WINS and DNS, works every time... -Original Message- From: RBHATIA [mailto:RBHATIA;AIIM.ORG] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 9:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook Is it the LMHOSTS file or the HOSTS file ? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:RTener;midship.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook yes you should use the lmhost file on the client pc to map to your exchange server thats what we use here at my office and it works good. If you need more help dont hesitate to email me. rich -Original Message- From: JPC [mailto:jpciocon;hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 8:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: VPN breaks Outlook Hi, folks: Mixed mode, currently migrating users
RE: MAPI Error when starting Exchange Admin on the Server
I think that is office installs a truncated mapi32.dll into winroot/system32 folder and renames the original to mapi32x.dll. The original mapi32.dll I believe is 621K and the one that is installed is 128K. It would be simple to verify and do a swap and see if it corrects the issue. I can't drag up the appropriate Q# but I remember reading something about it. I found it originally during Exmerge issues and the article referenced an office install replacing the file. Hope that helps. Allan -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad;inovis.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 11:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Error when starting Exchange Admin on the Server Reapplying the Exchange SP usually fixes that, but that's not great for uptime. Not sure about the other way. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:John.Matteson;geac.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 10:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MAPI Error when starting Exchange Admin on the Server Good morning to you all: I have had someone install Microsoft Office on one of the Exchange server in my org. Predictably, it has broken Outlook and Exchange admin on that server. The server still operates, but Exchange Admin no longer works from the server console. There was a fix posted a while back, something having to do with one of the MAPI*.dll files. Can anyone repost the fix? I've looked, but the way things have been going recently, that fix probably when out with the last PF purge. TIA. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Good Working Software to prevent SPAM
You should be able to prevent the recipient from receiving notification. What is the Notifications=Inbound set to for the filter that is being used (Default?). Under advanced options set the notification settings for that Notification Name. Let me know if you have further questions, I have changed this for my users so it can be done. Allan J. -Original Message- From: James Casstevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 1:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Good Working Software to prevent SPAM Lately, our School District has been getting more and more SMAM e-mails. We are currently using Scan Mail for Exchange 5.5 and the e-manager part to filter out SMAM which leaves a lot to be desired because when a user gets a SMAM e-mail, it is deleted (about 50%) of the time, however the user, in addition, gets a message that states The original message content contained a virus or was blocked due to blocking rules and has been removed. We have discussed the problem with Trend, and they seem to have no way to prevent the user from receiving this additional message. So what is the difference in a user getting SPAM or a user getting a message saying that your SPAM has been deleted? Isn't the whole idea to limit the number of e-mail messages to those that which have some meaning to the user. My question to the group is: is there anyone using a product out there that they are pleased with and that is preventing SPAM from getting to the end user, that does not send additional mails to the user telling them that their SPAM has been deleted? Any advise and or guidance on this topic would be appreciated. Thanks in advance. James J. Casstevens Network Administrator Napa Valley Unified School District Napa, CA 94558 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: exmerge issue
FAQ 3.5.A3 references 3.71 being current, I have found a reference for Exmerge 6 for Exchange 2000 is this the version you are referring to? I have also tried a straight export from OL2000 client to .pst, this failed also. Could I be looking at IS inconsistencies? Thanks for the help. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 7:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: exmerge issue Get the new version and run it on a 2000 machine that is on the same network. Works fine. The new version has better logging among other things. - Original Message - From: Allan Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 4:28 PM Subject: exmerge issue I am trying to exmerge a dozen users on an Ex 5.5 (sp4) NT 4 (sp6a) and having trouble. The exmerge log is reporting many of the following items: Error copying message with subject 'Whatever subject is' in folder '\Inbox' (Whatever folder is). (MAPI_W_PARTIAL_COMPLETION) I have looked at Q174197 which was not very helpful. I am running Exmerge 3.71 with the same mapi32.dll that is in the winroot\system32 directory. I did not find any other relavent Q articles. The majority of dropped messages appear to have attachments (if that means anything to the price of tea in China). Example user A has 180mb reported Priv Information Store, exmerge estimates 350Mb pst, 45Mb PST is the result. Thanks for any help. Allan Johnson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: exmerge issue
Sorry, specific message after OL2000 export to .pst Sorry items could not be copied. They were moved or deleted, or access was denied. I have also tried client export on a number of boxes thinking the corrupt mailbox possibility. I have given my logon account Service Account Admin rights and as with the Exmerge process some emails are exported. There appears to be no rhyme or reason. I have gone into various user accounts and popped open emails that don't export with no problem or errors. The only difference between Exmerge and OL2000 export is that Exmerge gets more mail out. Very puzzled need beer. Thanks for any help. Allan -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 12:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: exmerge issue What do you mean it failed. What specifically happened? You could have a corrupted mailbox. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Allan Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: exmerge issue FAQ 3.5.A3 references 3.71 being current, I have found a reference for Exmerge 6 for Exchange 2000 is this the version you are referring to? I have also tried a straight export from OL2000 client to .pst, this failed also. Could I be looking at IS inconsistencies? Thanks for the help. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 7:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: exmerge issue Get the new version and run it on a 2000 machine that is on the same network. Works fine. The new version has better logging among other things. - Original Message - From: Allan Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 4:28 PM Subject: exmerge issue I am trying to exmerge a dozen users on an Ex 5.5 (sp4) NT 4 (sp6a) and having trouble. The exmerge log is reporting many of the following items: Error copying message with subject 'Whatever subject is' in folder '\Inbox' (Whatever folder is). (MAPI_W_PARTIAL_COMPLETION) I have looked at Q174197 which was not very helpful. I am running Exmerge 3.71 with the same mapi32.dll that is in the winroot\system32 directory. I did not find any other relavent Q articles. The majority of dropped messages appear to have attachments (if that means anything to the price of tea in China). Example user A has 180mb reported Priv Information Store, exmerge estimates 350Mb pst, 45Mb PST is the result. Thanks for any help. Allan Johnson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: exmerge issue
I wish, single site single server. I wanted to try the latest Exmerge that Tony suggested but ExSp3.exe (165Mb grr) download came through Not a Valid Win32 App. Anyone out there willing to contribute the latest Exmerge to a very thirsty irritated Admin? SoupNazis No Exchange for you, you get sendmail. /SoupNazis Thanks again. A. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 1:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: exmerge issue Yup - sounds like some IS issues. If you have another box you can move the mailbox to that might help -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Allan Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: exmerge issue FAQ 3.5.A3 references 3.71 being current, I have found a reference for Exmerge 6 for Exchange 2000 is this the version you are referring to? I have also tried a straight export from OL2000 client to .pst, this failed also. Could I be looking at IS inconsistencies? Thanks for the help. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 7:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: exmerge issue Get the new version and run it on a 2000 machine that is on the same network. Works fine. The new version has better logging among other things. - Original Message - From: Allan Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 4:28 PM Subject: exmerge issue I am trying to exmerge a dozen users on an Ex 5.5 (sp4) NT 4 (sp6a) and having trouble. The exmerge log is reporting many of the following items: Error copying message with subject 'Whatever subject is' in folder '\Inbox' (Whatever folder is). (MAPI_W_PARTIAL_COMPLETION) I have looked at Q174197 which was not very helpful. I am running Exmerge 3.71 with the same mapi32.dll that is in the winroot\system32 directory. I did not find any other relavent Q articles. The majority of dropped messages appear to have attachments (if that means anything to the price of tea in China). Example user A has 180mb reported Priv Information Store, exmerge estimates 350Mb pst, 45Mb PST is the result. Thanks for any help. Allan Johnson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
exmerge issue
I am trying to exmerge a dozen users on an Ex 5.5 (sp4) NT 4 (sp6a) and having trouble. The exmerge log is reporting many of the following items: Error copying message with subject 'Whatever subject is' in folder '\Inbox' (Whatever folder is). (MAPI_W_PARTIAL_COMPLETION) I have looked at Q174197 which was not very helpful. I am running Exmerge 3.71 with the same mapi32.dll that is in the winroot\system32 directory. I did not find any other relavent Q articles. The majority of dropped messages appear to have attachments (if that means anything to the price of tea in China). Example user A has 180mb reported Priv Information Store, exmerge estimates 350Mb pst, 45Mb PST is the result. Thanks for any help. Allan Johnson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly
Just to make sure things are interesting, W32/Opaserv-B Magallanez is supposed to be raised to Level 1 by Fsecure today. Anyone seen this one yet? Still feeling pretty cozy behind Martin's list but curious about attachment extensions for it. -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 4:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly Either that or you're blocking all the files through your file filtering so they're blending in with all the Klez background noise. The way this is ramping up I have a feeling that Bugbear, just like Klez before it, is destined to become a permanent part of our lives. -Peter -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 12:06 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly Gulp! Either it's making it thru Sophos and Antigen or I'm not getting any. I sure hope it's the latter. Bill Lambert Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 12:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly It's now a neck and neck race which virus is hitting us more Klex or Bugbear-A. Thank the programmers for ScanMail and Nemex. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 3:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly http:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Scott Force [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 3:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly I haven't seen it yet either and I can't find anything on it yet. Anyone have any info on it, (is it an attachment)?? I haven't seen any yet either, but Messagelabs already has it in 3rd place behind Klez and Yaha, so they are out there. -Peter _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this
