I just have to simply restart them.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Morgan, Joshua
(Greenville)
Sent: Friday, 8 August 2003 1:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IIS WWW service randomly stops few time a day
When the services stop
When the services stop are you able to simply restart them or do you have
to reboot?
Joshua Morgan
AIMCO
W. 864 239-1015
-Original Message-
From: by [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 4:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: IIS WWW service randomly
22:45
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IIS log Files with wrong date??
I thought they were in UTC.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
I'm assuming we were all just kidding...
-Original Message-
From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 5:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IIS log Files with wrong date??
Assuming you're not kidding, UTC is the same as GMT is the same as Zulu
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IIS log Files with wrong date??
IIS Log times are in GMT
-Original Message-
From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 11:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: IIS log Files with wrong date??
W2K Sp3, E2K Sp3 -- only
Nope - Zulu time.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 2:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IIS log Files with wrong date??
I thought they were in UTC.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting
!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 11:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IIS log Files with wrong date??
IIS Log times are in GMT
-Original Message-
From: Matt Plahtinsky
:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IIS log Files with wrong date??
UTC's French. GMT'll do g
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 17:45
To: Exchange Discussions
I thought they were in UTC.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 2:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IIS
You're -4 GMT.
-Original Message-
From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 1:34 PM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: IIS log Files with wrong date??
Subject: IIS log Files with wrong date??
W2K Sp3, E2K Sp3 -- only one exchange server.
I setup
Greenwich Mean Time?
- Original Message -
From: Matt Plahtinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 11:33 AM
Subject: IIS log Files with wrong date??
W2K Sp3, E2K Sp3 -- only one exchange server.
I setup OWA and im trying to
Happy Fun Ball.
- Original Message -
From: William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 2:39 PM
Subject: Re: IIS log Files with wrong date??
Greenwich Mean Time?
- Original Message -
From: Matt Plahtinsky
very mean
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 2:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: IIS log Files with wrong date??
Greenwich Mean Time?
- Original Message -
From: Matt Plahtinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED
IIS Log times are in GMT
-Original Message-
From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 11:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: IIS log Files with wrong date??
W2K Sp3, E2K Sp3 -- only one exchange server.
I setup OWA and im trying to trouble
Thanks for the help.
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 2:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IIS log Files with wrong date??
IIS Log times are in GMT
-Original Message-
From: Matt Plahtinsky
Anything is possible. Never heard of that, though.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday,
PROTECTED]]
Sent: 09 January 2003 21:23
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: IIS
What the hell is an M$?
On 1/9/03 15:18, Johnny Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That apache.org post was a subtle anti M$ jab I think hhehe
I saw a report the other day that apache has like 66
PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 4:28 PM
Subject: RE: IIS
Hmmm, maybe you are right that we should keep this on topic and without
any
excess noise. Either way, don't you think that reacting to a humourous
answer to a question any admin should know or know how to find out
lol
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 2:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: IIS
I think you all missed the point of Mr. Scharff's post, but whatever,
the mere fact that Hummert's parents allow him to leave his room
I haven't seen my parents in weeks, but I did see your mom a few minutes
ago. She said to say Hi for her
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 1:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: IIS
I
Isn't that a show on MTV?
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, January 09, 2003 4:13 PM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: IIS
Subject: Re: IIS
4
Someone take away his shovel please.
On 1/9/03 15:30, Johnny Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Micro$oft
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 1:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: IIS
What the hell is an M
billion cmd.exe exploits
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 1:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: IIS
I'm confused as to how this answer was helpful to Tony. I looked at the
URL
It was posted in an Exchange forum. The assumption would be that he wants to
use OWA. In which case IIS is the only solution
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 2:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IIS
Johansson Patrick wrote:
ok, have to admit that you may have a point after having looked
through the archives at Mr. Hummerts answers to various posts, not to
mention the last one. Sorry.
I'd just like to warn anyone new to the list that following any links
posted by Mr. Hummert is not
Yea cause all the post on this list are on topic
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 2:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IIS
It was posted in an Exchange forum. The assumption
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 4:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IIS
Actually it was a very helpful answer to Tony. While it may not be the
product he's looking for, it's a viable alternative
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IIS
Hey, what do you mean by that!!
Regards,
Paul.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, 10 January 2003 9:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: IIS
Not a problem. He's quite
So you made an *assumption* about what he was asking? Didn't you have some
words of wisdom on that topic once as well?
