RE: Secure E-Mail

2003-10-29 Thread Scott Weston
We currrently use the Certified Mail with the Mail Marshal package. It accepts site certificates from other servers so if you send to a domain that the 2 of us have shared certificates and they have a secure mail server... then all mails sent to and from those servers will be encrypted. Anyone

RE: Secure E-Mail

2003-10-29 Thread Fyodorov, Andrey
Wow, this sounds pretty good. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Scott Weston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 8:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Secure E-Mail We currrently

RE: Secure E-Mail

2003-10-28 Thread Fyodorov, Andrey
What kind of security are you looking for? Encryption? Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Miller, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Secure

RE: Secure E-Mail

2003-10-28 Thread Miller, Robert
Yes, Encryption... I don't think we have a need for signatures Thanks -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 2:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Secure E-Mail What kind of security are you looking

RE: Secure E-Mail

2003-10-28 Thread Tony Hlabse
I am thinking that SSL and using a group policy applied to the users in question would be possible From: Miller, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Secure E-Mail Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 14:35:16 -0600

RE: Secure E-Mail

2003-10-28 Thread Anthony Sollars
Have you looked into Exchange 2003 and Rights Management Server? We are going forward with this most likely. Anthony L. Sollars Technology Consultant Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc. 480 Houser Way North, Renton Wa., 98055 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( 425.254.4845 ) 425.681.4190 2

Re: Secure E-Mail

2003-10-28 Thread Dean Cunningham
http://www.e-government.govt.nz/docs/see-mail-bus-req-2-2/chapter1.html http://www.e-government.govt.nz/see/index.asp The NZ government has been down this path and the first link gives some practical requirements in regard to RFCs etc. May be of some help Mimesweeper has secrectsweeper and

RE: Secure E-Mail

2003-10-28 Thread Dean Cunningham
How does that enable distant clients to see encrypted mail, where the destination email client is not known? [EMAIL PROTECTED] 29/10/2003 9:44:35 a.m. Have you looked into Exchange 2003 and Rights Management Server? We are going forward with this most likely. Anthony L. Sollars Technology

RE: Secure E-Mail

2003-10-28 Thread Martin Blackstone
This is what I'm wondering. There has to be a mechanism on the receiving end to unencrypt this stuff. -Original Message- From: Dean Cunningham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 12:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Secure E-Mail How does that enable

RE: Secure E-Mail

2003-10-28 Thread Dean Cunningham
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 12:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Secure E-Mail How does that enable distant clients to see encrypted mail, where the destination email client is not known? [EMAIL PROTECTED] 29/10/2003 9:44:35 a.m. Have you looked into Exchange 2003

RE: Secure E-Mail

2003-10-28 Thread Martin Blackstone
it, correct? -Original Message- From: Dean Cunningham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Secure E-Mail Thats where tumbleweed and mimesweeper seem to have that bit covered from mimsweeper's publicity blurb When using

Re: Secure E-Mail

2003-10-28 Thread bscott
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, at 1:48pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The goal is to provide our attorneys with the ability to send and receive secure email with their clients with 1. no user interaction or training That is a contradiction. Security is about trust. In order to trust another party, you

RE: Secure E-Mail

2003-10-28 Thread Miller, Robert
before sending). I want everything done server/gateway side - with no interaction from the attorney. I hope this makes sense -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 3:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Secure E

RE: Secure E-Mail

2003-10-28 Thread Dean Cunningham
Discussions Subject: RE: Secure E-Mail Thats where tumbleweed and mimesweeper seem to have that bit covered from mimsweeper's publicity blurb When using the Send-Anywhere functionality the recipient does not need any special software installed for them to receive and read the message. The recipient opens

RE: Secure E-Mail

2003-10-28 Thread Miller, Robert
PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 3:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Secure E-Mail Without having used either product :-) yeah, correct. It looks like more of a pull delivery mechanism as in one way , to client. Be interesting to see how they would do a secure send

RE: Secure E-Mail

2003-10-28 Thread Martin Blackstone
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 3:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Secure E-Mail Without having used either product :-) yeah, correct. It looks like more of a pull delivery mechanism as in one way , to client. Be interesting to see how they would do

RE: Secure E-Mail

2003-10-28 Thread Miller, Robert
, October 28, 2003 4:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Secure E-Mail Why do they want encryption? Is truly so it cant be sniffed over the wire or is it more that they don't want email to fall into the wrong hands? -Original Message- From: Miller, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: Secure E-Mail

2003-10-28 Thread Fyodorov, Andrey
, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 4:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Secure E-Mail This is what I'm wondering. There has to be a mechanism

RE: Secure E-Mail

2003-10-28 Thread Fyodorov, Andrey
Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Miller, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 4:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Secure E-Mail I think you are missing the point of my statement - when I stated no user interaction I

RE: Secure E-Mail

2003-10-28 Thread Fyodorov, Andrey
Subject: RE: Secure E-Mail they want it because their clients and legal peers have it... :) but that's another story... Actually both - from the CTO (and he was an attorney for years and used Tumbleweed at his prior firm)... -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: Secure E-Mail

2003-10-28 Thread bscott
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, at 3:55pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think you are missing the point of my statement I think you missed the point of *mine*. :-) There is no silver bullet for security. You cannot buy a product or service and thereby achieve any level of security. You cannot apply

RE: Secure E-Mail

2003-10-28 Thread Dean Cunningham
Ah right then, Any of the vendors I mentioned should be able to give you that functionality. In the case of the NZ Govt the button was a bit of VBA that prepended the subject with a keyword and their target was between gateways in organisations. Typically you would set the gateway up not allow