eManager on a gateway server is definitely the way to go, it would only cost you a 2000 server license and an acceptable PC (processor memory etc). I have mine running on a dual Pentium 200 with 512MB, leftover server. The product works well and is relatively customizable, it catches 80-85% of valid Spam, .1% valid emails out of 1500-2000 emails a day incoming (.1% example whoever would of thought that Suma Cum Laude was not Spam? :oP). I second the PITA on not being able to change default rules and also the bug that erased custom rules during an autoupdate (They fixed that one). I give it 8 out of 10 against similar programs under $2000. -Original Message- From: Lynne July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 4:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this I ran into that same problem - kind of defeats the purpose of the filter when the subject contains the offensive language. So we switched to the MAPI version. This has problems of it's own - it is not possible to configure this product to scan incoming mail only. Users attempt to save contact or calandar items (which shouldn't be scanned) with a banned word and they disappear. A better solution (if you have the budget) is to scan on the gateway instead. -Original Message- From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this What version are you using? ESE/API or MAPI/AVAPI?. I am demoing the ESE/API version and the SPAM that is blocked actually appears in the users mailboxes in preview mode and then when you click to open the message, you see the standard message The email was blocked according to rules. and I only have the Administrator being notified, not the sender or recipient, so I would think the recipient would not see any notification. Brian Dugas MIS Director Summit Technical Services, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.summit-technical.com Phone: 401-736-8323 x11 Fax: 401-738-9813 -Original Message- From: Darrin J. Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 3:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this I'm using it at two clients sites. I think that it works great. I haven't had any complaints. It blocks 99.9% of the crap! You can customize it as well. -Original Message- From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this Hello all, Is anyone using Trend's eManager for Scanmail to stop/block SPAM? If you are, thoughts - positive/negative? Thanks - Brian Brian Dugas MIS Director Summit Technical Services, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.summit-technical.com Phone: 401-736-8323 x11 Fax: 401-738-9813 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Full Text Indexing
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/BestIndexing.asp I did not see the option to add PDF in this document, perhaps some whitepaper from Adobe. Did not sound terribly hard to implement, I would be most interested in what the performance hits would be as you get into larger databases. Anyone out there using this solution, offering insites? -Original Message- From: Ryan Malayter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 3:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full Text Indexing Do you have to do something besides install the Adobe PDF Ifilter to add PDF files to that list? -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 12:01 PM Posted To: Exchange List Conversation: Full Text Indexing Subject: RE: Full Text Indexing You are correct. The following file types, up to 16mb in size by default, change-able with a reg hack: .doc, .xls, .ppt, .html, .htm, .asp, .txt, and .eml -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 10:40 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Full Text Indexing Subject: RE: Full Text Indexing My impression has been that Exchange 2000 indexing searches within attachments -Original Message- From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 11:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full Text Indexing Err on earlier response. You would need 3rd party app. to search attachments. -Original Message- From: Allan Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full Text Indexing My email packrats (err users) have asked for the ability to do full text searches against mail messages and attachments. I would appreciate any feedback on available products, hopefully use/don't use. Slipstick has a number of options and I have also read Integrating Microsoft Site Server Search with Microsoft Exchange and Ex2000 Full indexing. Any advice or opinions are appreciated. Current environment Ex 5.5 SP4 on NT 4. Perhaps this is the Killer App to get management to let me upgrade :o). Thanks, Allan Johnson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Full Text Indexing
My email packrats (err users) have asked for the ability to do full text searches against mail messages and attachments. I would appreciate any feedback on available products, hopefully use/don't use. Slipstick has a number of options and I have also read Integrating Microsoft Site Server Search with Microsoft Exchange and Ex2000 Full indexing. Any advice or opinions are appreciated. Current environment Ex 5.5 SP4 on NT 4. Perhaps this is the Killer App to get management to let me upgrade :o). Thanks, Allan Johnson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Full Text Indexing
It is the desire to search Attachment content that they really want. All of the products I have looked at report the ability to search most MS Office formats, .txt, some .zip etc etc. Plus an indexing feature would greatly increase the speed of the search, some of my users are 600+MB packrats. Also a number of the solutions advertise being able to setup searches across multiple mailboxes, not sure how that would function permissions wise but it could be usefull. -Original Message- From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 10:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full Text Indexing What's wrong with using find under tools? This will allow them to search their own mailboxes. -Original Message- From: Allan Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full Text Indexing My email packrats (err users) have asked for the ability to do full text searches against mail messages and attachments. I would appreciate any feedback on available products, hopefully use/don't use. Slipstick has a number of options and I have also read Integrating Microsoft Site Server Search with Microsoft Exchange and Ex2000 Full indexing. Any advice or opinions are appreciated. Current environment Ex 5.5 SP4 on NT 4. Perhaps this is the Killer App to get management to let me upgrade :o). Thanks, Allan Johnson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Full Text Indexing
Correct, well almost MS does have a couple of solutions. Really I was just hoping someone has implemented something to meet this need, and might have an opinion. I am going to have to evaluate any solution(s) and was just hoping to reduce the number of evaluations and or stay away from any PIG applications. Thanks, A. -Original Message- From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 11:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full Text Indexing Err on earlier response. You would need 3rd party app. to search attachments. -Original Message- From: Allan Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full Text Indexing My email packrats (err users) have asked for the ability to do full text searches against mail messages and attachments. I would appreciate any feedback on available products, hopefully use/don't use. Slipstick has a number of options and I have also read Integrating Microsoft Site Server Search with Microsoft Exchange and Ex2000 Full indexing. Any advice or opinions are appreciated. Current environment Ex 5.5 SP4 on NT 4. Perhaps this is the Killer App to get management to let me upgrade :o). Thanks, Allan Johnson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The infamous Invalid data in message
I didn't think it was the length of the Subject line just the content probably confused the heck out of the recieving machine so it rejected it. :o) -Original Message- From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 4:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The infamous Invalid data in message Is that a setting in Outlook? I have never had to mess with the mime settings..I was wondering about the Subject lineit is awfully longwould that effect the header of the message? -Original Message- From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 4:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The infamous Invalid data in message They need to disable 8 bit mime is my guess. -Original Message- From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 12:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: The infamous Invalid data in message This subject has reared it's ugly head once again. There is very little documentation that I have found to help remedy this problem. Does anyone know how I can go about to troubleshoot this error? Thank you. Dave Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: Invocation of Informal Dispute on the Missed Milestone for Ground water Operable Unit Record of Decision 1 (C-720) Signature McCracken Coun ty, Kentucky KY8-890-008-982_v1.TIF Sent: 7/22/2002 10:52 AM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 7/22/2002 10:53 AM Unable to deliver the message due to a communications failure The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=DOE;l=ORO-FOB-MX2N-020722155226Z-57677 MSEXCH:IMS:DOE:ORO:ORO-MAIL 3554 (000B09AA) 554 Invalid data in message I thought we had this fixed but it doesn't appear that it is. Give me a call. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA setup problems
perhaps you are thinking of 5.5 OWA alias login page? You were still required to enter Windows Auth unless you had NO Auth Required. -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 12:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OWA setup problems Not by default. -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 6:26 PM Subject: RE: OWA setup problems E2K OWA doesn't have a logon page. -Original Message- From: Jerry Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 10:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OWA setup problems Ok, what I have now done is to just set up IIS and exchange with defaults and some test users with mailboxes. I fought with it then got more frustrated and walked away and came back an hour later and voila, it works. Now I just need to figure out how to get it to let me bring up the webpage and just log in via the web page instead of the login box. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Spam Filter Suggestions
I agree, Emanager is pretty good. Not to ham-fisted, I have had to retrieve 5-10 valid emails over 6 months while having a reduction of 80-90% of spam mails. FYI for anyone running 3.52 version of Emanager, there is a Bug (definitely not a enhancement) that can delete your custom rules/content filters after a rule auto-update. Contact Trend for (3.52_1538_HotFix) if this might effect you, alternatively backup your csconfig.dat file to save your rules/filters. Allan Thinks content filters have their place (1) (1) Hi Steve -Original Message- From: Robert Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 4:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Spam Filter Suggestions I just purchased the Scanmail Emanager piece and so far it is working with just the updated default rules and it seems to be catching a lot of spam. Although I need to make some of my own rules to up the anti... So far I like it By the way, I am running it in AVAPI mode which the eManager piece runs better because I can forward the caught spam to a mailbox Thank You, Robert Williams Senior Network Administrator Raypak, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone - 805-278-5363 -Original Message- From: Louanne Fournier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Spam Filter Suggestions Does anyone have recommendations on good spam filtering software? We are currently using ScanMail and are looking at their Emanager product but I wanted to know if there are other products we should look at. Thanks! Louanne [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Haiku Good Friday
