RE: Exchange 5.5 Server hammer-age.

2003-08-18 Thread Bob Sadler
Run the Task Manager on your Exchange Server and see what's eating up all the CPU Pocesses. We have this problem occasionally with mssdmn.exe running 100% utilization. We just kill this process and things go back to normal. As of yet, no one at MS has been able to explain why this occurs.

RE: Exchange 5.5 Server hammer-age.

2003-08-18 Thread PF: Exchange
Until recently, our Exchange 5.5 Server has been running smoothly. Lately however, it has been running S..L..O..W on occasions. The only thing that's changed is we have recently started upgrading some of our NT 4.0 workstations to Windows XP workstations. Almost all those users

RE: Exchange 5.5 Server hammer-age.

2003-08-18 Thread Waters, Jeff
Running fine for us in a mixed nt/2k/xp area. We have about 800 users on a PIII-450 Xeon with 1gig of ram and 3 arms. No performance problems for any of the users. Have you checked your DNS and WINS setting on the XP systems, how does name resolution to your exchange server work from the cmd

RE: Exchange 5.5 Server hammer-age.

2003-08-18 Thread Barry Horner
Administrator Central Community College - Grand Island, NE (V) 308.398.7361(F) 308.398.7399 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 8:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Exchange 5.5 Server hammer-age

RE: Exchange 5.5 Server hammer-age.

2003-08-18 Thread John Matteson
Just to give you a comparison, I'm running a Dell PE 6600, 2 Gigs RAM, dual 1.4 GHz processors, 900 users spread over 3 Message Databases and two RAID arrays. We still get the flag. I get the flag when I'm sitting still too, no manual activity on the laptop that I'm using. The flag is set by

RE: Exchange 5.5 Server hammer-age.

2003-08-18 Thread Finch Brett
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 08:52 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Server hammer-age. Just to give you a comparison, I'm running a Dell PE 6600, 2 Gigs RAM, dual 1.4 GHz processors, 900 users spread over 3 Message Databases and two RAID arrays. We still get