RE: IMC Archive Folder
Is this a question or are you replying to something?? -- Rev. Kevinm WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sean Faust Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 8:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Archive Folder For example I have 3,965 files all date 11-13 in the out folder with names like W53at610, small files but lots of them.Can these be deleted? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: outsource!?
What is the CIO expecting to get out of this?? -- Rev. Kevinm WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jon Hill Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 7:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: outsource!? My CIO has asked me to attend a meeting in which IBM is going to propose outsourcing our e-mail services, taking over for our 350 Exchange 2000 mailboxes. I'm looking for arguments to marshal against outsourcing. So far, what I've got is: * security: We use Clearswift MIMEsweeper to block incoming (and outgoing) messages containing viruses or executable files (.bat, .exe, etc.). This being IBM, I'm sure they can protect against viruses, though. * disaster recovery: Our disaster site is updated in real time. During the blackout in August e-mail was up twenty minutes after I arrived at the DR site. Again, probably not a potent line item against IBM. * regulatory: we have some regulatory requirements for keeping all records (including e-mail) on site for seven years. * integration: Our CRM solution integrates directly into Exchange, adding contacts directly to the users' mailboxes. * performance: I have trouble seeing how performance would be adequate when the mail server is off site. * price: 250 users. 350 mailboxes. 140GB/month (according to the Journal folders). That can't be cheap. * legacy: Seven years of preexisting e-mail, spread out among mailboxes and pst files. About 200GB all told. What else am I missing? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: outsource!?
Is that all??? Or do they want better service, less heads, more features, more stability? They want rid of current staff and practices? All kinds of reasons. One would need to know what they are in order to be best show them as wrong. -- Rev. Kevinm WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2003 7:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: outsource!? The same thing they all expect. To save money. -Original Message- From: Kevinm[MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2003 6:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: outsource!? What is the CIO expecting to get out of this?? -- Rev. Kevinm WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jon Hill Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 7:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: outsource!? My CIO has asked me to attend a meeting in which IBM is going to propose outsourcing our e-mail services, taking over for our 350 Exchange 2000 mailboxes. I'm looking for arguments to marshal against outsourcing. So far, what I've got is: * security: We use Clearswift MIMEsweeper to block incoming (and outgoing) messages containing viruses or executable files (.bat, .exe, etc.). This being IBM, I'm sure they can protect against viruses, though. * disaster recovery: Our disaster site is updated in real time. During the blackout in August e-mail was up twenty minutes after I arrived at the DR site. Again, probably not a potent line item against IBM. * regulatory: we have some regulatory requirements for keeping all records (including e-mail) on site for seven years. * integration: Our CRM solution integrates directly into Exchange, adding contacts directly to the users' mailboxes. * performance: I have trouble seeing how performance would be adequate when the mail server is off site. * price: 250 users. 350 mailboxes. 140GB/month (according to the Journal folders). That can't be cheap. * legacy: Seven years of preexisting e-mail, spread out among mailboxes and pst files. About 200GB all told. What else am I missing? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Site connector question
What was the question///? -- Rev. Kevinm WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Dietz Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2003 7:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Site connector question My answer is 200. I will have Outlook published in a Citrix farm at this remote location. 200 people will access outlook from that site. The Outlook application will be published on Terminal Servers (Citrix). From the servers Outlook will need to find an exchange server 1 of which is at my corporate office. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How do I set up a system-wide rule?
