The receiving system has a receive size limit.
- Original Message -
From: Robert V [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 3:53 PM
Subject: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit
Have Exchange 5.5 Server on NT 4.0 SP6A, clients
PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit
552 EXCEEDED STORAGE ALLOCATION
-Original Message-
From: Robert V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 4:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data
On Tue, 18 Dec 2001, Chris Scharff wrote:
If it serves a business need and e-mail is the easiest method for
achieving
that goal, barring other limitations it seems just fine to me.
Internet email is not designed for large file transfer. That sure
qualifies as other limitations in my book.
It's coming from the remote mail servers. They don't want your big ass 14MB
attachments.
D
The secret to success is to know something nobody else knows. -Aristotle
Onassis
-Original Message-
From: Robert V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 1:53 PM
To:
D,
That is what I was thinking. How can our users tell that it is coming
from the remote system?
Thanks,
Rob
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
I would say that whereever you are sending the message has a smaller mailbox
limit than the size of the message that is being sent... but a copy of the
NDR would certainly help with a precise answer...
MP
-Original Message-
From: Robert V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 19
You could have them read RFC821 and give them a quiz to test for
comprehension.
-Original Message-
From: Robert V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 3:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit
D
blistex
Can you post that NDR? I could then show you which part of it tells the
tale.
-Original Message-
From: Robert V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 3:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit
Have
1:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit
D,
That is what I was thinking. How can our users tell that it is coming from
the remote system?
Thanks,
Rob
_
List posting FAQ: http
Okay, so what part of this contains the info I'm looking for?
(This is a test message to an aol address)
Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.
Subject: TEST
Sent: 12/18/01 3:08 PM
The following recipient(s) could not be reached:
'[EMAIL
552 EXCEEDED STORAGE ALLOCATION
-Original Message-
From: Robert V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 4:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit
Okay, so what part of this contains the info I'm looking
I would have never guessed...;) Thank you for enlightening me! ;)
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:
-Original Message-
From: Robert V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 19 December 2001 9:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit
I would have never guessed...;) Thank you for enlightening me
I think the AOL limit is around 5MB.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 14:22
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit
How much space is available at the aol address for e
There is no way on earth an AOL address is going to accept a 14MB attachment
or most any other ISP. Private email systems may. But you are stretching it
regardless.
You also need to post the NDR in its entirety.
-Original Message-
From: Robert V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
, 2001 2:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit
How much space is available at the aol address for e-mails? Is presume
it is NOT unrestricted...
Can you send through smaller attachments to the same or different
addresses? Are you able to break up
2001 10:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit
A 14MB file shouldn't be emailed. It should be FTP'd or put on a web
site
with a link. I would be pissed if people were pumping files that size to
my
users.
One time, sure, constant, no way.
-Original
]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 3:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit
I think the AOL limit is around 5MB.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 14:22
To: Exchange
support attachments over ~=3MB, the barring other
limitations clause does seem to come into play in this particular instance.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 12/18/2001 5:40 PM
Subject: RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit
A 14MB file
Discussions
Subject: RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit
If it serves a business need and e-mail is the easiest method for achieving
that goal, barring other limitations it seems just fine to me. When I worked
for $vsc it was not uncommon to receive a mail message from a customer which
.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert V
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 2:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit
Okay, so what part of this contains the info I'm looking for?
(This is a test
, December 18, 2001 2:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit
I would have never guessed...;) Thank you for enlightening me! ;)
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource
22 matches
Mail list logo
