RE: Dumb Question about Relaying

2001-11-21 Thread Roger Seielstad
:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Dumb Question about Relaying I'm ready to get flamed for this one. (Be gentle)Better to learn the hard way then not at all. I have heard everyone talk about not relaying mail or not allowing the relaying of mail. But what exactly does

RE: Dumb Question about Relaying

2001-11-21 Thread Roger Seielstad
- From: John Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 6:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Dumb Question about Relaying Brian, The idea behind the relay-secure article is to protect your system from being used as a bounce. By default Exchange 5.5

Dumb Question about Relaying

2001-11-19 Thread Murphy, Brian
I'm ready to get flamed for this one. (Be gentle)Better to learn the hard way then not at all. I have heard everyone talk about not relaying mail or not allowing the relaying of mail. But what exactly does that mean? For example, I have my system setup to NOT relay mail as per the FAQ.

Re: Dumb Question about Relaying

2001-11-19 Thread Benjamin Scott
On Mon, 19 Nov 2001, Murphy, Brian wrote: I have heard everyone talk about not relaying mail or not allowing the relaying of mail. But what exactly does that mean? An SMTP system that performs relaying will accept mail for domains other than those handled by the local system, and pass it on

RE: Dumb Question about Relaying

2001-11-19 Thread John Martinez
open and surprisingly I found many. Did that answer your questions? John -Original Message- From: Murphy, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Dumb Question about Relaying I just want to receive mail for my domain