Re: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit
The receiving system has a receive size limit. - Original Message - From: Robert V [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 3:53 PM Subject: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit Have Exchange 5.5 Server on NT 4.0 SP6A, clients are Outlook 98 and also 2000 - problem is occuring with both. Basically we have users who are trying to send large attachments, in this example 14mb, to an outside address. The system administrator returns the message as undeliverable, stating a 552 Exceeded local data allocation limit I have tested sending this message to an aol address, and another business address, and it fails each time. It seems this undeliverable message is coming from our system, however our system does not have a limit set for the internet connector. The user mailboxes on our system are not nearing their limit either. I don't see anything in our event log either. Any thoughts? Rob VadeBonCoeur [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit
Dear Robert, Q254921 http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q254921 Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 04:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit 552 EXCEEDED STORAGE ALLOCATION -Original Message- From: Robert V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 4:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit Okay, so what part of this contains the info I'm looking for? (This is a test message to an aol address) Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject:TEST Sent: 12/18/01 3:08 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 12/18/01 3:30 PM Unable to deliver the message due to a communications failure The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=Blistex;l=BLISTEXEXC-011218212354Z-27729 MSEXCH:IMS:Blistex:BlistexInc:BLISTEXEXC 3552 (000B09AA) 552 EXCEEDED STORAGE ALLOCATION _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit
On Tue, 18 Dec 2001, Chris Scharff wrote: If it serves a business need and e-mail is the easiest method for achieving that goal, barring other limitations it seems just fine to me. Internet email is not designed for large file transfer. That sure qualifies as other limitations in my book. :) -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not | | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or | | organization. All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit
Have Exchange 5.5 Server on NT 4.0 SP6A, clients are Outlook 98 and also 2000 - problem is occuring with both. Basically we have users who are trying to send large attachments, in this example 14mb, to an outside address. The system administrator returns the message as undeliverable, stating a 552 Exceeded local data allocation limit I have tested sending this message to an aol address, and another business address, and it fails each time. It seems this undeliverable message is coming from our system, however our system does not have a limit set for the internet connector. The user mailboxes on our system are not nearing their limit either. I don't see anything in our event log either. Any thoughts? Rob VadeBonCoeur [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit
It's coming from the remote mail servers. They don't want your big ass 14MB attachments. D The secret to success is to know something nobody else knows. -Aristotle Onassis -Original Message- From: Robert V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 1:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit Have Exchange 5.5 Server on NT 4.0 SP6A, clients are Outlook 98 and also 2000 - problem is occuring with both. Basically we have users who are trying to send large attachments, in this example 14mb, to an outside address. The system administrator returns the message as undeliverable, stating a 552 Exceeded local data allocation limit I have tested sending this message to an aol address, and another business address, and it fails each time. It seems this undeliverable message is coming from our system, however our system does not have a limit set for the internet connector. The user mailboxes on our system are not nearing their limit either. I don't see anything in our event log either. Any thoughts? Rob VadeBonCoeur [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit
D, That is what I was thinking. How can our users tell that it is coming from the remote system? Thanks, Rob _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit
I would say that whereever you are sending the message has a smaller mailbox limit than the size of the message that is being sent... but a copy of the NDR would certainly help with a precise answer... MP -Original Message- From: Robert V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 19 December 2001 8:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit Have Exchange 5.5 Server on NT 4.0 SP6A, clients are Outlook 98 and also 2000 - problem is occuring with both. Basically we have users who are trying to send large attachments, in this example 14mb, to an outside address. The system administrator returns the message as undeliverable, stating a 552 Exceeded local data allocation limit I have tested sending this message to an aol address, and another business address, and it fails each time. It seems this undeliverable message is coming from our system, however our system does not have a limit set for the internet connector. The user mailboxes on our system are not nearing their limit either. I don't see anything in our event log either. Any thoughts? Rob VadeBonCoeur [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit
You could have them read RFC821 and give them a quiz to test for comprehension. -Original Message- From: Robert V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 3:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit D, That is what I was thinking. How can our users tell that it is coming from the remote system? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit
