1. Yes, taking the old site's display name.
2. Yes, and even then you can't move servers, just users.
3. You'll have to move to an E2K server in the original site, then,
once in native mode, from the original administrative group to the final
one. But you only need to bring up one
.
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SRS and E2K Migration questions
1. Yes, taking the old site's display name.
2. Yes, and even then you can't move servers, just users.
3. You'll have to move to an E2K server in the original site, then, once in
native mode, from the original
Discussions
Subject: RE: SRS and E2K Migration questions
Thanks piles Ed,
So...a key point I've taken is this:
Even when in Native Mode with 5 legacy Sites/AG's, I cannot move Servers
between Administration Groups;
Yes.
But still some confusion on 3. If I can't move servers between AG's in
mixed
-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 26 February 2003 9:08 a.m.
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SRS and E2K Migration questions
1. Yes, taking the old site's display name.
2. Yes, and even then you can't move servers, just users.
3. You'll have to move to an E2K
: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 2:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SRS and E2K Migration questions
But still some confusion on 3. If I can't move servers between AG's in
mixed or native mode, I would still need a 2nd intermediate server for
each Site/AG to move to the final AG. Is that what
February 2003 11:51 a.m.
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SRS and E2K Migration questions
Why not:
5.5 -- E2K in old site -- move mbx to new h/w in new AG
?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message
25, 2003 3:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SRS and E2K Migration questions
I think we are saying the same thing aren't we? It's still 2 user
moves.
First - Move users from E55 server to E2K in old site
Second - Move users from E2K server in old site to E2K server in new
AG
Discussions
Subject: RE: SRS and E2K Migration questions
Right. Two moves, but only one intermediate server.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Yes?
On 2/11/03 17:23, Charles Marriott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is SRS used and/or necessary with ADCs?
tia
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
Brain fart I guess. I don't remember configuring it in any way for any
migration.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 5:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: SRS
Yes?
On 2/11/03 17:23
, 2003 5:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SRS
Brain fart I guess. I don't remember configuring it in any way for any
migration.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 5:19 PM
To: Exchange
Yes, as you'll need to do this before removing the ADC. Check out the
article below for further info.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q272314
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 30 August 2002 13:16
Posted To:
Q272314
-Original Message-
From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 8:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SRS
Can the Site Replication Service be removed once the last Exchange 5.5
server is decommissioned? Is it used for anything else?
13 matches
Mail list logo