You need to write some code to do that. -- Rev. Kevinm WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hilda De Nigris Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 7:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: How do I set up a system-wide rule? Hello again. Here's another question I'd like to throw out there. In using W2K, Exchange 5.5 (SP4) OFFICE XP on the client side. Without manually for each individual mailbox on our exchange server, is there a system-wide rule or 3rd party utility that we can use to create a folder inside each of our user's mailbox, have the rule then move items from within their INBOX to this folder and have it expire/deleted after a certain period of time? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange on the road
There is also IMAP. -- Rev. Kevinm WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik Sojka Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 6:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on the road 1) OWA 2) VPN and OST file synchronization 3) RPC over HTTP (assuming you're running Exchange 2003/Outlook 2003) You may also want to ensure that the downloaded messages weren't deleted from the server (which might be the default with POP depending on the client in use). -Original Message- From: Steve Cobb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 4:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange on the road I have a customer that wants to be able to get their inter-office Exchange mails on the road. They want to do this from within Outlook. When I POP the Exchange server from outside the office, it starts to download ALL his messages, even those he has already read. Is there a way around this? If I let all the messages download, when he reconnects to the domain, will he get duplicates? Thanks, Steve Cobb _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: More than one domain in the same AD / Exchange
Do you just want to answer move then one inbound FWDN domains?? If so you can do that with a recipients policy just add another SMTP address.. -- Rev. Kevinm WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Troels Majlandt Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 10:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: More than one domain in the same AD / Exchange More than one domain in the same AD / Exchange. Anyone know how this could bee done. I.E. First DC have AD - the second DC is Exchange. I would like to have more than one domain in the AD so i i.e. can make to user with the same name [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] on the Exchange they have ofcouse there own mailbox When I install a AD on a Windows 2000 DC i make the domain ie. domain01.com so far so good - and now i can make user like [EMAIL PROTECTED], but how do I add the second domain (domain02.com) to the AD to be able to make a username like [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2003 Outlook 2003 connectivity issue
This just started 5 days ago but has been running fine since June? And nothing at all has changed, not even a cable being bumped in the server room? Any errors at all in the event log? -- Rev. Kevinm WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fredrick Zilz Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 3:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2003 Outlook 2003 connectivity issue Each morning for the last 5, I have ended up rebooting my Exchange 2003 (on windows 2003 member server)because my Outlook clients (xp and 2003) recieve messages stating that outlook is downloading data from the exchange server, on non cached setups it just sits like this, on cached versions a red exclamation appears in the system tray. If you right click and choose cancel server request, it looks like all is connected for a minute or so, then it happens again no updates take place. If I right click on the outlook icon in the client system tray, it shows three connections to exchange server mail at least one of which will show multiple errors and an extended response time. Synchronization error log just shows Network problems are preventing connection to the microsoft exchange server. I have windows 2000 sp4, and Windows xp SP1(fully updated) clients mosly running Outlook 2003 some in exchange cached mode and some not cached, as well as a couple Outlook xp clients. All have same issue. The server is available (shared folders, remote desktop). The Event log does not show any unusual errors - nothing that marks the start of this issue. The Outlook 2003 client shows connected but with a red exclamation on the system tray icon. - does not shift to disconnected. The Exchange server is a dual xeon 2.4 ghz, 2 gig ram. Processor usage does not go above 20%, memory usage is normal, and the server has only one nic (gigabit) on a managed gigabit switch. The whole network is only about 35 computers and three servers. The whole thing sits behind a checkpoint firewall, so the lan users are not going through a router or firewall to reach the server. All users are experiencing the same thing at the same time. After I reboot, all is well until the next morning sometime. I have Virus protection on the server but it is set to exclude the exchsrvr directories and subdirectories. I have GFI Mail Essentials and GFI Mail Security running I have tried disabling GFI Mail Essentials (stopped Services), but the problem still came back. Automated Backup has been suspended until I resolve the issue (arcserve brightstor). I upgraded office xp to 2003 in about three sets over the course of 5 days. It was only after the last set that I started seeing this issue, but all are installed off the same shared folder using the same Group Policy. I had two computers on the Beta 2 of Office 2003 for months did not see this issue. Exchange Server has been 2003 since the RTM release. I don't know what else to look at - anybody have any advice? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Just a quick question
