RE: Disable ability to reply

2001-09-18 Thread Scott Perley-TM
-Original Message- From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: September 14, 2001 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Disable ability to reply Dear DL Members, I have been asked to figure out how to send an e-mail message out to a System Distribution List

Disable ability to reply

2001-09-14 Thread Garrish, Robert B.
Dear DL Members, I have been asked to figure out how to send an e-mail message out to a System Distribution List, and prevent the recipients from being able to reply to the message they receive. I did not think that this was possible. I used the help in Outlook 2000 and

RE: Disable ability to reply

2001-09-14 Thread Robert Moore
Does everyone need to be able to send to the DL (but not reply to the sent message)? Or just the select few? -Original Message- From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 12:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Disable ability to reply Dear

RE: Disable ability to reply

2001-09-14 Thread Thomas Di Nardo
Restrict who can send to the DL and use a custom form with the reply and reply to all buttons removed. Thomas Di Nardo -Original Message- From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 12:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Disable ability

RE: Disable ability to reply

2001-09-14 Thread Steve Hanna
Add a line at the beginning of the MSG stating do not reply to this MSG as it was sent from an administrative mail box beyond that delivery restrictions --steve Dear DL Members, I have been asked to figure out how to send an e-mail message out to a System Distribution List,

RE: Disable ability to reply

2001-09-14 Thread Drewski
. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Garrish, Robert B. Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Disable ability to reply Dear DL Members, I have been asked to figure out how to send an e-mail message out

RE: Disable ability to reply

2001-09-14 Thread coopere
Are you wishing to keep them from replying to all, replying to the sender, or both? If you want to keep them from replying to all you can go about it a couple of ways. First, on the Delivery Restrictions tab of the System DL, only allow yourself (and any others necessary) to address mail to

RE: Disable ability to reply

2001-09-14 Thread Garrish, Robert B.
ability to reply Are you wishing to keep them from replying to all, replying to the sender, or both? If you want to keep them from replying to all you can go about it a couple of ways. First, on the Delivery Restrictions tab of the System DL, only allow yourself (and any others necessary

RE: Disable ability to reply

2001-09-14 Thread Steve Hanna
Discussions Subject: RE: Disable ability to reply Dear DL Members, We have presented a couple of alternate options, such as creating a generic mailbox to use to send the message from, so that any reply would not go to a mailbox belonging to a human being. We even mentioned Steve

RE: Disable ability to reply

2001-09-14 Thread Ed Crowley
: Friday, September 14, 2001 10:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Disable ability to reply If you give these certain members from HR the ability to Send As the DL, and have it locked down, would that not accomplish what you are looking for? I.e. E-mail comes from DL. Individual tries to reply

RE: Disable ability to reply

2001-09-14 Thread Tom Meunier
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, September 14, 2001 04:19 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Disable ability to reply Subject: RE: Disable ability to reply Mr. Thomas Di Nardo, however incompetent he may be, has answered your question. Use a custom Outlook

RE: Disable ability to reply

2001-09-14 Thread Soysal, Serdar
14, 2001 5:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Disable ability to reply Uh... what the hell is THAT about? Mr. di Nardo ruin one of K-Mart's servers or something? If so, your assessment of his competence is a matter between you him. If not, your judgement of his competence should