blistex Can you post that NDR? I could then show you which part of it tells the tale. -Original Message- From: Robert V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 3:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit Have Exchange 5.5 Server on NT 4.0 SP6A, clients are Outlook 98 and also 2000 - problem is occuring with both. Basically we have users who are trying to send large attachments, in this example 14mb, to an outside address. The system administrator returns the message as undeliverable, stating a 552 Exceeded local data allocation limit I have tested sending this message to an aol address, and another business address, and it fails each time. It seems this undeliverable message is coming from our system, however our system does not have a limit set for the internet connector. The user mailboxes on our system are not nearing their limit either. I don't see anything in our event log either. Any thoughts? Rob VadeBonCoeur [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit
Edumecate them... Or Chris's idea was good too! ;o) Otherwise, it's on you my friend... D Idiocy: Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups. - - http://www.despair.com -Original Message- From: Robert V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 1:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit D, That is what I was thinking. How can our users tell that it is coming from the remote system? Thanks, Rob _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit
Okay, so what part of this contains the info I'm looking for? (This is a test message to an aol address) Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: TEST Sent: 12/18/01 3:08 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 12/18/01 3:30 PM Unable to deliver the message due to a communications failure The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=Blistex;l=BLISTEXEXC-011218212354Z-27729 MSEXCH:IMS:Blistex:BlistexInc:BLISTEXEXC 3552 (000B09AA) 552 EXCEEDED STORAGE ALLOCATION _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit
552 EXCEEDED STORAGE ALLOCATION -Original Message- From: Robert V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 4:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit Okay, so what part of this contains the info I'm looking for? (This is a test message to an aol address) Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject:TEST Sent: 12/18/01 3:08 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 12/18/01 3:30 PM Unable to deliver the message due to a communications failure The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=Blistex;l=BLISTEXEXC-011218212354Z-27729 MSEXCH:IMS:Blistex:BlistexInc:BLISTEXEXC 3552 (000B09AA) 552 EXCEEDED STORAGE ALLOCATION _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit
I would have never guessed...;) Thank you for enlightening me! ;) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit
How much space is available at the aol address for e-mails? Is presume it is NOT unrestricted... Can you send through smaller attachments to the same or different addresses? Are you able to break up the attachment into files that are small enough to not warrant ftp'ing them? (hint) MP -Original Message- From: Robert V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 19 December 2001 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit I would have never guessed...;) Thank you for enlightening me! ;) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit
I think the AOL limit is around 5MB. -Peter -Original Message- From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 14:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit How much space is available at the aol address for e-mails? Is presume it is NOT unrestricted... Can you send through smaller attachments to the same or different addresses? Are you able to break up the attachment into files that are small enough to not warrant ftp'ing them? (hint) MP -Original Message- From: Robert V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 19 December 2001 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit I would have never guessed...;) Thank you for enlightening me! ;) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit
There is no way on earth an AOL address is going to accept a 14MB attachment or most any other ISP. Private email systems may. But you are stretching it regardless. You also need to post the NDR in its entirety. -Original Message- From: Robert V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 1:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit Have Exchange 5.5 Server on NT 4.0 SP6A, clients are Outlook 98 and also 2000 - problem is occuring with both. Basically we have users who are trying to send large attachments, in this example 14mb, to an outside address. The system administrator returns the message as undeliverable, stating a 552 Exceeded local data allocation limit I have tested sending this message to an aol address, and another business address, and it fails each time. It seems this undeliverable message is coming from our system, however our system does not have a limit set for the internet connector. The user mailboxes on our system are not nearing their limit either. I don't see anything in our event log either. Any thoughts? Rob VadeBonCoeur [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit
A 14MB file shouldn't be emailed. It should be FTP'd or put on a web site with a link. I would be pissed if people were pumping files that size to my users. One time, sure, constant, no way. -Original Message- From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 2:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit How much space is available at the aol address for e-mails? Is presume it is NOT unrestricted... Can you send through smaller attachments to the same or different addresses? Are you able to break up the attachment into files that are small enough to not warrant ftp'ing them? (hint) MP -Original Message- From: Robert V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 19 December 2001 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit I would have never guessed...;) Thank you for enlightening me! ;) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit
I totally agree. 14 mb is way too big for a single e-mail. Breaking it down into a few attachments of 2-3mb's each though would be OK by me (assuming the mailbox could handle that.) MP -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 19 December 2001 10:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit A 14MB file shouldn't be emailed. It should be FTP'd or put on a web site with a link. I would be pissed if people were pumping files that size to my users. One time, sure, constant, no way. -Original Message- From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 2:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit How much space is available at the aol address for e-mails? Is presume it is NOT unrestricted... Can you send through smaller attachments to the same or different addresses? Are you able to break up the attachment into files that are small enough to not warrant ftp'ing them? (hint) MP -Original Message- From: Robert V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 19 December 2001 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit I would have never guessed...;) Thank you for enlightening me! ;) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit
Actually, I have an AOL account...I know, I know...but I've had it since before I became a network admin and all my friends know the address... Mailbox limit for AOL is 16 mb Single-Instance inbound e-mail limit is 3.5 mb -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 3:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit I think the AOL limit is around 5MB. -Peter -Original Message- From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 14:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit How much space is available at the aol address for e-mails? Is presume it is NOT unrestricted... Can you send through smaller attachments to the same or different addresses? Are you able to break up the attachment into files that are small enough to not warrant ftp'ing them? (hint) MP -Original Message- From: Robert V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 19 December 2001 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit I would have never guessed...;) Thank you for enlightening me! ;) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit
If it serves a business need and e-mail is the easiest method for achieving that goal, barring other limitations it seems just fine to me. When I worked for $vsc it was not uncommon to receive a mail message from a customer which contained an attachment of 100MB or more. Given that AOL doesn't support attachments over ~=3MB, the barring other limitations clause does seem to come into play in this particular instance. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 12/18/2001 5:40 PM Subject: RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit A 14MB file shouldn't be emailed. It should be FTP'd or put on a web site with a link. I would be pissed if people were pumping files that size to my users. One time, sure, constant, no way. -Original Message- From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 2:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit How much space is available at the aol address for e-mails? Is presume it is NOT unrestricted... Can you send through smaller attachments to the same or different addresses? Are you able to break up the attachment into files that are small enough to not warrant ftp'ing them? (hint) MP -Original Message- From: Robert V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 19 December 2001 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit I would have never guessed...;) Thank you for enlightening me! ;) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit
You should say if it serves both parties needs. In other words, while it may serve yours, it may not serve mine and if it is my mail system you are sending too, YOU need to find another way. As I said, there are other ways. The simplest would be to post them to a web page and allow directory browsing of that page. www.yourcompany.com/attachments_for_martin Also if this is a regular thing, there are better methods. Its just a matter of a little user education. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 6:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit If it serves a business need and e-mail is the easiest method for achieving that goal, barring other limitations it seems just fine to me. When I worked for $vsc it was not uncommon to receive a mail message from a customer which contained an attachment of 100MB or more. Given that AOL doesn't support attachments over ~=3MB, the barring other limitations clause does seem to come into play in this particular instance. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 12/18/2001 5:40 PM Subject: RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit A 14MB file shouldn't be emailed. It should be FTP'd or put on a web site with a link. I would be pissed if people were pumping files that size to my users. One time, sure, constant, no way. -Original Message- From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 2:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit How much space is available at the aol address for e-mails? Is presume it is NOT unrestricted... Can you send through smaller attachments to the same or different addresses? Are you able to break up the attachment into files that are small enough to not warrant ftp'ing them? (hint) MP -Original Message- From: Robert V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 19 December 2001 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit I would have never guessed...;) Thank you for enlightening me! ;) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit
The 552 at the end of the message tells you that the message bounced in an SMTP transaction. That makes it pretty clear that the recipient's e-mail system is responsible. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert V Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 2:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit Okay, so what part of this contains the info I'm looking for? (This is a test message to an aol address) Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: TEST Sent: 12/18/01 3:08 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 12/18/01 3:30 PM Unable to deliver the message due to a communications failure The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=Blistex;l=BLISTEXEXC-011218212354Z-27729 MSEXCH:IMS:Blistex:BlistexInc:BLISTEXEXC 3552 (000B09AA) 552 EXCEEDED STORAGE ALLOCATION _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit
Your oversnipping leaves your messages with no context. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert V Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit I would have never guessed...;) Thank you for enlightening me! ;) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