On 1/9/03 16:19, Christopher Hummert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yea cause all the post on this list are on topic
www.google.com ?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 2:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: IIS
Ok... So then describe for the class the 'logic' that led you to post a
URL for Apache
guy's fight like you are married.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 5:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: IIS
Ok... So then describe for the class the 'logic' that led you to post a URL
for Apache when
We are..in fact I can't wait till we get to the makeup $ex
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mellott, Bill
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 2:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IIS
guy's fight like you are married
LMAO!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mellott, Bill
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 5:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IIS
guy's fight like you are married.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto
i like fish
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 2:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: IIS
I think you've confused this list with alt.webserv.advocacy, dumbass.
On 1/9/03 16:14, Christopher Hummert [EMAIL PROTECTED
www.apache.org
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 10:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: IIS
Can someone tell me where I can download IIS4 or IIS5. Thank
Tony Nguyen ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.microsoft.com/ntserver/nts/downloads/recommended/NT4OptPk/default
.asp
-Original Message-
From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 10:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: IIS
Can someone tell me where I can download IIS4 or IIS5. Thank
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 10:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IIS
http://www.microsoft.com/ntserver/nts/downloads/recommended/NT4OptPk/default
.asp
-Original Message-
From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 10
*lol*
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 9. tammikuuta 2003 20:44
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IIS
www.apache.org
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen
Sent: Thursday
I'm confused as to how this answer was helpful to Tony. I looked at the URL
you listed, but was unable to determine a download URL on that website for
IIS. Perhaps you meant to point him to www.google.com, but just made an
unfortunate typo. Certainly you wouldn't be engaging in puerile behavior
That is IIS 2.0. Way out of date and not compatable with OWA.
-Original Message-
From: Johnny Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 12:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IIS
Download it? Just add it in the Add/Remove programs Control Panel applet
All the cool sites use IIS 2.0
- Original Message -
From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 4:05 PM
Subject: RE: IIS
That is IIS 2.0. Way out of date and not compatable with OWA.
-Original Message
I think jackass might be a little strong - it seemd a pretty good suggestion of a
possible alternative to IIS.
Alex
Chris Scharff wrote:
I'm confused as to how this answer was helpful to Tony. I looked at the URL
you listed, but was unable to determine a download URL on that website for
4 out of 5 admins prefer jackass .
- Original Message -
From: Alexander Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 4:08 PM
Subject: Re: IIS
I think jackass might be a little strong - it seemd a pretty good
suggestion
The other one just wants ass
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 1:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: IIS
4 out of 5 admins prefer jackass .
- Original Message -
From: Alexander Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED
Subject: Re: IIS
I think jackass might be a little strong - it seemd a pretty good
suggestion of a possible alternative to IIS.
Alex
Chris Scharff wrote:
I'm confused as to how this answer was helpful to Tony. I looked at the URL
you listed, but was unable to determine a download URL
: IIS
4 out of 5 admins prefer jackass .
- Original Message -
From: Alexander Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 4:08 PM
Subject: Re: IIS
I think jackass might be a little strong - it seemd a pretty good
suggestion
Jackass might be a little strong if you're a six year old girl in Sweden,
but in Mr. Hummert's case, if the 6 heels and maid's smock fit.
On 1/9/03 15:08, Alexander Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think jackass might be a little strong - it seemd a pretty good
suggestion of a possible
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 1:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: IIS
4 out of 5 admins prefer jackass .
- Original Message -
From: Alexander Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 4:08 PM
They don't. I traded that outfit in for one with a little bit more
leather and so nipple clamps
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 1:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: IIS
Jackass
Follow by example?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 1:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: IIS
I'm confused as to how this answer was helpful to Tony. I looked at the
URL you listed
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 1:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: IIS
I'm confused as to how this answer was helpful to Tony. I looked at the
URL you listed, but was unable to determine a download URL on that
website for IIS. Perhaps you meant to point him to www.google.com, but
just
Micro$oft
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 1:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: IIS
What the hell is an M$?
On 1/9/03 15:18, Johnny Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That apache.org post was a subtle anti M
Thank You everyone for the information and help. I found the download from
Martin. Thank again
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 1:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IIS
Actually it was a very helpful answer
Subject: Re: IIS
I have no problem with people enjoying their time on this list, I do however
have a problem with the odd jackass or seven. Mr. Hummert has demonstrated
time and again that he's natural born loser, I was simply helping him out
with an object lesson.