PHB half day let us out at three o'clock thank you pointy one -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 9:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Haiku Good Friday Half day off today Oh, such a refreshing change Drunk before sunset _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 554 errors from Hot Mail
Subject: Re: 554 Invalid data in message FYI, I am not nor will I ever be confused with the Official Thread Monitor. I just happen to remember this thread for the reprimand delivered, not a soda spurt but a pretty good chuckle. Doctor, I have a pain. Where? Well, I'm not going to tell you except that it's above my waist and below my neck. Daniel Chenault -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 554 errors from Hot Mail Hold on. Let me get the Thread Monitor on the phone. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 554 errors from Hot Mail Importance: High Good morning, I wasn't here yesterday. Could you please point me to the thread that talked about this? Thanks. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 -Original Message- From: Whitlock, Teresa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 4:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 554 errors from Hot Mail Would you mind explaining this a bit further? I don't have a PIX for our firewall which was what was suggested yesterday when I posted about this. Thanks in advance for any information. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 9:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 554 errors from Hot Mail Try removing the SMTP fixup. This doesn't allow ESMTP commands to flow. Exchange uses these when talking to foreign email systems. Yes we sit behind a firewall.. Please share any information you can. I would greatly appreciate it. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 10:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: 554 errors from Hot Mail Sounds familiar. Are you behind a firewall. - Original Message - From: Mitchell Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 10:31 AM Subject: 554 errors from Hot Mail Good morning, Outlook 98. Exchange 5.5 sp4. I have a user getting the following errors. I do not know where to begin to look. This Sister is using a Hotmail account to send to our exchange server. PLEASE HELP. Reporting-MTA: dns;hotmail.com Received-From-MTA: dns;mail.hotmail.com Arrival-Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 18:21:19 -0800 Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED] Action: failed Status: 5.0.0 Diagnostic-Code: smtp;554 Invalid data in message . character on a line by itself. .241.49]) 250-AUTH 250 SIZE 512 HELP 250-SAML 250-SEND 250-SOML 250-TURN 250-XADR 250-XSTA 250-ETRN 250-XGEN 250-RELAY 250 SIZE 2560 sent from the internet. transmit, or distribute unsolicited bulk 220 e-mail sent from the internet. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
RE: The day after superbowl
did everyone stop playing golf suddenly? -Original Message- From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 10:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl yes, that's why it's the most popular sport in the world. -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 February 2002 15:24 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl Unfortunately football/soccer is also boring. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Atkinson, Daniel Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 8:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl haha, correction - the only 'real football' game worth watching is the one that actually _is_ football, you know, the one based around using your feet to kick the ball... seriously, i do really like 'american football', but it's a bit stop-start and there are way too many stats and ad-breaks. The only real football game worth watching any more is Army-Navy. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 9:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl Patriots (finally a sports team to celebrate in boston) :) -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 9:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl Who won? John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys! -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 9:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl No change there then. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 February 2002 14:20 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: The day after superbowl Just sitting here starring at the computer screen. Feels like some took my Brain out of my head and just poured Budweiser on in all night. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:
RE: mail
sorry it is dealers prices -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 9:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: mail I recommend you post the entire NDR. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 08:25 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: mail Subject: mail Hello, I received this message from a client that sends messages over our website that I dont host. We host the email server with the address below [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is this due to bad scripting on a website. I know its not my email server cause I can send receive internal and external to this address. Any recommendations would be appreciated -Original Message- From: Postmaster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 5:43 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Undeliverable Mail undeliverable to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Original message follows. Received: from 65.209.124.14 [65.209.124.212] by como.MIS with ESMTP (SMTPD32-7.00) id AF0920D0086; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 17:43:24 -0500 Content-type: text/plain Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 17:42:20 -0500 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: test To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] test _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: mail
No laughing list persons, to much multi-tasking. Sorry for the interruption return to your Exchange discussion. -Original Message- From: Allan Johnson Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 9:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: mail sorry it is dealers prices -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 9:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: mail I recommend you post the entire NDR. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 08:25 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: mail Subject: mail Hello, I received this message from a client that sends messages over our website that I dont host. We host the email server with the address below [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is this due to bad scripting on a website. I know its not my email server cause I can send receive internal and external to this address. Any recommendations would be appreciated -Original Message- From: Postmaster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 5:43 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Undeliverable Mail undeliverable to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Original message follows. Received: from 65.209.124.14 [65.209.124.212] by como.MIS with ESMTP (SMTPD32-7.00) id AF0920D0086; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 17:43:24 -0500 Content-type: text/plain Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 17:42:20 -0500 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: test To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] test _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Was: Question from a troll to a Yoda - Now: RFC Question
understanding why bumblebees, pigs, flat birds fly ask Yoda you must My whack at an answer on Haiku Fri. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 9:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Was: Question from a troll to a Yoda - Now: RFC Question Time flies like a bird, fruit flies like a banana. -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 9:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Was: Question from a troll to a Yoda - Now: RFC Question Once again, this group is not focusing on the discussion. L = (1/2) d v2 s CL If you want to figure flying pigs into this equation, I'll have to get back to you tomorrow. You people are impossible. -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 6:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Was: Question from a troll to a Yoda - Now: RFC Question The same can be said here in the (somewhat) United States. There has been a plague infesting honeybee hives for several years now. Bee population numbers are falling into the toilet, although I don't believe that the plague is having an effect on Africanized bees. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925 -Original Message- From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 8:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Was: Question from a troll to a Yoda - Now: RFC Question Pretty much as I understand the latest theory of bee flight but put much better than I could have done. But it does prove that the formula presented by Jennifer may not hold true for everything that flies. However, is a deflated bird flying or just a projectile being shot from some device? Coming back to bees it is with great sadness to know that at least the humble bumble bee in Britain is reducing in numbers, no more honey for us! Paul -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 January 2002 13:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Was: Question from a troll to a Yoda - Now: RFC Question Obviously bumble bees do fly but no fixed wing study in a conventional wind tunnel has shown how enough lift can be generated to lift the huge mass of a bumble bee (compared to its wing size). A wide range of studies have been done in recent years to try to understand the bee's unique method of flying. Insects like the bee do not flap their wings up and down as one might think. The movement of their wings is forward and backward. Lay your right hand on the table (palm down) and move it to the left. That is what the bee does as the first part of its wing beat. This movement produces lift because your hand produces the same effect as an airplane wing. Air moving over the top produces a low pressure because of the greater curvature, a principal known as Bernoulli's principal. Now flip your hand over (palm up) and return it to its original position. Computer studies shown that the timing of the flip is critical. The wake of the forward stroke allows the wing to recapture energy as the wing is moved back. There is a surge of forces on the wing as this happens which provides great lift at minimal energy. Dr. Adrian Thomas of Oxford University says, The whole system is a lot more complicated than we thought. A lot remains to be done to understand this, but the maneuverability and efficiency of it indicates man needs to understand to improve his own methods of flying. To suggest that such systems come about by chance strains credibility to the limit. The enormous complexity of the motion, the design of the wings to do the flying, and the support system that moves the wing all speaks of highly planned and designed structures that we still do not totally understand. Does that answer your question? Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange 2000 Listowner www.exchange-mail.org -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bendall, Paul Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 1:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Was: Question from a troll to a Yoda - Now: RFC Question I am impressed with all this theory but to digress slightly, can you explain how a bee flies? Paul -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 January 2002 12:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Was: Question from a troll to a Yoda - Now: RFC Question You forgot the cross wind factor. Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange 2000 Listowner www.exchange-mail.org -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jennifer Baker Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 1:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Was: Question from a troll to a Yoda - Now: RFC Question How fast does a deflated bird fly?
