RE: CLEVER SPAM EMAIL

2002-07-17 Thread Robert Moir
-Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 July 2002 18:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: CLEVER SPAM EMAIL Reading those docs makes troubleshooting e-mail issues so much easier. Printing out RFC821 and trying to send e-mail from

RE: CLEVER SPAM EMAIL

2002-07-17 Thread East, Bill
: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 5:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: CLEVER SPAM EMAIL -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 July 2002 18:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: CLEVER SPAM EMAIL Reading those docs makes

RE: CLEVER SPAM EMAIL

2002-07-17 Thread Freese, Roberta
Ah, yes but there's a bit more to that one, IIRC: And yet, Baldric^WRobert, there are administrators out there who would not recognize a clever spam email if it painted itself purple and danced naked on top of a harpsichord, singing Clever Spam Emails are Here Again. (I knew I'd memorized

RE: CLEVER SPAM EMAIL

2002-07-17 Thread Chris Scharff
Reading those docs makes troubleshooting e-mail issues so much easier. Printing out RFC821 and trying to send e-mail from a telnet session (to duplicate what's being done in the RFCs) takes only a day, but the benefits will last much longer. I don't see how anyone could call themselves

RE: CLEVER SPAM EMAIL

2002-07-17 Thread Andy David
I did not have email with that woman. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 10:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: CLEVER SPAM EMAIL Reading those docs makes troubleshooting e-mail issues so much easier. Printing

RE: CLEVER SPAM EMAIL

2002-07-16 Thread Casey Taguchi
Does this mean I have no recourse? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange

RE: CLEVER SPAM EMAIL

2002-07-16 Thread Ed Crowley
AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: CLEVER SPAM EMAIL Does this mean I have no recourse? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp

RE: CLEVER SPAM EMAIL

2002-07-16 Thread Ed Crowley
To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: CLEVER SPAM EMAIL Does this mean I have no recourse? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp

RE: CLEVER SPAM EMAIL

2002-07-16 Thread Chris Scharff
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 12:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: CLEVER SPAM EMAIL Really, and this doesn't apply solely to you, Mr. Taguchi, everyone should read and understand RFCs 821 and 822, and their successors 2821 and 2822. All this Spam, spoofing

RE: CLEVER SPAM EMAIL

2002-07-15 Thread Chris Scharff
When you figure out how to verify the from address is legitimate, let me know. A similar related conversation took place last week on a similar topic. The subject of the thread was RE: MAIL SPOOFING;NOT MAN SPOOFING. -Original Message- From: Casey Taguchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

RE: CLEVER SPAM EMAIL

2002-07-15 Thread Casey Taguchi
Here is a copy of the header I got from the user. It appears that the senders address has been forged with the receivers address. Received: from mail.syncor.com (YWING [10.10.51.35]) by us-whl-e2.syncor.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id

RE: CLEVER SPAM EMAIL

2002-07-15 Thread Martin Blackstone
[EMAIL PROTECTED]?? -Original Message- From: Casey Taguchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: CLEVER SPAM EMAIL Here is a copy of the header I got from the user. It appears that the senders address has been forged