On 1/9/03 15:28, Johansson Patrick
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 2:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: IIS
A viable alternative as it relates to Exchange? Really.
On 1/9/03 15:28, Christopher Hummert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually it was a very
, 2003 2:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: IIS
So you made an *assumption* about what he was asking? Didn't you have
some words of wisdom on that topic once as well?
On 1/9/03 16:19, Christopher Hummert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yea cause all the post on this list are on topic
Subject: Re: IIS
So you made an *assumption* about what he was asking? Didn't you have
some words of wisdom on that topic once as well?
On 1/9/03 16:19, Christopher Hummert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yea cause all the post on this list are on topic
Hey, what do you mean by that!!
Regards,
Paul.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, 10 January 2003 9:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: IIS
Not a problem. He's quite a Paul.
On 1/9/03 16:17, Johansson Patrick [EMAIL PROTECTED
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IIS
We are..in fact I can't wait till we get to the makeup $ex
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mellott, Bill
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 2:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IIS
guy's
: Thursday, January 09, 2003 2:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IIS
I haven't seen my parents in weeks, but I did see your mom a few minutes
ago. She said to say Hi for her
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David
Sent: Thursday
stressful jobs and
we are just having a bit of fun while trying to help others out.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 9. tammikuuta 2003 23:04
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: IIS
I'm confused as to how this answer was helpful to Tony. I
-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10. tammikuuta 2003 0:11
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: IIS
I have no problem with people enjoying their time on this list, I do however
have a problem with the odd jackass or seven. Mr. Hummert has demonstrated
time and again
Discussions
Subject: Re: IIS/OWA failing?
I ran across this about 4 years ago. The solution was to uninstall OWA,
reinstall OWA, then re apply the SP. Not sure if this would work for you
but OWA on 5.5 sometimes would act strangely for no reason and this is what
a call to MS did back then. I do
- Original Message -
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 2:00 PM
Subject: IIS/OWA failing?
Exchange 5.5 SP4 NT 4.0 and 2000.
We've been having problems with our Outlook Web Access and IIS
I ran across this about 4 years ago. The solution was to uninstall OWA,
reinstall OWA, then re apply the SP. Not sure if this would work for you
but OWA on 5.5 sometimes would act strangely for no reason and this is what
a call to MS did back then. I do remember after upgrading the hardware it
Actually,
I just rebuilt a new 2000 server and it also experienced the problem. Just
brought it on-line a couple of days ago with 2000 SP3.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 2:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: IIS
, 2002 8:03 PM
Posted To: ExchangeDiscussion
Conversation: IIS Authentication changes at reboot
Subject: Re: IIS Authentication changes at reboot
Yes and clearing Integrated NT Authentication option so just
the name and password fields are visible.
- Original Message -
From: Martin
Andrew,
When you go to HTTP protocol and right click on Exchange Virtual Settings it
tells you to use IIS manager to makes changes.
- Original Message -
From: Andrew Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 11:05 AM
Subject: RE: IIS
Never mind it has to be done at the folder called Exchange under the Virtual
HTTP server.
Thanks
- Original Message -
From: Tony Hlabse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 09, 2002 11:12 PM
Subject: Re: IIS Authentication changes at reboot
, 2002 8:13 PM
Posted To: ExchangeDiscussion
Conversation: IIS Authentication changes at reboot
Subject: Re: IIS Authentication changes at reboot
Andrew,
When you go to HTTP protocol and right click on Exchange
Virtual Settings it tells you to use IIS manager to makes changes
you need to do
cscript.exe adsutil.vbs set w3svc/1/root/defaultlogonDomain \
this is from Exchange 2000 hosting whitepaper
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, June 09, 2002 10:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: IIS Authentication changes
You cannot change the default HTTP Virtual Server settings in ESM. It refers
you to IIS Admin for that.
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 11:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IIS Authentication changes at reboot
at reboot
Subject: RE: IIS Authentication changes at reboot
You cannot change the default HTTP Virtual Server settings in
ESM. It refers you to IIS Admin for that.
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 11:06 AM
To: Exchange
: RE: IIS QUESTION
I was able to change the Logon user for the IIS Admin Service and the WWW
service to my local user and my domain user without a problem.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: kanee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 7:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject
, June 03, 2002 3:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IIS QUESTION
DUDE - I did read the whole thread. What it appears you are trying to
accomplish is getting IIS to log everything to a mapped drive or UNC
path - if your web sites are so high traffic as you claim, you wouldn't
want
I was able to change the Logon user for the IIS Admin Service and the WWW
service to my local user and my domain user without a problem.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: kanee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 7:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IIS
Why can't you log to an ODBC datasource. This is not as performant as
logging to a file.