RE: Weird Error
looking for that engagement ring she can't say NO to? -Original Message- From: Dillon, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 2:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Weird Error A 2-Carat D flawless would be sufficient down-payment for 1 year of my automated alt.clueless.boss forum. -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 2:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Weird Error I understand that, but the response my boss received led him to believe he received the ndr from our internal server. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 2:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Weird Error That is the MSN sys admin message. They're not people you know, it's all computers talking to each other. -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 1:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Weird Error But why wouldn't it just send it to MSN, and then have the MSN Sys Admin send me a message telling me the account doesn't exist. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 2:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Weird Error Because your server tried to send the mail and it failed with user unknown. MSN thought you'd like to know. -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 1:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Weird Error My boss sent an e-mail to a msn.com account. but this is the error message he received back. Why would this becoming from my System Administrator? Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: Sent: 1/4/2002 2:06 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 1/4/2002 2:06 PM The recipient name is not recognized The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=Finlay Fine Jewe;l=MAIL-MO-1-020104190541Z-15960 MSEXCH:IMS:Finlay Fine Jewelry Corp.:FINLAY-NATION:MAIL-MO-1 3550 (000B09AA) 550 5.1.1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] User unknown _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis, Suhler Associates, Inc. by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange
RE: Trend e-manager opinions/caveats/complexity?
Your environment and mine are comparable. I just lost my battle with managment and had to move forward with an eManager solution on 3.52 Trend Suite. I setup W2K server front end with Interscan and eManager. I have to admit I spent about 1 week slowly implementing additional rules above what came out of the box and have seen a steady reduction in SPAM. Average daily traffic is between 1500-2500 emails and we are now filtering 250-400 emails / 24 hour period, I have yet to have anyone make me go through the filtered mail for something caught that should not have been. I spot check the filtered mail notifications I get for header info just to verify. Since the original week I spend maybe 1-2 hours reading requests from users for additional word(s)/from domain tweeking and making any changes if I so decide. eManager lets you archive filtered mail after a rule change, archiving filters but also sends the mail to the original recepient. You can verify that you did not start pulling out huge amounts of valid mail with a rule misjudgment. The exception rules are great considering any of my sensitive word filters would greatly reduce the humor and knowledge gleaned from this list. I would only get posts from Trolls. **As an additional note Jim Schwartz's letter made it through from a hotmail account as a test. Great test though. I also don't deliver notifications to senders about blocked mail with just this list in mind. If you have any questions contact me. Allan -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 4:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Trend e-manager opinions/caveats/complexity? Then I would tell my managers that the amount of time it would take would be zero. I'm not qualified to decide what is and is not business related. Although if you want to send what ever you consider porn to me, I'll let you know what I think. ;-) -Original Message- From: Smith, Ronni [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 3:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Trend e-manager opinions/caveats/complexity? Hence my last question as to the amount of time spent pulling the good mail out of the filtered mail. I am already aware of many of the pitfalls of content filtering. Anything I didn't already know I learned through an experiment with the Outlook rules which resulted in noticible amounts of my list mail moving into the junk folder. Something about friggin lyris and fsck iirc. Ronni -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 11:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Trend e-manager opinions/caveats/complexity? Amen. The other consideration you should look at is will you filter e-mails that are really business related, but for whatever reason appear to be spam. This blocks legitimate mail and could possibly lose you business. Example: snipped _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: changing port
Considering the many posts on mail filtering and the fact that eManager wanted the same type of thing, I ended up accepting mail on 25 for Interscan/eManager (W2K server) forwarding directly 127.0.0.1:6025 to IIS5 SMTP accepting on port 6025 and then forwarded all mail directly to my Exchange server. Simple to set up and allowed Exchange to act exactly how it is supposed to out of the box. I Regedit Exchange settings at gunpoint only. Just FYI I guess. Good luck. Allan -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 5:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: changing port Oh, my. You mean the truth is out there for those willing to seek it? Will wonders never cease... - Original Message - From: Ben Schorr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 3:54 PM Subject: RE: changing port Actually a quick search found this: --- In MS Exchange's case you edit the TCP/IP services file (%SystemRoot%\system32\drivers\etc\services). You will need to change the default TCP port number for SMTP to another free port number (e.g. port 97 is often available). --- On the MailMarshal website. http://www.cleane-mail.com/ Aloha, -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 11:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: changing port MailMarshall doesn't include instructions on how to make the change? I'm disappointed. Anyway... There is no way to change it in the Exchange 5.5 admin, it is controlled by the services file in the \%system root%\drivers\etc directory. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 3:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: changing port We are using Mail Marshall and the reason port 25 needs to be change is because Mail Marshall uses this port(97) for mail and sends mail to Exchange Server, instead of Exchange recieving it first. Mail Marshall is acting like a mail security gateway for Exchange. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off topic: EXPLORER.EXE 100% CPU
Not sure about Scanmail having the file locked but have you tried del or attrib from a DOS prompt? Allan -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off topic: EXPLORER.EXE 100% CPU This is going to be a little off topic, but I thought I would post it in case someone ran into it as well. I have ScanMail moving infected files. One of the files that was moved into the \VIRUS area was a FUN.MP3 that is listed as a short cut. I cannot delete due to a sharing violation (believe ScanMail still has locked). Once you try to delete or look at the attributes, your NT workstation jumps up to 100% CPU utilization for EXPLORER. Even disconnecting the mapped drive does not clear EXPLORER.EXE and the only way to get your workstation back is to reboot. I duplicated this on 3 NT workstations. Two running NT 4.0 sp6a one running sp5. Took me 3 days to determine what was causing my workstation to go crazy. I sure won't clear the areas from the server console. I can just see me killing the box! Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off topic: EXPLORER.EXE 100% CPU
err, stop scanmail services and try. Will be just your luck the latest melissa will come out during that 5 minute window. What version of scanmail? Did it move the file based on infection or attachment blocking? You say the mp3 file is listed as a shortcut, it has a .lnk extension or just the mp3 extension? Adding mp2;mp3 to your attachment blocking list may be a good idea, especially if the file is locked for some reason by scanmail scanning the attachment. See past thread Attachment Nazi Mrs. Jennifer Baker had the bomb (read atom) list of attachments to stop. -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off topic: EXPLORER.EXE 100% CPU If you try to delete it from DOS, it still is locked but it doesn't take EXPLORER.EXE up to 100% utilization. -Original Message- From: Allan Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off topic: EXPLORER.EXE 100% CPU Not sure about Scanmail having the file locked but have you tried del or attrib from a DOS prompt? Allan -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off topic: EXPLORER.EXE 100% CPU This is going to be a little off topic, but I thought I would post it in case someone ran into it as well. I have ScanMail moving infected files. One of the files that was moved into the \VIRUS area was a FUN.MP3 that is listed as a short cut. I cannot delete due to a sharing violation (believe ScanMail still has locked). Once you try to delete or look at the attributes, your NT workstation jumps up to 100% CPU utilization for EXPLORER. Even disconnecting the mapped drive does not clear EXPLORER.EXE and the only way to get your workstation back is to reboot. I duplicated this on 3 NT workstations. Two running NT 4.0 sp6a one running sp5. Took me 3 days to determine what was causing my workstation to go crazy. I sure won't clear the areas from the server console. I can just see me killing the box! Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA 5.5sp4 on IIS5/Win2k SP2