What?? I call BS.. there is nothing at all wrong with an in place upgrade I do them all the time. While you might not like them, they are a great option to upgrade. -- Rev. Kevinm WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Crista Murphy Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 5:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Just a quick question DEFINITELY hire a consultant. I've actually been in this situation already and it turned into a 3 day nightmare with Microsoft Tech Support. The most important thing to know is that Microsoft does not recommend an in place upgrade of Exchange 5.5 and it can potentially be the absolute worst thing you do ever in your career. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Just a quick question
I blanked out after the second line.. He can made the AD FQDN domain name .com no problem and keep the same short NetBIOS domain name. and be all happy. Other wise a consultant would be a great thing. Or maybe a fresh start with ADMT all kinds of things he can do here. -- Rev. Kevinm WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Weston Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 5:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Just a quick question If I read the post right he isn't wanting to do an inplace upgrade of exchange but of the NEW PDC which is NT4. Thus an upgrade from nt4 to win2k server with AD and leaving the ex5 on the nt4 box. His problem is that he wants to know if he can rename the domain to domain.com during this procedure and not affect exchange. -Original Message- From: Crista Murphy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 7:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Just a quick question DEFINITELY hire a consultant. I've actually been in this situation already and it turned into a 3 day nightmare with Microsoft Tech Support. The most important thing to know is that Microsoft does not recommend an in place upgrade of Exchange 5.5 and it can potentially be the absolute worst thing you do ever in your career. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Just a quick question
Good luck.. Have fun with the ADC.. the newer the ADC the better.. unless you are going to just Exmerge over night one night? -- Rev. Kevinm WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 6:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Just a quick question Hi all, Scott is correct, i'm not upgrading the NT4 box with Exchange 5.5 on it. This will remain on the NT4 BDC as is, in a mixed mode situation. I have the new kit as the PCD now and will upgrade it to Win2K. Then install AD with the new domain name. I believe now the netbios domain name will be retained so exchange should continue to function as normal on the BDC. I have just built the scenario in my test room and made the switch and all seems to run fine. I will now install Exchange 2000 on the Win2k box and migrate the users over to Exchange 2000 from 5.5. Thanks for all your help..invaluable as always. David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SPAM filtering on a budget
Those tests were not all that great.. The results are off due to bad imput.. -- Rev. Kevinm WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Woodruff, Michael Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 9:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SPAM filtering on a budget http://www.nwfusion.com/reviews/2003/0915spam.html Here is how well they work in production. Not sure about pricing though, call em. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Plahtinsky Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SPAM filtering on a budget Hello list, I know SPAM filtering products have been covered in great detail but I'm having problems finding a good gateway SPAM filtering product that's not going to cost me a lot of money. I have a small organization of about 100 users. The products that I have found that are reasonably priced are Xwall ($360.00) and SpamAssassin (free). My problem with SpamAssassin is that I don't know the first thing about Linux so that's out of the question. Xwall seems like a good product but I want a few more to compare. My budget won't allow for more than about $800.00. What cheep products are you using. Good/Bad experiences. Any help with my product search would be great. Thanks Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SPAM filtering on a budget
The ones at the top right = ] -- Rev. Kevinm WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Woodruff, Michael Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 9:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SPAM filtering on a budget Well, we have had 3 of the products listed and its pretty accurate for those. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevinm[MVP] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 12:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SPAM filtering on a budget Those tests were not all that great.. The results are off due to bad imput.. -- Rev. Kevinm WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Woodruff, Michael Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 9:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SPAM filtering on a budget http://www.nwfusion.com/reviews/2003/0915spam.html Here is how well they work in production. Not sure about pricing though, call em. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Plahtinsky Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SPAM filtering on a budget Hello list, I know SPAM filtering products have been covered in great detail but I'm having problems finding a good gateway SPAM filtering product that's not going to cost me a lot of money. I have a small organization of about 100 users. The products that I have found that are reasonably priced are Xwall ($360.00) and SpamAssassin (free). My problem with SpamAssassin is that I don't know the first thing about Linux so that's out of the question. Xwall seems like a good product but I want a few more to compare. My budget won't allow for more than about $800.00. What cheep products are you using. Good/Bad experiences. Any help with my product search would be great. Thanks Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RPC over HTTP - help needed
