-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16 July 2002 18:13
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: CLEVER SPAM EMAIL
Reading those docs makes troubleshooting e-mail issues so
much easier. Printing out RFC821 and trying to send e-mail
from
: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 5:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: CLEVER SPAM EMAIL
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16 July 2002 18:13
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: CLEVER SPAM EMAIL
Reading those docs makes
Ah, yes but there's a bit more to that one, IIRC:
And yet, Baldric^WRobert, there are administrators out there who would not
recognize a clever spam email if it
painted itself purple and danced naked on top of a harpsichord,
singing Clever Spam Emails are Here Again.
(I knew I'd memorized
Reading those docs makes troubleshooting e-mail issues so
much easier. Printing out RFC821 and trying to send e-mail
from a telnet session (to duplicate what's being done in the
RFCs) takes only a day, but the benefits will last much longer.
I don't see how anyone could call themselves
I did not have email with that woman.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 10:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: CLEVER SPAM EMAIL
Reading those docs makes troubleshooting e-mail issues so
much easier. Printing
Does this mean I have no recourse?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange
AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: CLEVER SPAM EMAIL
Does this mean I have no recourse?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: CLEVER SPAM EMAIL
Does this mean I have no recourse?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 12:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: CLEVER SPAM EMAIL
Really, and this doesn't apply solely to you, Mr. Taguchi, everyone
should read and understand RFCs 821 and 822, and their successors 2821
and 2822. All this Spam, spoofing
When you figure out how to verify the from address is legitimate, let me
know. A similar related conversation took place last week on a similar
topic. The subject of the thread was RE: MAIL SPOOFING;NOT MAN SPOOFING.
-Original Message-
From: Casey Taguchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Here is a copy of the header I got from the user. It appears that the
senders address has been forged with the receivers address.
Received: from mail.syncor.com (YWING [10.10.51.35]) by
us-whl-e2.syncor.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service
Version 5.5.2653.13)
id
[EMAIL PROTECTED]??
-Original Message-
From: Casey Taguchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: CLEVER SPAM EMAIL
Here is a copy of the header I got from the user. It appears that the
senders address has been forged
12 matches
Mail list logo