John, Replies directly to the Exchange List will definitely increase your chance of getting more answers, I post suggestions when I think I can help and to offset those times I have to post questions. So, reading your reply your user is an admin? Non-secure suggestion try logging in with Administrator or your EX service account. Also where does the blank page occur, at IIS login or OWA login? You can remove Basic Auth and just leave Anonymous to rule out permissions at the IIS box also. IIS logging is under properties of the Exchange site, properties button for logging = extended tab. Security Auditing (logon success/failure etc) is enabled/configured through MMC. -Original Message- From: Wynkoop, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 5:41 PM To: Allan Johnson Subject: RE: OWA 5.5sp4 on IIS5/Win2k SP2 Yes, I'm unable to get my mail or that of an average user... I don't know what the logs are saying, I can't find any use for them... They seem to only show me hits and http get requests, not anything else. Is there some way to increase the severity of my logging, to maybe catch the problem? Thanks, J -Original Message- From: Allan Johnson Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 4:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA 5.5sp4 on IIS5/Win2k SP2 Have you tried logging in with administrator level users? Do the w3svc logs and/or security logs show anything usefull? -Original Message- From: Wynkoop, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 3:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA 5.5sp4 on IIS5/Win2k SP2 Multiple domains, but my exchange server and my users are in the same domain -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 3:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA 5.5sp4 on IIS5/Win2k SP2 Only one domain right? No resource domains or anything? -Original Message- From: Wynkoop, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 2:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA 5.5sp4 on IIS5/Win2k SP2 We have 3 BDC's I'll reboot them later tonight and see if that helps, but the problem is constant so I don't know what kind of effect rebooting the BDC's and PDC will have. Thanks, John -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 3:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA 5.5sp4 on IIS5/Win2k SP2 John, How many BDCs do you have? Below is the reason why I'm asking (snipped from my response to another thread). ... Here we have multiple account domains and the OWA servers are in a resource domain. I had that problem for one of those account domains. As it turns out, the domain controller for the account domain was flaking out. Rebooted the DC and the problem went away. ... -Original Message- From: Wynkoop, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 3:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA 5.5sp4 on IIS5/Win2k SP2 Thanks for you suggestions, see below for my replies... Let's examine a few things: 1. You stated that the server is a standalone system. However, is it a member of the NT Domain. Yes, the win2k webserver is a member server. 2. Under IIS properties (Directory Security) do you have Anonymous access checked and Basic Auth. Under Basic Auth do you have the domain preset. (Side note) If you do not have the domain preset are users typing in the full syntax to login (alias first followed by domain\username - password) Yes, anonymous and basic auth checked. Yes, I have the domain listed under basic auth. I've tried using simply usernames as well as fully quailfied user names (neither works). 3. Have you modified the NTFS permissions on the C Drive. If so, reset webdata directory to Everyone Full and retest. No, reset and tried anyway. Same problem. 4. Have you modified the Location of the Webdata directory? If so, reinstall SP4 and don't move the directory...retest. (Side note: If this was the problem let me know and I will tell you how to move the directory successfully). No. Reinstalled SP4 anyway, same problem. 5. Are you sure that the users that need access to OWA site have Log on local rights and access system from network right. Yes, granted Doamin users access to log on locally, this includes all users who might need access. Thanks. Brian Murphy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
RE: OWA 5.5sp4 on IIS5/Win2k SP2
Have you installed the Ex. SP4 on the OWA box? -Original Message- From: Wynkoop, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 10:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA 5.5sp4 on IIS5/Win2k SP2 Thanks Allan, I appreciate everyone's help with this matter, it's a teaser. Yes, when logging on as the exchange admin or a regular user I get three IE log on boxes (site, realm, username, password) then it takes me to a blank page instead of the root.asp that I am used to seeing on my production server. It seems that the problem I am having is with the authentication of OWA against the exchange server (but i'm not sure). I can get to the website just fine, but not to my mailbox. I'm confused and need some suggestions. Thanks, John -Original Message- From: Allan Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 9:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA 5.5sp4 on IIS5/Win2k SP2 John, Replies directly to the Exchange List will definitely increase your chance of getting more answers, I post suggestions when I think I can help and to offset those times I have to post questions. So, reading your reply your user is an admin? Non-secure suggestion try logging in with Administrator or your EX service account. Also where does the blank page occur, at IIS login or OWA login? You can remove Basic Auth and just leave Anonymous to rule out permissions at the IIS box also. IIS logging is under properties of the Exchange site, properties button for logging = extended tab. Security Auditing (logon success/failure etc) is enabled/configured through MMC. -Original Message- From: Wynkoop, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 5:41 PM To: Allan Johnson Subject: RE: OWA 5.5sp4 on IIS5/Win2k SP2 Yes, I'm unable to get my mail or that of an average user... I don't know what the logs are saying, I can't find any use for them... They seem to only show me hits and http get requests, not anything else. Is there some way to increase the severity of my logging, to maybe catch the problem? Thanks, J -Original Message- From: Allan Johnson Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 4:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA 5.5sp4 on IIS5/Win2k SP2 Have you tried logging in with administrator level users? Do the w3svc logs and/or security logs show anything usefull? -Original Message- From: Wynkoop, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 3:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA 5.5sp4 on IIS5/Win2k SP2 Multiple domains, but my exchange server and my users are in the same domain -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 3:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA 5.5sp4 on IIS5/Win2k SP2 Only one domain right? No resource domains or anything? -Original Message- From: Wynkoop, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 2:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA 5.5sp4 on IIS5/Win2k SP2 We have 3 BDC's I'll reboot them later tonight and see if that helps, but the problem is constant so I don't know what kind of effect rebooting the BDC's and PDC will have. Thanks, John -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 3:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA 5.5sp4 on IIS5/Win2k SP2 John, How many BDCs do you have? Below is the reason why I'm asking (snipped from my response to another thread). ... Here we have multiple account domains and the OWA servers are in a resource domain. I had that problem for one of those account domains. As it turns out, the domain controller for the account domain was flaking out. Rebooted the DC and the problem went away. ... -Original Message- From: Wynkoop, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 3:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA 5.5sp4 on IIS5/Win2k SP2 Thanks for you suggestions, see below for my replies... Let's examine a few things: 1. You stated that the server is a standalone system. However, is it a member of the NT Domain. Yes, the win2k webserver is a member server. 2. Under IIS properties (Directory Security) do you have Anonymous access checked and Basic Auth. Under Basic Auth do you have the domain preset. (Side note) If you do not have the domain preset are users typing in the full syntax to login (alias first followed by domain\username - password) Yes, anonymous and basic auth checked. Yes, I have the domain listed under basic auth. I've tried using simply usernames as well as fully quailfied user names (neither works). 3. Have you modified the NTFS permissions on the C Drive. If so, reset webdata directory to Everyone Full and retest. No, reset and tried anyway. Same problem. 4. Have you modified the Location of the Webdata directory
RE: OWA 5.5sp4 on IIS5/Win2k SP2
Sorry just re-read, if you are getting 3 IE login boxes it sounds as if you are not being authenticated to the IIS site. NO error about auth failed from IIS? Having read through the mail, you used domain\user? I seem to remember using domain/user until I defaulted the domain. What exactly have you set under Local Policies=Log on Locally, hopefully something along the lines of domain/global user group. -Original Message- From: Allan Johnson Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA 5.5sp4 on IIS5/Win2k SP2 Have you installed the Ex. SP4 on the OWA box? -Original Message- From: Wynkoop, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 10:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA 5.5sp4 on IIS5/Win2k SP2 Thanks Allan, I appreciate everyone's help with this matter, it's a teaser. Yes, when logging on as the exchange admin or a regular user I get three IE log on boxes (site, realm, username, password) then it takes me to a blank page instead of the root.asp that I am used to seeing on my production server. It seems that the problem I am having is with the authentication of OWA against the exchange server (but i'm not sure). I can get to the website just fine, but not to my mailbox. I'm confused and need some suggestions. Thanks, John -Original Message- From: Allan Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 9:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA 5.5sp4 on IIS5/Win2k SP2 John, Replies directly to the Exchange List will definitely increase your chance of getting more answers, I post suggestions when I think I can help and to offset those times I have to post questions. So, reading your reply your user is an admin? Non-secure suggestion try logging in with Administrator or your EX service account. Also where does the blank page occur, at IIS login or OWA login? You can remove Basic Auth and just leave Anonymous to rule out permissions at the IIS box also. IIS logging is under properties of the Exchange site, properties button for logging = extended tab. Security Auditing (logon success/failure etc) is enabled/configured through MMC. -Original Message- From: Wynkoop, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 