I am pretty much in the same boat you are in, Lets watch this support web cast and see if it is helpful. Starts in about 30 minutes.. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?kbid=829134 -- Rev. Kevinm WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Troels Majlandt Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 10:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RPC over HTTP - help needed Hope any one can help. When I try to connect from Outook to Exchange with RPC over HTTP, my username/password are rejected. (My domianname are corp.test.dk) Con DC Computername : TESTEXCH Windows Server 2003 - Exchange Server 2003 (the only Exchange server I have) Cerificated is installed on this is also working at OWA where I use formbased logon and HTTPS 1) RPC over HTTP networking services are installed in the Windows Components Wizard 2) At the IIS the Basic authentication are selected in Authenticated access, at the Default website at the RPC directory. (Enable anonymous access same place are still checked) 3) The following are put as value here HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\software\Microsoft\Rpc\RpcProxy in ValidPorts TESTEXCH:593;testexch.corp.test.dk:593;TESTEXCH:6001-6002;testexch.corp .test.dk:6001-6002;TESTEXCH:6004;testexch.corp.test.dk:6004; TESTPRINT:593;testprint.corp.test.dk:593;TESTPRINT:6004;filprint.corp.te st.dk:6004 DC Computername : TESTPRINT (GC - Global Catalog) Windows Server 2003 1) The following are put as made as a Multi-String Value named NSPI interface protocol her HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\NTDS\Parameters Client (my home PC) Windows XP SR1 - updated on WIndowsUpdate with latest security fixes and so on and the Hotfix regarding RPC over HTTP to WindowsXP and Outlook 2003 Configuration Made a new profile - named it OutlookRPC. Add a new e-mail account - in server type choose Microsoft Exchange Server. As Microsoft Excange Server : https://webmail.test.dk (this is the same URL i use when I connect to the OWA from home and this is working fine, with formbased logon) In username - my username In more settings - Exchange Proxy settings Use this URL to connect to my proxy server for exchange : webmail.test.dk Selected Connect using SSL only Selected Mutually authenticated the session when connecting with SSL and in the Principle name for proxy server : msstd:testexch.corp.test.dk In Proxy authentication selected Basic authentication I do belive that I have made everything right - but when I try to connect my username and password are rejected no matter what I write. I use the samme username/password to connect to OWA and to logon at my work PC. Any1 have any ideas where to look for a way to find a fix for the error I have that the password/username are rejected. Tx Troels Majlandt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Password Changing
You need to check the check box to inherit permissions on the sec tab. That should make you happier. -- Rev. Kevinm WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Password Changing My company is about to implement a security policy that forces users to change their passwords every 60 Days. Problem some of our user accounts do not have self listed under security permissions within the ADUC. This user gets access denied when trying to change his/her password. This is an upgraded Windows 2000 Domain upgraded from NT 4.0 to Windows 2000 All Dc's Are Currently Windows 2000 SP4 and we are in Native Mode. Note we have tried to add Self under security but once replication occurs it removes Self. Has anyone ever heard of this ? TIA, Joshua _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SPAM filtering on a budget
There are win32 versions of spam assassin as well. -- Rev. Kevinm WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Boyd, Nathan Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 11:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SPAM filtering on a budget My advice would be to find someone who does know Linux (a student, maybe?) and have them assist you in setting up a Linux/SpamAssassin box. There are many, many guides available on the Internet to do this sort of thing. ___ If you are a pure Microsoft shop I would consider the costs of moving from a standardized environment for just one product. It is not just an issue of today's installation, of course you will need to learn linux/unix spamassassin and sendmail, which is fun, and then learn how to support it. You should also consider how the company will support non standard NOS in the future i.e. when you leave, especially if spamassasin becomes the gateway, therefore becoming a critical system. I learnt UNIX at UC Berkeley, so don't take me as a Microsoft centric person, but I have seen the implications of this move. Network Environments that are mainly Microsoft standard and start adding a couple of free Linux boxes for a saving of a couple of grand tend to end up spending a lot more in the long run. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RPC over HTTP - help needed
Are you using SSL?? With a store bought Cert. I got about the same from the cast and went back to hunting on mine. Bought a cert and it seems to be working now.. My home grown cert would not install on the client side. You could try installing the cert with IE by connecting to https:// OWA ?? might help you. Have you watched it connect by holding down CTRL and right clicking the outlook icon in the task bar by the time?? -- Rev. Kevinm WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Troels Majlandt Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 3:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RPC over HTTP - help needed I did see the webcast and checked my configuration 2 more times - and still same result. I asked a question and the answer was that i should check that basic auth. was on - and it is - so I am still in the same boat, no luck to connect to the exchange server - the username/password are stil rejected. If there was a solution in the webcast I missed it :-) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
