RE: site connector question.

2004-01-06 Thread Ward, Stuart
ah the wonders of technology... apologies for the resend - was rejected the first time: remove the Directory Replication Connector, then the site connector -Original Message- From: Vas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 5:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:

RE: site connector question.

2004-01-06 Thread Fyodorov, Andrey
You mean Office B will never come back online? -Original Message- From: Vas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 5:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: site connector question. Happy New Year All. Just a quick question for the new year. I am running exchange

Re: site connector question.

2004-01-06 Thread Vas
Thanks - Original Message - From: Ward, Stuart [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 1:18 PM Subject: RE: site connector question. ah the wonders of technology... apologies for the resend - was rejected the first time: remove

Re: Site connector question

2003-11-16 Thread Kevin Dietz
My answer is 200. I will have Outlook published in a Citrix farm at this remote location. 200 people will access outlook from that site. The Outlook application will be published on Terminal Servers (Citrix). From the servers Outlook will need to find an exchange server 1 of which is at my

RE: Site connector question

2003-11-16 Thread Kevin Dietz
What are those factores. I do not want my users to have an Outlook experience as if they were accessing it online over a 40K dialup connection. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web

RE: Site connector question

2003-11-16 Thread Kevinm[MVP]
What was the question///? -- Rev. Kevinm WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Dietz Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2003 7:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Site connector question My answer is 200. I

Re: Site connector question

2003-11-16 Thread Tony Hlabse
PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Site connector question Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 07:41:56 -0800 My answer is 200. I will have Outlook published in a Citrix farm at this remote location. 200 people will access outlook from

Re: Site connector question

2003-11-15 Thread Tony Hlabse
How many users at the remote site? From: Kevin Dietz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Site connector question Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 11:42:32 -0800 Currently I have a single Exchange Server 2K in my main

RE: Site connector question

2003-11-15 Thread Ed Crowley [MVP]
Answers inline. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Dietz Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 11:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions

RE: Site Connector

2002-09-06 Thread Ali Wilkes (IT)
If you have others available, choose a different server (re-home it). -Original Message- From: Harris, Dot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:01 AM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: Site Connector Subject: Site Connector I'm replacing

RE: Site Connector between Disparate Orgs

2001-11-09 Thread Ed Crowley
There are three types of site connectors, RPC, X.400 and SMTP. (I'm using my own terminology because the standard terminology is confusing.) Any of these three let you connect sites using the Connected Sites tab. For this to work, your sites must have the exact same organization name, and it