5:41 PM To: Allan Johnson Subject: RE: OWA 5.5sp4 on IIS5/Win2k SP2 Yes, I'm unable to get my mail or that of an average user... I don't know what the logs are saying, I can't find any use for them... They seem to only show me hits and http get requests, not anything else. Is there some way to increase the severity of my logging, to maybe catch the problem? Thanks, J -Original Message- From: Allan Johnson Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 4:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA 5.5sp4 on IIS5/Win2k SP2 Have you tried logging in with administrator level users? Do the w3svc logs and/or security logs show anything usefull? -Original Message- From: Wynkoop, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 3:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA 5.5sp4 on IIS5/Win2k SP2 Multiple domains, but my exchange server and my users are in the same domain -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 3:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA 5.5sp4 on IIS5/Win2k SP2 Only one domain right? No resource domains or anything? -Original Message- From: Wynkoop, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 2:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA 5.5sp4 on IIS5/Win2k SP2 We have 3 BDC's I'll reboot them later tonight and see if that helps, but the problem is constant so I don't know what kind of effect rebooting the BDC's and PDC will have. Thanks, John -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 3:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA 5.5sp4 on IIS5/Win2k SP2 John, How many BDCs do you have? Below is the reason why I'm asking (snipped from my response to another thread). ... Here we have multiple account domains and the OWA servers are in a resource domain. I had that problem for one of those account domains. As it turns out, the domain controller for the account domain was flaking out. Rebooted the DC and the problem went away. ... -Original Message- From: Wynkoop, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 3:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA 5.5sp4 on IIS5/Win2k SP2 Thanks for you suggestions, see below for my replies... Let's examine a few things: 1. You stated that the server is a standalone system. However, is it a member of the NT Domain. Yes, the win2k webserver is a member server. 2. Under IIS properties (Directory Security) do you have Anonymous access checked and Basic Auth. Under Basic Auth do you have the domain
RE: OWA 5.5sp4 on IIS5/Win2k SP2
Having no fun now!! Have you tried setting Auth to Anonymous just for testing? Just to be explicit (not doubting your capabilities) Logon locally rights are displayed as domain name\users Have you set up auditing Local Security Policies on the IIS Box, also are you auditing Logon Success/Failure at the PDC? -Original Message- From: Wynkoop, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 11:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA 5.5sp4 on IIS5/Win2k SP2 I can't seem to find any error messages regarding authentication for IIS, even in the logs. Also, I tried the domain/username idea with no change in the symptoms. Local Policies=Log on Locally is granted to all domain users. thanks for you suggestions. -Original Message- From: Allan Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 11:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA 5.5sp4 on IIS5/Win2k SP2 Sorry just re-read, if you are getting 3 IE login boxes it sounds as if you are not being authenticated to the IIS site. NO error about auth failed from IIS? Having read through the mail, you used domain\user? I seem to remember using domain/user until I defaulted the domain. What exactly have you set under Local Policies=Log on Locally, hopefully something along the lines of domain/global user group. -Original Message- From: Allan Johnson Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA 5.5sp4 on IIS5/Win2k SP2 Have you installed the Ex. SP4 on the OWA box? -Original Message- From: Wynkoop, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 10:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA 5.5sp4 on IIS5/Win2k SP2 Thanks Allan, I appreciate everyone's help with this matter, it's a teaser. Yes, when logging on as the exchange admin or a regular user I get three IE log on boxes (site, realm, username, password) then it takes me to a blank page instead of the root.asp that I am used to seeing on my production server. It seems that the problem I am having is with the authentication of OWA against the exchange server (but i'm not sure). I can get to the website just fine, but not to my mailbox. I'm confused and need some suggestions. Thanks, John -Original Message- From: Allan Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 9:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA 5.5sp4 on IIS5/Win2k SP2 John, Replies directly to the Exchange List will definitely increase your chance of getting more answers, I post suggestions when I think I can help and to offset those times I have to post questions. So, reading your reply your user is an admin? Non-secure suggestion try logging in with Administrator or your EX service account. Also where does the blank page occur, at IIS login or OWA login? You can remove Basic Auth and just leave Anonymous to rule out permissions at the IIS box also. IIS logging is under properties of the Exchange site, properties button for logging = extended tab. Security Auditing (logon success/failure etc) is enabled/configured through MMC. -Original Message- From: Wynkoop, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 5:41 PM To: Allan Johnson Subject: RE: OWA 5.5sp4 on IIS5/Win2k SP2 Yes, I'm unable to get my mail or that of an average user... I don't know what the logs are saying, I can't find any use for them... They seem to only show me hits and http get requests, not anything else. Is there some way to increase the severity of my logging, to maybe catch the problem? Thanks, J -Original Message- From: Allan Johnson Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 4:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA 5.5sp4 on IIS5/Win2k SP2 Have you tried logging in with administrator level users? Do the w3svc logs and/or security logs show anything usefull? -Original Message- From: Wynkoop, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 3:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA 5.5sp4 on IIS5/Win2k SP2 Multiple domains, but my exchange server and my users are in the same domain -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 3:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA 5.5sp4 on IIS5/Win2k SP2 Only one domain right? No resource domains or anything? -Original Message- From: Wynkoop, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 2:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA 5.5sp4 on IIS5/Win2k SP2 We have 3 BDC's I'll reboot them later tonight and see if that helps, but the problem is constant so I don't know what kind of effect rebooting the BDC's and PDC will have. Thanks, John -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 3:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA 5.5sp4 on IIS5/Win2k SP2 John
RE: OWA 5.5sp4 on IIS5/Win2k SP2
Have you tried logging in with administrator level users? Do the w3svc logs and/or security logs show anything usefull? -Original Message- From: Wynkoop, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 3:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA 5.5sp4 on IIS5/Win2k SP2 Multiple domains, but my exchange server and my users are in the same domain -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 3:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA 5.5sp4 on IIS5/Win2k SP2 Only one domain right? No resource domains or anything? -Original Message- From: Wynkoop, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 2:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA 5.5sp4 on IIS5/Win2k SP2 We have 3 BDC's I'll reboot them later tonight and see if that helps, but the problem is constant so I don't know what kind of effect rebooting the BDC's and PDC will have. Thanks, John -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 3:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA 5.5sp4 on IIS5/Win2k SP2 John, How many BDCs do you have? Below is the reason why I'm asking (snipped from my response to another thread). ... Here we have multiple account domains and the OWA servers are in a resource domain. I had that problem for one of those account domains. As it turns out, the domain controller for the account domain was flaking out. Rebooted the DC and the problem went away. ... -Original Message- From: Wynkoop, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 3:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA 5.5sp4 on IIS5/Win2k SP2 Thanks for you suggestions, see below for my replies... Let's examine a few things: 1. You stated that the server is a standalone system. However, is it a member of the NT Domain. Yes, the win2k webserver is a member server. 2. Under IIS properties (Directory Security) do you have Anonymous access checked and Basic Auth. Under Basic Auth do you have the domain preset. (Side note) If you do not have the domain preset are users typing in the full syntax to login (alias first followed by domain\username - password) Yes, anonymous and basic auth checked. Yes, I have the domain listed under basic auth. I've tried using simply usernames as well as fully quailfied user names (neither works). 3. Have you modified the NTFS permissions on the C Drive. If so, reset webdata directory to Everyone Full and retest. No, reset and tried anyway. Same problem. 4. Have you modified the Location of the Webdata directory? If so, reinstall SP4 and don't move the directory...retest. (Side note: If this was the problem let me know and I will tell you how to move the directory successfully). No. Reinstalled SP4 anyway, same problem. 5. Are you sure that the users that need access to OWA site have Log on local rights and access system from network right. Yes, granted Doamin users access to log on locally, this includes all users who might need access. Thanks. Brian Murphy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
extension smtp cannot be loaded