IIS runs under the local system account. The documentation you are
reading must be incorrect.
A note on IIS Logging. This is a high performance asynchronous process.
So entries are flushed to disk when
the webtrends prog runs to analyse the
logs.
thx
-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 3:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: IIS QUESTION
Why can't you log to an ODBC datasource. This is not as performant as
logging to a file
: Re: IIS QUESTION
Why can't you log to an ODBC datasource. This is not as performant as
logging to a file.
IIS runs under the local system account. The documentation you are
reading must be incorrect.
A note on IIS Logging. This is a high performance asynchronous process.
So entries
of your internal domain
-Original Message-
From: kanee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 3:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IIS QUESTION
i cannot take that risk that comes along with the odbc logging i thought
about it, these are highly visible websites in my
-
From: Kevin Lundy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 3:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IIS QUESTION
Webtrends can simply retrieve the log files, you don't need to write a batch
file.
You might also want to move this discussion over to
http://www.15seconds.com
you say you would write a batch file.
Yes, I have ideas.
-Original Message-
From: kanee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 3:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IIS QUESTION
dude read thw whole message before answering..not trying to be rude.i
know i
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 12:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IIS QUESTION
DUDE - I did read the whole thread. What it appears you are trying to
accomplish is getting IIS to log everything to a mapped drive or UNC path -
if your web sites are so high traffic as you claim
Let's hope they don't block 443 :)
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 24 April 2002 02:56
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: iis 5
Note: Due to the Code Red virus a great many ISP's suppling Internet access
to the Home market have blocked port
if your isp blocks inbound access to port 80 run your web on a different
port, or upgrade isp services.
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 2:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: iis 5
No
-Original Message
upgrade isp services.. is there a wizard for that ? :-}
-Original Message-
From: Byron Kennedy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 24 April 2002 14:45
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: iis 5
if your isp blocks inbound access to port 80 run your web on a different
port, or upgrade isp
I want to know who to upgrade to.
If your DSL and Cable folks both block 80 inbound, who else is there that
you could afford?
-Original Message-
From: Myles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 6:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: iis 5
upgrade
May they need to be paid?
-Original Message-
From: Myles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 24 April 2002 03:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: iis 5
upgrade isp services.. is there a wizard for that ? :-}
-Original Message-
From: Byron Kennedy [mailto:[EMAIL
web hosting ... if the ISP is nice enough to block 80 in the interests of security,
they're bound to be nice enough to host it for free.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 24 April 2002 15:09
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: iis 5
I want
Firewall?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tener, Richard
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 4:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: iis 5
Does anyone know of a good website besides (Technet) that explains how to
set permissions in iis 5
The best website for immediate use is http://localhost/iisHelp
In this case I'm gonna guess that it's NAT that's causing your problem.
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 04:15 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Can you telnet to port 80 on the machine from the outside?
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 2:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: iis 5
Im not in front of the computer now however I was basically giving all
No
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 5:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: iis 5
Can you telnet to port 80 on the machine from the outside?
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL
Then you must have the port blocked or IIS isnt running.
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 2:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: iis 5
No
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 4:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: iis 5
Then you must have the port blocked or IIS isnt running.
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 2:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: iis 5
. User like IUSR_MACHINE.
ROnny
-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Pa vegne av Tom Meunier
Sendt: 23. april 2002 23:22
Til: Exchange Discussions
Emne: RE: iis 5
The best website for immediate use is http://localhost/iisHelp
In this case I'm gonna
on the dmz smtp server set the remote domain to forward mail to the internal
IP ADDRESS of the internal server. don't use hostnames if at all possible.
is the mail still in queue on the dmx smtp server?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Yes. I've been using the internal IP only. No host name for the forward
to:
-Original Message-
From: Byron Kennedy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 2:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IIS SMTP Server (IIS5)
on the dmz smtp server set the remote
Have you made sure to secure this IIS SMTP box against relay?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP)
All your base are belong to us.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jesse Rink
Sent:
You are infected with the Nimda virus!
-Original Message-
From: Jesse Rink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 2:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: IIS SMTP relay for Exchange - Is my relay being used by others?
Okay. Here's the low-down.
I have an
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