Hoping someone has run into this before. I am receiving extension smtp cannot be loaded when trying to open the IMC on my Ex 5.5 SP4 / NT 4 SP6a. I have the option of abort/ignore/retry, if I ignore the IMC opens. This has just recently (past week) started, I originally saw it running admin from my W2K pro workstation. It also happens logged onto the server. Q196924 and Q250907 both refer to a version conflict of IMCADMIN.DLL but when I follow the instructions and look at the version number in raw mode it matches the version of the file. Any ideas? I am planning a reboot during off hours but I hate that answer. The only other thing I can think of right now would be to re-apply SP4 but that is not a willy-nilly answer for a production server. Any help is appreciated. Allan Johnson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Email Virus Protection
Virus software configured correctly (Trend or Sybari) on your Exchange server will run great and protect your mailboxes like a champ. Trend Scanmail - saving my butt for 3+ yrs. We are evaluating gateway scanning for content filtering as well as another layer of virus protection, call it a warm fuzzy feeling. Trend's eManager product really is a small blip on the budget as well. Allan -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 8:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Email Virus Protection I use and prefer both. I let the mail hit the gateway for a preliminary scan, then on to the Exch server for a second scan. The gateway also can act as a holding area should the Exch server go down. If I had to choose one or the other, it would be a product that installs directly on my Exchange server. Trend or Antigen. -Original Message- From: BY [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 3:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Email Virus Protection Hello Group, If you have a choice as an Exchange Administrator, would you prefer to protect your Exchange environment by installing an e-mail filtering product (gateway) at the DMZ area instead of installing an anti-virus mail product on the machine running Exchange Server? I prefer an gateway solution because I have no confident to complicate my Exchange environment if possible. It seems to me that sometimes Exchange cannot get along well with these products. By doing that, do you think I would be able to filter both incoming and outgoing mails from virus infection? According to my last year's investigation, Trendmicro was the highly recommended one to be running on Exchange server. Is this still the case? I am reviewing the solution again since the management is ready now. I would also appreciate your recommendation which e-mail filtering product you like. Also, if budget is an issue, should I introduce an antivirus product for Exchange Server or an e-mail filtering gateway product ? Thank you for your contribution. BY _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Email Scanners
well evidently tis' the season to be content scanning. I am evaluating eManager due to the fact I use Trend for Exchange and Servers, another product on clients. Is anyone currently using eManager in production for the purpose of content filtering and do you give a thumb up or down? rant it is more efficient for those users with offended sensibilities to call me and have me continuously adjusting content filters than it is for them to press DELETE. /rant -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 6:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Email Scanners We've been mostly happy with MailSweeper from Baltimore Technologies. It will block attachments and scan content. Virus scanning can be done by hooking in a third-party scanner like McAfee, NAV or F-Secure. Aloha, -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Network Issues [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 1:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Email Scanners Sorry... We are running Exchange 5.5 / SP4 and the guys upstairs want to be able to block attachments, scan for viruses and scan the content of the email for what management deems inappropriate. Thanks again. -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 3:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Email Scanners And we're all partial to Kelly, except that damn ugly sig that she uses. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 3:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Email Scanners The FAQ lists Trend... but I happen to be partial to Antigen from Sybari Software :) ~ -K.Borndale Network Administrator Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com One man's ceiling is another man's floor |+--- || Network Issues | || [EMAIL PROTECTED]| || om | || Sent by: | || bounce-exchange-148870@ls| || .swynk.com | || | || | || 12/06/2001 06:14 PM | || Please respond to| || Exchange Discussions | || | |+--- - -- | | | | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Subject: Email Scanners | - -- | I have been tasked to find an email scanner for our enterprise. I was wondering which one of the many products available do you recommend? Your advice is greatly appreciated. Thanks. Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List
Strip HTML out of incoming mail in OL2000/2002.
Just FYI, normally wouldn'nt post it but thought others might be interested. An answer to stupid HTML mail. http://ntbugtraq.ntadvice.com/default.asp?sid=1pid=55did=38 Allan _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Invalid Page Fault
IIRC, Nimda infected rich20.dll. Once the virus is removed you still need to replace rich20.dll with a known clean copy for OL to start working again. Outside of the Nimda scenerio I have seen client virus software with the OL addin cause similar things to happen. If you have such a program running on the client try to disable the OL plug in and start OL. Good luck. -Original Message- From: Barry Patterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Invalid Page Fault What's the exact message? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mitchell Mike Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 10:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Invalid Page Fault Outlook 98, Exchange 5.5 SP4 I have a client that keeps getting an invalid page fault when she tries to log in. She doesn't make it pass the Outlook 98 screen splash. It chugs along for about 3-4 seconds and then the invalid page fault message appears. I have used the article Q182001 on Microsoft, but none of these options work. Any ideas would be appreciated. Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: HELP Can't send mail
Had the same config. But FAQ configuration works better. Otherwise there is an MS whitepaper about setting up Exchange with MS Proxy and running proxy client on Ex. Like I said the FAQ configuration works better and is easier. http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxh.htm -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 6:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: HELP Can't send mail Also. Do a services check. DO you see anything like nmap running. Someone could have setup a port redirector on the box. Easiest way to find out. Perform a port scan against this box (please). Goto www.google.com and search for port scanner. Download an eval and scan the box. This will give me a better idea of what's going on. Also, open a command prompt and type ipconfig /all just to verify the IP address is indeed bound to the external card. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 4:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: HELP Can't send mail Hmm. So you have a dual-homed proxy server with an external ip address bound to one card and an internal ip address bound to another card. Your MX record is pointing to your Proxy Server but you do not have an SMTP relay or Exchange running an Internet Mail Connector to forward mail to your internal server. Your using an internal address for your Exchange server: I rebuilt this box and called it the same name. I then used 10.0.0.12 for an ip address. I have since changed it to 10.0.0.11 which is the other ip address. Still no mail. This ip address must be set to what it was before? Do we have that information? Obviously if this box has an internal ip address only and is not dual-homed then you are recieving your smtp mail from another box - hence, again...the proxy server somehow is providing this function. The only situation I could see where it was not is IF you have a firewall providing port forwarding services...We have determined that this is not the case because the IP address (according to you) is hard bound to the external interface of the proxy server. If the proxy server was forwarding smtp traffic then setting up your mail server with the EXACT same address as before is a MUST. Then configure your Internet Mail Connector under the Connections Tab in Exchange Administrator to Forward all messages to host (Proxy Server). And set the routing tab to Reroute incomming SMTP traffic for (yourdomain.com). -Original Message- From: Brett Wesoloski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 4:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: HELP Can't send mail The ip address is pount to a box. I have Microsoft Proxy. I also have microsoft proxy client installed on the exchange server which I forgot to mention eailer. Thanks again. Define forward? Are they forwarding this IP address to a firewall that subsequently forwards packets to specific ports? In other words is this IP address bound to your proxy server or a firewall (hard box) like Cisco Pix or something similiar that has port forwarding capability (or a NAT Box)? If not then I'm still pointing the finger at the proxy server. It has to be your smtp relay. -Original Message- From: Brett Wesoloski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 4:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: HELP Can't send mail itol.com is infinity technologies. They forward our mail to us at our sight. 207.170.31.254 Thanks again you have been very helpful. I really appreciate it. Ok. Well who is itol.com in relation to your company. You only have two ip's to choose from on your mx records: mail.itol.com 209.62.160.14 mail.klemmtanklines.com 207.170.31.254 Do a port scan on your Proxy Box. Your probably running an SMTP relay of some sort back to the other Exchange Box. Maybe it was using authentification? Dunno. Check the Internet Services Manager is SMTP Server Running? If 207.170.31.245 is your proxy server (and this has not changed) then your proxy server is your SMTP server. -Original Message- From: Brett Wesoloski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 4:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: HELP Can't send mail No Proxy is not on the same server. The exchange box only has exchange on it. Is your proxy server running Exchange? With Internet Mail Connector? If you rebuilt your server you might have screwed up the site connector between the servers. :) -Original Message- From: Brett Wesoloski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 3:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: HELP Can't send mail That ip address goes to my proxy server. _ List
RE: my 2 cents
All Disney theme parks (4) have been shut down and are being evacuated at this time. Even the mouse is scared. From Central Florida Allan J. -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 11:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: my 2 cents Oh Stuff it Carlos. We don't need your crap right now. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 ...the words that I remember from my childhood still are true, that there are none so blind as those who will not see --The Moody Blues (I know you're out there) -Original Message- From: Velazquez, Carlos F [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: my 2 cents The world, not just the US, has just changed. Assume we will be on war footing for the next several months. The news is reporting as I type that terrorist organizations are saying that not all attacks are over. Expect all sorts of shortages in fuel, food, etc. Nationwide curfews are in the offing and should be implemented immediately. This me or X or whatever generation has just learned a tough lesson: those that fail to heed history are doomed to repeat it. This is Pearl Harbor all over again, except it is worse. We have grown fat, inattentive, complacent, naively thinking the rest of the world hold the same values and respect for human life that we have. Now we know better. This is a massive incomprehensible failure in intelligence. The liberals gutted the CIA the FBI in the 70's and we are now reaping the rewards. The only way to have and preserve peace is to be always ready for conflict and to have the gonads to follow up and implement what we have learned from the hard lessons of history. -Original Message- From: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Terrible disasters and an expression of sympathetic grief. If we step back a moment from the horrific events happening, we realize that the world has changed abruptly this morning. The United States is at war, (officially or not) and it is for the first time that it has affected the mainland since 1812. God help us all... John Allhiser MCSE CCNA Network Engineer Business Men's Assurance -Original Message- From: Velazquez, Carlos F [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Terrible disasters and an expression of sympathetic grief. plane just crashed at Camp David -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Terrible disasters and an expression of sympathetic grief. Does anyone know if the Wired Magazine is located in the World Trade Center? -Original Message- From: Orr, Dale L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 11:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Terrible disasters and an expression of sympathetic grief. Very thoughtful of you, Dean. We have all lost someone today: the person we woke up as. And I doubt if we'll ever see them again. Our thoughts and prayers are with the victims. Dale L. Orr Network Administrator DoD Polygraph Institute -Original Message- From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Terrible disasters and an expression of sympathetic grief. Let me step out from behind the curtain to say I feel deep shock and grief for those of you who are affected by the disasters happening today. Some of you are only in shock; others have lost dear ones. Some of the people on this list may have been injured or killed, even. The enormity of this day overwhelms us all. The images, reports, and losses touch every human deeply. Let me offer myself as someone you can correspond with, should you have any need. Many of you placed yourselves at my disposal during my time of loss: I am here for you, should you need in your time of loss. It is peacemaking and sharing of grief that keeps us human. You can reach me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dean Webb _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
RE: contacts
Is the business fax field populated? -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 3:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: contacts OAB, like PSTs ... hmmm.. BAD -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Bricher Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 15:10 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: contacts really do not feel like doing any work today, but alas I must. A number of the users in my company are showing 2 contacts under Outlook Address Book when opening the address book. I have removed the OAB from services, and readded it. I went to properties of contacts and chose show this folder as an email address book. It still shows contacts twice. It also shows 2 contacts in services - addressing - keep personal addresses in Thanks, John _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Analysis (was: Terrible disasters...)
I don't know if I would consider this the first time since 1812the term act of war is correct in my opinion but let us not forget those that were lost before. Let us hope that something like this never happens again! World Trade Center Bombing Friday, February 26, 1993 At 12:18 on a snowy Friday afternoon, a massive explosion rocked the foundation of the Twin Towers of the Trade Center in lower Manhattan--the second tallest buildings in the world and a magnet for 100,000 workers. © Time Magazine -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 3:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Analysis (was: Terrible disasters...) I beg to differ with your narrow analysis. For the US, this is the first time since 1812 that the civilian population has been under attack. It is the first time since 1941 that the US has been overtly attacked in an obvious act of war (I fail to find any other words to describe the actions of this morning). For the world, we have witnessed that a relatively small group of individuals can hold the world at hostage; that is unparalled in all of human history. Wall Street is shut down as is the Exchange in London. Between those two exchanges are the vast bulk of the world's business dealings. Everything is shut down. Imagine that you, as in individual, just found that you cannot access your cash, your bank accounts and that your home has just collapsed. Yes, there has been speculation for years that such a thing could happen. It is no longer speculation; it is fact. I note that your employer is based in Massachusetts; it is not outside the realm of possibility that you have customers, friends, relatives involved in this massacre. I am, quite frankly, totally unable to understand how you could not be struck with horror and revulsion at what has happened to us as a people, as a nation and as a point of time. I will NOT join you in saying this is nothing but a demonstration of vulnerability; this was the cold-blooded, calculated murder of tens of thousands of civilians, non-combatants in whatever war these aggressors think they are fighting. At this moment (tomorrow I may feel calmer) I am of the opinion that anyone who voices such namby-pamby it's only... as you have below is an apologist who is, at the very least, emotionally aligned with the soon-to-be-corpses who perpetrated this monstrous crime. -Original Message- From: Benjamin Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Analysis (was: Terrible disasters...) On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, John Allhiser wrote: If we step back a moment from the horrific events happening, we realize that the world has changed abruptly this morning. I hate to be callous, but the only thing that has changed is public perception. People have been pointing out how vulnerable a crowded city is to any kind of attack or disaster for decades. People have been pointing out how vulnerable the USA is to terrorist attack for at least twenty years. No analyst in this field would be surprised that this occurred. -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do | not | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, | entity or | organization. All information is provided without | warranty of any kind. | _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: blocking internet access (OT)
http://www.worldvillage.com/family/parental.html Above site has 20 or so programs and even some hardware solutions for internet/PC control. Some parents are hesitant to use the sTicK(tm) (or Foot for that matter) and I have gone as far as installing W2K Pro with profiles for children so that Word apps are the only thing available, No Run/No Control Panel/No Install etc etc. Good luck! -Original Message- From: Orr, Dale L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) No, just Fired Up -Original Message- From: Josefowski, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) And if he does it again, does he get fired? LJ -Original Message- From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) I second that emotion. In this case a simple No should suffice. If it doesn't, a boot password on the machine should do the trick. -Original Message- From: Orr, Dale L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) Is it time yet for Ed to chime in with There are no technological solutions to behavioral problems? :-) -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) Doesn't ZoneAlarm Pro have password protection for settings? Andy David J Muller International -Original Message- From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) Or you could compile a little VB app called IE.exe that pops up a GIANT dialog box saying Dad said NO Internet and drop it on your PC. Rename IE's executable so only you know where to find it. Steve -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) What OS? How savvy is your kid? You could just hard-code wrong DNS servers, wrong gateway, remove the IP stack, whatever. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, August 17, 2001 07:07 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: blocking internet access (OT) Subject: blocking internet access (OT) Thanks for those that read this even though its OT. It's a quickie... I need to block access to the internet from my pc, but be able to use it when *I* want to. ( Parent kid issue). Zone alarm would be perfect, but if I use it to do not allow IE to access the internet, all that needs to be done is open ZA, and click allow it. If ZA could be password protected it would be perfect. Anyone have a link or suggestion? Does Programs like Net nanny do this or just limit WHERE they can go? Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange
